graduate student perspective, not a person who relates primarilyas an employer or instructor of graduate students— hence, the “before I forget” part of the title. I hope theperspective gained by hindsight can supplement that lack of immediacy and that as a communicative act Ican speak directly to graduate students with something valuable. Now a faculty member, I am alsolooking towards being able to synthesize these pieces of advice in ways that I may be able to pass along tomy own and other graduate students. I do not anticipate this advice to be comprehensive, and I inviteothers to add their wisdom as well, in this paper (see Section 5) and future works. In this envisionedcollective body of knowledge on graduate student process, no one would
interdisciplinary graduate education and is the Director of an NSF-NRT Program. He is author/co-author of over 170 journal publi- cations, 25 conference proceedings and has given close to 75 invited talks at international and international venues. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Non-Academic Career Pathways for Engineering Doctoral Students: An Evaluation of anNSF Research Traineeship Program Our evidence-based practice paper examines non-academic pathways, which arebecoming increasingly common for graduate degree recipients, particularly those in STEMfields. However, career preparation by academic institutions, faculty, and advisors tends tooverwhelmingly focus on academic career pathways
assessed the partner’spotential for bringing in research funding, and has opted to invest in their potential (andpresumably also identified a lab where the research can be carried out, and a research mentor).Other offers can emerge, depending on your partner’s goals. For example, an offer of Lecturer,or Clinical Assistant Professor are good long-term positions with job stability, and the rewardingexperiences of working with students. These are teaching-focused positions and will keep thepartner very busy, precluding their ability to pursue research objectives. Thus, if becomingtenure-track faculty members in your respective fields lies in your long-term dual-career goals, Irecommend negotiating for a partner position that actively supports their
educators.Our quantitative study is based on a dataset of 559 early-career engineering graduates whoparticipated in the Engineering Majors Survey (EMS). EMS is a longitudinal U.S. nationwidesurvey designed to explore engineering students’ and then later graduates’ technical,innovation, and entrepreneurial interests and experiences. Innovative behavior outcomes areanalyzed considering socio-demographic characteristics such as gender and underrepresentedracial/ethnic minority (URM) status, and characteristics of the workplace such as industryand company size. Furthermore, we elaborate on the interrelation of innovative behavior andleadership responsibility.We find no significant differences in innovative behavior of female and male engineeringgraduates
ituniquely included three courses. While the other case study sites were bound as a singleinstructional setting, this site was defined around an instructional intervention, which wasembedded in three different course types. The courses were all offered through the chemical andbiological engineering department and included a required, foundational course (ChemicalEngineering Fluid Mechanics, n= 40 students); an upper-division technical elective (SustainableEnergy, n=37 students); and a lower-division elective open to all majors on campus (Energy andSustainability, n=65 students). The intervention was developed and taught by a team of twochemical and biological engineering faculty members at Montana State University. Detail on thedevelopment and
responses, we do not wish tosuggest that these are the “wrong” career experiences. Career pursuits entail a number of unknownvariables that may result in undesirable outcomes, and recognizing discontent may be a first stepto finding career interests that are more enriching.Future work from this project will include expanding the analysis to other engineering major. Wealso plan to interview faculty members and students to understand their perceptions of careerpreparation and potential career pathways leading from an engineering degree.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the Purdue University Davidson School of Engineering, whosePipeline Center funded this project. This work was also supported by the National ScienceFoundation (DGE
as it relates to this careerpath.Data are being collected on Fellows’ reactions to individual grant activities and their overallparticipation. In addition to Fellow data, participating faculty are surveyed to provide furtherinformation on student growth in key areas of concern (teaching, research, and multiculturalawareness to work with diverse populations). Fellow surveys will continue to be collected beyondgraduation to further understand how Fellows transition into and exist within academic settings.The research on career decision-making is being conducted through a Social Cognitive CareerTheory lens. This lens focuses on three aspects of career development and decision-making: (1)how an individual develops their career interests, (2) how
, mismatched expectations for what theirgraduate school experience would be like and conflicting personal and professional identitiesinfluenced their decision process. Peters and Daly [15] studied engineering students who returnedto graduate school after working for a time, showing that the utility of the degree was a majordriving force in persistence. The decision to stay in the degree was viewed through an analysis ofcosts, saying that “the question was not whether they could successfully complete a graduatedegree program but whether it was worth doing” (p. 262). A more comprehensive model of theattrition decision process was developed by Berdanier et al. [16]. The GrAD model not onlyexposed the major factors in engineering graduate student
strategic plans were developed to serve as the starting point for career preparationsince many graduate students do not feel sufficiently prepared, especially for careers outside ofacademia [1]. The graduate students were encouraged to think about where they sought to beemployed upon graduation and to be mindful that more than a doctoral degree would be requiredto obtain employment. Guided conversation allowed them to think of the yearly activities theyshould consider undertaking. The strategic planning also extended to the broader vision of theresearch group. Part of the change vision of the faculty member was establishing an organizationbuilt on mutual benefit. By articulating visions and strategies on an individual and collectivelevel, the
student survey is reflective qualitative remarks from individual commentssubmitted after course completion. The individual comments were in the form of an open endedessay with the writing prompt framed with three questions: What are the things you reallyappreciated about the course or things that could have be done better, what are the concepts thatyou learned that you think will help you in your continued career at Fulbright (and beyond!), andwhat are the things that surprised you that you learned about yourself through your time inCreating & Making.Students wrote between 500 to 1500 words for their personal reflections and the information wasthen compiled and evaluated as to congruence with the breakdown of elements in active learning
us what we maybe already knew, but nevertheless needed to hear: students enterengineering education from diverse points of origin and continue through to careers that are aslikely beyond engineering as within it. However, a close reading of the report also reveals twovoices. On the one hand, there was the voice of educators and administrators eager to celebratethe fact that engineering can serve as rigorous preparation for a variety of future occupations. Onthe other hand, there was a smaller number of educators, including NAE staff members who,through their engagement with the literature on women and minorities in engineering educationsought to make the point that many students enter engineering with diverse backgrounds andpreparation in
, “Employers Rate Career Competencies, New Hire Proficiency,” December 11, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.naceweb.org/career-readiness/competencies/employers-rate-career-competencies- new-hire-proficiency/. [Accessed February 3, 2019].[15] W. Hsin and J. Cigas, “Short Videos Improve Student Learning in Online Education,” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 253–259, 2013.[16] L. Hurtubise, B. Martin, A. Gilliland, and J. Mahan, “To Play or Not To Play: Leveraging Video in Medical Education,” Journal of Graduate Medical Education, vol. 5 no. 1, pp. 13– 18, 2013.[17] R. H. Kay, “Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 28
rural communities support and promote engineering as a career choice for theirstudents. Therefore, this study explored the ways in which rural communities provide support tohelp students make fully informed decisions about engineering as a college major.The findings presented here come from Phase 2 of a three-phase study exploring engineeringcareer choice among rural students. Using interview and focus group data collected from currentengineering students in Phase 1, Phase 2 turned to community members, including high schoolpersonnel, local industry leaders, members of local governments, and members of keycommunity organizations (e.g., 4-H). Using interviews with 16 participants across 3communities, we address the following question: What
inclusivecampus climates, there is still underrepresentation of Blacks/African Americans,Latinx/Hispanics, and Native Americans (including Native Hawaiians and Alaska Natives)within the STEM professoriate nationwide. For students who are members of these groups, theculturally isolating experience this deficit creates can weaken one’s academic self-perception,and hinder performance in STEM disciplines. This paper explores the relationship betweenintentionality towards diversity and inclusion in faculty job postings and corresponding facultydemographics at a variety of US postsecondary institutions. The research questions we areinvestigating are: • In what ways are diversity and inclusion implicitly and explicitly addressed in the
Paper ID #30124An Autoethnography: Outcomes from Faculty Engagement in CourseDevelopment in a Large First-Year Engineering ProgramDr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Holly M. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education. She is current the Assistant Department Head for Undergraduate Programs and the former Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and practice related to graduate student mentoring. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, was nominated for a
top three criteria when choosing a place to publish your scholarly work? o #1 ________________________________________________ o #2 ________________________________________________ o #3 ________________________________________________5 When starting as a graduate student or new faculty member, how were you advised about publishingchoices? How do you advise undergraduate or graduate students on publishing scholarly outputs?6 When considering dissemination of scholarly activity, have you considered other options outside oftraditional publishing formats?7 Do you think publishing choices change over an academic career? If so, how?8 Do you think that promotion and tenure guidelines relate to scholarly publishing? o Yes o
students in these results shared that there was an extreme difference inwhat they expected of their graduate endeavors and what they actually experienced, whichtranslated into them feeling alone and exiled [13]. Isolation or exclusion is one of the primefactors for a decrease in retention of URM students [19]. Others acknowledged the impact thatthese issues had on their ability to function as a normal member of STEM society. Thealienation from faculty and peers often resulted in a lack of confidence and comfort withcommunicating in order to gain understanding, attend meetings, request help, or even participate[19][12]. Due to a lack of STEM faculty and peers that represent similar life narratives andcultural norms [18], many minoritized students
environmental engineering from the University of North Dakota. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Utah State University with a research focus on the ethical and career aspects of mentoring of science and engineering graduate students and hidden curriculum in engineering.Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and the M.S. and Ph.D. in EE from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of diversity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She is Co-Director of
Paper ID #29189”Adversary or Ally”: Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Perceptions ofFacultyMr. H. Ronald Clements III, Purdue University H. Ronald Clements is a postbaccalaureate research assistant in the STRIDE lab at Purdue University and an incumbent graduate student for Purdue’s Engineering Education department for the 2020-2021 year. He works with Dr. Allison Godwin on her NSF CAREER grant titled ”Actualizing Latent Diver- sity: Building Innovation through Engineering Students’ Identity Development,” assisting with narrative analysis and interviews and helping to understand the identity trajectories of latently
additional experience of customer discovery assistedthe RL in tailoring the research objectives and taught the faculty and graduate student mentorabout the commercial potential of this project.Case Study of the effects of combining REU research activities and I-Corps site customerdiscovery activities:Harvest-to-harvest: Novel clay-based adsorbents for poultry litter: The REU students processedand evaluated the efficacy of natural clay-based adsorbents to harvest phosphates and ammoniumions from poultry litter, and explored its application as a fertilizer. Besides turning a waste into auseful product, this waste management solution is expected to help poultry producers reduce thelevels of ammonia in chicken farm houses, thereby reducing energy
Paper ID #29446Changing an Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Culture fromthe Bottom Up: Action Plans Generated from Faculty InterviewsElise A. Frickey, Iowa State University Elise is a graduate student at Iowa State University. As a doctoral student in Counseling Psychology, she has been involved with research on the application of self-determination theory to different domains to allow for better understanding of the relationships between contextual factors, basic psychological needs, and indices of well-being. Prior to attending Iowa State University, she obtained a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and Spanish
a different institution) to understand the differences in the natureand number of comments associated with both types of proposals. This qualitative approach isintended to inform the direction of future research rather than to provide conclusive evidence oftrends in reviewer comments [4]. Methods Data Collection The workshops supported two-person teams, comprised of the PI (who, in accordance with S-STEM program requirements was a faculty member teaching in an S-STEM eligible discipline) and a team member with expertise in educational or related areas of research (referred to in this project as researcher participants). A total of 21 teams (42 participants) comprised the 2017 cohort. We
findings.For a number of years, several members of the American Society for Engineering Education(ASEE) thought that ASEE should engage in the recognition of educational qualifications if itwas to be a truly professional society. It was felt that ASEE had a professional responsibility toencourage all new engineering educators to gain an initial teaching qualification, not to beconfused with subsequent faculty development. There were no courses equivalent to IGIP [9] butthere were a few well established and recognized courses that were regularly offered (e.g. NETI)[10]. The opportunity to pursue this issue came when Professor Arnold Pears invited one of usto join him in presenting a one-day workshop on evidence-based teaching for persons with littleor
engineering postdoctoral appointments influence postdoctoral scholars’ view of the professoriate? 2. How does the view of the professoriate influence postdoctoral scholars’ career decision-making process?Literature ReviewA postdoctoral appointment is evolving into an important stepping stone to entering theengineering professoriate because it affords doctoral graduates with advanced preparation toassume the research, teaching, and service responsibilities of a tenure-track faculty member(Andalib et al., 2018; Main & Wang, 2019). Research has demonstrated that postdoctoralappointments are exceptionally advantageous for URMs and women, as their enhanced trainingleads them to be more competitive in the professoriate job
. Megan received a B.A. in English from Rice University.Prof. Michael Wolf Michael Wolf is Professor of Mathematics at Rice University as well as Faculty Director of the Rice Emerging Scholars Program, an initiative he co-founded in 2012. The Rice Emerging Scholars program is a comprehensive 2-4 year program that begins the summer before matriculation for a group of matric- ulating Rice students whose preparation for STEM is weaker than those of their peers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Examining STEM Diagnostic Exam Scores and Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Three-Year STEM Psychological and Career OutcomesAbstractIn this research-based paper, we explore the relationships
over graduate school. Thepaper provides an in-depth discussion on the findings of the REU program evaluation and itsimpact on undergraduate students with respect to their future plans and career choice. The analysisis also done by gender, ethnicity, academic level (sophomore, junior, senior), and type of homeinstitution (e.g., large research universities, rural and small schools) to explore if there was anysignificant difference in mean research competency scores based on these attributes. 1. IntroductionToday’s manufacturing operations are more complex and globally scalable compared to those inthe last century (Lee et al., 2016). This complexity in manufacturing operations is due to a shift inmanufacturing from craftsmanship model in the
Teaching assistants play a vital role in the teaching mission of higher education institutionslike the College of Engineering at UW Madison. They are often the first point of contact a studentmay have with their instructional team and the most familiar role model for an undergraduatestudent questioning a career in the course subject field or academia in general. Not only are TAsvital to the student experience, but they are also potential future faculty, after earning an advanceddegree, it will be expected that they know how to teach. The mission of NEO is to prepare TAs for the charge of teaching, through giving them theskills and tools to teach and engage students, developing their identity as a teacher and skills toadvocate for themselves
learning facilitators (PLFs) as they first seek to support theircapacity to teach, and in doing so, also gain insight from them. Many faculty report seekingfeedback from their PLFs as they make instructional decisions. Taking this further, some haveargued that students should be co-designers. However, engaging teams of students and faculty inthis way presents a clear power imbalance [24], but one that researchers have asserted can beovercome by positioning students as collaborators and discussing points of view and insightsgained from these different vantage points. Others have argued that because of the powerdynamics, an intermediary such as an expert in teaching and learning is needed to formsuccessful student-faculty design partnerships [25
Paper ID #29438The Role of Teaching Self-Efficacy in Electrical and ComputerEngineering Faculty Teaching SatisfactionMr. Kent A. Crick, Iowa State University Kent Crick is currently in his third year as a graduate student at Iowa State University. He is currently a PhD candidate in Counseling Psychology and conducts research in self-determination as it relates to student and faculty motivation and well-being. Prior to attending Iowa State, he obtained a Master’s Degree in Clinical Psychology from the University of Indianapolis. He then worked as a research coordi- nator for the Diabetes and Translational Research Center
STEMeducation enterprise and broaden the pool of researchers that can conduct fundamental researchinto STEM learning and learning environments. This is motivated in part by the recognition thatimproved STEM education will benefit from qualitative and quantitative research [1], and for theneed to evaluate the effectiveness of various initiatives that are being explored [2]. Recent NSFawards have focused mostly on graduate students seeking to become STEM researchersincluding studies that established: 1) an Institute in Critical Quantitative, Computational, andMixed Methods Training for Underrepresented Scholars [3], 2) a Meta-Analysis ResearchInstitute (MMARI) to improve the quality of meta-analyses conducted in STEM education byproviding training to