. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Demographic Leadership –A First of its Kind Diversity Leadership Online Course in a Tier-1 University Doctorate Degree ProgramAbstractThis first course in a professional doctorate degree program called the Doctorate of Technology(DTECH) on demographic leadership at a tier 1 university was premised on years of research,practice, and scholarship. The scholarship was conducted by asking the question “Why don’tyou like me?”“Why don’t you like me?” as a research question, is not about the author(s) individually, butabout each of us as individuals. It is about all of us. The question is really “why don’t
Cybersecurity Related Skills.” [Online]. Available: https://cybersecurityventures.com/only-3-percent-of-u-s-bachelors- degree-grads-have-cybersecurity-related-skills/. [Accessed: 18-Dec-2019].[16] “2019 Cybersecurity Almanac: 100 Facts, Figures, Predictions and Statistics.” [Online]. Available: https://cybersecurityventures.com/cybersecurity-almanac-2019/. [Accessed: 18- Dec-2019].[17] “Online Cyber Security Certificate Programs | Search for Schools.” [Online]. Available: https://www.cyberdegrees.org/listings/certificate-programs-online/. [Accessed: 18-Dec- 2019].[18] “History of Boot Camps – Boot Camp & Military Fitness Institute.” [Online]. Available: https://bootcampmilitaryfitnessinstitute.com/what-are-boot-camps
threeparticipants. The third member maintained their student performance ratio. Evaluation of the RTOPevaluation tool displays a shift in engineering faculty attitudes and beliefs towards fidelity of EBISand JTF pedagogy. Future work includes the dissemination of these evidence based instructionalstrategies and JTF pedagogy across a second cohort, as well as additional RTOP analysis for eachparticipant. A broader impact of this novel study is increased student performance, engagement, anddevelopment throughout their engineering careers.References[1] Krause, S., Middleton, J., Hjelmstad, K., Judson, E., Culbertson, R., Ankeny, C., Stevens, D. (2016). Scaling a Cyber-Enabled, Just-in-Time-Teaching with Two-Way Formative Feedback (JTF) Pedagogy to the
that synchronous courses beoffered at particular times (partner requests). Efforts were made to create long-term (2 to 3 year)schedules which provided the DL student with information about course future offerings.Furthermore, as DL programs became more popular at the university, access to a limited numberof DL classrooms (university controlled) became competitive. The department, and oureducational partners developed asynchronous classes which alleviated the time requirement, andallowed students who were on extended deployments to remain in the program. Furthermore, weused well-qualified adjunct faculty to teach courses pertinent to the degree. Many of thesefaculty were Ph.D.’s or MD’s employed by our partner, which allowed some of the courses
do so, students were admitted to Purdue and registered for the appropriate course(s) by the regular campus deadlines even though the classes didn’t start at the traditional campus semester start times. • The Purdue Business Office did not invoice Red Gold until the courses were actually delivered. • Course delivery schedules were built around Pack Season by holding one course in the fall, two courses in the spring and one course in the summer.The students selected to attend Phase I, now named Certificate of Completion from RedGold University as delivered by Purdue University, were Team Leaders from variousdepartments and plants at Red Gold. They came from scheduling, plant floor operations,and the maintenance
discussion to facilitate a consistent understanding of the technology andpedagogy.Two-Way Interactive VideoA classroom equipped with video transmission/receive equipment is connected to one or moreother remote classrooms similarly equipped. Typically, a presentation originates from one siteand is transmitted to the other site(s). The students in remote classrooms can both see and hearthe instructor real-time, and the instructor can see and hear students from the remote sites.Remote sites have the image of the instructor and presentation materials either on a televisionmonitor or as a projected image. The instructor can lecture and present materials using the samemedia as in a traditional classroom (chalk, overheads, video tapes, computer generated
the blocking and tackling of process creation. The difficulty,however, comes during the process completion step of assigning resources. During this activity,true cross-discipline collaboration must occur. The resultant process flow may very well be apermutation with inefficiencies and additional costs if cultural and emotional considerationsmaterialize.While the above discussion provides meaningful insight into defining distance education as aprocess, and provides a methodology to do so, an area for further research would be to surveyseveral comparable universities to determine their peer organizational structures andsubsequently validate the methodology proposed above.References1 Bozkurt, A., Akgun-Ozbec, E., Yilmazel, S., et al. (2015
', Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11 (2004), 247-72.8 Ruth Deakin Crick, and Guoxing Yu, 'Assessing Learning Dispositions: Is the Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory Valid and Reliable as a Measurement Tool?', Educational Research, 50 (2008), 387-402.9 S. M. Lord, J. C. Chen, K. J. McGaughey, and V. W. Chang, 'Measuring Propensity for Lifelong Learning: Comparing Chinese and U.S. Engineering Students', in Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2013 IEEE (2013), pp. 329-34.10 John C Chen, Karen McGaughey, and Susan M Lord, 'Measuring Students' Propensity for Lifelong Learning', in Profession of Engineering Education: Advancing Teaching, Research and Careers: 23rd
area(s). Learning Objectives: What will teachers take away from this lesson? While some learning objectives can be bottom line and traditional, the intention is that the most beneficial portion of the lesson is the teacher's inference on its application to the teachers' subject area. Main Idea: This is the message to the team of freshmen who pick this topic in order to communicate what the EPICS course is envisioning for this module. These are restatements of the learning objectives with subtle suggestions for the interactivity; Page 24.1392.7 however, this decision is ultimately made by the
Page 26.1673.13and Management Technology (ICEMT), 2010 International Conference on (pp. 362 - 366). IEEE ConferencePublications.5 Lawrence-Slater, M. (2002). On-line learning: a student viewpoint. Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32ndAnnual . 1, pp. T1E-19 - T1E-24 vol.1 . IEEE Conference Publications.6 Aippersbach, S, Alley, M., Garner, J. (2013)" How Slide Design Affects a Student Presenter’s Understanding ofthe Content ." 2013 ASEE Annual Conference. American Society for Engineerin Education, 2013.7 Jones, R., Plemmons, K., (2007) Addressing the Career Development Needs of Experienced Project Professionals,AC2007-1283, 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition8 Tian, Z; Abraham, J. (2014) Application of computational fluid
Ability to Influence Department and Faculty Participation. ASEE/CIEC 2013 Conference. Phoenix, AZ.4 The Chronicle of Higher Education. (2014). Almanac 2014-2015. The Chronicle of Higher Education, August 22,2014, Volume LX, Number 45.5 Black. (2013). Explanation and Types of Doctorates. Black Ph.D. / Ed.D. Magazine Online. Downloaded from theinternet April 3, 2013. http://blackphdeddmagazine.com/Explanation_and_Types_of_Doctorates.html6 Dunn, S. (2014). We’ve Formed an Adjunct Union. Now What? The Chronicle of Higher Education. Downloaded from the internet November 13, 2014. https://chroniclevitae.com/news/798-we-ve-formed-an-adjunct-union- now-what?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en
subject. The root cause lies in thefamiliar enablers, computing, control and communications. The powerful workstationprocessor of 1990 is now a $2 embedded component and multiple 1990 supercomputersare routinely available for each system management function. The same electronicscapability now allows data to be collected at Gbyte/s rates. Control functions can bedetermined by complex algorithms rather than constrained closed loops. Moresignificantly, all the data can be stored for future analysis or reports. Low cost, high datarate fiber or wireless communications is the glue that holds the system together.The industry has exploited the new technology to create a global marketplace of suppliersand users. They are both the creators and principal
Summary S Y T Y Final Final Total Avail % Availab % PG Total Total B B B M able UG le PG Votes Avail % Tech Tech Tech Tech UG Votes Votes able Votes Votes Civil 6 28 3 13 50 248 15% 107 12% 355 14% Computer & IT 65 88 64 6 223 517 42% 18 33% 535 42% Electrical 19 7 5 29 60 255 12% 38 76% 293 20% E & TC 13 31 14 22 80
basisoften in another location where there may be issues getting particular courses. When a studentleaves early, the program completion rate suffers and there is lost income to the college. As thecurricula were developed, consideration was given to keeping required undergraduate coursesthroughout the last year of the program. The senior design project usually provides thisconstraint in that it may not be possible to offer that course(s) out of sequence. In the case of theElectrical – MBA program in Figure 1, it is typically not possible to complete all of the SeniorElectives (EE Sr Elec) prior to the 5th year.Advanced Placement – Completing both degrees in five years requires that students are ahead ofthe traditional curriculum. Students are best
23.4.5Operating Philosophy:The most efficient way to operate an effective and efficient TCEP is with teamwork. Theprinciple players on the team are: 1. Technical Community Leadership 2. University Partner(s) 3. Human Resource Management 4. Employee University Partner 1. Tailored Curriculum 2. Application-Oriented Faculty 3. Technical Graduate DegreeHuman Relations Technical Community 1. Career Path Management 1. Champion the TCEP 2. Efficiency of Operations 2. Content
a reasonable “value” for your performance improvements along with a commonly used formula for estimating "real" training costs, the spreadsheet will calculate a Return on Investment for the training. The calculation can help you determine if it is worth your while to take the training. Each section is explained as you come to it. ENTER YOUR DATA IN THE ORANGE SHADED CELLS. ALL OTHER CELLS ARE PROTECTED. Step 1: TASK COMPENSATION This section calculates the weighted value of the portion of your base total "cash value" compensation (pay plus benefits) that is devoted to tasks involving the use of the knowledge/skills set(s) dealt with in the training program you are considering. Enter your base annual gross salary in line 1. In line 2, enter
visualization of materials concepts through demonstrations and experiential learning through hands on exercises. Page 22.301.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Building an Engaged, Collaborative, and Inspired Teaching CultureIn the early 1990’s, the University of Alberta was already using teaching awards, peerconsultation, and student course evaluations to motivate better teaching. While the culture waspositive, it was not informed or intentional. Over the last twenty years, the faculty has growndramatically, many new instructors have been hired, class sizes have increased, and the
GillichBibliography1. Bourne, J., D. Harris, and F. Mayadas, Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 94(1): p. 131-146.2. ABET, Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. 2005, ABET: Baltimore, MD.3. Trapp, S., Blended Learning Concepts – a Short Overview, in Innovative Approaches for Learning and Knowledge Sharing, E. Tomadaki and P. Scott, Editors. 2006, Sun SITE Central Europe: Aachen, Germany. p. 28-35.4. Schramm, D., Global challenges for engineering educators: lessons from an online masters degree for practicing engineers, in 2002 ASEE/SEFI/TUB Colloquium. 2002, American Society for Engineering Education: Berlin, Germany.5. Allen, I.E., J
Incoming Working Professional Students. In Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. San Antonio, TX.: American Society for Engineering Education.6 Triola, M. (2010). Elementary Statistics. 11th Ed. San Francisco, CA.: Addison-Wesley.7 College of Technology (2012). 2012 MS Student Handbook. West Lafayette, IN.: Graduate Office, College of Technology.8 Dyrenfurth, M., Newton, K., Schuver, M. & Elliott, S. (2009). ROI: Return on Investment as a Factor in Designing Graduate Research Projects for Mutual Benefit. In Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Austin, TX.: American Society for Engineering Education. Page 23.1276.9
. Adams, R.S., and Felder, R.M. (2008). Reframing Professional Development: A systems approach to preparingengineering educators to educate tomorrow’s engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 239–240.2. Boice, R. (2000). Advice for New Faculty Members: Nihil Nimus. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.3. Felder, R.M., Brent, R.,and Prince, M. J. (2011) Engineering instructional Development: Programs, BestPractices, and Recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 89-122.4. Fink, D.L., Ambrose, S. and Wheeler, D. (2005). Becoming a professional engineering educator: A new role for a Page 23.1356.9new era. Journal of
Market ResearchUPCEA Hallmarks of Excellence in Online Leadership. The UPCEA Hallmarks of Excellencein Online Leadership was developed by the UPCEA National Task Force on Hallmarks ofExcellence in Online Leadership: Jay A. Halfond, Boston University & Senior Fellow UPCEACenter for Online Leadership and Strategy (chair); Andrew Casiello, Old Dominion Universiy;Dave Cillay, Washington State University; Nancy Coleman, PlattForm; Vickie Cook, Universityof Illinois Springfield; John LaBrie, Northeastern University; Mary Niemiec, University ofNebraska; and Witt Salley, Clemson University.Bauer, S., & Bastedo, K., November 17, 2016, Advanced Professional Development for Experienced Online Faculty. Lecture presented at Online Learning
our experience, we believe that the online learning paradigm is conduciveto the 21st-centry education where creativity, critical thinking, communication and collaborationare encouraged.References1. S. Patrick, “E-Learning: A Federal Perspective”, U.S. Department of Education, (www.nutn.org/susan_patrick.pdf).2. J. Bourne, D. Harris, F. Mayadas, “Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime”, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 9(1), pp. 15-41 (2005).3. A. F. Mayadas, “What is ALN?” (http://www.aln.org.alnweb.aln.htm).4. L. Palma, R. F. Morrison, P. N. Enjeti, J W. Howze ,“Use of Web-Based Materials to Teach Electric Circuit Theory,, IEEE Transactions on Education, 48 (4) November 2006.5
is that we had more content than we couldreasonably address within time available for the course, so focusing on objectives and outcomeshelped us pare the material down to its most important components.A revised version of Bloom’s Taxonomy [3] was used to write learning outcomes and objectivesin measurable terms. As a result of an iterative process between SME and curriculum designers,course level learning objectives were aligned with the learning outcomes; likewise, module-levellearning objectives were aligned to course-level learning objectives to ensure that each learningmodule could help learners to achieve intended learning outcomes. To exemplify this point, thetable below lists learning outcomes, course-level objectives, and Module 1’s
Research Center. January 31. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact- tank/2018/01/31/more-adults-now-share-their-living-space-driven-in-part-by-parents-living-with-their-adult- children/[2] Dimock, M. (2019). Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins. Pew Research Center. January 17, 2019.[3] Smith, C., Turner, S. (2016). The Radical Transformation of Diversity and Inclusion: The Millennial Influence. Deloitte University, The Leadership Center for Inclusion. Downloaded from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/radical-transformation-of-diversity-and- inclusion.html.[4] Keathley, J., Merrill, P., Owens, T., & Meggarrey, I. (2013). “The Executive Guide to Innovation
program • Who is responsible for professional development program enforcement? • How is the professional development program implemented at the national level? • How is the professional development program implemented at the local level? • How is the professional development program included in accreditation? • Is participation compulsory or voluntarily? • Who is/are the target group(s)? • What is the professional development program duration? • What is the professional development program content? • How are qualifications recognized and/or rewarded?Clearly criteria, standards, and policy regarding professional qualification for teaching in highereducation are unique to each nation’s needs, interests, and
faculty, documentation of professional development activities, or other teaching related items. ‚ Is participation compulsory or voluntarily? Participation requirements vary widely. ‚ Who is/are the target group(s)? While some countries focus on professional development for junior faculty, others address all those teaching in technical, engineering-related domains. ‚ What is the professional development program duration? There may be multiple sequential levels of professional development activities and/or achievement, and programs vary from short courses to continuous development. ‚ What is the professional development
education research and the learning sciences, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 151-185, 2011.4. S. Galloway, The professional body and continuing professional development: New directions in engineering, Innovations in Education and Training International, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 231-240, 1998.5. National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, retrieved from http://www.nae.edu/Publications/Reports/25677.aspx, 2005.6. M.H. McCaulley, E.S. Godleski, C.F. Yokomoto, L. Harrisberger, and E.D. Sloan, Applications of psychological type in engineering education, Engineering Education, Vol. 73
,and employing good listening skills, faculty can effectively navigate a variety of career situationsto arrive at a mutually beneficial end.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to acknowledge the review committee for the Women in EngineeringDivision, which encouraged them to formalize the panel discussion into a paper focused onacademic negotiation.References 1. Fisher, R., Ury, W. and Patton, B. (2012). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Third Ed., London: Random House 2. Harvard Business Essentials: Negotiation, 2003. 3. Kolb, D.M., Williams, J. (2003) Everyday Negotiation, Navigating the Hidden Agendas in Bargaining, Jossey-Bass. 4. Babcock, L., and Laschever, S., (2003). Women Don’t Ask
, Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning, in R.E. Mayer (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 19-30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.24. J. Sweller, P. Ayres, and S. Kalyuga, Cognitive Load Theory, New York: Springer, 2011.25. J.E. Kemp and D.C. Smellie, Planning, Producing, and Using Instructional Technologies (7th ed.), New York: HarperCollins, 1994.26. K. Burke, A pragmatic approach to criticism of multimedia, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 6(1), 57-75, 1977-78.27. R. Slawson, Multi-Image Slide/Tape Programs, Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1988.28. R.D. Owens and G.O. Coldevin, Effects of varied temporal visual overlapping in multi-image tape-slide presentations
Page 23.158.11Planner / Leader(s) (2-4)The planners are the key to the successful creation, development and execution of a leadershipweekend summit. Between two and four extreme leaders who have completed their LTPexperiences volunteer their time, thoughts and personal visions to create a weekend summitretreat. They spend between six and twelve months creating a theme, developing a programstructure, soliciting a cadre of volunteers to assist in the development and execution phases of theprogram and leading the four day/three night experiential leadership event for up to ninetyvolunteer participants, coaches, session champions and group coaches.The efforts are similar to serving as a program manager who has won a project, must select andlead a