of multiple projects inthe local community as previously discussed. Preliminary mid-term assessment indicated thatstudents felt overwhelmed about the project and concerned that the workload is too much. Theinterdisciplinary make-up of the team has led to complications in scheduling site visits and teammeetings. To alleviate this and based on student feedback, the schedule was revised to includeone project work day each week as well as additional interim assignments to ensure that studentsare making the required progress. Specifically, the students, who were working on capstoneprojects in their various majors, felt that this was a second capstone. While that was absolutelynot the intention of the course instructors, this was a comment that
data obtained through amixed-methods approach. Results indicate that students’ attitudes toward teamwork andtheir perceptions of their own teamwork skills improved over the semester.IntroductionTeamwork is vital to engineers’ professional lives. Passow 2012 surveyed over 4000practicing engineers representing eleven different disciplines asking them to evaluatethe importance of the different ABET competencies in their careers [1]. Teamwork(ABET Outcome 5, formally ABET Outcome D) received the highest rating.Considering its importance to the field, team-based assignments, particularly semester-long design projects, are commonly employed in engineering curricula. Whileteamwork can be a rewarding experience, it can also be a source of anxiety and
project based learning on leadership abilities and communication skills,” in 47th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings, 2011.[18] A. Ayob, R. A. Majid, A. Hussain, and M. M. Mustaffa, “Creativity enhancement through experiential learning,” Adv. Nat. Appl. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 94–99, 2012.[19] N. Hotaling, B. B. Fasse, L. F. Bost, C. D. Hermann, and C. R. Forest, “A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 630–656, 2012.[20] K. Evans and F. Reeder, A Human Capital Crisis in Cybersecurity: Technical Proficiency Matters. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies, 2010.[21] Cyber
because of the open-ended nature of the activity [30]. Sinceproject-based learning is often done in teams, students engage in reflective dialogue and weighvarious perspectives that further promote critical thinking. Students are also given moreownership over their learning process than they would with traditional course pedagogy, whichfacilitates positive motivations [29], [42]. Capstone design projects, required of all ABET-accredited programs, is just one example of such open-ended, team-based projects. 6Providing real-world scenarios with no right or wrong answers provides an ideal context forstudents to learn how to apply critical thinking to
education.Bhattacharjee and Ghosh discussed the usefulness of role-playing in construction education andemphasized how students employed critical thinking skills as they played the role of differentstakeholders [6] [7]. In project-based learning, students work on real projects. Most constructionprograms require students to complete capstone projects as the culminating experience to earntheir degrees. Students can learn higher-level cognitive skills through project-based and problem-based learning [8].In recent years, there has been increasing use of technology to foster and support learning.Messner et al. discussed the use of immersive virtual reality in construction education, and theyfound that students have a better understanding of construction projects in
City College of New York and her Doctorate degree at University of Florida in Environmental Engineering. She has over 10 years of experience developing international and national research experiences for STEM majors, as well as project management. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Works in Progress: Integrating Information Literacy into a Multi- Disciplinary First-Year Engineering ProgramMotivationThis Work in Progress paper describes a pilot program of integrating a librarian-led guest lectureinto a first-year engineering program. While many first-year engineering programs historicallyhave provided students with a lecture-based
Engineering at Purdue Uni- versity. He received his PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. His research interest includes big-data health analytics. He is actively in collaborating with international partners to enhance American engineering students’ global learning.Mrs. Eunhye Kim, Purdue University at West Lafayette Eunhye Kim is a Ph.D. student and research assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests lie in engineering design education, especially for engineering stu- dents’ entrepreneurial mindsets and multidisciplinary teamwork skills in design and innovation projects. She earned a B.S. in Electronics Engineering and an M.B.A. in South Korea
. However, the IDI surveys almost always show a higher perceived culturalcompetency than the actual measured developmental level which would need to be taken intoconsideration. Evaluating training or experiences incorporated into classes at multiple levelswould provide a better picture of whether my conclusions are correct. I have incorporated aService Learning project for people in another culture for a Senior Capstone course. Thesestudents did not travel to that location but needed to learn about the culture in order to create adesign that was effective. Based on the research shown in this paper, one project most likely wasnot sufficient to increase cultural competence. However, if students are exposed to manyexperiences over their college
) is a 30-credit hour distance educationgraduate degree from the top 10 ranked College of Engineering at a Texas A&M University. Theprogram began in 2001 and has graduated more than 600+ professionals in addition to 99currently enrolled students in two cohorts. The MID program is a 21 month, part-time, lock-step,online graduate program designed for working professionals. The program focuses on SupplyChain Management, Logistics and Profitability of distributors and manufacturers (suppliers) inthe industrial channels. The MID program involves immersive learning experiences such as aresidency week, a global class & trip and a capstone project. The program has won national [2]and regional [3] awards.Curriculum The MID Program is
foundthat team conflict is highly negatively correlated with team performance and team enjoyment incapstone design courses, with 1 in 4 students reporting that they experienced significant conflict,with the majority of cases consisting of conflict of a personal, or relationship, nature [1].In 2015, a series of teamwork training modules were developed by the Teamwork Clinic throughthe collaboration of various departments on campus [2]. Each of the six modules were designedto integrate seamlessly into courses with large or lengthy design projects, with the goal thatstudents apply what they learn directly to their team processes and team projects. This papercontinues to expand on work that has been published about the first four teamwork modules inthe
experimental section had aparti pris pedagogy [31] with a reverse content sequence where the central big ideas ofarchitectural structures preceded their refinement into statics and mechanics. The instructionalmethod is traditional lecture via marker on whiteboard. The learning outcomes are primarilyhomework and examinations. The assessment follows an absolute grading system [27, p. 433]. Capstone Architectural Structures The course originally had a researchemphasis due to the accreditation shift to the five-year Master of Architecture degree. Theresearch projects commonly dealt with building failures and natural disasters [32]. Theinstructional method was discussion [33]. The student work was posters and scholarly papers inthe case
. [11] 2019 Engineering Capstone/senior design Entrepreneurial mindset Current Work 2020 Engineering All courses Entrepreneurial mindsetAlthough coaching in engineering professional development has happened, to our knowledge there have been nocross-university and inter-disciplinary coaching programs.Coaching Project StructureApproximately 30 faculty participants registered and attended each of three workshops held in the summer of2019, representing three cohorts of faculty participants. The cohorts were distinguished based on the month –June, July, August – the training occurred. Workshop participants were recruited from schools in the KEENnetwork or potential member schools
clear in The Engineer of 2020 and it is also a central part ofthe Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge, 3rd Edition. Many programs provide an opportunityfor students to demonstrate creativity and innovation in their capstone projects but few providefoundational instruction or opportunities to hone creativity skills throughout the curriculum.Inspired by the need to develop creative and innovative engineers and encouraged by theliterature about how the necessary skills and attitudes can be developed through education, thispaper describes how creativity has been deliberately and explicitly integrated in a requiredsenior-level civil engineering course. Although early in implementation and assessment, the datasuggests that integrating creativity into
Paper ID #31377Creating a Makerspace for Cross-disciplinary Teaching and Collaborationwith Limited FundingDr. David G Alexander, California State University, Chico Dr. Alexander’s research interests and areas of expertise are in teaching pedagogy, capstone design, renewable energy systems, thermal sciences, vehicle system modeling and simulation, heat transfer, new product development, entrepreneurship, and technology transfer. He is PI and adviser of the Department of Energy Collegiate Wind Competition 2016. He is also working on an undergraduate research project modeling solar cells using a thermodynamics approach and
14assessment and improvement process. Additionally, our program could benefit fromcomprehensive relook and revision of grading rubrics for technical communication relatedgraded events in the near term.Second, our university’s environmental engineering program can explore the use of scaffoldingtechnical communication events across courses. Scaffolding centers on intentionally connectinggraded events (e.g., capstone projects or research papers) with technical communicationcomponents across courses, either within the same semester or longitudinally across semesters.Scaffolding events across semesters offers several advantages, to include the ability for studentsto benchmark against previous performance and continually add to a body of increasinglycomplex
resume.Three students indicated a “Very high likelihood” of offering Candidate 2 an interview, while nostudents selected “Very low likelihood” for Candidate 2’s interview prospects. Candidate 2’sweighted mean evaluation was 3.44. When asked which traits stood out about Candidate 2,experience was again the most commonly included response, but the student evaluators alsoremarked on Candidate 2’s capstone project and programming language skills. Figure 3: Quantitative evaluation of Candidate 2 (“John”); N=16. Figure 4: Qualitative evaluation of Candidate 2 (“John”).Coding the qualitative traits assessment for each of the candidates highlights the disparity betweennon-technical and language skills for “Julie” vice
characterization methods for composites and additivelymanufactured materials. SCS participants are engaged in project-based learning activities,including MAM hands-on outreach workshops on various manufacturing technologies,educational seminars, as well as capstone and research projects in partnership with industrial andgovernment research labs. Figure 1. Proposed network of interventions for supporting SCS students in MAM programBy introducing students to various career opportunities through series of educational MAMseminars and workshops, the current program prepares SCS students for the path they will needto take upon graduation in joining the engineering work force. The proposed support networkalso includes curricular, research, and
, P. Iglesias, K. N. Leipold, and J. D. Wellin, “Recent developments in engineering measure- ments lab,” 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2015, https://peer.asee.org/24647. [7] Purdue University, “Catme smarter teamwork,” https://info.catme.org/about/overview/. [8] B. Oakley, R. Felder, R. Brent, and I. Elhajj, “Turning student groups into effective teams,” Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2004. [9] PASCO Scientific, “Pasco 2.0 capstone user’s guide,” www.pasco.com, 2020.[10] E. Selvi, S. Soto-Caban, R. S. Taylor, and W. R. Wilson, “Similar consecutive bridge design projects for fresh- men and sophomore level engineering courses,” 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2011, https
, andpromote critical thinking [2]. In the learning context of PBL, students develop authenticquestions for problems that are situated within real-world practices [3], which leads tomeaningful learning experiences [4].Competences, such as critical thinking and communication skills promoted by PBLmethodologies, are increasingly important for engineering practice. In the labor market it isexpected that engineers not only work in technical contexts, developing solutions that meetclients’ needs, but also perform their work through effective collaboration with others [5]. Inengineering schools, these competencies are usually taught in the design courses at the finalstages of the career (Capstone Course), which use project-based learning
aspect to the successful performance of student teams is communication. Student teamsnegotiate many aspects of collaboration, including deadlines, meeting times, and expectations.Previous works have found that the different meanings which people place on commonly usedwords or phrases often lead to miscommunications in the professional workplace. It is unknown,however, how this situation translates to the collegiate setting, specifically on team-basedprojects, the manners that this could potentially affect the progress of the students, and if thereare any differences in interpretation of these phrases that are along demographic lines. In thisstudent-directed project, participants (n=119) of varying technical backgrounds were surveyed asto their
collection. These interactions are less often for assessmentpurposes. This project describes the development of a tool that can be used in formal andinformal spaces which capitalizes on behaviors students already do to capture data that mightotherwise be overlooked in engineering K-12 environments. For the purposes of less obtrusivepeer assessment (LOPA), students record themselves (or others) during class presentations orstudio critiques and assess each other after having been trained to identify elements of a K-12engineering epistemic frame (EEFK12).IntroductionEngineering design is a process and interpretive practice[1], and traditional assessments oftenfail to assess higher order thinking skills[2]. STEM content knowledge is assessed more often
. Anderson. 2011. Deciding to Major in Computer Science: A Grounded Theory of Students’ Self-Assessment of Ability. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3–10.[25] Joe Linhoff and Amber Settle. 2009. Motivating and Evaluating Game Development Capstone Projects. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (FDG ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 121–128.[26] Runestone Interactive LLC. 2019. How to Think Like a Computer Scientist: Interactive Edition. https://runestone.academy/runestone/static/thinkcspy/index.html.[27] Dastyni Loksa and Andrew J. Ko. 2016. The Role of Self-Regulation in Programming Problem Solving
Research, 2, 1 (2001).[11] W. Riddell, S. Bakrania, K. Bhatia, K. Dahm, R. Harvey and L. Weiss, “Putting the HorseBefore the Cart: Fitting a new project into established design and writing pedagogy,” Paperpresented at 2009 ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Spring Conference, Baltimore, MD, April2009.[12] https://engineeringunleashed.com/about.aspx , accessed 11/19/2019[13] https://engineeringunleashed.com/cards.aspx, accessed 11/19/2019[14] Mynderse, J. A., & Liu, L., & Gerhart, A. L., & Fletcher, R. W., & Vejdani, H., & Jing, W.,& Yee, K. E. “Development of an Entrepreneurial Mind-set within a Three-Semester MechanicalEngineering Capstone Design Sequence Based on the SAE Collegiate Design Series,” Paperpresented at 2019 ASEE
theeducation librarians to assess the effectiveness of the library consultations. Four assessment toolswere developed and used by the librarians involved with teaching student teams. This paperdiscusses the end of semester questionnaire, which was the preferred assessment tool of thelibrarians. We conducted the detailed data analysis described in this paper after the completion ofthe original assessment project. This paper can contribute to a librarian’s assessment toolkit andinteractions with students during consultations.Context The course project, which is also the department’s junior capstone, is a 16 to 22 pageresearch project on a mechanical power transmission topic that students work on in teams. Thiswriting project requires engineering
Paper ID #28786An Open-Source Autonomous Vessel for Maritime ResearchDr. Robert Kidd, State University of New York, Maritime College Dr. Kidd completed his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. at the University of Florida in 2011, 2013, and 2015 respectively. He worked at the Center for Intelligent Machines and Robotics at UF from 2009 to 2015 researching the use autonomous ground vehicles including ATVs, a Toyota Highlander, and a tracked loader. He has taught at SUNY Maritime College since 2015 running the capstone design sequence for mechanical engineers. His research interests include additive manufacturing, fault-tolerant control
populations.Humanitarian Engineering is an area which aims to promote human welfare through the creation,invention and modification of appropriate technologies. One of the specific goals is to address needs ofpeople who have been largely ignored by the engineering community [12]. Over the last decade,humanitarian engineering programs and organizations have emerged in large numbers in the US.Additionally, humanitarian engineering programs typically tend to attract larger number of femalestudents than mainstream engineering programs. For example, a study at the Colorado School of minesfound that the percent of female engineering students who were participating in capstone projects that hada humanitarian aspect were significantly larger than those participating in
providestudents with a basic and fundamental knowledge of mechanical instrumentation and sensors(both in theory and practice), data acquisition systems, and how to process / analyze themeasurements in preparation of both industry, subsequent lab courses, and preliminary / detaildesign (yearlong senior capstone project). The learning outcomes stated in the course syllabusare: 1. Develop a fundamental knowledge of the working principles behind various sensors and transducers, including their response and calibration for static and dynamic responses. 2. Acquire analog signals utilizing benchtop / handheld equipment (multimeter, oscilloscope) and National Instruments* data acquisition (DAQ) hardware with LabVIEW* 3. Conduct, analyze, and
11connection with these communities [28].College: Undergraduate and graduate students In the case of the university stage, I analyzed six articles related to classroominterventions through Capstone Design Projects (CDP) or specific courses for the developmentof solutions aimed to achieve social justice, focused on the lack access to specific products,from a welfare approach to social problems, and its effects on particular products. Theresearchers were, for the most part, engineering instructors in areas such as mechanicalengineering [29], IT Engineering [30], Building Engineering [31] or interdisciplinary groupswhere there are at least one engineer [32] [33] [34], who also looked for fosteringinterdisciplinary teamwork. For this, these
through a capstone project, thesis, or other participatory design process inwhich students engage with stakeholders ([22] see also [23] [24]). In these, material dealing withethics is not considered separate from the main topics of the engineering course, but instead asinextricably related to it as blood is when infused into a human body. Infusions of ethics mayentail complicated course planning that can be a challenge for educators who are inexperiencedin method and topic areas, but they can nonetheless be strong options for helping engineeringstudents see ethical implications in their work.A “high dose” of ethics, on the other hand, might entail a larger-scale endeavor such as adedicated course of study focused explicitly on engineering ethics
knowledgebetween electronics and software necessary to be a mechatronics engineer with system-levelthinking. The material has been structured in such a way that students can work through each laband walk away learning new skills beyond their fundamental mechanical engineering curriculum.For our student evaluations, we predict to see an increase in student engagement andunderstanding from having a real-world application they are solving, such as a NASA Marsrover mission. Moreover, the proposed mechatronics curriculum should provide students toencompass more challenging mechanical engineering senior design capstone projects that moststudents are taking concurrently or the following semester of taking the mechatronics course.In the future, we have many