their own experience, and which of the reflective practices they have continued to use.We report elsewhere16 on the reflective practices that students found valuable and continued touse after the class.When we designed the course, we did not anticipate writing these papers, and so did not organizethe course in order to do research; our goal was to teach effectively. Thus, we only haveanecdotal evidence about the causes for student learning or the impact of conflict in particular ontheir learning.Comparing our course with previous instances of it is difficult because we taught it in a verydifferent way. We used many “unusual” techniques, including reflective techniques, 2-hourclass sessions, teaching with our mouths shut, devoting almost one
. Watson teaches computer science and software engineering courses as an associate professor at National University (La Jolla, CA) while continuing research in the areas of human and machine cognition. He holds a joint doctoral degree in Education with emphasis on education technology and multicultural education from Claremont Graduate University and San© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Diego State University. His research work in metacognitive analysis has garnered a number of awards, including Phi Delta Kappa's 2002 Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation, and the top Award in Educational Research for the California State University. Dr. Watson has a B.A. in Economics
innovative businessmodels. Based on their potential to create new key business applications, better products and2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference, April 6-7, 2018 – University of the District of Columbiasustainable environment, the estimated potential economic impacts of identified disruptivetechnologies is between $14 trillion and $33 trillion a year in 2025 [7].This paper is organized as follows. Section two of this paper will provide brief descriptions ofthe differences between sustainable and disruptive technologies. Section three will providedescription of key disruptive technologies and brief analysis of their economic and socialimpacts. Section four will provide a road map for creating courses to provide students withessential skill
a very advanced topic for the railroad industry. There are many safety and power issuesthat the research team examined. The railroad industry wanted to utilize the fuel cell as anauxiliary source of energy, thus, employing a smaller, more efficient diesel power plant toprovide power. The net result would be a cost and fuel savings over various regions and terrains.The design team determined that an SOFC (solid oxide) cell was best for this purpose. On boardgasification of biodiesel will be used for the fuel. Major components include SOFC, gasifier, gascleaning, heat exchangers for heat recovery/preheating and cooling. This cooling system has toremove heat from the fuel cell stack using bi-polar plates and remove heat from electric motorsand
Industrial EngineersYesenia Cruz, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez Yesenia Cruz is a graduate student working at the International Service Systems Research Lab in issues of complex systems for disaster relief. She is president of the Student chapter of INFORMS at the UPRM.Marta Rosa, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez Marta Rosa is a 4th year Industrial Engineering student at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez and is part of a group of undergrads that participates in opportunities for research at the IE department. Marta is a member of IIE.Alexandra Medina-Borja, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez Dr. Alexandra Medina-Borja is an assistant professor at the University of Puerto Rico at
material in a short time.Future research may include work that begins to reconsider the centuries-old curriculum thatcontinues to take precedence when educating engineers and consider ways to integrate leadershipmore heavily into this curriculum. More research is needed on how to successfully integrateleadership into the robust and heavily technical engineering curriculum and the best practices orpedagogies for teaching leadership to undergraduate engineering students.ConclusionThis study examined the experiences and perspectives of 14 civil engineering students related totheir undergraduate education, out-of-class involvement, and career development. Intervieweesdescribed their involvement in a variety of OOCAs, which was the most influential to
, the proposed research has the potential to broaden participationin STEM by increasing engagement, retention, and graduation of underrepresented minorities.Second, in building SocioTechnical Learning capacity, the research will also contribute to newapproaches for community centered solutions that leverage cultural assets of underrepresentedstudents and consider alternative knowledges in collaborative technology design, development,and implementation. As students graduate and enter the workforce, they carry with them thecapacity to respond to human and societal dimensions of technology in daily practices.3. Conceptual FrameworkThe literature characterizes multiple separate flavors of social learning and techno-centriclearning in the context of
] “Cybersecurity Curricula 2017 Curriculum Guidelines for Post-Secondary Degree Programs in Cybersecurity,” Dec. 2017.[12] “ABET Approves Accreditation Criteria for Undergraduate Cybersecurity Programs.” https://www.abet.org/abet-approves-accreditation-criteria-for-undergraduate-cybersecurity- programs/ (accessed Jan. 15, 2021).[13] D. H. Tobey, R. A. Gandhi, A. B. Watkins, and C. W. O’Brien, “Competency is Not a Three Letter Word A Glossary Supporting Competency-based Instructional Design in Cybersecurity,” Cybersecurity Skills Journal: Practice and Research, vol. 20, pp. 32–38, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/download/57509751/Tobey__Gandhi__Watkins___OBrien_2018_Co
of Engineering. Cambridge UK.James Clarke.[23] Eck, R. W and W.J. Wilhelm (1979) Guided design: an approach to education for practice in engineering.Engineering Education, February, 191- 198.[24]loc.cit[25] Wales, C. E and R. Stager (1986). Series of articles in Vol 62 of Engineering Education. Wales, C. E.,Nardi, A and R. Stager (1986). Professional Decision Making. Morgantown. WV. Center for Guided Design,West Virginia University.[26]Wales, C. H and R. A. Stager (1990). Thinking with Equations. Problem Solving in Math and Science.Morgantown, WV. Center for Guided Design, West Virginia University.[27] Heywood, J (1996). An engineering approach to teaching decision making skills in schools using anengineering heuristic. Proceedings Frontiers
Student Exchange, Faculty Exchange, and Faculty Collaboration – both instructionand research and development. We then share some of the key characteristics that make eachpossible and successful. Key factors, such as timetable matching and course equivalencymapping for accreditation and time-to-degree considerations, will be described and exampleprocedures and documents to these ends will be shared.This paper provides, not a conceptual exploration of what might be, but rather a practical, reality-based sharing of best practices that derive from our two institutions’ more than two year effort toevolve sustainable linkages. We are reporting on lessons learned from the real experience ofadministrators, faculty and students, not only exchanging but
practical experienceduring the pre-licensure and post-licensure periods.One of the next crucial issues associated with this initiative to raise the bar in civil engineeringeducation is, “Who should teach the BOK?” Currently, the model is that all tenured faculty musthave a Ph.D. and if they are teaching a design course, they need a professional license orequivalent education and experience. It is extremely difficult to find a faculty member who is anoutstanding researcher, has extensive academic credentials, and possesses experience inprofessional practice. What is the ideal combination? Must the person teaching design havemore than just the minimum number of years of practical experience necessary to sit for the PE?Or should these faculty have
(USA). Dr. Ayala is currently serving as Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology Department, Frank Batten College of Engineering and Technology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA. Prior to joining ODU in 2013, Dr. Ayala spent three years as a Postdoctoral Researcher at University of Delaware where he expanded his knowledge on simulation of multiphase flows while acquiring skills in high performance parallel computing and scientific computation. Before that, Dr. Ayala hold a faculty position at Universidad de Oriente at Mechanical Engineering Department where he taught and developed graduate and undergraduate courses for a number of subjects such as Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer
environmental engineering, a depart- mental Scholars program allowing highly qualified students and accelerated program to earn their MSCE in addition to their BS degree, the interdisciplinary ideaLAB promoting innovation in engineering, and the cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs. Fridley has advised 32 masters and doctoral students to completion. His former students have moved into leadership positions in industry, public service, and academia.Dr. W. Edward Back, University of Alabama Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Director, Center for Sustainable Infrastructure
Engineering (NAE), the National Science Foundation(NSF), and the National Research Council (NRC) have charged engineering schools to prepareengineers for global workforces.3-5 The American Society for Engineering Education’s (ASEE)Green Report (2010) also calls for engineering colleges to adapt curricula and programs to Page 26.874.3incorporate “an appreciation of different cultures and business practices, and the understandingthat the practice of engineering is now global.”6 Additionally, ABET requires engineeringprograms to demonstrate that their graduates have “the broad education necessary to understandthe impact of engineering solutions in a
processes of human interaction facilitation via digital network-based processes are the following:1. The process by which mathematical, graphical, and descriptive programs can be conveyed/displayed.2. The process by which an individual can initiate the facilitation process by indicating/describing their interests/response.3. The process by which an individual can locate information that has been made available by others.4. The process by which national language and other borders/barriers across which there is a need for such facilitation of human interactions are bridged.Traditionally, engineering education has been content-centered and design-oriented. It alsoprimarily involves problem solving skills. Traditional
content areas. The mainfoundation the constructivist scenario is built upon states that authentic learning must be student-centered and meaningful and must encourage students to engage in real-world experiences, thusallowing them to go further in their learning and education.III. DesignThe basic structure of the workshop involved sharing information and materials with the teachersduring the morning sessions. This structure builds on known ideas about infusing technologyinto the instructional techniques of teachers, as many educators are experiencing atransformation in the ideology of “best-practices” as they once knew it9. Appendix I highlightsthe schedule developed for the workshop activities.Each morning, the workshop began with a group
Paper ID #32867Gendered Experience of Engineering Knowledge in Military Technology ClassDr. Jae Hoon Lim, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Jae Hoon Lim is a Professor of Research Methods at the University of North Carolina Charlotte. Dr. Lim’s research explores the intersection of gender, race, and class in STEM education and highlights the dialogical process of identity construction across various groups of underrepresented minorities in STEM fields. She has served as a co-PI and qualitative evaluator for multiple federal grants supporting engineering program innovation and diverse workforce development. Her
AC 2012-4816: LEVERAGING BUILDING INFORMATION MODELINGTECHNOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGE-MENT EDUCATIONDr. Namhun Lee, East Carolina UniversityDr. Carrie S. Dossick, University of Washington Carrie Sturts Dossick is an Associate Professor in the Department of Construction Management in the College of Built Environments, and the Executive Director of the Pacific Northwest Center for Construc- tion Research and Education, where she has been developing a new course for Integrated Project Delivery called ARCH404/CM404 Integrated Design-Build Studio. Dossick’s main research interests focus on emerging collaboration methods and technologies such as Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) and Building Information
Abstract The low recruitment and high attrition rate of women in engineering is well documented.Women account for only twenty percent of the entering class cohort, and drop out at a rate tenpercent higher than their male counterparts.1 Although in the past twenty years women havemade inroads into many fields that were male-dominated, women have made little or no progressin engineering.1 This paper has three goals. First, this paper will review existing literature that identifiescurrent and alternative theories about why engineering programs do not retain female students.Second, this paper will synthesize motivational psychology research into a best-practice modelfor engineering programs. Last, we hypothesize that photovoltaic
. Davis illuminates the nature of professional engineering;“knowing engineering ethics is as much a part of knowing how to engineer as knowing how tocalculate stress or design a circuit is. Indeed, insofar as engineering is a profession, knowing howto calculate stress or design a circuit is in part knowing what the profession allows, forbids, orrequires.”1In this paper we look at ethics across the curriculum and implementing engineering ethicseducation via the case methodology. A brief presentation on the history of engineering educationis followed by a discussion of ethics in engineering education. Case methodology is examinedincluding a look at sources for cases and case research. Finally, the two-stage engineering ethicseducation model used by
Center for Infrastructure and Transportation Studies. He is agraduate of Carnegie Mellon University (BSEE, 1971), the University of Delaware (MEE, 1976), and theUniversity of Pennsylvania (Ph.D., CE, 1984). He is a past Vice-Chair and Secretary of the ASCE DepartmentHeads Council Executive Committee.STACY EISENMAN: Ms. Eisenman is a graduate of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (BSCE, 2002). She iscurrently pursing her M.S. in civil engineering at Rensselaer and plans to continue her education with a Ph.D. intransportation. She is a member of Tau Beta Pi and Chi Epsilon. Ms. Eisenman was a participant in the AdmiralCombs Design Retreat in 2001 and an Assistant Director of the retreat in 2002
the Analog Discovery Board helped them learn. An increase of studentsexpressing interest in graduate programs and research was also noted [6].Expanding on the LiaB and Mobile Studio concept, we wanted to investigate the feasibility ofimplementing a similar structure at West Virginia University. What difficulties must beovercome with integrating into existing infrastructure? What resources are best situated for theuse of the TA? What effects does this method have on student learning outcomes? How dostudents’ respond to this approach?WVU LiaB SetupThe setup chosen for this pilot investigation included: Digilent Analog Discovery 2 Board, BNCAdapter Board, BNC Oscilloscope x1/x10 Probes (Pair), Shielded USB cable, and WaveForms2015 software [14
Innovation and also on Virtu- alized Active Learning. He has completed over 275 technical and educational publications, 47 funded projects as PI/Co-I, and 22 Ph.D. graduates. He serves as the founding Director of the Evaluation and Proficiency Center (EPC), is an iSTEM Fellow, and the Digital Learning Faculty Fellow at UCF. He received the UCF university-level Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Award twice, Teaching Initia- tive Program Award four times, Research Initiative Award twice, Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching Award, Advisor of the Year, Distinguished Research Lecturer, Marchioli Collective Impact Award, the Effective Practice Award from Online Learning Consortium, and the Joseph M. Biedenbach Outstanding
co-authored a text book chapter and research papers on machining of composites. He has a di- verse industrial experience for 27 years, in design, research and manufacturing of electro mechanical systems, such as design of various types of gear and gear boxes, antennas and light and heavy fabricated structures, for communication, TV telecast, natural disasters management and Telemedicine application. Dr PS, designed and manufactured various types of antenna’s weighing from 200 pounds to 100,000 pounds. He was also actively involved in configuring the antenna controls and selection of motor and motor controllers. Dr PS, has advised senior/capstone projects over 5 years. Has reviewed papers for ASEE, SAMPE, ASME and
are entrepreneurs that coulddevelop and market simple economical solutions addressing basic needs on a large scale.Technology Incubation Center [32] of NUST in Pakistan is an example of university businessincubators which can facilitate university graduates to develop their innovative business ideasand transition into forming enterprises. Engineers having a sense of social responsibility areneeded - who are committed to work towards alleviating poverty and empowering theunderprivileged. This requires a unique worldview for being an engineer that a student isunlikely to develop through the traditional engineering education. Alternate educational modelssuch as service learning [33] has the potential to allow students to develop competencies
. Narayanan Komerath, Professor in AE and director of the John J. Harper wind tunnel, leads the Georgia TechExperimental Aerodynamics Group (EAG). He has taught over 1600 AEs in 19 courses in the past 15 years. He is aprincipal researcher in the Rotorcraft Center of Excellence at Georgia Tech since its inception in 1982. He is anAssociate Fellow of AIAA. He has won GT awards for Outstanding Graduate Student Development, OutstandingPh.D. thesis advisor, and Most Valuable Professor (GTAE Class of '91). EAG research projects have enjoyed theparticipation of nearly 100 undergraduates over the past 14 years. EAG is a leader in multidisciplinary team-oriented projects, including the Aerospace Digital Library Project at Georgia Tech: http
generation with intuitive editing tools like Camtasia opens the door to immersive, interdisciplinarylearning experiences.This paper aims to fill that gap by documenting the deliberate integration of AI tools and Camtasia intoengineering education activities that promote entrepreneurial thinking and mindset development,grounded in the KEEN 3C framework.3. MethodologyFigure 2 provides a visual methodological approach for this study that centers on integrating AI-assistedtools with Camtasia to facilitate mindset-driven STEAM content creation in alignment with the KEENframework. The process follows a structured instructional design model that emphasizes student-led,project-based learning, complemented by coaching, multimedia production, and
Pittsburgh.Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan Aileen is faculty in Engineering Education and Biomedical Engineering. Previously, Aileen was the Associate Director for Academics in the Center for Entrepreneurship and was responsible for building the Program in Entrepreneurship for UM undergraduates, co-developing the masters level entrepreneur- ship program, and launching the biomedical engineering graduate design program. Aileen has received a number of awards for her teaching, including the Thomas M. Sawyer, Jr. Teaching Award, the UM ASEE Outstanding Professor Award and the Teaching with Sakai Innovation Award. Prior to joining the University of Michigan faculty, she worked in the private sector gaining
participant’s design outcomes [10][11]. Further still, many papersaddress different ideation methods and their efficacy [12] [13]. However, all previouslyreferenced papers follow participants who all have similar engineering and problem-solvingexperience. This paper not only addresses the different ideation methods but also compares theoutcomes between student and practicing engineers. By understanding the importance of learningdifferent ideation methods and detailing how to use them effectively, this paper describes how tooptimize problem-solving to best demonstrate the competencies that employers are seeking. This paper and associated research is for a Senior Honors Project within the engineeringdiscipline. The inspiration behind this project
[8].For those students who have interest, are accepted, and enrolled, the graduation rate of UnitedStates engineering students has remained steady for decades. Of all students who enroll asengineering majors approximately 50% will graduate, with a disproportionately high attritionrate for women and minorities [9].Understanding and addressing student success factors is a critical element to supporting diverseand thriving engineering graduates. Among the main factors [9] found for students leavingengineering were classroom and academic climate, self-efficacy and self-confidence, and raceand gender issues. Academic success is not solely based on abilities and aptitudes; it is alsoinfluenced by sense of belonging in the academic environment [10