Education, 2022#BlackLivesMatter: Black Lives Matter: A content analysis of top engineering institutions’responses to social-political activism AbstractAs members of both an educational institution and the society at large, it’s safe to assume thatwhat happens to Black people in society directly impacts what happens to Black engineeringstudents. Due to a turn of events surrounding Black Americans encounters with law enforcement,Black Lives Matter (BLM) --a movement of social-political activism that emerged in 2013-- hasseen a burst of activity. Following George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, and Breonna Taylor’s death,this movement has prompted a drastic increase in statements released by corporations
Findings Collection analysis research September‐October August‐early 2021 October‐November September 2021 2021 Data collection will Statistical analysis of continue throughout survey data spring and into fall Survey sent to all 2022 Write up
fellow in the Particulate Media Research Laboratory. Her research interests focus on the characterization and behavior of fine-grained soils, their response to changing chemical environments (i.e. changes in pH and ionic concentration), and traditional and non-traditional soil modification techniques (e.g. polymer-modified soils) for improving engineering properties. Dr. Palomino teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in materials character- ization and testing, soil mechanics, geosynthetics, and soil properties.Dr. Veerle Keppens, University of Tennessee at Knoxville American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022
doctoral students need to meet during their graduate studies and how the dissemination of these expectations affect students from underrepresented groups.Beleicia B Bullock, Stanford University Beleicia Bullock is a first-year Computer Science Ph.D. student at Stanford University. Her research interests focus on leveraging human-computer interaction to develop equitable systems that support com- munities in online and offline settings. To this end, Beleicia explores both novel systems-building and interventions that can help train students to tackle these issues in the future. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Forming and Fulfilling
Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 840–866, 2022.[5] A. Rempfler and R. Uphues, “System Competence In Geography Education: Development Of Competence Models, Diagnosing Pupils’achievement,” European Journal of Geography, vol. 3, no. 1, 2012.[6] V. J. Shute, “Simply assessment,” International Journal of Learning and Media, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2009.[7] R. M. Jaradat, “An instrument to assess individual capacity for system thinking,” 2014.[8] N. Rustaman, H. Firman, and B. Tjasyono, “Development and validation of climate change system thinking instrument (CCSTI) for measuring system thinking on climate change content,” presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2018, p. 012046.[9
positive impact on student learning outcomes on the courseconcepts than the traditional reading assignments. 2. MethodIn this study, we designed and implemented hands-on inquiry-based learning activities aspretraining materials for a Mechanics of Materials class of 99 students in spring 2022. At thesame time, traditional reading assignments were also used as pre-training materials. Bothpre-trainings used optional learning materials for extra credit. The class met twice a week for80-minute lectures. The pre-training materials were required to be completed before theupcoming week’s lectures.Reading AssignmentStudents in the class could choose to complete optional reading assignments for extra credit. Inthe reading assignments, students read
the team • Project Objectives • Project Requirements (constraints, rules/regulations, required features/functions) • Finalized Design Criteria ranked using a pairwise comparison chart, • Metrics for each Design Criteria based on a 10-point scale • Documentation of brainstorming process used • 3 distinct conceptual design sketches • Presentation of detailed design • Evaluation of performance • Lessons learnedAssessment and EvaluationAlthough course revisions started in 2016, the fall semester of 2022 was the first time the marblelift project was embedded from start to finish. Data were collected anonymously at the end of thesemester from two sections of the course taught by the same instructor. Of the 40
: Past views of future directions," Engineering Education, vol. 80, pp. 517-522, 1990.[2] L. Harrisberger, J. Heydinger, and M. Talburtt, "Experiential Learning in Engineering Education," American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC, 1976.[3] B. K. Jesiek, L. K. Newswander, and M. Borrego, "Engineering Education Research: Discipline, Community, or Field?," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 39-52, 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01004.x.[4] E. S. f. E. E. SEFI. "SEFI Cooperation." http://sefibenvwh.cluster023.hosting.ovh.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Institutional- members-leaflet.pdf (accessed April 5, 2022.[5] (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for
challenges for engineering education during the era of COVID is theimplementation of hands-on activities. While CAD and hand-sketching are critical skills in theengineering toolbox and can be taught remotely, the in-person makerspace experience cannot bereplaced virtually. Following university guidelines, this course was implemented in asynchronous, hybrid setting, with students participating in-person and remotely.During the 2021-2022 academic year, UC San Diego courses were permitted to be up to 50%remote with masks required in all in-person classroom environments. To preserve the in-personmakerspace experience as much as possible, students were required to attend all labs and lecturesin-person; however, accommodations were made for those who were
of working with faculty and taking advantage of the insights provided bythe teaching pyramid, MTEI has succeed in moving many faculty up to higher levels on theTeaching Pyramid. Our course evaluations rate teaching effectiveness on a scale of one to five,with five being the top score. Figure 3 summarizes Cornell Engineering scores on overallteaching effectiveness from Fall 2022, by score bins on the right of the figure, and by thepercentage of faculty in each bin on the left. We have moved most of the faculty out of thebottom two levels, and only about a quarter of the faculty are in the Solid Teaching bin or lower.The lowest bin covers the 43% of the teaching score range and only 2% of the teachers. Theremaining bins each cover 12.5% of the
Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2020, p. 34045. doi: 10.18260/1-2--34045.[7] R. A. Miller, A. Vaccaro, E. W. Kimball, and R. Forester, “‘It’s dude culture’: Students with minoritized identities of sexuality and/or gender navigating STEM majors.,” J. Divers. High. Educ., Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1037/dhe0000171.[8] E. A. Cech and W. R. Rothwell, “LGBTQ Inequality in Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 583–610, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1002/jee.20239.[9] A. Sona, J. Laboy Santana, and E. K. H. Saitta, “Looking through a Prism: A Systematic Review of LGBTQ+ STEM Literature,” J. Chem. Educ., p. acs.jchemed.2c00391, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00391.[10] E. A. Cech and T. J
unanswered. Initial questions on the survey asked the students declared major(ARCH, ARCHE, dual major, or undeclared), and a second question asked their year in ourprograms. Table 1(a) gives a breakdown of the responses, with none of the respondentsindicating undeclared as their current major. Table 1(b) provides a similar breakdown ofresponses from the follow-up survey. There were no respondents indicating a dual major orundeclared as their current major in the follow-up survey.It is important to the understanding of this survey that since the curriculum has the Introductionto Architecture course as a prerequisite to the first architecture design studio, the benefits of thiscourse should be considered within this research. In the fall 2022 semester
, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 2006, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.[3] R. N. Savage, K. C. Chen, and L. Vanasupa, “Integrating Project-based Learning throughout the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no. 3 & 4, 2007.[4] R. M. Marra, C. Plumb, and D. J. Hacker, “Developing Metacognitive Skills in PBL Undergraduate Engineering Introduction and Background,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2018.[5] K. Johnson, S. Claussen, J. A. Leydens, J. Blacklock, J. Y. Tsai, and N. Plata, “The Development of Sociotechnical Thinking in Engineering Undergraduates,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2022. [Online]. Available: www.slayte.com[6] M. Ashby, Materials
these students, 14 students were recruited. Student participants were askedto share information about their experiences as a first-year student in Seaver College, includingtheir challenges and struggles. Their techniques and strategies to overcome those challenges andstruggles were supplemented with the results from students who were not struggling or did notreceive midterm deficiency grades (n = 5) but rather thrived throughout the semester. For thesefive student participants, the authors received recommendations from professors. The semi-structured interviews were conducted in spring 2022, ranged from 9 to 36 minutes (M = 21.8, SD= 7.5), and were recorded and later transcribed using a third-party transcription service provider.This project is
).References[1] “Machinists,” U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 31-Mar-2022. [Online]. Available:https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes514041.htm. [Accessed: 24-Apr-2023].[2] J. Toney, “Where have all the machinists gone?,” Humanix, 01-May-2020. [Online].Available: https://humanix.com/where-have-all-the-machinists-gone. [Accessed: 24-Apr-2023].[3]Kari, “Bye-Bye Boomers: What retiring Machinists mean to plant safety,” Rockford Systems,LLC, 06-Apr-2023. [Online]. Available: https://rockfordsystems.com/bye-bye-boomers-what-retiring-machinists-mean-to-plant-safety/. [Accessed: 24-Apr-2023].[4] C. Varianou-Mikellidou, G. Boustras, O. Nicolaidou, C. Dimopoulos, and N. Mikellides,“Measuring performance within the ageing workforce,” Safety Science, vol. 140, p
Engineering and Technology (ABET). "History of the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology". 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.abet.org/about-abet/history/[12] J. W. Prados, G. D. Peterson, and L. R. Lattuca, “Quality assurance of Engineering Education through accreditation: The Impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and its Global Influence,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 165–184, 2005.[13] International Engineering Alliance. "Celebrating international engineering education standards and recognition". 2014[14] Comisión Nacional de Acreditación,11 Chile. "Criterios y Estándares de Calidad para la Acreditación Institucional del Subsistema Universitario". 2022[15] International
, “Developing a virtual reality game for manufacturing education,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG), Aug. 2019. doi: 10.1145/3337722.3341831.[24] B. Thiede, N. Mindt, M. Mennenga, and C. Herrmann, “Creating a Hybrid Multi-User Learning Experience by Enhancing Learning Factories Using Interactive 3D- Environments,” in Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Learning Factories, Apr. 2022. doi: 10.2139/SSRN.4074712.[25] A. Suh, C. Wagner, and L. Liu, “Enhancing User Engagement through Gamification,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 204–213, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1080/08874417.2016.1229143.[26] R. P. McMahan, C. Lai, and S. K
Science and Engineering Technology (IJRASET), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 197–201, 2017.[28] T. Gutierrez-Villalpando, M. A. C´ardenas-Cuevas, L. P´erez, E. Gutierrez, and A. Zavala, “Lean tools implementation for scrap reduction in a production line-a case study,” in IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings. Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE), 2022, pp. 1–6.[29] J. Malmqvist, K. Kohn R˚ adberg, and U. Lundqvist, “Challenge-Based learning experiences,” Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, pp. 1–13, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://rick.sellens.ca/CDIO2015/final/14/14 Paper.pdf[30] B. D. Jones, “User guide for assessing the components of the music® model of motivation,” 2021. [Online
, no. 5, pp. 448–468, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10956-018-9735-3.[6] D. Gürdür Broo, O. Kaynak, and S. M. Sait, “Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 25, p. 100311, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100311.[7] R. Varma, “US science and engineering workforce: Underrepresentation of women and minorities,” Am. Behav. Sci., vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 692–697, 2018.[8] C. T. Belser, M. Shillingford, A. P. Daire, D. J. Prescod, and M. A. Dagley, “Factors influencing undergraduate student retention in STEM majors: Career development, math ability, and demographics.,” Prof. Couns., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 262–276, 2018.[9] A. M. Ogilvie and D. B. Knight, “Engineering transfer students
designing RF/micro/millimeter-wave control devices and sensors. He is a Fellow of IEE and a Senior Member of IEEE.Dr. Wayne Bynoe, Wentworth Institute of Technology I am a professor in the School of Engineering at Wentworth Institute of Technology. My area of spe- cialization is Computer Networks. I worked for decades as a Technical Staff member at MIT Lincoln Laboratory in the areas of computer network modeling and simulation and high performance processor design for signal processing applications. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Robust Cellular Connection-Based Smart Street Lighting System for Supporting Strategic IoT Smart City
engineer in the bridge group at Whitman, Requardt, and Associates, LLP in Baltimore, MD. She is a licensed professional engineer in the State of Maryland. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Student performance, engagement, and satisfaction in a flipped Statics and Mechanics of Materials classroom: A Case StudyAbstractThis paper presents a case study of the evidence-based practice of flipping a classroom. Theflipped (or inverted) classroom has long been promoted as a method of improving studentengagement in the classroom as it creates opportunities for active learning experiences duringlecture time that would
Paper ID #37275Investigating Factors that Inform Engineering Students'Choice of Extracurricular ActvitiesBeata Johnson (PhD Student) Beata Johnson is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University.Joyce B. Main (Associate Professor) Joyce Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Investigating Factors that Inform Engineering Students’ Choice of Extracurricular ActivitiesAbstractThis research paper investigates
Award" in 2016 and the "Outstanding Performance Award" in 2018 from University of Waterloo. Her students regard her as an innovative teacher who continuously introduces new ideas to the classroom that increases their engagement.Arshia Khan (Dr) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com COVID-19 and the New Normal in Engineering and Computer Science Education: Students’ Perspectives on Online and Hybrid EducationAbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic caused a major disruption to colleges and universities, with manyinstitutions cancelling in-person learning and moving to completely online
baccalaureateprogram in Biomedical Informatics. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com ADVANCING STUDENT FUTURES IN STEMINTRODUCTIONThis is an evidence-based practice paper. The New York City College of Technology (City Tech)STEM program “Advancing Student Futures in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics” was designed as a multifaceted, evidence-based set of strategies deployed to provideboth academic and financial support to undergraduate STEM students. This set of strategiesinvolved need-based financial assistance and a matrix of support that encompasses our students’academic life, including close curricular advisement, one-on
collaborative learning. She has participated in two major overhauls of large courses in the College of Engineering: she played a key role in the re-structure of the three Mechanics courses in the Mechanical Science and Engineering Department, and the creation of the new computational-based linear algebra course, which was fully launched in Summer 2021. Silva research focuses on the use of web-tools for class collaborative activities, and on the development of online learning and assessment tools. Silva is passionate about teaching and improving the classroom experience for both students and instructors. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by
Delaware, where he teaches courses in mechanics, structural analysis, and structural design. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Promoting Student Learning and Teaching in the Virtual Environment and In- PersonAbstractThe objective of the study is to evaluate formative assessments used to engage and supportstudent learning in both the virtual and in-person learning environment in 2020 and 2021 for anundergraduate structural analysis class. In both the virtual and in-person learning environment,active learning and student engagement opportunities were created via a flipped classroom,which included breakout
, Miguel Andrés is developing teaching and evaluation pedagogy that directs a philosophy of seeking excellence as a pillar to eradicate corruption.Vanessa Guerra (Assistant Professor)Cristina Gallardo © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work in Progress: Collaborative Learning in Architecture and Civil Engineering Education – Case Study Johanna Acosta1, Jacoba Ubidia1, MiguelAndrés Guerra2*, Vanessa Guerra3, Cristina Gallardo11 Undergraduate student, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Departamento de
promotion of students' conceptual understanding of chemical concepts.Elizabeth FordeNilay Ozturk University of Minnesota © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Manifestation of Integration into Practice: A Single Case Study of an Elementary Science Teacher in ActionIntroduction The inclusion of engineering in K-12 science education is growing increasingly commonin the United States through A Framework for K-12 Science Education [1] and the NextGeneration Science Standards (NGSS) [2]. The framework articulates the role of engineering asa vehicle for students to learn scientific concepts and to engage them
Serving Institutions. Subbian’s educational research is focused on asset-based practices, ethics education, and formation of professional identities.Linda R Shawcolleen lynel halpin © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Ethical Decision-Making Frameworks for Engineering Education: A Cross-Disciplinary ReviewIntroduction The work of an engineer involves countless decisions and judgement calls during every stepof the planning, design, implementation, and evaluation phases of any given project. Thesedecisions may impact the public in a myriad of ways, with significant implications for publichealth