the solid rocket engine motors,experiences of the undergraduate students who have participated in the competition and lessonslearned through this experience, and a few key projects undergoing current development. It willbe shown that these projects focus on the principles of systems engineering with highly detailedsystem/subsystem designs for rocket systems and propulsion systems. These projects have shownto offer unique opportunities for students to experience real-world challenges that are typicallyfaced by the aerospace industries on a daily basis.IntroductionIn recent years, several engineering universities have seen student-run, student designed, launchand operated high-power rocket systems and fundamental research in propulsion
teaching practices, and the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Dr. Matthew Charles GrahamMadison E. Andrews, University of Texas at Austin Madison Andrews is a STEM Education doctoral student, Mechanical Engineering master’s student, and graduate research assistant for the Center for Engineering Education at the University of Texas at Austin. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University in 2017.Dr. Jenefer Husman, University of Oregon Jenefer Husman received a doctoral degree
Paper ID #42713Developing an AI and Engineering Design Hybrid-Remote Summer CampProgram for Underrepresented Students (Evaluation)Alvin Talmadge Hughes IV, University of Florida Alvin (TJ) Hughes is a graduate of the University of Florida with a Bachelor of Science in Materials Science and Engineering and a minor in Engineering Innovation. He has interests in additive manufacturing, materials analysis, and data analytics. He is the Data Science/AI curriculum lead for the EQuIPD grant at the University of Florida currently manages teams working on Python Professional Development for teachers interested in Data Science, as
, Virginia Tech Maura Borrego is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Dr. Borrego holds an M.S. and Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Stanford University. Her current research interests center around interdisciplinary graduate education in engineering. She has an NSF CAREER and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) award for this work.Kacey Beddoes, Virginia Tech Kacey Beddoes is a Ph.D. student in Science and Technology Studies at Virginia Tech. Her current research interests are interdisciplinary studies of gender and engineering education. She serves as Assistant Editor of the journal Engineering Studies and co
been shown to help students prepare for further studiesand jobs. There are many forms of undergraduate research experiences, but a common method is for astudent to work closely with a teacher in research. Students often find these hands-on experiences veryuseful and learn to work in teams, manage projects, and communication skills. In the scope of thiswork-in-progress study, our program, originally rooted in engineering, now draws one-quarter of itsstudents from departments outside the College of Engineering. The program objective is to offer studentsearly in their programs hands-on project experiences and enhance their collaboration skills across diversedisciplines and projects. Our study centers on an innovative, faculty-led
of Colorado in Denver and a Fellow at the International Design Center which is the largest design research center in the world. This center is located at both the Singapore University of Technology and Design and at MIT. He also runs an engineering consulting company (Creo Consulting) which specializes in training in innovation enhancements for engineering design. Dr Jensen regularly teaches courses in “Innovation in Product/Systems Design”. He has trained hundreds of design teams in “Innovation in Design of Products, Processes and Services” and has overseen the creation of dozens of patents. He has written over 135 peer-reviewed publications and has secured foundation, research and consulting grants for approximately
populations through the implementation of twopedagogies in introductory gateway courses within the chemistry and engineering disciplines.At the UC Merced, an entry-level human-centered engineering design course will be createdutilizing a Flipped Classroom (FC) pedagogy. At CSUB and Bakersfield College (BC), thegeneral chemistry courses will employ a Flipped Classroom Enhanced-POGIL or (FC-E-POGIL)pedagogy. This work in progress study anticipates utilizing pedagogical advancements inengineering design and chemistry to close equity gaps by addressing these project outcomes ofincreasing retention in a chosen or declared major, improving progress towards graduation, andimproving career preparedness among our students.Typical structures for flipped
education necessary to understand the impact of engineeringsolutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context[4]. Global consolidation isin fact a necessity towards future prosperities. However, for the design and construction industry,globalization is a trend that specifically means two things: increased opportunity and competition[32] .While many might assume that only the largest corporations feel the effects of globalization, thisis not the case. Although companies like Bechtel’s, Kellogg Brown & Roots, or Foster Wheeler Page 25.674.2Ltd. may be international players in direct competition with foreign markets
specifically at the transformation of engineering educationto address these needs5,6.Engineering capstone design courses play an integral role in this effort. As a culminatingexperience for graduates, students apply their newly acquired knowledge and abilities topractical engineering problems. This experience allows them to make valuable connectionsbetween theory and practice, and serves as an excellent opportunity to develop criticalprofessional skills7,8. The value and significance of this course is highlighted by the inclusion ofCriterion 4, the professional component in ABET’s accreditation requirements, which states that“students must be prepared for engineering practice through the curriculum culminating in amajor design experience based on the
acquire “practical”, hands-on research experience, for example, withexperiment design, data reduction, and instrumentation, and a variety of skills ranging from themundane, for example, machining of parts and soldering, to advanced, for example, computerdata reduction and simulation. These also can lead to a better appreciation, passion, andambition for the engineering/scientific profession and associated graduate education and/or career.The students tend to acquire a better understanding of how technology fits into and sometimesconflicts with the societal infrastructure, for example, with environmental, health/safety, andeconomic issues.Students also acquire skills in problem solving. The research is truly “original”, and frequentlypresents new
innovations. Similarly the 1970’s and 80’s produced abody of research focused on teacher’s concerns and viewpoints, which has had a similarly lowimmediate impact on educational practice. The article suggests that the educational research lacks thesocio-political ‘authority’ to bring about systematic reform. Regardless of the reason it is clear thatresearch in the field of education has not produced a history of usefulness for educators.Our particular situation is complicated further in that we have a long time scale, one semester per year,and low numbers, 12-30 students per year. This has made it difficult to conduct true rigorous controlledexperiments. Additionally our assessments have been performed on extra-credit assignments where
) Fellowship, Aggies Commit to Professional Student Educational Experiences, Graduate Teaching Lecturer Fellowship, and Climate Award. She was also the only academic recipient of the Texas and Louisiana Engineering News Record (ENR) Top Young Professional Award in 2017. Dr. Kermanshachi is currently directing a very vibrant construction engineering and education research group and advising several Ph.D. and Master’s students c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Analysis and Assessment of Graduate Students’ Perception and Academic Performance Using Open Educational Resource (OER) Course MaterialsMs. Thahomina Jahan Nipa, University of Texas at Arlington Ph.D. Student, Department of Civil
scholarship of teaching. His efforts in leading the Sustainable Buildings program were recognized with the 2019 Award for Excellence in Education Abroad Curriculum Design. He has also worked as a construction project engineer, consultant, and safety inspector. He believes educating the next generation of professionals will be pivotal in sustainability standard practices. Regarding engagement, Dr. Valdes-Vasquez has served as the USGBC student club’s adviser and the ASC Sustainability Team’s faculty coach since 2013. He is a CSU President’s Sustainability Commission member, among multiple other committees. In addition, he is involved with various professional organizations at the national level, including the
at the next generation of college graduates, the workforce is drastically different thanit was only twenty years ago. Almost half of the workforce will be freelance by 2027 [1] andover 65% of the jobs today did not exist 25 years ago [2]. The need to be flexible, think broadly,identify opportunities, be creative and innovative are requirements of almost any profession nowand into the future [3] and [4]. U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics projects 10.5% growth inSTEM fields from 2020 to 2030 [5]. However, under-represented groups remain under-represented in STEM fields especially in engineering. A Pew Research Center study showedBlack and Hispanic workers represent 9% and 8% of the STEM workforce compared to theirshare of all employed U.S
, by the, Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors Corporation. 3. Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study. 4. Ernst & Young. (1992). International quality study: An analysis of management practices that impact performance . Cleveland, OH: American Quality Foundation. 5. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 6. Hayes, B. J. (1996). Training in Quality. In R. L. Craig (Ed.), The ASTD training & development handbook (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill
dependent on their capacityto implement, plans for sustainability, innovation, STEM engagement best practices, more high-risk students, schools within the business vicinity, and sponsor priority [12].Post-secondary sample. In Spring of 2019, an updated APT-STEM was administered to 667students enrolled in a first semester calculus-based introductory physics course for engineers.This was done for continued validation of the instrument. However, because this was an oldergroup of students, the items were slightly reworded by the primary researcher in collaborationwith the course instructor. Also, this updated version had a total of 30-items compared to 24-items from the post-validation phase of the 2017 sample. This resulted because the items werere
is present. In addition tothe infrastructure, the CEID hosts design-centered classes, offers workshops, supports studentorganizations, and provides consulting assistance to its members. CEID members are allowed touse the facility for course, club, research, and personal projects, with an expectation that theyshare their work with others.21,22 Figure 9. Yale University: Center for Engineering Innovation and DesignThe university-wide access structure is a unique attribute of this facility. Undergraduate studentsfrom all disciplines and graduate students from the majority of Yale’s professional schools aremembers of the CEID. The design courses taught in the CEID encourage university-wideparticipation and include classes on social
Massachusetts-Lowell, and Worchester Polytechnic Institute. • Stand-alone courses such as Introduction to Engineering Design at Western Michigan University, Engineering Strategies and Practice at the University of Toronto, or Global Engineering Outreach Projects at Brigham Young University. • Community-inspired research and design projects such as the D80 Center at Michigan Tech. • Co-curricular or extracurricular group design projects sponsored by organizations (e.g. Engineers without Borders, or Tetra). These types of projects exist at many schools.In September 2011, engineering educators who have been engaged in LTS gathered on thecampus of the University of Colorado for a summit. The summit was organized by
Paper ID #34072FOUNDATIONS – Integrating Evidence-based Teaching and Learning Prac-ticesinto the Core Engineering Curriculum: Retrospective on the Progress ofTeaching-Track Faculty ParticipantsDr. Gail P. Baxter, Stevens Institute of Technology Gail P. Baxter is the Co-Director, Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education (CIESE) at Stevens Institute of Technology. Baxter leads CIESE research and evaluation efforts and manages a program to support faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices in the core courses in the School of Engineering at Stevens. Before joining CIESE, Baxter was a Senior Survey
, students needed to recall and understand all main components of the IoT architecture,apply their knowledge to design a complete IoT system, analyze and evaluate the system toensure it satisfies all requirements, build the design, and test it to evaluate its effectiveness.Finally, when defining EM for students, professors should emphasize those who think aboutinnovation and continuous improvement and not limit it to startups, which can help them viewcontinuous improvement within the discipline as a form of innovation.6. Conclusion6.1 Response to Research ObjectiveThe problem is that engineering students’ exposure to practicing soft skills, such as problem-solving, critical thinking, innovation, and creativity, is often limited to capstone courses
in engineering dynamics with applications to wearable technology for analysis of human motion in a variety of contexts ranging from warfighters to astronauts. In addition to her engineering work, she also has an interest in engineering education research, which most recently has focused on incorporating authentic engineering educational experiences through engineering history education and open-ended modeling problems designed to initiate the productive beginnings of engineering judgement and engineering identity. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Incorporating History Lessons into a Second Year Mechanical Engineering SeminarIntroduction Unlike the other major
that our approach to ENGAGE program implementation – whichincludes spending significant time together – has been transformative for many members of theCal Poly team. Many regularly report that they bring the knowledge gained from ourcollaboration and partnership into other related spheres of their work (e.g., review of transferadmission criteria, C-ID criteria, etc.).Institutional Change: Our collaboration has been aided by a tool developed by the CommunityCollege Research Center at Teachers College and the Aspen Institute, Essential Transfer Practice(ETP). Cal Poly and the two community college partners are using the tool to first document abaseline or current state and then track changes over time to transfer practices. This
application in integrating these concepts more explicitly into thecurriculum at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign’s BS in Systems Engineering &Design. Understanding systems thinking, design thinking and their relationship has value fordesigning a curriculum that can more fully prepare students to excel in both systems engineeringand professional design, enhancing students’ impact after graduation.2.1 Design Thinking OverviewDesign thinking is cognition, or the process of thinking, that includes the usage of solution-basedmethods to explore human centered values throughout the engineering design process [1][2]. Ithas also been described as “high order intellectual activity” that “requires practice and islearnable” [1]. There are various
Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Post-Secondary Teach-ing (1991).28. G. Schraw, R.S. Dennison. Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 4,pp. 460-475 (1994).29. S. Bolhuis, M.J.M. Voeten. Teachers’ Conceptions of Student Learning and Own Learning. Teachers and Teach-ing: Theory and Practice, 10, 1, pp. 77-98 (2004).30. E. Deci, R. Ryan, (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of RochesterPress (2002).31. M. Standage, D. C. Treasure, J. L. Duda and K. A. Prusak. Validity, Reliability, and Invariance of the SituationalMotivation Scale (SIMS) Across Diverse Physical Activity Contexts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25,19-43, (2003
requires a clear definition of these skills to better preparethe IT professionals expected to fill these positions. Currently the demand for IT professionalsoutstrips the qualified applicants.The research designed to develop a framework of IT skill sets involved a business survey whichincluded the preparation and distribution of a questionnaire. The questionnaire instrument listeda number of skills associated with the IT profession. The instrument was then distributed to 380companies and 100 of the Best 100 places to work in IT as developed by Computerworld in1999. Though the response produced only 60 (13 %) useable questionnaires, the researchersjustified this as those responding were from companies that regularly recruit IT students
teamwork in collaborative research settings?" To comprehensively address themain research question, the study will explore the following sub-questions: • RQ1: What are the perceived weaknesses of teamwork as experienced by students? • RQ2: How do students in URPs navigate and resolve conflicts within their teams? • RQ3: What are the strengths of teamwork as perceived by students in URPs?By addressing these questions, the study aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the roleand impact of teamwork in URPs. It seeks to offer insights into best practices for fosteringeffective teamwork in such programs and to highlight the potential areas for improvement inteam dynamics. This, in turn, can inform the design and implementation of future URPs
startupcompanies must complete their designs and transition them to well-documented prototypes thatare worthy of operational testing and evaluation. The intellectual property ownership thatresults from the Capstone projects is agreed to as part of the team/project selection process in thefirst semester.The Product Innovation Cellar An essential element required to enable product development projects is providing thestudents the necessary equipment and facilities necessary to be successful. Until recently, thesefacilities consisted primarily of faculty research labs where individual student teams wereassigned space based on faculty interest in their projects. For those teams not given space infaculty facilities, a small lab with five individual
engineering management curriculum offers innovative courses in technicalmarketing, high tech product strategy, fast cycle time product development & launch, andengineering entrepreneurship. In these case study courses, students develop real world marketingand business plans for commercializing innovative new products and technologies. Some of theinnovative product development and technology commercialization ideas have won accolades atregional business idea pitching competitions.All students in the Florida Tech College of Engineering must participate in a senior designprogram. The intensive undergraduate engineering programs at the university have resulted in anumber of outstanding crossfunctional Senior Design Projects. The Senior Design program
. Adam Carberry is an associate professor at Arizona State University in the Fulton Schools of Engi- neering Polytechnic School. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Ed- ucation and Outreach.Julianne L. Holloway, Arizona State UniversityDr. Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State
graduate research assistant. He later worked at Haliburton Energy Services and worked at the Houston Independent School district as an APcalculus, Precalculus, and College Prep. Math instructor till 2019. From 2020 to the present, he is a Ph. D student at Prairie View A&M University/Electrical and Computer Engineering Department where works as a research assistant at the Center for Advancing Innovation in Smart Micro- grid. His main research interests are sustainable power and energy systems, microgrids, power electronics and motor drives, digital methods for measurements control systems, and digital signal processing.Samir Abood, Prairie View A & M University/ Electrical and Computer Engineering Department