, requiring a level of background information tobe taught at the beginning. Similarly, the applicants selected are those they have a pre-existinginterest in engineering and a desire to learn more about the topic. To that end, the module shouldbe implemented in settings involving a pool of students with diverse interests so as to better gageits effectiveness.By implementing the modules twice, slight revisions and improvements to the material andactivities were made. In general though, the content remained constant from 2011 to 2012. Thefollowing module-specific lessons learned are discussed in detail.Liquefaction ModuleStudents were actively engaged in the lecture sections, the laboratory experiments, and the dataanalysis. They seemed to understand
of the Provost’s Inclusive Teaching Fellowship at CMU, was the 2020 recipient of the Frederick A. Howes Scholar Award in Computational Science and the 2016 MIT Graduate Teaching Award in the School of Engineering, and is an alumnus of the Department of Energy Computational Science Graduate Fellowship and the Tau Beta Pi Graduate Fellowship. Wang directs the Mechanics of Materials via Molecular and Multiscale Methods Laboratory (M5 Lab) at CMU, which focuses on computational micro- and nanoscale mechanics of fluids, soft matter, and active matter, with applications in Civil and Environmental Engineering across the nexus of water, en- ergy, sustainable materials, and urban livability. The M5 Lab is particularly
students the opportunity to engage in hands-on experience with mapping, beyond what would have been feasible with passivelectures/demonstrations. QGIS remains an accessible option for remote offerings of surveying-related lecture and laboratory courses.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2027637: RAPID: Impacts of Unprecedented Shift to Online Learning on Students' CognitiveLoad and Readiness for Self-Directed Learning. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Paas, F., A. Renkl, and J. Sweller, Cognitive load theory
, represents the objectives due allowing students to observe different best possible to variability in phenomena. Students would go out to option for traffic and the intersections during laboratory observation. inability to periods for in person observation. observe different scenarios.Observations Relies on video footage of Allows for the Sincethrough videos intersections along a major arterial of instructor to
Materials, laboratory and field testing of structures and the fatigue behavior of concrete bridges. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Inter-Collaborative Learning in Capstone Design How Do We Optimize Costs and Benefits?AbstractThe civil engineering programs at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (RH) and GonzagaUniversity (GU) have been seeking to understand how to best facilitate capstone projects incollaboration with students at other institutes. We have the following questions – • How beneficial is it for student teams to spend time together in person to understand their cultural differences and to develop a team rapport? • How beneficial is it
. David S Hurwitz, Oregon State University Dr. David Hurwitz is an Assistant Professor of Transportation Engineering in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University and is the Director of the OSU Driving and Bicycling Simulator Laboratory. Dr. Hurwitz conducts research in transportation engineering, in the areas of traffic operations and safety, and in engineering education, in the areas of conceptual assessment and curriculum adoption.Dr. Rod E. Turochy P.E., Auburn University Page 26.1717.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
AC 2007-502: USING THE SENIOR DESIGN JURY TO DIRECTLY ASSESSPROGRAM OUTCOMESMichael Bronzini, George Mason University Michael S. Bronzini currently holds the Dewberry Chair in Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering (CEIE) in the Volgenau School of Information Technology and Engineering at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, and is also the Chair of the CEIE Department. Prior positions include Director of the Center for Transportation Analysis at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Chair of the Department of Civil Engineering at Penn State University, and Director of the Transportation Center and Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Tennessee. Dr
AC 2008-1509: KINESTHETIC STRUCTURESKevin Dong, California Polytechnic State University Page 13.830.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Kinesthetic StructuresAbstractThis paper describes how students are engaged in hands-on activities that reinforce complexengineering principles. In addition to utilizing chalk board examples for design and analysisproblems, physical modeling, not necessarily traditional laboratory testing, is implemented tolink engineering theory with building behavior. Students design, build, and learn how structuresbehave in three dimensions.IntroductionFive years ago, the author switched careers and from practice to
engineering laboratory techniques, and g. an ability to communicate effectivelyteamwork k. an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 5. can explain basic concepts of leadership4. explain by way of several examples the societal h. the broad education necessary to understand thecontext of civil engineering practice including the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic,importance of civil engineering works to society and environmental, and societal contextcontemporary issues
recruit young and idealistic minds interested in contributing toward solvingsome of society’s vital fundamental concerns. The prospect of using emerging technologies toaddress sustainable development has the definite potential of exciting undergraduate students. Several initiatives in this regard are already underway. Stanford University, for instance, isplanning to provide an innovative experience to students by establishing a residential program ina newly constructed “green” dormitory building. The building is expected to showcase sustain-able concepts related to energy, water systems, vehicle refueling, air quality, etc. and serve as a“live-in laboratory.” The new thrusts are driving curriculum reform. Several Big 10+ CEE departments
students. The teamprefabricates some portions of the bridge on campus in a laboratory environment but completedmost of the construction on site. Construction related activities have taken 700-900 labor hoursfor these projects. Figure 3 shows images of the bridges constructed during the past three years. 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 Figure 3: Images of bridges from past three years Assessment The assessment of the project was considered with respect to the CE493 and CE494 course objectives and the civil engineering program student outcomes. The rubric in Table 1 below was used to assess student outcomes 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
Communication with Competition and Prizes” Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.12. Fiegel, G., and N. Derbidge, 2015. “Introducing Soil Property Evaluation in Geotechnical Engineering – Some Food for Thought,” Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.13. Durham, S., M. Hale, and S. Freyne, 2008. “Classroom Teaching Aids and Laboratory Experimentation to Engage Students in Materials Learning,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.14. Saliklis, E., 2008. "Arch Building for Kids. What did they learn? What did we learn?," Proceedings of the 2008
translate to post-graduation success. For example, students involved in research report greater confidence in theirability to relate to people of different races, cultures, or backgrounds, work successfully on ateam, and listen effectively [2]. These skills, individually and/or collectively, could translate intobenefits in post-secondary education or professional settings.In addition to the above benefits to students, faculty who mentor undergraduate student researchmay benefit by having additional assistance in a laboratory or with data collection, expansion oftheir own creativity and critical thinking, and overall professional growth [5].The objective of this study is to examine, from the perspectives of both mentors and mentees, theperception of
, C. M. Crowe, T. W. Hoffman, J. D. Wright, P. A. Taylor, K. A. Woodhouse, and C. G. K. Bouchard, "Developing Problem Solving Skills: The McMaster Problem Solving Program," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, pp. 75-91, 1997.[2] J. D. Lang, S. Cruse, F. D. McVey, and J. McMasters, "Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A Survey to Assist Curriculum Designers," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, pp. 43-51, 1999.[3] C. Hmelo-Silver, "Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 16, pp. 235-266, 2004.[4] Ram and P. Ram, "Problem-Based Learning in Undergraduate Instruction. A Sophomore Chemistry Laboratory," Journal of Chemical
Transportation Research Center (MTRC). A member of the faculty for 36 years, he is a licensed professional engineer and board-certified environmental engineer. During his academic career, he has published over 100 refereed and reference papers and report and made almost 170 papers and poster presentations. While much of his externally- funded research has focused of environmental and water resources engineering, his work in the areas of education, transportation, and construction has included improving instructional processes in laboratories, delineation of roadway systems and NEPA compliance for highways using remotely-sense data, modeling highway evacuation strategies and environmental impacts for predicting pavement
encompasses a broad range of activities that engage thestudents in meaningful learning.2,5 While homework and laboratory sessions likely includemeaningful learning activities, advocates of active learning focus on approaches that take placein the classroom in place of traditional lectures.2 Felder and Brent use the following definitionfor active learning: “anything course-related that all students in a class session are called upon todo other than simply watching, listening and taking notes” (p. 2).6 Active learning strategiesinclude the use of clicker questions in class, peer instruction, inquiry-based learning,collaborative learning, and problem- and project-based learning.4,5,6, 7Many active learning strategies have been used successfully in
. Many high-risk active learning techniqueshave been documented in recent literature, including field trips,5 peer teaching,6 class discussionson open-ended questions,7-8 hands-on manufacturing, laboratory testing,9-10 project-basedlearning,11 and cross grading and debate.12 The flipped classroom technique is also a new andeffective method of teaching13 where traditional lectures are converted to readings assigned tostudents outside of class and the class time is used for homework assignments and otheractivities. This technique was used successfully to teach sustainability in the past.14Low-risk active learning techniques have been introduced to engage students even in a lecture-based delivery, such as lecture worksheets,6 reading quizzes,7 and
Page 26.1319.2appealing to our youth. The National Research Council (NRC) provides several recommendations for enhancingeducation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines.Recommendations include providing engaging laboratory, classroom and fieldexperiences; teaching large numbers of students from diverse backgrounds; improvingassessment of learning outcomes; and informing science faculty about research oneffective teaching6-8. NRC recommendations are met with diverse pedagogicalapproaches. Experiential learning, which involves constructing meaning from directexperience and involves the learner in a real
Individual-Based Models.”19 McQuiggan20 Waarts, Van Everdingen, and Van Hillegersberg, “The Dynamics of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Innovations.”21 Rogers 10-15.22 Ellen Dubinsky, “A Current Snapshot of Institutional Repositories: Growth Rate, Disciplinary Content and Faculty Contributions,” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 2, no. 3 (2014): 1-22.23 Brown and Abbas, “Institutional Digital Repositories for Science and Technology: A View from the Laboratory.”24 Dubinsky.25 Dedoose Version 5.0.11, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data (2014). Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC
graduations: 1. Transform Teaching and Learning: Improved retention as a result of expanding our undergraduate teaching assistance (UTA) programs and institutionalizing a formal UTA training pedagogy. A working knowledge in best practices will enable UTAs to be both effective and engaging in the laboratory and/or classroom. 2. Increase Faculty and Student Interactions: Improved retention as a result of implementing university-wide and discipline-specific (intentional) community building activities that foster STEM students’ sense of identification with STEM departments.PRIMES conceptual framework was designed around three groups that intersect: STEM faculty,STEM undergraduates, and STEM Undergraduate Teaching
classroom and laboratory has been funded by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) over the last twenty years. His work has led to at least one textbook [5]adopting the micro-insertion approach to incorporate ethical decision making into the end-of-chapter problems.Micro-insertion inserts new content at the micro-scale of a course. For example, Riley et al. [6]describe how ethics can be micro-inserted into a course by expanding the context of technicalhomework problems. A traditional calculation-based problem would be expanded by asking thestudent to evaluate an ethics issue based on their calculation. An instructor hesitant to sacrifice aportion of their course to an unrelated topic is more likely to adopt micro-insertion when shownthat properly
individuals who have spent countless hours developing theGeoGebra software package and its related manuals, videos, and other help sources. Withoutyour efforts, I would have no hope of compiling the JavaScript code used for my interactives. Ialso wish to thank my students for their willingness to engage in all of my experimental learningmethods in the hope I can find something that they will benefit from.References[1] M. Prince, "Does active learning work? A review of the research," Journal of engineering education, vol. 93, pp. 223-231, 2004.[2] T. de Jong, M. C. Linn, and Z. C. Zacharia, "Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education," Science, vol. 340, pp. 305-308, 2013.[3] E. Wheeler and R. L
and institutional support.Collaborative InquiryAs Austin and Baldwin state, “The image of the solitary scholar working alone in a li-brary carrel or laboratory is no more than a fond memory or historical artifact.”17 Just ascollaboration has become ubiquitous in scholarly research, it is important for educationalgoals as well. Collaboration can help to assess whether a desired instructional goal is be-ing met. It is especially important to use collaboration when the desired assessment fallsoutside the expertise of the instructor. Collaborative inquiry is also desirable to show thatteaching methods are effective. One instructor who had seen a dramatic improvement instudent performance was told by colleagues that his results were “interesting
Advanced Transportation and Infrastructure Engineering Research (CATIER) at Morgan State University and the director of the Civil Engineering Undergraduate Laboratory. He has over eighteen years of experience in practicing, teaching and research in civil engineering. His academic background and professional skills allows him to teach a range of courses across three different departments in the school of engineering. This is a rare and uncommon achievement. Within his short time at Morgan, he has made contributions in teaching both undergraduate and graduate courses. He has been uniquely credited for his inspirational mentoring activities and educat- ing underrepresented minority students. Through his teaching and
consulting engineer and also worked for the U.S. Corps of Engineers. Killgore also served as adjunct faculty at Seattle University where he taught water resources engineering and fluid mechanics laboratory. He is a licensed professional civil engineer in the state of Washington and is a founding diplomate of American Academy of Water Rresources Engineer. He is a member of Tau Beta Pi. Page 23.457.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Educational Requirements for Professional Practice: What’s happening around the World?AbstractToday, all
differentialequations, probability and statistics, calculus-based physics, and general chemistry; proficiency in a minimum offour (4) recognized major civil engineering areas; the ability to conduct laboratory experiments and to criticallyanalyze and interpret data in more than one of the recognized major civil engineering areas; the ability to performcivil engineering design by means of design experiences integrated throughout the professional component of thecurriculum; and an understanding of professional practice issues such as: procurement of work, bidding versusquality-based selection processes, how the design professionals and the construction professions interact to constructa project, the importance of professional licensure and continuing education
with using the software, creating the videos tookapproximately 30 minutes to complete and averaged between 5 – 7 minutes in length.Assessment of student access and performance indicates that the students utilized the videos,appreciated the additional learning tool, and saw a trend in improved exam scores. Theinstructors will continue to create these videos for additional worksheet and possible homeworksolutions and plan to expand the assessment from both a qualitative and quantitative standpoint.References1 O’Neill, Geiger, Csavina, and Orndoff, “Making Statics Dynamic! Combining Lecture and Laboratory into anInterdisciplinary, Problem-Based, Active Learning Environment,” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Honolulu, Hawaii, June
, expected to be made available toundergraduates (through electives) if not required for an undergraduate degree. New engineeringanalysis and design tools and techniques are being continuously developed. This “explodingbody of knowledge” is, without question, impacting what and how the next generation will beand is being educated [4]. While certain topics may have or will become obsolete (e.g.,graphical methods in structural analysis) and while certain efficiencies in instruction have beenand will continue to be realized through technology (e.g., asynchronous virtual laboratories),there is little doubt that more is expected out of today’s baccalaureate curricula than ever before.The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a survey of the
materials and describe some of the laboratory tests conducted on them. 4. Determine stresses and strains in flexible and rigid pavements using different methods. 5. Design a flexible pavement using different design procedures. 6. Design a rigid pavement using different design procedures. 7. Use DARWin 3.1 AASHTO software to design flexible and rigid pavements. Once DARWin software had been implemented, the previously mentioned classical topicsremained the same. The inclusion of this software into the syllabus was for many reasons:building knowledge of using viable programs in the pavement engineering field to strengthen thecomprehension of the subject. Furthermore, it saves considerable amount of time after ensuringthat students
Alabama. Dr. Burian’s professional career spans more than 20 years during which he has worked as a de- sign engineer, as a Visiting Professor at Los Alamos National Laboratory, as a Professor at the University of Arkansas and the University of Utah, and as the Chief Water Consultant of an international engineer- ing and sustainability consulting firm he co-founded. He served as the first co-Director of Sustainability Curriculum Development at the University of Utah where he created pan-campus degree programs and stimulated infusion of sustainability principles and practices in teaching and learning activities across campus. Dr. Burian currently is the Project Director of the USAID-funded U.S.-Pakistan Center for