Asee peer logo
Displaying all 14 results
Conference Session
Construction Classroom Development
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tamara Chowdhury
Tagged Divisions
Construction
Outcomes Requires Student Learning Outcomes courses for curriculum 1 2 3 4 5 6 CMG 101 M L CMG 105 L L M CMG 110 S S TGC 217 S TGC 218 S L CMG 250 L M CMG 300 M L CMG 301 M S CMG
Conference Session
Construction Classroom Development
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Namhun Lee, East Carolina University; Eddy Rojas, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
Construction
excellent example of the innovative and transformative pedagogy that mostacademic institutions aspire to.Bibliography 1. AbouRizk, S. (1992). “A Stochastic Bidding Game for Construction Management.” SecondCanadian Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, CSCE, Ottawa, Ontario, pp. 576-587. 2. AbouRizk, S. and Sawhney, A. (1994). “Simulation and Gaming in ConstructionEngineering Education.” ASEE/C2E2 /C2EI Conference, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, AmericanSociety for Engineering Education. 3. Aldrich, C. (2005). Learning by Doing: A Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, ComputerGames, and Pedagogy in E-Learning and Other Educational Experiences. San Francisco: Pfeiffer. 4. Al-Jibouri, H. S. and Mawdesley, J. M. (2001). “Design and Experience with
Conference Session
Sustainable Construction Practice
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hyuksoo Kwon, Virginia Tech; Yong Han Ahn, East Carolina University; Hyun IK Shin, Kumoh National Instute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Construction
environment class 454 3.4978 1.22834[Integration] Interdisciplinary project and/or class including 454 3.4427 1.18677the concept of sustainability[Prior Experience] Experience and practice related to 454 3.6784 1.31978sustainable construction[Facility or Campaign] Sustainable facility or campaign in the 454 3.3612 1.20774university or college[Faculty] Professor(s) teaching sustainable construction 454 3.4361 1.21765The correlation coefficients between student’s attitude
Conference Session
Construction Classroom Development
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica Lower, Purdue.edu; Mark Shaurette, College of Technology, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Construction
meta-analysis to test a causal model. Communication Education, 55(1), 21-31.2. Cleveland-Innes, M. F. & Emes, C. (2005). Social and academic interaction in higher education contexts and the effect on deep learning. NASPA Journal, 42(2), 241-262.3. Cotten, S. R. & Wilson, B. (2006). Student-faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Higher Education, 51, 487-519.4. Etten, S. V., Pressley, M, McInerney, D. M., & Liem, A. D. (2008). College seniors’ theory of their academic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 812-828.5. Furlich, S. A. & Dwyer, J. F. (2007). Student motivation and instructor immediacy in community college mathematics classes. The Mathematics Educator, 10(2), 55-70.6. Halawah, I
Conference Session
Construction Classroom Development
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Whitney Lutey, Montana State University; Penny Knoll, Montana State University
Tagged Divisions
Construction
and Strategic Projects, College of Engineering, Montana State University and draftpaper reviewers for the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference.Bibliography1. Petersen, A.K., Reynolds, J.H., and Ng, L.W.T. (2008) The Attitude of Civil Engineering Students Towards Health and Safety Risk Management: a Case Study. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 33, Nos. 5-6:499-510.2. Andi. (2008) Construction workers perceptions toward safety culture. Civil Engineering Dimension 10.1: 1-6.3. Choudhry, R., Fang, D., and Mohamed, S. (2009) Closure of: Developing a Model of Construction Safety Culture. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 1: 45-47.4. National Construction Agenda (2008) For Occupational Safety and Health Research and
Conference Session
BIM and Other New Construction Practices
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Thomas Korman, California Polytechnic State University; Lonny Simonian, California Polytechnic State University
Tagged Divisions
Construction
shear walls, and architectural requirements, such as ceiling type and interstitial space.Each trade initially routes their system to their own advantage. This includes decreasing overalllength, routing close to support points, choosing prime locations for major components, andlocating system runs to facilitate the construction needs of their own trade.During coordination meetings, the participating student work groups compare preliminary routingfor their systems to identify and resolve conflicts. They also decide which trade(s) will revise theirdesign and submit requests for information (RFI) regarding problems that require an engineeringresolution. Deliverables of the project include the following: the building information model,coordinated
Conference Session
BIM and Other New Construction Practices
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Daphene Koch, Purdue University; Rajeswari Sundararajan, Purdue University; Greg Lasker, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Construction
daily wind speed was measured to be 5-6m/s,peaking from 9 a.m.-6 p.m8. The challenge was not only to design the most efficient wind energysystem but one that had enough storage capacity to maintain the house during peak energyconsumption hours when no wind was available.After obtaining all the necessary data HOMER, general-purpose hybrid system sizing andsimulation software, was used to identify the best system to supply electricity to the home basedon hourly performance simulations8. It was determined a 10 kW Jacob 23-10 wind turbine wasthe most efficient renewable wind energy system for the house. According to HOMER, a Jacob23-10 wind turbine would be able to support the energy needs of the home, and depending on theavailable wind energy, it
Conference Session
BIM and Other New Construction Practices
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Althea Arnold, University of North Texas
Tagged Divisions
Construction
assessment:A national study. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 1545-1562.2. Howe, S., Lasser, R., Su, K., and Pedicini, S. “AC 2009-1228: Content in Capstone Design Courses: Pilot SurveyResults from Faculty, Students, and Industry”, American Society for Engineering Education, 20093. Arnold, A. “Senior Design Capstone -- Lessons Learned From Our First Year”, Associated Schools ofConstruction Region5 Proceedings. Dallas, Texas October 2009. Worldwide web address:http://regionv.tamu.edu/conference/proceedings.asp4. Accreditation Board for Engineering & Technology (ABET). (2008). Criteria for Accrediting EngineeringTechnology Programs. Technology Accreditation Commission. Baltimore, MD. Worldwide web address:http://www.abet.org
Conference Session
Construction Classroom Development
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dennis Audo, Pittsburg State University; Seth O'Brien, Pittsburg State University
Tagged Divisions
Construction
) 2. Attention to detail (1-10 points) 3. Use of provided material(s) (1-10 points) 4. Oral presentation (1-25 points) 5. Enthusiasm (1-10 points) 6. Reason for participation (1-10 points) 7. Bonus points (Judge must state reason) (1-10 points) Students constructing their projectsEach grade level is awarded prizes for first, second and third place. Prizes awarded include toolboxes, tools, toy construction equipment, hats, pizza coupons, and gift cards. Then all the firstplace winners are judged to determine first, second and third overall. The prizes for overallwinners have been $100, $75, and $50 U. S. savings bonds
Conference Session
Sustainable Construction Practice
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Soller, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis; Daphene Koch, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Construction
15.730.8curriculum and the relevancy of the information will also be evaluated using the informationreceived from the students. The results of the assessment will be the subject of future studies.Bibliography1. Wahby, W.S. Industry and ET education collaborations from a construction engineering perspective. in 2004 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2004: American Society of Engineering Education.2. Viswanathan, S. and H. Evans, Harnessing industry collaboration in developing graduate-degree programs, in 2009 ASEE National Conference. 2009, American Society of Engineering Education.3. Dobrowski, T. University and industry collaboration ideas beneficial to both. in 2006 National ASEE
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Poster Session
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ifte Choudhury, Texas A&M University; Farzana Sultana, Vaughn Construction
Tagged Divisions
Construction
American Rainwater Harvesting Conference, Austin, TX, August 2003, pp. 335-343.6. Choudhury, I & Vasudevan, L., 2003, “Factors of biological contamination of harvested rainwater for residential consumption,” Hawaii International Conference on Social Sciences. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii. June 2003. [WWW document]. URL http://www.watercache.com/docs/rwquality1.pdf.7. Mbugua, J., 2000, “Rainwater harvesting and poverty alleviation, Laikipia experience,” [WWW document]. URL http://www.cpatsa.embrapa.br/catalogo/doc/political/5_2_John_Mbugua.doc.8. Mutekwa, V. & Kusangaya, S., 2006, “Contribution of rainwater harvesting technologies to rural livelihoods in Zimbabwe: the case of Ngundu ward in
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Poster Session
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Enno Koehn, Lamar University; Venkat Kadupukotta, Lamar University; Sandeep Tirunagari, Lamar University
Tagged Divisions
Construction
construction industry itself in the form of better economy and improved workingconditions.References: 1. Indian Concrete Journal, published by ACC limited, Vol-79, 2005. 2. Construction Planning and Management by U.K.Srivastava, 2009. 3. Concrete Technology Theory and Practice by S.Chand, Publishers: S. CHAND & COMPANY LTD, 2006. 4. Engineering Materials by Surendar Singh, Konark Publishers PVT Ltd, 2004. 5. Building Construction by B.C.Punmia, Laxmi Publication, 10th edition. 6. Foundation Engineering by P.C.Varghese, Prentice-hall Of India Pvt Ltd. 7. Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures by M.L.Gambhir, Prentice-hall Of India Pvt Ltd, 4th edition. 8. Ghareexpert: http://www.gharexpert.com
Conference Session
Sustainable Construction Practice
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mark Shaurette, College of Technology, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Construction
appropriateshould be part of the curriculum as well.Bibliography1. D’Agostino, B., Mikulis, M., & Bridgers, M. (2007). FMI & CMAA Eighth Annual Survey of Owners. Raleigh,NC: FMI2. National Demolition Association. (2010). 10 Common Misconceptions about the Demolition Industry. Retrievedon January 3, 2010 fromhttp://www.demolitionassociation.com/PUBLICRELATIONS/10CommonMisconceptions/tabid/108/Default.aspx3. Institute of Demolition Engineers. (2008). Trading hard hats for mortar boards. Demolition Engineer. 2007(3),8-9. Page 15.1227.114. Beckman, K., Coulter, N., & Khajenoori, S. (1997). Collaborations: closing the industry-academia
Conference Session
BIM and Other New Construction Practices
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anthony Mutai, Bowling Green State University; Stan Guidera, Bowling Green State University
Tagged Divisions
Construction
, A., Benne, B., & Kalay, Y. E. (1998). Intelligent representation for computer- aided building design. Automation In Construction, 8, 49-71. 16 Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2008). BIM handbook: A guide to Building Information Modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 17 Jernigan, F. (2007). BIG BIM small bim: The practical approach to Building Information Modeling, integrated practice done the right way! (1st ed.). Salisbury, MD: 4Sites Press. 18 Fox, S., & Hietanen, J. (2007). Interorganizational use of building information models: Potential for automational, informational and transformational effects