program initiated the use of a new softwareprogram in several courses. The software is PowerCivil, provided by Bentley Systems Inc.. Thestand-alone program is a comprehensive design solution for site modeling, land development,and planning. It is a multidiscipline tool that provides integrated capabilities for survey,graphical coordinate geometry, digital terrain modeling, site grading and design, street design,water and sewer design, and storm water drainage design. The toolset supports plans preparation, Page 14.775.4plan sheet generation, and volume/material quantity calculation for a wide range of projects,such as commercial and residential
-term plan for management of updates to the publishedCivil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CE BOK) and the associated ABET accreditationcriteria.1 This plan calls for ASCE to develop a formal revision to the CE BOK and associatedcriteria on a regular eight-year cycle. This regular change-cycle reflects three broadly acceptedconclusions drawn from ASCE’s experience in developing the first two editions of the CE BOK,from 2002 to the present: A professional body of knowledge is a dynamic entity that reflects the ever-changing nature of professional jurisdictions. A given profession (or professional group) can be strengthened by formally articulating and publishing its body of knowledge, but only if the profession is willing
insupporting ABET accreditation of the Civil Engineering program as well other programs in thedepartment are presented.1. IntroductionThe Civil Engineering (CE) program started at Indiana University-Purdue University FortWayne (IPFW) in 2006; the only public program offered in the area that enables students to getexcellent public education while living at home and attending school. In December 2008, theCivil Engineering Assessment Plan (CEAP) was developed and approved, based on thedepartment’s existing “one-assessment-plan-fits-all” format that was developed for all programsin 2004. The assessment plan requires intensive effort to implement and lacks consistency anddocumentation in some aspects of assessment. In order to meet the ABET requirements
shapingpublic policy.Summit organizers and participants intend that the vision will guide policies, plans, processes,and progress within the civil engineering community and beyond including around the globe.Individual civil engineers and leaders of civil engineering organizations should act to move thecivil engineering toward the vision.Keywords – change, civil engineering, global, leadership, summit, visionIntroductionCivil engineers are rightfully proud of their legacy. Over the past century, clean water supplieshave extended general life expectancies. Transportation systems serve as an economic and socialengine. New bridges, blending strength and beauty, speed transport and bring communitiescloser together. Public and private construction, for which
Construction Institute.Jennifer Caffrey, Pennoni Associates Inc. Jennifer M. Caffrey is a Staff Engineer currently working on commercial, institutional, and municipal land development projects for Pennoni Associates Inc. in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. She earned a B.S. in Civil Engineering in 2002 from Lehigh University and is presently working on an M.S. in Engineering Management from Drexel University. During the summer of 2000, Ms. Caffrey participated in the initial golf facility design through the Lehigh Earth Observatory (LEO) summer internship program. In the fall of that year, she utilized the Integrated Learning Experience (ILE) program to continue gaining experience in planning
sustainability programs in eachcountry and by comparing sustainability efforts in developed countries with those in adeveloping country. Of primary importance throughout each program was providing the studentsone-on-one interactions with researchers in each country and allowing them to continue thoserelationships as they completed research projects back in the U.S.This paper reviews the process of establishing and developing an international research programand the key elements needed to make it successful. It then discusses the actual researchexperiences in our program, the work products developed, and the benefits realized by thestudents. The key topics discussed include program planning, logistics, program execution,assessment, and lessons
a research subject andeducational practice in the context of Educational Psychology. It refers to active learning that isguided by motivation to learn, metacognition (awareness of one’s knowledge and beliefs), andstrategic action (planning, monitoring, and evaluating personal progress, and taking properaction). A wealth of research has supported that optimal academic performance is strongly tied tothe extent to which the learner uses SRL1. Equipping students with SRL abilities not onlycontributes to success in formal education, but also prepares them for lifelong learning2. Despitethe extensive research in the literature, SRL is still not well known and utilized by theengineering education community for facilitating student learning in
revisited forspecific course projects in the Civil and Environmental Engineering curriculum. The commoncourse project platform was introduced in the freshman surveying course, where studentscollected geographical data. This project platform was revisited throughout the freshman yearthrough the development of site plans and topographic maps of the project site in graphicalcommunications and geographical information systems courses. This method provides afoundational context for a civil engineering site development that will be used in future coursesfor designing a multi-story building in a structural design course, analyzing soil samples forfoundation design in a soil mechanics course, and developing a stormwater management plan ina water resources
(a two phase project which was first planned as a prototype to evaluate project ideas to be displayed during the spring and summer of 2005 and then a full Resource Center for be completed by 2007).March 2004 – Dr. E.C. Inniss is contacted by the Director of Infrastructure Planning at the San Antonio Water System (SAWS) inquiring about whether University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA) students might be interested in helping with the design of a model of the SAWS water and wastewater system. The SAWS contact was unrelated to introductions made at the September Witte meeting, but rather related to a research project done with SAWS.June 2004 – Initial SAWS-Witte planning meeting
designing structuralmembers from common construction materials (wood, masonry, and concrete). This coursetakes the fundamentals developed in CE300 and applies them in the context of design codes.Understanding analysis procedures and current design codes, CE450 serves as an opportunity forthe students to put their knowledge to use in a broader context.CE450 focuses on the engineering design process (see Figure 2). While this process isintroduced in CE300 and reinforced in CE350, it is not until the third course that students areable to apply their knowledge to a large engineering problem. This paper focuses on thesemester-long Engineering Design Project (EDP) in CE450. In this project, students are requiredto design and develop a construction plan
techniques, and the infusion of globalperspectives that includes how different regions of the world are addressing climate change andadaptation planning, has been particularly enriching to the student experience. The authorsdiscuss how CGA has incorporated climate science into engineering education and how thecourse provides exposure to best practices used in civil engineering to promote infrastructureresiliency in a changing environment.Key words: Climate Education, Civil Engineering, ResiliencyIntroductionThe United States Coast Guard Academy (CGA), located in New London, Connecticut is thesmallest of the United States military academies with approximately 1000 cadets and its missionis to educate, train and develop leaders of character who are
&CIS, the processes for the sustainable delivery and use of F&CIS, andthe resources required for the delivery and use of F&CIS in a sustainable way.In a sustainable approach to F&CIS, decision-makers need to integrate sustainability at all stages ofthe project life cycle, particularly the early funding allocation, planning and conceptual design phases.More specifically, to be successful in the pursuit of sustainability, the A/E/C industry needs to: (1)define, plan, and design more sustainable F&CIS; (2) procure, construct, commission, operate, andmaintain F&CIS in more sustainable ways; and (3) supply more sustainable building technologies,systems, products and materials used within F&CIS. Satisfying these needs
Assessment Straightforward: A Case Study on the Successful Implementation of ABET Student Outcomes 1-7AbstractIn recent years, many engineering programs have begun planning for the change from the previousABET Student Outcomes (a)-(k) to the current ABET Student Outcomes 1-7. In addition, due tothe current COVID-19 pandemic, many of these programs will participate in a virtual ABETreview and site visit. Depending on the success of these virtual visits, the author theorizes thatfuture ABET accreditation reviews may continue to be remote, given the accessibility of videoconferencing tools and the various savings manifested in costs, time, and environmental impactsfrom reviewers not needing to travel to the institutions.Despite
teaching workshop to support online and remote instruction.However, in the spring of 2020, as many of us were thrown into a new teaching environmentbecause of COVID restrictions, this became a priority for the university. Most of us had littleexperience or preparation for online or remote teaching. However, the principles of goodteaching have stood the test of time: organize the content, plan the presentation and activities,communicate clearly, create intellectual excitement, and engage students. These principles haveendured for centuries, and they will endure into the “new normal”—whatever that turns out tobe.We embraced this idea at our university, developing a weeklong workshop to prepare faculty forremote and online teaching based on an
associated resources and efforts needed to complete the work. Inaddition, the format includes a section for ratios and analysis, which is used for testing out theaccuracy of the bid against known benchmarks.The Association for Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) is comprised of constructionprofessionals, and the association’s journals are practice-based and practical. The total costmanagement (TCM) framework published by AACE [4] details the fundamental principles andframework that inform how practitioners should practice cost estimating and include thefollowing:1. Plan for cost estimating2. Quantify scope content3. Cost scope content4. Price the cost estimate5. Simulate and optimize costs6. Budget costs7. Analyze cash flow8. Bidding the cost
. Page 11.976.4Dr. Lushington was interested in developing a missionary compound that would contain a freemedical clinic, a home for battered women, a soup kitchen, and an orphanage. The specific tasksincluded a floor plan, site layout, structural design, and foundation design. These tasks met ourcriteria for a viable civil engineering project. In addition, the client wanted the student team tobe sensitive to cultural and economic constraints, which met our criteria for an internationaldesign experience. Communication was not anticipated as a problem since Dr. Lushington wasaccessible by email and English is the national language of Trinidad. Everything seemed to fallinto place even though we knew we were in for some challenges.Launching the
for Individual Terms of a Sawtooth Forcing FunctionAdding a summation to the equation in Figure 10 gives Figure 11, which was used to createFigure 8.Figure 11: Equation for the Fourier Series Representation of a Sawtooth Forcing FunctionSummaryThe examples presented in this paper only scratch the surface of what an instructor can do withlive math in the classroom. In addition to having a plan for changing some parameters in asystematic fashion as part of a lesson, the instructor can use Mathcad to make changes that werenot planned, spurred by a suggestion or a question from the class, or an idea that occurs to theauthor during their explanation of the planned presentation.Using live math in the classroom works in any class where an instructor
Page 22.486.2Responsibility. These outcomes are couched in the following six levels of attainment specifiedwith Bloom’s Taxonomy.4 1. Knowledge - the remembering of previously learned material. 2. Comprehension - the ability to grasp the meaning of material. 3. Application - the ability to use learned material in new and concrete situations. 4. Analysis - the ability to break down material into its component parts so that its organizational structure may be understood. 5. Synthesis - the ability to put together to form a new whole. This may involve the production of a unique communication, a plan of operation (research proposal), or a set of abstract relations (scheme for
important aspect of teaching this course is gettingstudents familiar with the steel frame and common connections which are used in theconstruction of a frame. This paper presents the construction of a steel frame sculpture withdetailed beam to column and column to footing connections. This frame was constructed as astudent project completely on campus. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)motivates faculties and students nationally to design and built a steel sculpture for theiruniversities by providing construction plans for them. Although the authors used AISC’s idea tobuild the steel sculpture, the sculpture presented in this poster is not built the plan provided byAISC. A tree shaped sculpture was drafted in SketchUp and the sculpture
– pre-spring break and post-spring break. The schedule includes major milestones which include deliverable dates, and community meetings (Figure 2). Page 23.717.4 1-Jan 31-Jan 2-Mar 1-Apr Submit resume and cover letter Highlight experience/select project manager/identify "firms" Proposals due/presentations/project awarded Present concepts to community Draft preliminary report and plans Dry run - presentations Draft final report and
developing new sustainability-enriched engineering education material is the need for knowledge and skills from multipledisciplines to be incorporated into learning experiences. This creates limitations to whatinstructors can accomplish with students lacking the necessary knowledge and skills unless thereare added requirements for pre-requisite coursework, additional time taken in class to teach extramaterial, or extra assignments for students to learn the material independently. Each of thesesolutions means the course must be modified to reduce content or increase time and effort ofstudents to enable new content to be included. In most cases this is a major impediment and onethat prevents instructors from moving forward with plans for anything more
- Page 25.832.2riences1, but we do not distinguish between the two in this paper.course of the semester, the students performed five different evaluations of infrastructure com-ponents (e.g., pavements, bridges, etc.). These evaluations were intended to be simplified exer-cises modeled after the infrastructure assessments from the American Society of Civil Engineer’sReport Card for America’s Infrastructure.2BackgroundThe development of the I2I and I&S courses is the culmination of many years of effort by theDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Wisconsin—Platteville.In 2005, five faculty members from the department were awarded an NSF Department LevelReform (DLR) planning grant (EEC 0530506). The work carried
project management experience,or capstone sequence, for the Department of Civil Engineering (Department) at LawrenceTechnological University occurs over two terms: ECE4021 CE Design Project 1 (CE Project 1), a one-credit course offered in the fall, and ECE4033 CE Design Project 2 (CE Project 2), a three-credit course offered in the spring.Students form their own teams of three to five members and develop a project where theygenerate a conceptual design and project management plan. The capstone represents theculmination of the students’ undergraduate education, providing them an opportunity to integratevarious curricular components in preparation for careers as civil engineers.Neither course has an instructor in the traditional sense
to $2500 foronly one research presentation, and up to $2500 for only one faculty developmentopportunity (workshop, conference attendance) per year and only with a detailedprofessional development plan established with the department head prior to the currentyear of funding. Additionally, new assistant professors could apply for one grant in eacharea, associate professors on track to achieving full professor could apply for two out of thethree grants and full professors and long-term associate professors could only apply for oneout of the three faculty development grants.Initially the full and long-term associate professors expressed concern at the loss of anexpected college-wide benefit. However, further research into benefit use noted that
is presented on how they effectively plan and execute field trips ofconstruction sites as part of a senior level design class. The focus of the paper is on structural andgeotechnical components of construction, though the recommendations are applicable to a widertour scope of topics and classes. Clearly defining the purpose and goals of the field trip,coordinating with construction managers and others involved in the project throughout theplanning and tour, and organizing the activity are all important to providing a meaningfulexperience that addresses the class learning objectives. A range of examples are presented oftours that have been conducted to demonstrate specific learning opportunities available atconstruction sites. Photos are
roundsare used until an adequate group consensus is reached. This study utilized a questionnairedeveloped considering the individual input from a group of twelve practicing structural engineersand several academics from the Denver and Front Range Colorado area for an e-mail basedsurvey planned for a maximum of three rounds. The first two rounds of the survey were devotedto obtaining a distribution of respondee’s expectation for achievement levels to be reached by theaspiring structural engineer both upon completion of a masters-level program in structuralengineering and after five years of practice in the profession. If the results of Round 2 variedsignificantly from those of Round 1, the planned use of Round 3 was to conduct Round 3 in thesame
4 Triple Bottom Line/Sustainability 5 Social impacts of infrastructure 6 Teamwork 7 Ethics I 8 Ethics II 9 Traits of effective written and oral communication 10 Financing public works 11 Safety/licensure 12 Land use and planning/growth/forecastingThe process to create these lessons is as follows. Team assignments – teams of faculty members were assembled to create each lesson. Faculty members were asked to give preferences to the 12 lessons they would like to develop. Teams contained three
“important” category are listed in Table 2. Sixty six percent or more of thesurvey participants identified the topics below as “important.” In examining the data, there isonly a 14 percent spread from the top-ranked to the bottom-ranked item, not a significantvariation, indicating that all topics were considered similarly necessary in determining agraduate’s relevance. The placement of urban and regional planning above wastewater,transportation, and power generation and distribution showed the need for initial planning toenable efficient and correct placement and operation of other critical infrastructure items. Table 2. Important topics for CE in developing nations. Rank Civil Engineering Topic
agreed to take it on as aproject. Composer Herron plans to incorporate the musical bridges designed by the students intoher composition and performance.Goals, Objectives, and RequirementsThe main goal of the project was to have students apply the theory discussed in class to design,analyze, and build sound-generating or musical bridges in small groups. Additional goals for theproject were: to engage a broader demographic of students (specifically women andunderrepresented minorities), help students build connections between engineering and music,and encourage students to be creative.In addition to designing and building bridges, students analyzed the forces, stresses, anddeflections expected in their bridges for a given load and calculated
student workplace learning experiences and reflective goalsetting practices. This paper presents a case study of engineering students currently inworkplace learning environments. Students participated in a parallel reflective planning andreview-focused course designed to help students to structure setting goals and objectives, aswell as reflect on workplace practices. The purpose of this study was to investigate, what isthe impact of reflective practice on student goal achievement in workplace learningexperiences?Theoretical FrameworkWorkplace learning (WPL) is part of the education for practice spectrum, and is supported byunique teaching strategies and appropriate supervision at Charles Sturt University’s (CSU)Engineering program. The objective