not major, but they were necessary for theadoption of the program to an institution like UIC. These changes were incorporated to ensurethat the program met the goals and kept its critical components (i.e., ENG 294 course, dual-mentoring, and team-based structure). After the first year of the program, we plan to report onstudent outcomes and assessment data as well as provide a more detailed report of theadjustments made to ERSP at UIC.References[1] M. Barrow, S. Thomas, and C. Alvarado, “Ersp: A structured cs research program for early- college students,” in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2016, pp. 148–153.[2] n.d., “ERSP | Instructor resources.” [Online]. Available
roughly 50% of teams using them as scheduled. Additional office hour sessionscould be scheduled at later times to service teams that were not ready to opt-in. Since currentcourse deliverables do not assess team progress in the IP and market access domains, the facultyare monitoring the extracurricular success of teams (patenting, business plan competitions,external funding, and co-curricular project continuation) for further impact over the next 5 years.Conclusion: The implementation of expert office hours successfully administered project-specific feedback in highly specialized topics at scale (~14 teams), with positive responses fromboth students and experts. The faculty are exploring further changes, such as adding contractmanufacturing
of the intervention were positive [18, 21], an important conclusion was that implementingactivities in a single course may not be the best or most effective approach. Instead, developingthe students’ ST/SE knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) via a well-planned sequence ofinterventions that take place in different courses and during different years of the undergraduateprogram may be a more desirable alternative.Although courses dealing with product design and development lend themselves to introducingST and SE concepts, mechanical engineering undergraduate programs seldom offer more thanone or two of those courses in their curriculum. Thus, to gradually develop the ST and SE skillsof the students during their undergraduate education, it is
financial need as determined by WTAMU Financial Aid office; anddemonstrate academic potential in engineering and mathematics. Students planning to pursue orcurrently pursuing a degree in engineering or mathematics may apply for scholarship fundsunder this program regardless of academic classification, but preference is given to first- andsecond-year and transfer students. TEAMSF selection team jointly reviewed student applicationsusually during the first week of April. Applications were ranked using a scoring rubric givingpoints, based on application materials submitted, for categories related to eligibility criteria andinterest. This rubric was developed through iterations of two previous S-STEM programs. Inorder to be granted scholarship renewal
a Ph.D. candidate in biomedical engineering with research focused in the area of bioelectromag- netics, specifically designing electronics that can be used as medical devices. She obtained her B.S. and M.S. degrees at NDSU in electrical and computer engineering. Mary is also interested in STEM education research.Ms. Lauren Singelmann, North Dakota State University Lauren Singelmann is a Masters Student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University. Her research interests are innovation-based-learning, educational data mining, and K-12 Out- reach. She works for the NDSU College of Engineering as the K-12 Outreach Coordinator where she plans and organizes outreach activities and camps for
threats and defend against attacks without assemblingteams and qualified team members with skills in all the aforementioned disciplines. This paperaims at presenting the plan and procedures required for creating an project based interdisciplinarycourse at cybersecurity of frontier technologies between the College of Engineering, College ofScience, and College of Business Administration. The course objective is to bring students fromthe three disciplines into a multidisciplinary experience that aids students at replicating real lifeprojects. Instructors from all three disciplines guide the students during the course work andsupervise the project activities. The fifteen-week course can adopt different types of cybersecuritysystems and provide a
access to resources that theycould share with students to help them develop these skills if they do not come to thecompetition team with those skills already in their possession; some respondents indicated thatthe courses designed to prepare students for design, such as a junior-level design course, weresometimes not adequate to prepare students for the real-world setting of a competition team andits associated demands. As a result of our work with the survey and interview data, we are in theprocess of creating the KEEN Competition Teams Skills Map, which adapts the KES to thecompetition team context, revises some of the KES skills and adds skills that are not yet a part ofthe KES. Our plan is to have this Map in draft form and ready for review
barriers to completion? Answers to these questions generally hit on three themes: (1) Be selective - ensure students coming to the program have academic skills to succeed. (2) Have strong counselors, peer mentors, and student success offices to help focus students. (3) Financial planning - look at how they can afford to pay for all four years, not just this semester.8. Do you have many incumbent workers in your program focused on up-skilling? The number of incumbent workers who are people with a technical type job (maintenance or associate degree) trying to up-skill is very small. This reinforces the notion that the entrants into most of the BSET programs are college-age students.9. What have you found that has been successful in
andinclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.”Because engineering has traditionally not been considered a leadership profession, many engineersand engineering educators may be unfamiliar with, or even averse to leadership principles andprocesses. One profession that may be a resource for leadership principles and insight is theProfession of Arms, and more specifically, the U.S. Army. Officers and soldiers are often referredto as leaders and as an organization, the Army maintains a high degree of public confidence.Unfortunately, less than one percent of the U.S. population serves in the military and recently,there are concerns that the Army is becoming a family business; many of those serving come fromfamilies with a
above can be attributed to the fact that the problem statement in PBLinvolves certain planned imperfections to mimic real-world projects, which are often ill-structuredand vague. Here are some of the responses from control (C) and test (T) groups for the followingquestion: “Do you think you can use or apply what you have learned in this assignment in yourprofessional life? Please explain how.” C: “I believe I can use this to set up my business and help my parents to set up their restaurant structure.” C: “I think I can use or apply what I have learned in this assignment in my professional life, because I can come across a situation where someone has a question on queries to help them set up a database, and I could help them
uttermost pride. The staff at thenot-for-project organization all had very positive feedback on all of our meetings during thisproject.On Interdisciplinary CollaborationThe students all had very positive comments on interdisciplinary collaboration. Their idea aboutcollaboration have been strengthened. They enjoyed the hands-on nature of the project, appliedtheir knowledge, and planned to use their skills in the future.Conclusions and Future WorkIn an interdisciplinary service-learning project in spring 2019, the engineering and art students helped theclients on the Autism spectrum to convert their drawings to interactive art with sound effects whentouched, using Touch Board and conductive paint. The meeting time when the clients were available
to recognize the extent and nature of information need, then to locate, evaluate, and effectively use the needed information. It involves designing, evaluating, and implementing a strategy to answer questions or achieve a desired goal.Another institution did not have significant depth in their self-study, but they had an‘improvement plan’ they were implementing that included a significant IL component. Their 3.goutcome was divided into written communication, oral communication components, as well asan expectation that students ‘use citations for proposed work.’ In their plan to enhance writingability, in a technical writing course, they state that ‘citation and referencing methods will alsobe taught…’Another institution
Average points earned Percentage Correct Pre-test 5 33.33% Post-test 11 73.33%In addition, we evaluated the workshop and the teachers’ experience. We used Likert Scalequestions to ask if the goals were accomplished, their understanding enhanced, and asked themto rate the instructors, activities, and facilities. In addition, we asked for feedback on theworkshop’s strengths and weaknesses, how they plan to incorporate these activities into their 6 5 4 Maximum 3
written, semester after semester. This is both great, and bad. These othernon-writing activities are fantastic and probably more effectual at changing the system most days. Butgraduate student funding eventually dries up, graduate students are not equally listened to and creditedwhen they take on service and activist roles, and graduate school is frankly a difficult place with highworkload and low pay that you don’t want to stay forever. Figuring out what you need to do to get out ofhere (i.e., how to get the writing done) is not the whole game, but it’s one part of it.So, take some time and map out what your strengths and weaknesses are. Be honest with yourself aboutit. Start to work out some plans for how to combat those weaknesses. How will
hours were not held during the summers of2017, 2018, or 2019. Plans are currently being formulated to offer this service during part of theupcoming 2020 summer, as faculty have made this request. Academic Year COE Office Academic Year COE Consultations Hours’ Questions August 1, 2017 3 August 1, 2017 41 - July 31, 2018 - July 31, 2018 August 1, 2018 27 August 1, 2018 93 - July 31, 2019 - July 31, 2019 August 1, 2019 22 August 1, 2019 108 -January 23, - January 23, 2020* 2020* (Table 5
students also went on planned (andimpromptu) weekend outings and activities, including hiking excursions, travel to nearbyWashington, D.C., a trip to an amusement park, free concerts in the community, and a wide arrayof other options available in the greater Charlottesville, VA area.Student REU participants met as a group with all of the available faculty mentors and othergraduate students three times each summer: after three and six weeks, respectively, to presenttheir progress to date in a gallery-style poster session, and at the conclusion of the ten-weekprogram to present in a formal symposium. The two group “check-in” meetings served threepurposes: 1) The group meetings gave the students invaluable communication experience indiscussing
students (39 from engineering and 3 fromnon-engineering disciplines) used the tool to explore ethical implications of technology inhealthcare and biomedicine. We plan to use the Ethical Competency Assessment Frameworkproposed by Zhu and Jesiek [7] as a basis for student assessment across three areas – ethicsknowledge, contextual knowledge, and attitudes. Each guiding question in the tool can bemapped one or more of these three areas and then assessed on a scale of 1 to 5 with 5 beingeffective and 1 being not effective. Such an assessment is a part of our ongoing work.ConclusionThis work-in-progress paper includes a pragmatic, prototypical ethical decision-making modelfor use in engineering education. The proposed model has the potential to promote
commitment to use and support undergraduates in deliveryof instruction. There was not an objection to resituating their use. However, there was additionaloverhead to support the hiring process. In addition, the grant provided support for the pedagogyclass in the form of a stipend. This support will not be tenable after the grant period. Fortunately,the university has recently implemented the construct of a “non-credit” course for high-impactexperiential learning. We are in the process of approval of a LA pedagogy non-credit course.Climate SurveyWe have developed a survey instrument to assess student perceptions of climate (Davis et al.,2018), and delivered the survey for the third year. The plan is to have the survey be a continuedprogram level
their graduate degree in our university. Though most of scholars stated thatthey plan to do graduate study in the future during our interaction and discussion, we understandtheir decision to delay their dream and shoulder the financial responsibility towards their family.The project team struggled with our last objective (SETS-OB4) that “require all SETS recipients toparticipate in at least 80% of project activities.” Because all our scholars take more courses thanminimum required credit hour for full time students in order to graduate, their time becomes themost precious and limited resources they can dispose. Even though the project team eagerlydeveloped and established many activities aimed at enhance their on campus experience from allthree
-12 schools. The successful model andexperience collected from this project would be promoted to other counties of West Virginia andother states.Through the STEM ambassadress program, the following three outcomes are anticipated.Outcome 1: Female high school students’ performance in their math and science courses isimproved.Outcome 2: Female high school students’ interest in STEM disciplines is increased.Outcome 3: High school students’ parents become more knowledgeable about STEM.Implementation planImplementation plan of the proposed ambassadress program includes the following three tasks.Task 1: Train female undergraduate students to become the ambassadresses.In the summer of 2018, a training workshop was organized at West Virginia
drawing a concept map, making notes on what is understood, asking questions, comparing and contrasting cases, designing plans, making hypotheses and causal relations, and generating predictions.3. Active instruction: For the instrument, active instruction is assessed in individual activities in which the students are engaged during or outside the class, such as making presentations, asking or answering questions during class, reviewing content before class, and solving problems on their own.4. Passive instruction: As the name suggests, this involves activities in which students passively receive information from the instructor, such as when the instructor a) directly gives most of the information for a homework assignment, b) gives
and FAU faculty arecurrently developing a plan to pilot the evaluation of the course frameworks. Additionally, FAUproject staff and State College faculty initiated the refinement of the Introduction toProgramming course, which was targeted and completed during year 3 of the project.b) Development of a course-specific mentor support modelDuring years 1 and 2, Florida Atlantic University HSI project staff developed and iterativelyrefined a generic process (see Appendix B) through which project mentors, College ofEngineering and Computer Science junior and senior honors' students, would provideinstructional support to participating HSI students enrolled in the specific gateway mathematicssections taught by project-affiliated State College
identified areas of disconnect that form the basis for this paper include: 1) sustainedmotivation, 2) finding the right options, 3) understanding the process, and 4) standing out. Foreach theme, information is presented that relates to the first three stages of the design thinkingprocess. The empathy stage is addressed through a discussion of specific issues shared byinterview and focus group participants, with appropriate connections to educational andcognitive theory. The issues are then distilled into a succinct problem statement. Each sectionends with a list of potential ways to address the problem statement, with proposed action stepsdrawn from the ideation phase of the study. In the conclusion of the paper, plans are sharedrelated to future
research interest are student learning and persistence in higher education. Her current projects explore student motivation and success in STEM disciplines at the undergraduate and professional education levels.Mr. Harrison Douglas Lawson, Michigan State University Graduate Student at Michigan State University pursuing a M.S. in Chemical Engineering. After graduat- ing, I plan to pursue doctoral studies at Carnegie Mellon University. My research focuses are biology and education. After graduating I aspire to continue working with education programs and join a university as teaching faculty.Dr. Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State University Mark Urban-Lurain is retired as an Associate Professor and Associate Director for
Botswana towards sustainable economicgrowth, global competitiveness, and improved quality of life (Atkinson & Mayo, 2010). On October 1st, 2016 Botswana formed the Ministry of Tertiary Education, Research,Science and Technology with the explicitly stated goal of transforming Botswana from aresource-based to a knowledge-based economy. The impetus for such an initiative was set forthin Botswana’s Vision 2036. Set forth in 2016, this new “vision” for Botswana was predicated onthe mapping of a transformative agenda that reflected the aspirations and goals of the nation. Forthis vision to come to fruition it was imperative that Botswana create a strategic plan to help withredefining their resource-based economy to that of a knowledge-based
seen by other universities to improve theclassroom engagement [3]. There were lab hours 2 hours a day, 4 days a week. There were nolab hours on Friday. Along with lab hours and more TAs, a new program was introducedexclusively for this course, our Peer Mentor Program. Unlike other peer mentor programs, thementors were from within the department at various levels, some being TAs. The Peer MentorProgram was specifically introduced to maintain retention not only within the MechanicalEngineering Department, but retention at NMT overall. They were responsible for planning andorchestrating mentor events and having office hours, both of which allowed students to get extrahelp with the course, other courses, and becoming acquainted with the department
that are not considered minorities isessential to understand the planning direction for future investment. But many incorporatingfactors make it a very confounding issue and that calls for further studies. Most of the resultsindicate an inevitable role of the co-curricular spaces in the daily activities of students. Forexample, students of the surveyed group responded upon daily usage of the spaces, in which thenewly renovated space is among highly used regularly. The frequent use of the co-curricular areasof the library Annex and Zachry, suggested the interior design and environment in those two placesresemble in different aspects. For instance, both locations have access to coffee shops and studyresources. Also, the results further show the
. The cash flow diagram below represents a breakdown of all cost considering present state,annual cost and future value. See Figure 14. Fig. 14. Cash flow diagram After calculating the yearly cost associated to the product, the rate of return needs to becalculated. Rate of return represents the time of the profit and the amount it will be. By findingout the rate of return, we can identify if the investment is a short term investment or long term;in-turn we can compare our profit margins to other alternatives and present investmentopportunities to the owner.IX. Project planning Planning was done through communication with the previous team to discuss what wereimprovements they had wish to complete. Then there
102 Electrical Engineering 21 108 Environmental Engineering 2 9 Industrial Engineering 8 43 Mechanical Engineering 25 125 Nuclear Engineering 5 21 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Number of Dissertations Used Total Number of DissertationsFigure 1The original plan was to use the same program created for the research done
of the intervention was postponed to the summer semester due to the globalcoronavirus pandemic, so we will describe the planned activity instead. In this phase, each teamexpands their literature review and proposes recommendations for pursuing future design andresearch efforts. These proposed efforts should create value in some way for a stakeholder groupthat is negatively impacted (or not positively impacted) by the current design. Students will writea report quantifying how their proposed improvements could create value for their chosenstakeholder group via changing the dynamics of bias in the situation being modeled.In contrast to Phase 1, where teams wrote for a non-technical audience, students are told to writethis deliverable for a