, elective courses. In addition, students are able to select PSE-related options in twoof their fourth-year required courses, covering laboratory experiences and a design project. Intotal, the PSE stream includes five required courses, two required courses that have PSE-directedoptions, and three elective courses. The next section describes the allocation of topics to therequired and elective courses.2.2 Division Between Required and Elective PSE TopicsWhile, we would like all students to master a wide range of PSE topics, we must be realisticabout the time the students have for PSE in the core curriculum. Therefore, we have selectedrequired topics that are needed by essentially all practicing engineers and elective topics that arewidely applied in
. Ongoingwork will refine the existing activities, as well as test the effectiveness of new activities for Page 11.1390.2thermodynamics courses designed to reduce misconceptions about entropy.IntroductionRecent research emphasizes the critical importance of conceptual learning. Indeed, of three keyfindings in the National Research Council’s study on how people learn [1], the first finding is theneed to draw out and engage student preconceptions and the second finding highlights the needfor students to understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework. In short,meaningful learning in science and engineering requires that students master
enrollments have been strong. A master of engineering in integratedmicrosystems degree program was developed so that industry professionals would have afocused set of coursework, while providing flexibility that would permit custom tailoring of thetotal course package to serve specific needs. Distance education dissemination of the courses aswhole courses, or as discrete portions of course materials, was intended to be available; that goalhas been realized. The core courses originate at the University of Michigan (UM), and havebeen distributed to Michigan State University (MSU), Michigan Technological University(MTU), Howard University (HU), University of Puerto Rico – Mayaguez (UPRM), and WesternMichigan University (WMU). Rochester Institute of
at the core of SDT. Since SDT focuses on understanding individualmotivation and development in specific contexts, which for this study will be FYEPs, it is anappropriate framework for this work that examines GTAs’ personal perspectives on theirteaching practice competence beliefs. For this particular paper, we will only focus on the need ofcompetence because we believe it serves as the foundation for research on the otherpsychological needs.It is often said that if you can teach something, you have truly mastered it. This notion ofmastery at a fundamental level relates to the SDT component of competence. SDT suggests thatpeople act in ways that satisfy competence needs, and therefore, it is important to understandwhat competence means in
Technology (ETEC), with at least 50 sustainingenrollments of 200+ students in fall 2010 according to ASEE data. On the other hand, since the1980’s only about 14 institutions have created master’s degrees in ETEC. Some M.S. programshave evolved from Master of Science in Technology (M.S.T.) or Master of Technology (M.T.)versions. One fundamental question posed in the debate is whether ETEC curricula rise to thenecessary scientific rigor of traditional M.S. degrees. This paper asserts that the M.S. in ETECshould stand on equal footing with M.S. programs in any other field and particularly inengineering when viewed from the perspective of (i) the scientific level of graduate ETECcourses; (ii) the roles that ETEC graduates perform in the engineering
singlecourse or spread between many courses will be discussed as a methodology into how oneprogram is looking at meeting ABET accreditation requirements for students seeking anaccredited degree at the masters degree level without an accredited degree at thebachelors degree level. Page 15.1067.21.0 IntroductionThe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) has recognized the lack of certainknowledge and skills among recent graduates, while at the same time engineeringprograms are facing pressure to decrease credit hour requirements in undergraduatecurriculums. ASCE formed a committee to study and develop a Civil Engineering Bodyof Knowledge (BOK)1 to document
effective and efficient part manufacturing methods and complete production systems for commercial and industrial products. The common theme for students is mastering process, production system and enterprise design procedures that are applicable to any product in any industry. Graduates have been successful in manufacturing enterprises that produce virtually every type of product -- literally, from spacecraft to foodstuffs. In addition to traditional courses, Dr. Wells leads innovation teams in two engineering venues: product realization and transforming laboratory research into commercial products. Dr. Wells’ active research lies in orthopedic implants, micro-assembly, micro-machining, circuit
Graduate and Professional Studies,and Dr. Skipper assumed the program leadership responsibilities of marketing, recruiting, coursedevelopment, and operations. In Academic Year 2011-2012, the program continued to grow,reaching 180 course enrollments across the fall, spring and summer semesters. A secondgraduating class of 16 students completed their studies in May 2012. Students and employerscontinued to find great value in this program resulting in 285 enrollments in AY 2012-2013 and27 MSPM graduates in May 2013.At this time, The Citadel’s Master of Science in Project Management (MSPM) is the only suchprogram in the State of South Carolina. In recognition of the continued growth of this uniqueprogram, and to provide a clear path for future
member.Each professor then printed out the emailed form and followed other specific guidelines thatwere provided. It was required for each school to print out a “master” form and not use this onebut make copies out of that one, so that all copies would have the exact alignment with the“master” copy. When we collected the completed surveys back, we used the “master” copy asthe answer key and according to the “master” copy’s alignment, Remark software was able to Page 23.24.8score all the other forms students had completed in a particular institution. Because each schoolhad a different printer and each master copy was printed out from a different
American Water Works Association http://www.awwa.org/ECUK British Engineering Council http://www.engc.org.uk/ENSMP European Federation of National Engineering Societies http://www.cri.ensmp.fr/feani/ESA Ecological Society of America http://www.esa.org/FMB Federation of Master Builders http://www.fmb.org.ukFMS Federation of Materials Societies http://www.fms.orgHKIE Hong Kong Institute of Engineers http://www.hkie.org.hk/HFES Human Factors and Ergonomics Society http://www.hfes.orgICE The Institution of Civil Engineers
grades and objectives must first be established.There are at least two reasons that there may be no concrete link between course gradesand course objectives. First, after faculty set up (or are handed) objectives for aparticular course, they may not refer back to them while conducting the course, resultingin assignments and tests which may have little to do with the stated course objectives.Secondly, even if the instructor does teach with a view to the course objectives, it is notunreasonable to find students who fail to master one or more of the stated objectives of acourse yet still manage to pass the course. Further, it is conceivable that even in a classwith a Gaussian grade distribution centered on C to have a majority of students fail
Session 3275 So You’re a New Teacher – What Now? Captain Craig Quadrato United States Military AcademyIntroduction Teaching is not my regular job. Or at least it wasn’t. One of the wonderful opportunitiesin the Army is the chance to get selected as a rotating faculty member at The United StatesMilitary Academy (USMA) at West Point. When I was accepted, I was overjoyed. With theappointment as an instructor at USMA came a fully funded masters degree and the opportunityto present structural steel design to undergraduate cadets. But somewhere
has not yet learned to transforminto useful products efficiently.2.1 The Master Equation for ECDM ApplicationHuman population growth is, of course, a major factor fueling explosive industrial growth andexpanded use and consumption of materials. Since 1970, human population has grown 8-fold: itis now approximately 6 billion and is anticipated to peak at between 10 and 15 billion late in thetwenty-first century. The stresses on many aspects of the earth system are strongly influenced bythe needs of the population that must be provided for and by the standard of living thatpopulation desires. One of the famous expressions of these driving forces is provided by the so-called “master equation”: Environmental impact = (population) x ((GDP
AC 2011-2123: RENEWABLE ENERGY INTERNSHIPS: STUDY OF 7THAND 8TH GRADE STUDENTS KNOWLEDGE OF RELATED SCIENCEAND ENGINEERING CONTENTTirupalavanam G. Ganesh, Arizona State University Tirupalavanam G. Ganesh is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Arizona State University’s Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering. He has bachelors and masters degrees in Computer Science and Engineering and a PhD in Curriculum and Instruction. His research interests include educational research methods, communication of research, and k-16+ engineering education. Ganesh’s research is largely focused on studying k-12 curricula, and teaching-learning processes in both the formal and informal settings. He is principal investigator of
. Page 25.382.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Defining the Core Body of Knowledge (CorBoK) for a Graduate Program in Systems Engineering: A Work in ProgressAbstractThe Graduate Reference Curriculum on Systems Engineering (GRCSE™) version 0.51 providesrecommendations for the development of graduate level systems engineering curricula. Theseguidelines address student entrance expectations, a core body of knowledge (CorBoK) and anaccompanying set of outcomes that the student is expected to master by graduation, and a sampleset of objectives that the student should achieve three to five years after graduation. GRCSE alsoincludes guidelines for implementing the GRCSE recommendations and
attainment of baccalaureate-level BOK outcomes as well as masters-level BOK outcomes.Although the ABET criteria have been shown to constitute a viable instrument for facilitatingBOK fulfillment, it is not true that these criteria are fully adaptable to this purpose. The ABETEAC criteria consist of three different components, each with its own unique limitations as aninstrument for BOK fulfillment: The General Criteria for Baccalaureate Level Programs (GCBLP) are applicable to all ABET EAC-accredited programs in all engineering disciplines. Changing these criteria would require the support of ABET and its 29 member societies. The ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) is currently considering the establishment
Session 2251 The Use of Portfolios as Assessment Tools in an Engineering Program Francis J. Hopcroft Associate Professor Wentworth Institute of Technology Boston, MAAbstractPortfolios have long been the pride of other disciplines, including the Architecture and InteriorDesign Programs, at most universities and colleges. Students compile master portfoliosthroughout their education to demonstrate to prospective employers, and accreditors, the depth oftheir skills and the
TongjiUniversity). The program is aimed at undergraduate and graduate students of the sixuniversities who are not majoring in Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science or SoftwareEngineering, and focuses on training students to master the core knowledge and practicalapplication capabilities of AI. Students who complete the required credits within the specifiedtime and pass the exam will receive a certification and credits recognized by the sixuniversities. This is China’s first micro-minor educational program that is built acrossuniversities and recognized by each other, and it is also a typical case of Chinese universitiesexploring the cultivation of AI talents.4.1 VisionVision serves as a foundation for an interdisciplinary program by describing the
Aircraft System Design Graduate Curriculum: A Lifecycle Focus Earll M. Murman, Paul A. Lagacé Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and Engineering Systems Division Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139AbstractAircraft system design encompasses technical, social and lifecycle topics, and is suitable forgraduate studies at the masters level and beyond. Several degree programs in MIT’s School ofEngineering offer opportunities for students seeking subjects and degrees in this area. Theseprograms are summarized, and one subject on
Paper ID #10404The inverted classroom in introductory calculus: Best practices and potentialbenefits for the preparation of engineersDr. Robert Talbert, Grand Valley State University Robert Talbert is an Associate Professor in the Mathematics Department at Grand Valley State University in Allendale, Michigan USA. He was previously on the faculty at Bethel College (Indiana) from 1997– 2001 and Franklin College from 2001–2011. He holds a Ph.D. degree in Mathematics from Vanderbilt University, where he was a Master Teaching Fellow for the Center for Teaching and received the B.F. Bryant Prize for Excellence in Teaching
Experimental Sciences and is member of the IEEE. Her research interests include computer architecture, artificial neural networks techniques and information and communication technologies applied to higher education. She is currently a professor of System Engineering and Automation at the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the UNED, Spain.Dr. Maria Jos´e Albert Gomez, UNED PhD in Education, Bachelor of Psychology Professor, Department of Educational Theory and Social Pedagogy UNEDMiss Rosario Gil, Spanish University for Distance Education (UNED) Rosario Gil has a PhD in Industrial Engineering from Spanish University for Distance Education (UNED) and a Master and Bachelor in Telecommunication Engineering
. The hope and premise of the most traditional approaches is that students who listen, work, and engage with master teachers (in most cases this has been a master apprentice model [19]) they will learn a thinking process. Consequently, the students will take various classes that are thoughts by different masters and try different approaches to become better thinkers. All engineering educators are familiar – either as students or lecturers -‐-‐ with successful examples of such classes with dynamic and great presentations that continue to help many students learn and understand the subject matter. Mathematics, science, and engineering include
leverage that diversity to build stronger teams, and reach better overall outcomes.Associated faculty mentors typically instruct coursework in both the engineering and engineeringtechnology programs and have developed a personal relationship with the students in both degreeprograms. They use this familiarity to foster teamwork and close collaboration between students in allof the various programs.An additional asset to the project is the involvement of a limited number of graduate students enrolledin the Master of Science in Systems Engineering (MSSE) program. These students bring an added levelof maturity and expertise to the project. They also possess a more advanced understanding of programand project management concepts as well as an
master’s programs is vital for grasping how the nextgenerations of engineers are grappling with the challenges that current and emerging AItechnologies will create.Research QuestionsDrawing on interviews with 62 electrical and computer engineering (ECE) master’s students(described in more detail below), we explore three broad questions related to their perspectiveson AI. (1) What opportunities and dangers do ECE masters students see in artificial intelligencebroadly? Do they exhibit unbridled enthusiasm for AI’s potential? Are they apprehensive orfearful of AI developments and what an AI-saturated future will hold? As the future leaders ofthese technologies, ECE masters students are bellwethers for the views of the engineeringprofession more
) criteria [19]. Since ABET accreditation criteria were introduced in 1996they have spurred an intense national reassessment of the engineering curriculum. ABETaccreditation and published goals provide a helpful yardstick to ensure that engineering programsmeet certain standards [20], and that our new course fits these criteria. Table 1 shows how wepropose to align our goals under the umbrella of the ABET criteria.Table 1. Alignment between ABET criteria and the course learning objectives andoutcomes. ABET Criteria Specific Goals 1. identify, formulate, and solve complex Students acquire knowledge to identify how engineering problems by applying principles ML may be useful in technology; they master
Self-Awareness about Teaching Style Development of a Tool Debra Larson Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZAbstractIn his book titled “Mastering the Techniques of Teaching”, Joseph Lowman presents a rigorouslydeveloped and frequently referenced two-dimensional model for characterizing the range ofteaching styles found in college classrooms. This model has been integrated into the ASCE’sExcellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) Teaching Workshops (ETW); presented touniversity faculty over the course of two or three workshops per summer since 1999. To date,over 380 faculty have attended ETW. During
andothers, will be ubiquitous. There is a great and growing demand for wireless communicationprofessionals and web developers for portable devices. National University was one of the firstuniversities in the US to consider this problem seriously. It identified the educational needs,developed a complete graduate program in 2002, and started offering a Master of Science inWireless Communications (MSWC) from June 2004. The students of the first and second stringsof this new program successfully completed their MS degrees in May 2005 and May 2006respectively. The students of the third and fourth strings are now taking course and they areexpected to graduate in September 2007 and March 2008 respectively. The fifth string isscheduled to start in June
Post-doctoral Researcher Catherine Female 41 18 First year Ph.D. student Page 22.1431.4We also found it useful to represent the pathways of each of the participants. Figure 1 representstheir current status and key academic and professional events prior to returning. Educational and Career Pathway for Andrew Undergraduate Masters’ Masters’ and Work Experience: Future Plans: (Mathematics/ Degree Doctorate (Physics
and context informationTABLE III LIST OF AI TECHNIQUES USED IN RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS,Continued Authors, Year Type of Study Techniques ES: Empirical Study LR: Literature Review Masters et al., 2008 [25] ES Collaborative Filtering Modritscher et al., 2011 [26] ES Segal et al., 2014 [28] ES Khanal et al., 2020 [31] LR Lu et al., 2015 [34] LR Wu & Chen, 2013 [39] LR Uddin et al., 2021 [38] LR Lu et al., 2015 [34] LR Computational
bachelor’s degree in physics and mathematics from the University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire; a Master of Science in Metallurgical Engineering and PhD in metallurgy from the University of Minnesota; and an MBA from the University of St. Thomas. Prior to joining the University of St. Thomas, Bennett held executive positions in industry for more than 20 years, working at BMC Industries, CPI (now Boston Scientific) and Teltech as well as in several entrepreneurial organizations. Bennett served as Executive Director of the Minnesota Center for Engineering and Man- ufacturing Excellence (MnCEME). His current focus is on webinars and workshops on leadership for engineers in industry and academia. Bennett has a variety of academic