process is toencourage life-long learning skills. A crucial component of this endeavor is to follow thegraduates and to observe whether the stated outcomes of an undergraduate curriculum are metfollowing graduation.3. Course StructureThe three consecutive UOL courses offered in chemical engineering curriculum have twopurposes: firstly, introducing fundamental transport concepts to students enabling them toreinforce core courses and secondly, teaching how to design/implement experiments and lastlyemphasizing critical thinking on the processes. In industry, engineers are often responsible forpractical laboratory issues in order to meet the requirements for experimental data in developinga new product and to test a product whether the product or
. Page 22.588.6Conclusions This work describes the results of integrating an ethics case study in Senior UnitOperations Laboratory over a two year period. The data obtained from post course surveysrevealed several findings. First, students feel that learning ethics is important, and that casestudies were a useful tool in doing so. Second, we need to consider if teaching ethics is useful,because it is often a function of how students are raised. Finally, choosing the “right” personnel(i.e. one that is engaging and possesses a relevant industrial background) for this project isimportant for delivering a positive experience for students.References[1] American Institute of Chemical Engineering , AICHE Code of Ethics, Accessed January 18,2011
size.Commonly accepted and literature proven methods of instruction are commonly applied withinthe course. Use of “clickers” is common both as formative assessment and as a teaching tool.Resources supporting an emphasis on conceptual learning, such as publication of conceptualquestions online, are increasing. Problem based learning approaches are common, as arelaboratories. Many programs are utilizing improved simulations of laboratories to obtain learningoutcomes similar to laboratory exercises. Active learning approaches are widespread and varied,and those who use them are satisfied that they are effective.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank all of the instructors who completed this survey; the departmentchairs who passed on the request
Lecturer at the Uni- versity of Washington teaching the Chemical Engineering Laboratories (traditionally the Unit Operations lab). Her worked as a Lecturer included the development of new experimental modules for undergraduate ChemE students, the submission of proposals with an educational focus and the supervision of the labora- tories. During this time she also participated in outreach activities arranged by the College of Engineering to target increasing the number of students from underrepresented minorities in engineering programs. Today, Marvi serves as a Senior Research Scientist in the Bioengineering Department at the University of Washington and works as an independent consultant in engineering innovations.Dr
operations lab experiments and provides instruction for the virtualbioreactor. Dr. David Hackleman developed CBEE 416 and served as the Linus PaulingEngineer for 5 years. The authors are indebted to numerous practicing engineers for sharingtheir time and experiences with students. Finally, several faculty members sponsor seniorprojects, committing resources and knowledge.References1. Feisel, L. D. and A. J. Rosa. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. J. Eng. Educ., 94, 121–130.2. Wankat, P.C. and F.S. Oreovicz. (1993). Teaching engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.3. ABET Website, http://www.abet.org/, retrieved Jan. 2011.4. Dutson, A., R. Todd, S. Magleby, and C. Sorensen. 1997. A Review of Literature
the six teachersthat completed post-implementation surveys, 100% stated that they intended to use the VirtualLaboratory Project again. The majority of those interviewed also expressed interest in using theVirtual Laboratory Project in subsequent years.Sources of EffectivenessIn this preliminary report of findings, some of the authors’ expected sources of effectivenesswere found to be reinforced by both teachers and students interviewed and surveyed. One ofthese sources was the situated, industrial context of the instructional design. Three questions onthe post-implementation survey elicited responses consistent with this source of effectiveness: • What need in your teaching did the laboratory address? • What specific content, concepts
AC 2011-1778: UNIT OPERATIONS LAB BAZAAR: INCORPORATIONOF LABORATORY EXPERIENCES IN SIX INTEGRATED PILLAR COURSESMichael Jefferson Baird, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Baird joined the chemical engineering department at the University of Pittsburgh in the spring of 2008 as Instructor of Undergraduate Laboratory Courses. He also teaches a graduate course entitled ”Petroleum and Natural Gas Processing”. Before joining the University of Pittsburgh, Dr. Baird was an associate pro- fessor of chemistry at Wheeling Jesuit University for nine years following his retirement from the U.S. Department of Energy. While at DOE’s National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) in Pittsburgh, Dr. Baird managed projects involving the
challenge-based human metabolism laboratory for undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education 97, 213-222 (2008).5 Flora, J. R. V., Cooper, A. T. . Incorporating inquirybased laboratory experiment in undergraduate environmental engineering laboratory. Journal of Professional Issues Engineering Educational.Practice 131, 19-25 (2005).6 Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J.,Glaser, R. . Categorization and representation in physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 4, 121-152 (1981).7 Halloun, I. Schematic modeling for meaningful learning of physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33, 1019–1041 (1996).8 Greeno, J. G., and Middle School Mathematics through
AC 2011-1130: TEACHING CHEMICAL ENGINEERING CONCEPTS TONONCHEMICAL ENGINEERS: INDIGO: A WORLD OF BLUESPolly R. Piergiovanni, Lafayette College Polly R. Piergiovanni is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engi- neering at Lafayette College. She teaches the introductory engineering and chemical engineering courses, as well as process control. Her research interests include process control, biochemical engineering and the dyeing process. Page 22.1375.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Teaching Chemical Engineering Concepts to Nonchemical
AC 2011-1915: ALTERNATIVE LAB REPORTS - ENGINEERING EFFEC-TIVE COMMUNICATIONDaniel Lepek, The Cooper Union Daniel Lepek is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at The Cooper Union for the Advance- ment of Science and Art. He received his Ph.D. from New Jersey Institute of Technology and B.E. from The Cooper Union. Since joining The Cooper Union in 2009, he has taught more than half the courses in the chemical engineering curriculum. Currently, he teaches the undergraduate laboratory course se- quence and the graduate transport phenomena sequence. Recently, he has developed and introduced new elective courses on particle technology and pharmaceutical engineering. His research interests include particle
Jason Keith is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Michigan Technological University. He received his B.S.ChE from the University of Akron in 1995, and his Ph.D from the University of Notre Dame in 2001. He is the 2008 recipient of the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effectiveness and Educational Scholarship as well as a 2010 inductee into the Michigan Technological University Academy of Teaching Excellence. His current research interests include reactor stability, al- ternative energy, and engineering education. He is active within ASEE.Horacio Adrian Duarte, Texas A&M University-KingsvilleDavid W. Caspary, Michigan Technological University David Caspary is the Manager of Laboratory
electron microscopy and x-ray diffraction, and the chemicalcomposition with FTIR spectroscopy. We demonstrated control over the mesoporosity,crystallinity, morphology and surface chemical composition. To quantify the photocatalyticactivity of the TIO2 particles, we measure the photodecomposition of a fluorescent dye underultraviolet irradiation. A parametric study was performed to find the optimum conditions formaximum photocatalytic activity.Teaching / Education InterestsIn the chemical engineering curriculum, students are taught about the fundamentals of heat andmomentum transfer. The teaching process involves classroom lectures and often correspondingundergraduate laboratory experiments. Another tool that can be used to reinforce the
control group performed the actual hands-onexperiment and a test group performed a simulation using a Java applet that simulated the handson experiment. Students in both groups were given the same laboratory instruction andperformed the experiment either virtually or in reality. At the conclusion of the lab, they weregiven a brief multiple choice test about the experiment and the results of this test were compared.No difference was observed in the results of the tests. This appears to indicate that studentlearning immediately after the experiment was similar in both groups.Introduction and BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine if engineering students performing a simulation of anexperiment using Virtual Reality demonstrated similar
AC 2011-1039: AN ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR EVALUATING A FOURSITE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH PROGRAM IN BIOFUELS ANDBIOREFINING ENGINEERINGDaniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder DANIEL W. KNIGHT is the engineering assessment specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program (ITLL) and the Broadening Opportunity through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center in CU’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from the Louisiana State University, and an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in coun- seling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of retention, program evaluation and teamwork
engineers. Advances have been made to this end 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, in applyingCooperative, Hands-on, Active and Problem based Learning, more commonly referred to as theCHAPL pedagogy, 7 in the form of both teaching methods, applied experiments, and equipment.It has been shown that when physical teaching aids and real life examples are employed ineducation, the student more often thinks outside the scope of the course and retains the essentialknowledge for later application 8, 9 which is why access to a Unit Operations Laboratory isessential to a well rounded education in engineering. In this paper we will be focusingspecifically on the advances made in heat transfer and fluid flow education in the form ofminiaturized industrial equipment.Even though
Beach. His research interests include microfluidics for organic synthesis, chemical and biological assays and fuel cells.Roger C. Lo, California State University, Long Beach,Department of Chemical Engineering Roger C. Lo is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at California State University, Long Beach. He received his Ph.D. from Texas A&M University in May 2008. Roger teaches undergraduate and grad- uate required courses (fluids, math, and transport phenomena) and also numerical analysis using Excel and MATLAB for chemical engineering calculations. Roger’s research interest focuses on microfluidics and its applications to solving chemical and biological problems, such as fuel cells, microreactors, and
), “Teaching Cellular Automaton Concepts Through InterdisciplinaryCollaborative Learning,” Chem. Eng. Ed., 34(4), 204-309, 315.10 Heitsch, A. T., Ekerdt, J. G., and Korgel, B. A. (2009), “NANOLAB at the University of Texas at Austin: AModel for Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education,” Chemical Engineering Education,43(3), 225-231.11 Hunter, K. W., Matson, J. O., and Dunn, R. (2002), “Impact of a Fifty-Minute Experiential Team-BuildingProgram on Design Team Performance,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference and Exposition, Session 2257.12 Biernacki, J. J. and Wilson, C. , (1999) “Interdisciplinary Laboratory in Advanced Materials - A Team-OrientedInquiry-Based Approach,” NSF
Journal cover. She is an active men- tor of undergraduate researchers and served as co-PI on an NSF REU site. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activities in area schools. Adrienne has been an active member of ASEE’s WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams since 2003.Donald P. Visco, Tennessee Technological UniversitySusan M. Montgomery, University of Michigan Susan Montgomery is Lecturer IV and program advisor in Chemical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She also serves as ASEE campus representative. She earned a BSEChE from the
Hassan, Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaMohammad Zamry Jamaludin, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) Mohammad Zamry is a tutor at the Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineer- ing,Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), since 2007. He is one of the class facilitators for a third-year chemical engineering course, Process Control and Dynamics, that employs cooperative problem-based learning (CPBL) as the teaching and learning methodology. He also implements CPBL lab for Process Control Laboratory, a lab course for the final year students. Mohammad Zamry is an active member of engineering education research team in UTM. The team is now very progressive in doing research re- lated to cooperative
AC 2011-959: DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY MOD-ULES IN THE CHEMICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMJason M. Keith, Michigan Technological University Jason Keith is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Michigan Technological University. He received his B.S.ChE from the University of Akron in 1995, and his Ph.D from the University of Notre Dame in 2001. He is the 2008 recipient of the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effectiveness and Educational Scholarship as well as a 2010 inductee into the Michigan Technological University Academy of Teaching Excellence. His current research interests include reactor stability, al- ternative energy, and engineering education. He is active within
professor of chemical engineering and Director of the Center for Engineering Ed- ucation at the Colorado School of Mines where he has taught chemical engineering and interdisciplinary courses and conducted engineering education research for the past 25 years. Dr. Miller has received three university-wide teaching awards and has held a Jenni teaching fellowship at CSM. He has received grant awards for education research from the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Education FIPSE program, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the Colorado Commission on Higher Education and has published widely in the engineering education literature. His research interests include measuring and repairing
Engineering award, and the 1999 College of Engineering Outstanding Engineering Educator Award.Dr. Bill B Elmore, Mississippi State University Bill B. Elmore, Ph.D., P.E. is the Interim Director and Hunter Henry Chair for the Dave C. Swalm School of Chemical Engineering, Mississippi State University. His teaching areas include integrated freshman engineering and chemical engineering courses through the curriculum including ChE Problem Analysis and Unit Operations laboratories. His current research intersts include engineering education reform, enzyme-based catalytic reactions and bioengineering applied to renewable fuels and chemicals
dynamics and effectiveness.Teams are easily observed during classroom or laboratory workshops, either whencomputational, deliberation, or laboratory activities are being done. If agreeable, teams can befilmed or photographed. Candid still photos taken by a teaching assistant have also been found tobe helpful at identifying ineffective team behaviors. Some common problems observed include: Page 22.1341.11distracted students, e.g. using computer to surf or view Facebook or texting on cell phone duringteam meeting; unengaged students, e.g. a student that never contributes and works off to the sidewhile others appear engaged; disconnected team, e.g
AC 2011-1798: STUDENT DESIGNED DESKTOP MODULES IN A THER-MODYNAMICS COURSEDonald P. Visco, Jr., University of Akron Donald P. Visco, Jr. is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and the Associate Dean for Undergradu- ate Studies at the University of Akron. Most recently, he was a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Tennessee Technological University. His current research interests include experimental and computa- tional thermodynamics as well as bioinformatics/drug design. He is an active and contributing member of ASEE at the local, regional and national levels. He is the 2006 recipient of the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effectiveness and Educational Scholarship as well as the 2009 recipient
specifically designed to facilitate knowledge inte-gration. This curriculum, in use for just over 5 years, is unique for its use of block scheduling.Block scheduling, in its simplest form, is transforming multi-semester courses into a single-semester course via extended, concentrated contact time. Among other things, the flexibilityafforded by extended and more frequent contact time allows (and encourages) greater opportu-nity for active and collaborative learning. The specific adaption of this technique to chemicalengineering has resulted in a curriculum comprised of 6 “Pillar” courses which are takenindividually in 6 consecutive undergraduate semesters and are accompanied by vertically in-tegrated laboratory experiences.IntroductionIn this paper, we
AC 2011-2744: ASSESSMENT IN THE HIGH PERFORMANCE LEARN-ING ENVIRONMENTSharon G. Sauer, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Sharon G. Sauer is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technol- ogy where she is teaching a variety of classroom and laboratory courses. She has long-standing interests in active learning techniques and has published papers in this and other educational areas, as well as in the fields of statistical thermodynamics and electrophoresis.Pedro E. Arce, Tennessee Technological University Pedro E. Arce is a University Distinguished Faculty Fellow, Professor and Chair of the Chemical En- gineering Dpt. at Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN. He has
chaired NJIT’s Excellence in Teaching Awards Committee and is past chair of the University Master Teacher Committee.Prof. Reginald Percy Tomkins, nEW jERSEY iNST of TEchnology Page 22.1332.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Student Learning and the Continuous Program Improvement Process in a Chemical Engineering ProgramIntroductionThe twenty-first century has brought renewed calls for educational reform at all levels. Thevarious stakeholders are seeking improved documentation of accountability through measurableoutcomes. Accrediting agencies, such as ABET
the Society of Biological Engineering.Michael J. Prince, Bucknell UniversityDr. Theresa A. Good, University of Maryland, Baltimore CountyLaurent Simon, New Jersey Institute of Technology Laurent Simon is an associate professor of Chemical Engineering and the Associate Director of the Phar- maceutical Engineering Program at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Colorado State University in 2001. His research and teaching interests in- volve modeling, analysis and control of drug-delivery systems. He is the author of a series of educational and interactive modules (Laboratory Online), available at http://laurentsimon.com/.John P. O’Connell, University of Virginia
refrigeration cycles might be included. In the second semester(mainly first semester juniors enrolled in the course) the instructor extends the principles tomixtures and focuses our discussion on phase equilibrium. In addition, this second course coverschemical reaction equilibrium and mixing processes. The combination of a very abstract topicand very young students makes therefore the teaching of thermodynamics a challengingexperience. Page 22.891.2To be effective learners in this course, students need some thermodynamics background beyondtheir high school experience and that, unfortunately, very often is not the case. Along with thesubjective
Chemical, Kodak, AT&T Bell Labs), and since 1993 he has been on the faculty in the OSU Chemi- cal Engineering Department. He is an OSU Honors College faculty and has been recognized for his teaching and advising activities by ASEE, AIChE, the College of Engineering, and Oregon State Univer- sity. His research interest for the last 35 years has been in all areas of polymer engineering and science, and for the last 18 years in engineering education. His passion is K-12 outreach for the recruitment and retention of women and minorities into engineering, with the current focus on introducing engineer- ing science at the middle school and high school levels. His K-12 outreach activities can be found at http