with “troubleshooting, research anddevelopment, invention and innovation, and experimentation in problem solving,” andstandard 11 with “applying the design process.” In the forward to the standards, WilliamWulf noted, “It is not enough that the standards are published. To have an impact, theymust influence what happens in every K-12 classroom in America.” Technology education shares engineering education’s desire to emphasize open-ended problem solving and the design process. For example, Standard 8 delineates designsteps very similar to those introduced to engineering students. In order to recognize theattributes of design, students in grades 9-12 should learn that the design process includes: • defining a problem, • brainstorming
impact of Web-based technology in education. Dr. Huguet’s primary areas of interest for research and practice include instructional design, Web-based design, integration of Web-based technology, and faculty adoption of emerging technologies.Tom Haley, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteYaron Danon, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Page 15.638.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Hands-On Nuclear Engineering Education – A Blended ApproachAbstractBlended instruction has become a powerful delivery mode whose power lies in the merging oftraditional, face-to-face instruction and web-based instruction. It also
under a single college orschool the disciplines of engineering and technology. The curriculums were evolved with asingular focus. As time passed, theoretical instruction became more prominent and some ofthese colleges and schools pushed the technology portion of the curriculum to the peripheral,others simply eliminated technology altogether.The College of Engineering’s Division of Engineering Professional Education (ProEd) and theCollege of Technology’s Center for Professional Studies in Technology and Applied Research(ProSTAR) share a common purpose, mission and vision. Underlying these is the fundamentalpremise that both serve the graduate educational needs of professional working adult learners inthe STEM disciplines; this through credit and
- neers of Alberta, and the Medal of Distinction for Engineering Education from the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers. Dr. Sundararaj’s main research interests are in polymer blend and nanocomposite structure generation in twin-screw extruders, and modeling of polymer processes. In 2003, he received the prestigious Polymer Processing Society’s Morand Lambla Award for research in polymer processing and in 2006, he received the Humboldt Research Fellowship (Germany). He has won three best paper awards and has given over twenty (20) plenary and keynote presentations at major conferences. His interests outside work include basketball, gardening and chess.John A. Nychka, University of Alberta John was an assistant
product team; the team could include people who must fulfill roles in finance,marketing, history, law, design, procurement, scientific research, manufacture, maintenance, andthe list could go on and on. The ability to effectively communicate is the most important skillthat allows an engineer-leader to bridge the gap. The continual development of all leaders,especially engineer-leaders, must include training and development of this most important skill.Therefore, every single LTP offsite has included this element as a means for training our futureleaders to bridge the gap. The “Decision Making: The Full Monty!” offsite weekend summitwas no exception.What makes the program unique compared to others?What other classroom, training, teaching, or
for Today’s Practicing Engineers”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 1997 Conference •”Successful Model for Corporate-University Col- laboration”, International Association for Continuing Engineering education (IACEE), 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor •”Designing Engineer Educa- tional Partnership Model”, IACEE 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with Michigan Technolog- ical University •”Reengineering a Successful Graduate Program”, IACEE 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute •”Developing Product and Manufacturing Integra- tion Engineers”, IACEE 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with
Paper ID #11233Running the Academy as a BusinessDr. Mitchell L Springer PMP, SPHR, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Springer currently serves as the Executive Director for Purdue University’s College of Technology located in West Lafayette, Indiana. He possesses over 35 years of theoretical and industry-based practical experience from four disciplines: Software Engineering, Systems Engineering, Program Management and Human Resources. Dr. Springer possesses a significant strength in pattern recognition, analyzing and improving organizational systems. He is internationally recognized, has contributed to scholarship more
AC 2008-1643: A REVIEW OF PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATION,DEVELOPMENT, AND RECOGNITION OF FACULTY TEACHING IN HIGHEREDUCATION AROUND THE WORLDDirk Schaefer, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Dirk Schaefer is an Assistant Professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech Savannah, USA. His research interests are focused on the high-impact interdisciplinary area of Information Engineering for Complex Engineered Systems. Prior to joining Georgia Tech, Dr. Schaefer was a Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Durham University, UK. He has published around sixty-five papers on Computer-Aided Engineering and Design as well as Engineering Education in conference
measurements will allow program directors to assess thesuccess of the new initiative.SummaryThe CGEP directors are working together to share institutional strategies for moving engineeringcourses and degree programs online. While the approach may be different at each institution thedirectors are investigating how to apply Rogers Theory of Diffusion as a framework to increasefaculty interest and movement toward placing courses and degree programs online. The firststep in the development of this process occurred in June 2009 with a workshop designed topromote the best practices for developing and delivering online engineering programs.Additionally a follow-up assessment is planned to help determine additional best practices.References1. Allen, Elaine
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Demographic Leadership –A First of its Kind Diversity Leadership Online Course in a Tier-1 University Doctorate Degree ProgramAbstractThis first course in a professional doctorate degree program called the Doctorate of Technology(DTECH) on demographic leadership at a tier 1 university was premised on years of research,practice, and scholarship. The scholarship was conducted by asking the question “Why don’tyou like me?”“Why don’t you like me?” as a research question, is not about the author(s) individually, butabout each of us as individuals. It is about all of us. The question is really “why don’t
programs for KUSU graduates at Syracuse University, and professionaldevelopment workshops for teachers in Kenya. The interventions were based on quantitativeresearch studies conducted to determine where they would be most appropriate. The KUSUpartnership was structured on design-based research (DBR) methods framework. Figure 4describes the design-based research process. 12 Analysis of Development of Iterative practical solutions Reflection to cycles of problems by informed by
color that provides a written description of excess O2 and draft. Many of the courseinstructors have contributed materials to the book, which is primarily used as a reference for thestudents. Each student also receives a training manual containing the presentation slides in color. Page 14.721.6Plenty of space is provided for learners to make notes in the manual. Some of the slides alsocontain blanks designed to be filled in by the students to help encourage them to stay engagedand keep up with the instructor.Table 1 is a print device designed to show learners how opening or closing the burner or stackdamper impacts the excess O2 and draft
. The originaloffering was cohort-based and it employed a weekend format; meeting from Friday throughSunday. The cohort met three times a semester, twice in the summer semester, for a total of fivesemesters (Fall, Spring, Summer, Fall and Spring). After 22 months, all members of the initialcohort format graduated in the May 2000 graduation ceremony. Because of its non-traditionalapproach, the state’s authorization included the establishment of a different fee structure thannormal on-campus classes which resulted in a program cost that was higher than traditional on-campus equivalent programs.The Center for Professional Studies in Technology and Applied Research (ProSTAR) wasapproved by Purdue University under the College of Technology as an
that an experienced engineer ortechnician in a particular field was a sure fit as a teacher or trainer. Such assumptions invariably Page 26.1340.3lead to less than stellar classroom activities and tend to promote lackluster learningenvironments9. Consequently, this Practical Instructional Design for Engineers project wasdeveloped to initiate engineers into the world of learning and teaching by focusing on how todevelop and deliver training courses and materials that are constructed on instructional designbest practices. The Learning Training and Development team conduct formal research tocontinually improve company education products and
in GMU offering a Graduate Certificate Program in TechnicalEntrepreneurship tailored to meet the needs of USACE. Technological change and the increasein privatization and enterprise development trends within the public sector require a wide varietyof multidisciplinary skills for the successful management of government technical programs andprojects. The graduate level technical entrepreneurship certificate responds to the need for broadtraining in entrepreneurial skills, performance measurement, engineering informationmanagement, systems analysis and leadership.This paper assesses the impact of the GMU certificate program on USACE Headquarters and itsemployees. It attempts to answer the question: Are USACE engineers better leaders
, Boyd’s hobbies include back country camping and hiking as well as learning self reliance in the wild.Mr. Eric Paul Pearson, Northrop Grumman, Electronic Systems Eric Pearson is the Director of Cross-Sector Program Initiatives for Northrop Grumman Corporation. His has responsibilities for relationship building and cross culture leadership development. Eric has a BS in Education from Bowie State University and an MS In Technical Management form the Johns Hopkins, Whiting School of Engineering. Eric is best known for his development and leadership of the Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems New Graduate Engineering Rotation Program and the Recent Graduate Leadership Training Program (LTP), having selected and mentored
bachelor degree typically non-engineering, or just taken a number of courses.Many of these students also dropped out of college many years ago, due to family or financialreasons, or due to mediocre academic performance. In other words, these online students areusually mature individuals. They enrolled in the program with a specific goal of completing theircollege degree or extending their expertise for career advancement. Unlike the on-campus studentswho have just graduated from high school, these individuals often have rich life experiences andare not looking for the social aspect of the college experience. At the time of the application to theonline program, practically all of them hold jobs and are more mature and focused students. Theyeither
priority. Distance students are more likely to be practicing engineers, with learning goals tied to advancing their practical knowledge and career advancement. Course content must be highly relevant and authentic. Employ project-based learning that challenges and enables students to apply what they are learning to their workplace projects. Provide flexibility in assignments that allow students to hone their learning to their specific goals. Engage the experience and expertise of students for the benefit of all learners in the class. Engage experienced, capable instructional designers in the design of the program and each course. Investing in knowledgeable, capable instructional designers is one of the best investments a
organizationsunderstand they must prepare employees to compete in the global economy, to meet and exceedservice expectations, to adjust to changing roles and new technologies, and to respond to currentand future global pressures. Continuing education and training is no longer considered a cost tocut, but rather an investment to attract and retain the best workforce7. From Rose-Hulman’sperspective, it is also a way to stay connected with practicing professionals and be aware of theircurrent needs. Thus, continuing education promotes excellence in fulfilling the on-campuseducational mission by helping to assure that curricula, materials and delivery techniques areappropriate for the challenges that will be faced by the Institute’s graduates.To paraphrase Jim
Engineering from MIT and her M.S. in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include engineering design education (especially in regards to the design of complex systems), student preparation for post-graduation careers, and innovations in research-to-practice.Mel Chua, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Mel is an engineering education researcher with a focus on hacker/maker culture and faculty development. She is also an electrical and computer engineer and an order-20 all-pole auditory low-pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 250Hz.Dr. Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University Stephanie Cutler has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her dissertation
, annual, international conference focused on engineering education which is co-sponsored by IEEE and ASEE.Kara D Lynch, University of Kansas Continuing Education Kara Lynch is publication manager in the Center for Engineering and Interdisciplinary Professional Edu- cation at the University of Kansas and is responsible for developing and managing all publications related to marketing. She is also responsible for developing a communication and market research analysis strat- egy for the engineering and interdisciplinary programs at KUCE. Kara’s bachelor’s degree is in commu- nications from Fort Hays State University, Hays, Kansas, and her master’s degree is in journalism with communications emphasis from the University
an office suite. He’s in transportation – so a completely different unrelated civil engineering sub-discipline there. We started talking and all of the sudden we had some similar interests ….we started kind of talking about what could we do and then we kind of came up with trying to incorporate problem based learning into some classes that he and I were teaching.”For her second class, Dr. Jacksone was assigned to teach a senior design class and the first timethrough was with an established professor mentoring her which had a big impact on her approachto teaching these classes. “I think he mentored me extremely well …… I don’t think I wouldhave taught it like the other class in terms of where I had a curriculum that I
the position. Unfortunately, the lack of technicalskills and overall ability to perform the required duties of the position led to the dismissal of theemployee after a mere six months. The mathematical impact was: ~$28,000 between paying theindividual’s salary for six months and the 30% of the individual’s salary it cost the company toreplace this person. Having an individual in a role they were not qualified for over the course ofsix months also adversely impacts the employer’s projected profit margins. Privateorganizations generally do not view this as an acceptable standard practice where profits are thedriving force. Figure 3 displays a chart from Boushey and Glynn that shows the cost of replacingan employee [15
the faculty communities to ensure eligibility offuture funding, but the messaging for this mandate builds on our faculty’s own best practices fortheir research. Our faculty view weekly research group meetings as normative and maybe evencritical for the success of their research programs. More importantly, faculty do not find theseweekly meetings to infringe on their academic freedom, because these weekly meetings flow outof their common communal interest. By establishing faculty community first, these weekly Page 24.1329.7meetings should align with the academic freedom of the faculty and build on their beliefs of whatpractices support good
sufficient condition for an engineeringteacher. A good research scholar can be a good researcher, but he may not be a good teacher.Neither regulatory bodies nor the engineering colleges’ leadership requires teachers having anyexposure to theory and practices of education domain. This impacts performance of faculty andoverall college education, and perhaps results in mushrooming of private tuition classes that haveshort term focus and examination orientation. It is estimated that the overall private tuitionmarket’s annual turnover is double than the budget for education in the ongoing five year plan.All this is resulting in stooping down of the estimated employability of graduate engineers toonly 25% 3.Meantime the global demands from engineering
. Journal of Developmental Education, 23(2), 2-4, 6, 8. 10. Boylan, H. R. (2002). What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education. Boone, NC: National Center for Developmental Education. 11. Engel, C E (1991) Not Just a Method But a Way of Learning, in Boud D and Feletti, G (ends) The Challenge of Problem Based Learning. London: Kogan Page. 12. Magill, S. L., & Herden, R. P. (1998, October). Using educational outcomes and student portfolios to steer management education. Journal of Management Education, 22 (5), 567-90. 13. Keefe, J. W. (1991). Learning style: Cognitive and thinking skills. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals. 14. Keefe, J. W
Paper ID #18261Exploring School-to-work Transitions through Reflective JournalingMr. Ben David Lutz, Virginia Tech Ben Lutz is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research in- terests include innovative pedagogies in engineering design, exploring student experiences within design settings, school-to-work transitions for new engineers, and efforts for inclusion and diversity within en- gineering. His current work explores how students describe their own learning in engineering design and how that learning supports transfer of learning from school into professional practice as well
on: Who are the new students The implications of ever increasing college costs The impact of increasing debt loads Moving back home after graduation and its implications – Postponing marriage – Postponing the buying of homes, cars and other material possessions Educational and income implications of having children later in life How do we make program/cost changes to our offerings to remain competitiveWho Are the Students?To better understand how best and who is best to teach today’s college student, the personality Page 26.1559.2and essence of the student needs to be better understood.In a recent book
is a State of Indiana Registered domestic mediator.Mr. Mark T Schuver, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mark Schuver is the Director for the Center for Professional Studies in Technology and Applied Re- search (ProSTAR) in the College of Technology at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. He is responsible for the administration/operations of the Center with Program Management oversight of the Rolls-Royce Master’s Degree, the Construction Management Master’s Degree and non-credit certificate programs for working professionals in the College of Technology. Prior to joining Purdue in 2002, Mark was employed by Caterpillar Inc. for 35 years with assignments in Product Design, Research and De- velopment
: ≠ Orientation workshops for instructors which highlight the background educational research, student survey data from previous semesters, and provide activities to practice writing open-ended higher-order thinking questions. These workshops built a community of users and provided more information to faculty about best practices in scientific teaching. ≠ Meetings between the instructors and the programmer to learn how the instructors would tag responses. Our team began with the idea of being able to quickly sort responses and provide feedback. After talking to faculty we found that there are many methods of sorting responses and different perspectives on the types of feedback that should be sent to