, team sports, distance running, and watching movies.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West LafayetteMr. Paul David Mathis, Engineering Education Paul Mathis is a PhD student in the school of Engineering Education and a council member for ASEE student chapter at Purdue University. He has a bachelors degree in Physical Science and a Masters in Education Curriculum. His areas of interest are design, innovation, creativity and improving skills of future engineers. pmathis@purdue.edu. Page 24.831.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014I’m Not the Creative Type: Barriers to
faculty advisor to the EDDP’s Engineering Club and the Society of Women Engineers student organization. She also teaches a career planning class for engineers and a first-year engineering course. From 2006-2008, she was the Director for the Preparing Outstanding Women for Engineering Roles–POWER– Summer Camp. Mrs. McCormick received her Masters of Science in Technology and Bachelors of Science in Engineering from the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI.Ms. Terri L. Talbert-Hatch, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Terri Talbert-Hatch, Ed.D. Assistant Dean for Student Services Purdue School of Engineering & Technol- ogy, IUPUI Dr. Talbert-Hatch oversees the Student Services Office
assistant professor in the department of computer graphics technology of Pur- due university. He received his Ph.D. degree in the areas of human-computer interaction, information visualization, and visual analytics from the School of Interactive Arts and Technology at Simon Fraser University (SFU) in Canada. He earned Bachelor degree of Engineering from the Tsinghua University (China), and a Master of Science degree in Information Technology from SFU. His research covers inter- disciplinary domains of Information Visualization, Visual Analytics, Digital Media, and Human Computer Interaction. He seeks to design, model, and construct new forms of interaction in visualization and system design, by which the system can
conference papers. He has mentored four doctoral students, eleven masters students, 25 undergraduate research students, and eleven undergraduate senior design project teams; over 300 K-12 teachers and 95 high school student researchers; and eighteen undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 53 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he directs K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that currently enrich the STEM education of over 2,000 students annually.Dr. Magued G. Iskander P.E., Polytechnic Institute of New York University Dr. Magued Iskander is a professor of Civil and Urban Engineering at NYU-Poly. Dr. Iskander is a recip- ient of NSF CAREER award, Chi Epsilon (Civil Engineering Honor Society) Metropolitan
Center Inc., Worcester, MA.3 Coulton, R., & Udell, G. G. (1976). The national science foundation’s innovation center--An experiment in training potential entrepreneurs and innovators. Journal of small business management, 21(3), 11-20.4 Chin, T. M. (2009). Overseas R&D Center and Innovation Performance: The View of the Host Country’s Location Advantages. Master, National Tsing Hua University Taiwan.5 Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, USA.6 Nielsen, H. (2010).Universities in Regional Systems of Innovation: Has the Rural Research Center in Höfn Enhanced the Interaction Between the University and Local Actors?.Master’s thesis
, Electrical, Industrial, Mechanical, and Software),Engineering Technology (Mechanical, Electrical), Business, Nursing, and TechnicalCommunications. We are predominantly an undergraduate institution; we offer aninterdisciplinary graduate program leading to a Masters of Science in Engineering degree, aswell as masters programs in Environmental Engineering, Structural Engineering, andEngineering Management, but offer no doctoral programs. Since we do not offer degrees inmathematics or the sciences, these types of courses are offered through support departments.As we review the overview recommendations for the future of mechanical engineering programsset forth in this paper, we face some decisions and challenges that are likely common for thesmall
Feedback Control Systems, 4th Ed., Oxford.[9] Dorsey, Continuous and Discrete Control Systems, Mc Graw Hill.[10] Goodman, et al., Control System Design, Prentice Hall[11] C.H. Choi, “Enriching a modern control theory course with computer simulation,” Proceedings of the 1999International Conference on Simulation in Engineering Education, Society for Computer Simulation, pp. 77-82.[12] D. Frederick and J. Chow, Feedback Control Problems using MATLAB and the Control System Toolbox,Brooks/Cole Thomson Learning, 2000.[13] D. Hanselman and B. Littlefield, Mastering MATLAB 6, Prentice Hall, 2001.[14] J.B. Dabney and T.L. Harman, Mastering SIMULINK, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.Biographical informationDr. Choi received his Ph.D. degree in electrical and
has unfolded in two phases. The first phase, M3 (Motivation,Mentoring, and Manipulatives) Hybrid-Electric Vehicle Educational Highway, wasfunded for four years. The ongoing second phase is commonly referred to as the NSFGREATT project, whose full title is, Track 2, NSF GK-12: Graduate Research and Page 10.310.1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationEducation in Advanced Transportation Technology (GREATT). Both projects placeSTEM graduate students currently in Ph.D. and Masters programs involving research
degree is not in a technical discipline, but in management for engineers. That iswhere engineering-management programs come into play.Engineering Management programs combine business and technology courses. The Master ofScience in Engineering Management (MSEM) is a graduate degree that combines the strengthsof a traditional MBA with a focus on engineering and technology. Courses are geared towardproviding students the best of both worlds. Not only do they have an opportunity to refine theirtechnical skills, but it is done in a management context.These programs include core courses like most MBA programs, such as project management,quality engineering, engineering economics, statistics and organizational behavior, but with atechnological stream
will better master the subject matter throughits immediate application in their enterprise project work and that further development andunderstanding of the material will come through both student interest and enterprise needs. Thispaper will discuss teaching methodologies, course curricula, and techniques used in the deliveryof these professional development courses, as well as assessment and student feedback.Successes and challenges associated with this unique component of the Enterprise Program willalso be discussed.I. Enterprise Program BackgroundIn the fall of 2000, Michigan Tech University introduced a new and innovative undergraduateeducational experience that provides students of all disciplines on campus, but especiallyengineering
Role of Axiomatic Design in Teaching Capstone Courses Edwin Odom, Steven Beyerlein, Christopher A. Brown, Daniel Drew, Lloyd Gallup, Sam Zimmerman, and Jeremy Olberding University of Idaho/Worcester Polytechnic InstituteAbstractHelping undergraduate engineering students learn effective design practices that are applicable tothe modern workplace is one of the most complex challenges of engineering education. Onestrategy to help students master open-ended design projects is to use a systematic process.However, students often want to jump past the front end of the design process and thiscompromises the quality of the final product. This paper examines the suitability of
given one five-week, one six-weekand one three-month design projects. The students are expected to apply familiarization,functionality and testing to their projects. Any design decision is expected to have the designtrinity at its foundation. We do not, however, expect the students to master these conceptsimmediately. By giving the students multiple projects they have the opportunity to learn fromtheir mistakes and to show continuous improvement in their application of the design trinity.The effectiveness of this approach has been demonstrated in several ways. Perhaps the mostcompelling measure comes from a student evaluation administered at the end of the year. Aspart of this evaluation students are asked to assess their own development in a
. Naghedolfeizi, “Survey of LabView Technologies for Building Web/Internet-Enabled Experimental Setups,” Proceedings of ASEE 2002 Annual Conference[4] M. E. Parten, “Using Virtual Instrumentation in a Measurements Laboratory,” Proceedings of ASEE 2003 Annual ConferenceBiographical InformationCARLO SAPIJASZKOCarlo Sapijaszko is the author and the designer of the eTCB system. He has earned a Masters of Engineering Degreefrom University of Calgary and is a registered Professional Engineer. Carlo has a combined 10 years of academicand industry experience. He has held the positions of Professor, Program Chair, and most recently, a Dean ofElectronics with DeVry University.GENEVIEVE I. SAPIJASZKOGenevieve Sapijaszko is an Associate
to a much weaker set of skills in this area. • Two groups in the 04-05 course have had problems obtaining materials from suppliers, as documented in their progress reports. One group has developed effective strategies both for persistently contacting the supply (ability to communicate – outcome g) and for wisely using the time to master the techniques needed for their project using less expensive, readily available material (learning new skills – i, and using modern tools, k). The other group has done little to prod the supplier and little to advance their project. Only the progress reports reflect the differences in the ways these two groups designed and conducted experiments in the face
completion of this project would lead to the creation of a pre-engineering program relationship with other universities within three years and our ownengineering technology-related Masters of Science degree offered through Bluefield StateCollege by the end of the five-years if adequately funded.CART will incorporate advances in science and engineering knowledge into coursesand laboratories by utilizing the latest digital tools for creating, exchanging, presentingand communicating architectural space utilization, schematic designs, presentations, andworking drawings. This activity is vital to the proper delivery of any state of the artarchitectural program curriculum. The CART-CMS webmaster will work with programfaculty to research and develop best
Educationhow to create question banks, how to operate the classroom communication system, how toelectronically link all questions to state and district standards, how to generate reports of classand individual performance (overall and by particular standards), how to use this equipment inconjunction with existing student data files and electronic gradebooks, how to assemble theclassroom communication system for classroom use, and special applications.Once the teachers have mastered these basics of the technology, they are very receptive toaddressing some of the associated pedagogical considerations. Particular emphasis is placed onhow teachers can effectively respond to the real-time feedback this technology provides.Finally, participating teachers
, pp. 31-38.3. Lowman, Joseph, “Mastering the Techniques of Teaching,” Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1995.4. Wankat, P.C., and F.S. Oreovicz, “Teaching Engineering,” McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1993.5. Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, “A Compendium of Best Teaching and LearningPrinciples for C&ME Faculty,” United States Military Academy, 2001.6. Welch, R.W., J.K. Hitt, J.L. Baldwin, D.J. Bentler, D.B. Clarke, S.P. Gross, “The ExCEEd Workshop:Hints to Successful Teaching,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, June 2001, Session 2793.7. http://www.asce.org/exceed
Education, 4th edition. Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education. 2. Evans, D. L., “Tools for Assessing Conceptual Understanding in the Engineering Sciences,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, November 6-9, 2002. 3. Hestenes, D., Wells, M. and Swackhamer, G., “Force Concept Inventory,” The Physics Teacher, 30, 159-166, 1992. 4. Streveler, R.A., Olds, B.M., Miller, R. L. & Nelson, M.A. (June, 2003). “Using a Delphi Study to Identify the Most Difficult Concepts for Students to Master in Thermal and Transport Science. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Nashville, TN
,engineering, architecture, agriculture, business and science. The primary focus of Cal Poly isundergraduate polytechnic education and the applied terminal masters degree. The hallmark of the CalPoly engineering education is the “learn by doing” philosophy that emphasizes laboratory experienceand industrial participation in the curricula.Alumni possess an unparalleled combination of analytical skill as well as teaming and laboratorycapability. Corporations find that our graduates possess a solid theoretical foundation as well as anappreciation for the application of theory to practice. Cal Poly has an earned reputation for graduatingengineers with two feet on the ground and two hands on the problem. The appreciation is fostered by
reasoning]; select [from among available options for expanding production capacity, and justify your choice]; critique [an essay, report, or article for accuracy and style].Levels 4–6 are known as the higher-level (or higher-order) thinking skills. All engineering instructors would say that they want their students to master higher-levelthinking skills, but in many cases their lectures and homework assignments focus almostexclusively on Level 3. Then, if they put a high-level question on an exam (to see if the students“know how to think”) and the students do poorly on it, they blame it on the students’ lack ofability or poor study habits. Their criticism is misdirected. The only way people acquire skills is through practice
October 2001 and charged it to “… develop, organize and execute a detailed plan for fullrealization of ASCE Policy Statement 465.” In November 2003, in recognition of the long-termnature of implementing Policy Statement 465, TCAP3 was changed to the Committee onAcademic Prerequisites for Professional Practice (CAP3), a permanent Board-level committee.Policy Statement 465’s essence is that ASCE supports the concept of a master’s degree orequivalent as a requirement for licensure and the practice of civil engineering at the professionallevel. CAP3 developed an implementation master plan for which the Body of Knowledge (BOK)was the foundation. As a result, the BOK Committee (See Appendix) was formed in May 2002and charged to
, teamwork, projectmanagement and leadership.1 One way these skills could be acquired and enhanced is byparticipation in student project teams such as the concrete canoe and steel bridge teams andcompetitions. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Master Builders, Inc., and theAmerican Institute of Steel Construction sponsor these competitions annually. Approximately Page 8.243.1“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”200 teams from civil engineering and civil engineering technology programs across the US
increasingnumber and difficulty of the engineering course work to be done, in a relatively short timeand within the framework of a relevant, formal technical education, the priorities are setquickly. The student chooses to forego the cultural aspects of a civilized education for thetemporary riggers of the specialty training that must be mastered. In short, the culturaleducation must wait until after graduation when the engineer has more time for these moreearthly (dare it be called trivial) pursuits. There is even now a recently publishedcollection of short stories entitled “ The Best American Non-Required Reading” (emphasisis the author’s) which would imply that even the more liberal education must make
integrate the entire undergraduate curriculum via a network of interconnectedmodules.The ultimate success of IT in the classroom hinges to great extent on its ability to addresschallenges that may be difficult to solve without the enabling technology. One clear potential forusing information technology to improve upon traditional lecture classes is to use it to promotecollaborative learning19 and active learning12,13. Specifically, using information technology,sophisticated simulated environments can be created that allow students to address realisticproblem scenarios in a hands-on fashion using domain knowledge mastered in the relevant Page
workplace demands,” “college coursework, majors, or advanceddegrees,” and “social stuff: jokes, stories, personal news.” Upper division undergraduatesselected “job hunting and interviewing” more often than others. This makes sense as they arenearing graduation and most likely beginning to think about job searching. Ph.D. studentsselected “industry workplace, culture, values” and “differences between academia and industry”more often than others. This pairing is not surprising either; both of these topics would helpgraduate students gather information about upcoming decisions. Masters, and Ph.D. studentswere more likely to indicate “balancing a career and other interests, family, etc.” Mastersstudents, and to a lesser extent upper division
Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationresources used or available for the students, my teaching is based on the belief that my role asan instructor is still much more relevant than being a mere presence in the classroom,especially for undergraduate students, as some advocate. Technology is used only forimproving the educational process. In the past, technology changes were less drastic and there was more time allowed forindividuals to learn and master the newest technology. The Internet literature is full ofsimilar examples, from the invention of press to television. These days the new requirementsand the economic restrictions have a more dynamic nature. Savater 1, a Spanish philosopher,has mentioned that almost
tools for design cannot be taught in a traditionalclassroom. Also the CAD and other computer-based packages have many features and havebecome increasingly complex. Mastering the advanced tools is critical because the environmentsare changing fast. Lectures and demonstrations cannot help students learn advanced CAD/CAMtools. To learn advanced software, the best way to learn is by “doing” and “experiencing,” notjust “seeing” 8, 9.History of Continuous InnovationOne of our broad goals was to energize the undergraduate curriculum in the CAD area. Initially,we experimented with versions of the course where there was a significant amount of theory butlittle practice. During our interactions with industry, we noticed that engineers withundergraduate
, NT etc. The free version of "Real Player" ® does not runsmoothly at present, and the upgrade will cost the users approximately $20.00. The new version ofQuick Time that is part of the new Windows operating systems is supposed to work for SMI files, butour attempts to make it play have thus far failed. For Windows 98 on down, the present software worksflawlessly.To further facilitate the development of electronic media for on-line courses, we have generated a checklist of things professors need to do to produce a finished product. The following is a suggested outline ofmaterials the professor needs to compile on his or her own to master an electronic textbook:1. TITLE PAGE – Show credits, descriptive title, author's name, and all vital