AC 2012-3473: BIOMIMICRY INNOVATION AS A TOOL FOR DESIGNDr. Terri M. Lynch-Caris, Kettering University Terri Lynch-Caris, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor in the Industrial and Manufacturing Department at Kettering University and a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Michigan. She serves as the Director for the Center of Excellence in Teaching and Learning at Kettering. Her areas of interest in teaching and research include ergonomics and human modeling, statistics, work design and lean princi- ples, supply chain management, and environmental sustainability.Dr. Jonathan Weaver, University of Detroit MercyDr. Darrell K. Kleinke, University of Detroit Mercy Darrell Kleinke has more than 25 years of
leaders can orient basic research toward Page 26.1211.3developing ambitious technology platforms that can have practical application, fostercollaboration spanning traditional silos, and facilitate a smooth commercialization process thatincludes all relevant players. Our results show building an organizational culture around theseprinciples can have a dramatic impact on technology transfer outputs. We also propose sevenquestions for future research to encourage further work in this important area.Introduction: The innovation imperative Innovation is a key battleground in the twenty-first century. Economic experts agree, ifany country wants to
. Page 25.800.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Integrating Innovative Pedagogies into Engineering Economics CoursesAbstractIn this paper, we make a case for incorporating high-impact practices into the engineeringeconomics classroom as a way to increase student engagement, learning and performance.Wherever possible, we tie proposals to our own experiences. In some cases, the practices werefer to are extant in the education literature, but not ones that we have tried as yet; however, weplan to examine them in upcoming semesters and, possibly, incorporate them into our ownclassrooms. We also indicate how several of these practices help meet the requirements ofagencies that accredit engineering
year extension, a NSF Partnership for Innovation(PFI) grant and then follow up PFI grant, and a five year NSF Material Research Center forScience and Engineering Center (MRSEC) grant with a just awarded second five yearcontinuation.The specific elements for microEP students’ career preparation were (1) academic excellence incourses that would directly support a student’s professional performance, (2) research excellencein an area that would provide practice of the academic knowledge being gained throughcoursework, and (3) operational excellence in both the execution of graduate research and inmanagement skills needed in early professional careers.This paper will not address the first two elements of the microEP Graduate Program, but
. One of thegrants funded entrepreneurial multi-university wireless senior design projects, while the othersupported a series of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department senior design teams withentrepreneurial commitment. Additionally, Florida Tech has been an active partner of the NSF-funded Partnership for Innovation - Center for Entrepreneurship and TechnologyCommercialization (CENTECOM) along with UCF, USF and Florida A&M University. Theresponse to these grants has been extremely positive, with 7 of 13 entrepreneurial senior designteams in 2005 intending to launch businesses around their senior projects. Additionally, therewere twelve graduate E-teams presenting their business ideas at the EngineeringEntrepreneurship Business Idea
Radhakrishnan, National University Prof. Ben D Radhakrishnan is the Lead Faculty for MS Sustainability Management Program in School of Engineering and Computing at National University, San Diego, CA. He develops and teaches Engineering and Sustainability Management graduate level courses. Ben has conducted Sustainability workshops in Los Angeles (Army) and San Diego (SDGE). His special interests and research include promoting Leadership in Sustainability Practices, energy management of Data Centers and to establish Sustainable strategies for enterprises. He spent part of his 2011 and 2012 summers as an Affiliate Researcher at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, focusing on the energy efficiency of IT
Cognitive Engineering Center at Georgia Tech, where she is pursuing a Ph.D. in aerospace engineering. She received her B.S. in aerospace engineering from MIT and her M.S. in systems engineering from the University of Virginia. Coso is actively involved in the ASEE Student Division and the Graduate Engineering Education Consortium for Students, and she re- cently co-founded a Georgia Tech ASEE student chapter. Her research interests include the integration of cognitive engineering into the aerospace engineering design process, development and evaluation of in- terdisciplinary engineering courses and programs, mixed methods research designs, and graduate student experiences in engineering programs.Matthew E
Computer Research, 2(4). Pp. 130-138.9. de Vries, C., and Parkinson, M. B. (2014). ‘Limiting disproportionate disaccommodation in design for human variability’, Ergonomics, 57(1), pp.52-65.10. Rethaber, J. (2016). ‘Hit and Miss Ergonomics Education’, ISE Magazine, 48 (10), pp.31-34.11. da Silva, A.M., (2015) ‘Ergonomics and Sustainable Design: A Case Study on Practicing and Teaching’, Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 5806-5813.12. Dias, A.C., Almendra, R., and da Silva, F.M., (2015) ‘The Application of Ergonomic Knowledge by Undergraduate Product Design Students: FAULisbon as a Case Study’, Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 5851-5858.13. Chang, Y. H., and Miller, C. (2006). ‘Using Computer Simulation to Teach Undergraduate Engineering and
AC 2012-5046: DEFINING THE CORE BODY OF KNOWLEDGE (COR-BOK) FOR A GRADUATE PROGRAM IN SYSTEMS ENGINEERING: AWORK IN PROGRESSDr. Alice F. Squires, Stevens Institute of Technology Alice Squires is Manager of Systems Engineering at Aurora Flight Sciences and an adjunct systems engi- neering faculty for the School of Systems and Enterprises at Stevens Institute of Technology. She is one of many authors on the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (http://www.sebokwiki.org/) and the Graduate Curriculum for Systems Engineering (http://bkcase.org/grcse-05). She was previously a Senior Researcher for the Systems Engineering University Affiliated Research Center (SE UARC) and Online Technical Director for the School of
activities thatrealistically reflect practices in the field? Successful plans are easily differentiated from deficientplans when input from subject matter experts is considered. Therefore, determining the scope ofthe project, creating a work breakdown structure, and identifying the critical path particularlywith input from subject matter experts is crucial to facilitating learning-by-doing for real orpseudo projects in the planning stages. In this paper we present an innovative project-based learning approach for teachingproject management. By incorporating the design thinking strategy in the curriculum, studentteams identify and define problems (or needs) by empathizing with the users, proposing designalternatives, and creating quick-and
customer to encourage innovation, unlike industry-based research orientedinstitutions. The researchers proposed that a consumer pull for better teaching and learning couldmake a difference to encourage research oriented universities to reform their curriculums [8]. Another article presented a model for re-engineering an undergraduate industrialengineering curriculum. The model used a five phase approach which included planning andassessment, identification of emerging topics, curriculum redesign, recruitment strategies, and ameasurement and continuous improvement plan. A voice of customer (VoC), including bothindustry and academics, was used to identify emerging topics and desired characteristics forindustrial engineering graduates. The
Luisa Feliciano (Graduate Research and Innovation Center-GRIC), Aidsa Santiago (Materials Science and Engineering Department) and William J. Frey(UPRM School of Business) who actively collaborated in the editing process.References"Carin" Chuang, K., & Chen, K. (2013). Designing Service Learning Project in System Analysis and Design Course. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17(2), 47- 60.Castro-Sitiriche, M., Papadopoulos, C., Frey, W., Santiago-Roman, A., & Jimenez, L. (2014, September 1). National Science Foundation Grant #1449489. Retrieved September 27, 2016, from Cultivating Responsible Wellbeing in STEM: Social Engagement through Personal Ethics: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch
processes.One of the most useful practices that can be implemented to design products and processes inresponse to customer needs is Quality Function Deployment (QFD). It is a technique that strivesto utilize the voice of the customer directly into the development process for new products orservices. The customers’ perceptions can be identified and translated into the products designed,developed, and manufactured to fulfill those requirements. Customer needs are prioritized,innovative responses are determined, and processes maximized to improve effectiveness.Basically, QFD is a methodology that enables an organization to continually improve and exceedthe customers’ expectations. In this way, effective organizations can align their processes to meetor
presented the results of a survey of engineering study abroad programs thatgave light to some best practices and assessment methods of undergraduate internationalexperiences. Lohmann et al.9 described a quasi-experimental research effort to measure theeffectiveness of study abroad programs using an instrument developed by the InterculturalCommunications Institute10. The Handbook of Intercultural Competence11 acknowledges,however, that developing reliable instruments for this complex construct is challenging due tothe influence of so many external factors and recognizes the efforts of few institutions, includingLohmann et al.9, in measuring impact. Further, Deardoff11 is an advocate of triangulation inwhich assessment instruments are complemented by
to the voice of the customer to address marketing issues: Page 24.109.6Listening to the voice of the customers is one of the best practices that proved successful in ourapplied research. Since numerous six sigma projects have been discussed in the literature, thistechnique could be implemented in the Engineering Management curriculum at both theundergraduate and graduate levels. One caveat is important. General Electric and others thathave embraced six sigma projects have found the revolutionary changes leading to productinnovations diminish over time. Perhaps a systems approach works best by strategicallyseparating innovations into two
Paper ID #17277How to Design Lean Six Sigma Simulation Games for Online LearningDr. Ertunga C Ozelkan, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Ertunga C. Ozelkan, Ph.D., is Associate Professor of Systems Engineering & Engineering Management, and the Associate Director of the Center for Lean Logistics and Engineered Systems at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Before joining academia, Dr. Ozelkan worked for i2 Technologies, a leading supply chain software vendor and for Tefen USA, a systems design and industrial engineering consulting firm. Dr. Ozelkan holds a Ph.D. degree in Systems and Industrial Engineering
appropriateinfrastructure in place, and ensuring that faculty receive formal training in distance educationmethods and technology 20.Considerable research has focused on assessing distance education practices, and a number ofpublications have examined this topic in terms of what faculty can do to improve the educationalexperience for students: “What determines the success of distance teaching is the extent to whichthe institution and the individual instructor are able to provide the appropriate opportunity for,and quality of, dialogue between teacher and learner, as well as appropriately structured learningmaterials” 15, p. 6. However, tension can also exist between faculty and instructional designpersonnel. Whereas the ideal relationship would be one of
business process; (3) BPR tries to achieve major goals or dramaticperformance improvements; (4) IT is a critical enabler of BPR; and (5) organizational changesand human issues are critical enabler of BPR and must be managed accordingly16. We built ourBPR course around these five elements and specially tailored our curriculum to address the needto produce EM graduates who can work effectively at the interface between technology,management, and engineering.The Stevens BPR CourseThe BPR course provides knowledge on BPR and its main concepts; the technologies and thestrategies for implementing business transformation; and best practices on BPR. It emphasizesthe role of BPR in managing technology and the engineering functions. The course covers
Science (Summa Cum Laude). Prior to UNL, she was a professor at Bellevue University (Bellevue, Nebraska) for 26 years. She is an officer in the Engineering Leadership Development (LEAD) and Engineering Management (EMD) divisions of ASEE, and also active in the American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM).Ms. Yaoling Wang, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Yaoling Wang is an Instructional Designer at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Yaoling works with faculty and staff in the College of Engineering on both online and face-to-face course design. She assists instructors in implementing Evidence-Based Practices, developing instructional resources, and employing innovative instructional technologies to enhance
Paper ID #7050Evaluation of Perceptual Changes in an Engineering Sales ProgramDr. David Paul Sly, Iowa State University Dr. Dave Sly is a Professor of Practice within the Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering department. He is a registered Professional Engineer with B.A., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Industrial En- gineering, as well as an M.B.A. in Marketing from Iowa State University. In addition to teaching, Dr. Sly is president of Proplanner, an Industrial Engineering software company located in the ISU Research Park. For the past five years, Dr. Sly has worked extensively with business and academia on the
engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and with his collaborators he has received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Dr. Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University at West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is CATME Managing Director and the recipient of several NSF awards for research in engineering education and a research associate at Purdue University
(SDSU). The case study presented in this paper demonstrates howapplication of engineering management and quality improvement tools, such as Kaizen and Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, along with an enhanced approach to our commonly used teachingobservation process contributed to improved instructor’s outcomes.Formative versus Summative Teaching ObservationObservations of teaching can take the form of summative or formative evaluation, which servedifferent purposes for the faculty member being observed. The Iowa State Center for Excellencein Learning and Teaching2 has published a literature review, and statement of best practices, insummative peer evaluation of teaching, that is, where that evaluation plays a role in personneldecisions such as
as state agencies orprofessional associations.”11Due to this increasing demand and limited resources, certificates may not be free in the future,however. [Berkeley] is considering whether to charge a small fee that could vary depending onstudents’ means.”10Impacts on Colleges and UniversitiesThe long term impact will be interesting in terms of researching how universities enhance theirunderstanding of how people learn through online education and how students can be graded,especially through evaluations that don't require relatively simple scoring techniques from multi-ple choice tests, for example.35Online education could greatly affect how colleges offer higher education, particularly at thegraduate level.11 Universities such as the
(US based) and(International based) will need to work together. Now, more than twenty Universities from US,Germany, Switzerland, Japan, China, countries of Latin America are part of ME310community. It is unique opportunity to work on real challenges from Industry. ME310 projecthas length 9 months, mostly graduate level oriented and provided significant interculturalexperience for participants. ME310 course dynamic characteristics are also part of researchconducted at Stanford DesignX Lab, conducted at ME310 loft and Design Observatory (DO) atCenter for Design Research [9]. Design Observatory is a core instrument for conductingresearch in the field of design theory and methodology and created with the goal of conductingdesigner’s information
solving abusiness problem, instead of just blindly doing analysis with no application for the client.[3]Once an analysis is complete, the information must be presented either in writing or in person toa client. Therefore, it is important for analysts to have the ability to communicate the results ofan analysis in a way that can influence decisions. However, this is the portion of training thatsome analysts, like LaBarr[3] and Starbuck [10], think needs additional attention and training foryoung statisticians. Nonetheless, the best communication in the world will not help if thesenovices do not understand the basic theories and methodology behind the analysis; therefore allskills should be developed and practiced simultaneously throughout the
Innovationcapstone course within both the 595.793 Applied Innovation for Technical ProfessionalsEngineering Management and Technical 595.794 Experiential Innovation – Moving from Concept toManagement graduate degree programs. SustainmentThe course is designed to give students a 595.802Directed Studies in Technical Managementdeep understanding of various technical 595.803Independent Study in Technical Managementexecutive roles using a combination oflearning methods, ranging fromframework-based concepts to case-based application of the concepts in a simulatedbusiness/technical leader environment—essentially providing students an opportunity to practicethe senior
this process continue to grow andexcel. Notice that Category 7 appears to imply a combination of both technology innovation andbusiness results. In practice however; most organizations treat their Research and Developmentefforts coupled with marketing considerations, but essentially independent from the businessgrowth model for their core business units. This practical observation resulting from reviewingmore than 1000 Tennessee organizations over the past 20 years, underscores the gap identified in Page 26.297.3the relevant literature section of this article.It is also noteworthy that the 2014 Baldrige criteria place an increased emphasis on the
Engineering Education Inno- vation Center, the First-Year program serves approximately 1,800 students annually in courses organized to ensure student success through rigorous academics in a team-based environment. His responsibilities include operations, faculty recruiting, curriculum management, student retention, and program assess- ment. Merrill received his Ph.D. in instructional design and technology from the Ohio State University in 1985, and has an extensive background in public education, corporate training, and contract research. He has made frequent presentations at conferences held by the American Society for Engineering Edu- cation (ASEE) and its affiliate conference Frontiers in Education (FIE). He is part of
-friendly workforce development on-line classroom tailored to specific opportunities forstudent improvement.The consulting team began by interviewing graduating seniors who had recently taken theWorkKeys assessment. They expressed their frustrations with finding specific lessons buriedamongst thousands of pages across nearly two-dozen PDFs with no indices or tables of contents.This required the students to open each PDF in order and scroll through every page until finallyidentifying the desired lesson. This was an extremely time-consuming process for the studentsespecially those without high-speed internet access at home.Rather than immediately seeking a solution, the team was instructed to first conductbenchmarking research of best practices in
equitable and effective distribution of donated food to the food insecure at risk population [7]. Another study performed a literature review of research studies that modeled an environmentally-conscious supply chain design to support food security [8]. A study applied a system-of-system approach to provide a formal policy deployment framework to address global challenges, such as the food crisis [9]. Another author provided a literature review of logistics best practices for regional food systems, where food access is provided on a geographical close regional level. [10] An additional literature review identified studies in the areas of reverse logistics, closed loop and sustainability in the food supply chain [11]. The University of Dayton