this transformation, there is cause towarrant a broader exploration of relevant constructs. First, there is concern that self-efficacy canbe considered as a deficit-based construct. Second, its creation in the American context may nottranslate directly to the African context. [4] compared results on the General Self-Efficacy Scaleacross 25 countries and found some variation in the internal consistency across countries, basedon the range of Cronbach’s alpha values, a reliability measure, seen. Most of these countrieswere located in the Global North, and no single African country was included in the study. It istherefore possible that the self-efficacy construct may not be as relevant to our students as thosein other contexts. Third, some
previous research shows thatconfidence or self efficacy greatly impacts perseverance in the major [6]. If underrepresentedstudents in particular say that assessment and reporting practices negatively impact theirconfidence and are not always accurate representations of their learning, then these studentsmight be discouraged from persisting in the engineering major, thus further perpetuating thediversity problem that already exists in the profession.This paper explores how students describe the effect of assessment practices on their perceivedsense of efficacy. Specifically, it examines whether students report differences in their sense ofself-efficacy in response to different kinds of assessment (eg. tests vs. hands-on projects) andreporting of
clinical immersion course impacts students from historicallymarginalized groups in race, ethnicity, first-generation status, gender, and age. Comparisonswere made between historically marginalized groups such as African Americans, Hispanics,women, and first-generation college students and their dominant counterparts. Pre- and post-course Likert scale questions were used to analyze the student’s sense of self-efficacy, abilities tomake connections and create value, and general interests in engineering. Preliminary dataanalysis indicated that there are discrepancies in the results of different demographic groups.Further analysis will be conducted to reveal the intricacies of the relationship betweenhistorically marginalized groups and their
. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 23, p. 16284, 2022.6. Renshaw, T. L., & Bolognino, S. J. (2016). "The College Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire: A brief, multidimensional measure of undergraduate’s covitality." Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(2), pp. 463-484.7. Heslin, P. A., & Klehe, U. C. (2006). "Self-efficacy." Encyclopedia Of Industrial/Organizational Psychology, SG Rogelberg, Ed., vol. 2, pp. 705-708.8. Maddux, J. E., & Meier, L. J. (1995). "Self-efficacy and depression." In Self-Efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment, pp. 143-169. Springer, Boston, MA.9. Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). "The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A
financial difficulty. Prior research has acknowledged that HC socializes students to conform to thestatus quo [21]. Within this largely middle-class, straight, White, able-bodied, and malediscipline, the status quo perpetuates gendered values (HC), such as masculinity,objectivity, and autonomy through messages embedded in institutional and instructionalways [32].HC in engineering Individuals process and respond to HC by recognizing it (awareness), processingit (emotions), deciding what they can do about it (self-efficacy), and acting (self-advocacy) [2], [4]–[7], [9], [11], [12]. Previous research characterized individuals’responses to HC into three categories: 1) minimal/no action, 2) negotiating self, and 3)changing the environment
Arbor. Her dissertation studied the effects of instruction in engineering classrooms on women’s socioemotional outcomes including sense of belonging, engineering self-efficacy, and desire to remain in engineering.Donald L. Gillian-Daniel Don Gillian-Daniel (he/him) engages higher education and disciplinary and professional society audi- ences in learning how to use more equitable and inclusive professional practices (e.g., teaching, advising, research mentoring, colleagueship, and leadership). He has worked locally, nationally, and internation- ally, and consulted with universities, National Science Foundation-funded initiatives, as well as national non-profits. Don is the inaugural director of Professional
Imagination framework) [1] included in the curriculum to guidestudents through a detailed analysis of a song’s lyrics and their meaning, and 2) teachers’ self-efficacy for and attitudes around teaching on racial equity-related topics, including the specificpedagogical approaches non-racist teaching, culturally relevant teaching, and anti-racist teaching.This paper will present the results of the current evaluation with a specific focus on these twonewly added areas of inquiry. Results indicate that students and teachers found lyric analysis andthe OUTKAST Imagination framework to be a useful and valuable tool, and that teachers aregenerally comfortable with, and seek opportunities for, teaching on race-related topics, but theyvary in their self
) [7]. SCCT explains students’development of vocational and academic interests, career-relevant choices and decisions, andpersistence in professional, educational and occupational fields [8]. It specifically suggests thatenvironmental contextual elements combined with learning experiences impact self-efficacy andoutcome expectations to advance an individual’s interests and commitment decisions. The surveyitems were adopted from a previously tested model and study by Lent et al. [9] that examined theinterplay between interest, satisfaction and students' intentions regarding engineering majors.The pre-survey was given to students within their first month of taking the course and thepost-survey was given to students during their last month in the
Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 141, no. 2, p. C5014003 (13 pp.), Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943- 5541.0000219.[57] C. Samuelson and E. Litzler, “Seeing the big picture: The role that undergraduate work experiences can play in the persistence of female engineering undergraduates,” in 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 23, 2013 - June 26, 2013, in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. Atlanta, GA, United states: American Society for Engineering Education, 2013.[58] A. Huynh and H. L. Chen, “Exploring how innovation self-efficacy measures relate to engineering internship motivations and outcomes,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Virtual, 2020.[59] K. J. B
, andresponded to HC. A four-factor model was created because of this work, where the relationsbetween hidden curriculum awareness (factor 1), emotions (factor 2), self-efficacy (factor 3), andself-advocacy (factor 4) were explored across ~58 colleges of engineering and 984 engineeringfaculty and students in the U.S. From the validated instrument (UPHEME; Villanueva et al.,2020), Sellers & Villanueva (2021) analyzed a subset of strategies used by over one hundred andfifty-four BIPOCx individuals in engineering as they coped with the acquired HC. The authorsfound that advocacies taken by individuals, through self-advocacy (or their willingness to enact
journey and use culturally anchored curriculum to increase students’ knowledge and skills, improve students’ self-efficacy in pursuing higher education, increase sense of belonging on a university campus, and help students navigate campus systems.Ahmad Slim, The University of Arizona Dr. Ahmad Slim is a PostDoc researcher at the University of Arizona, where he specializes in educational data mining and machine learning. With a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the University of New Mexico, he leads initiatives to develop analytics solutions that support strategic decision-making in academic and administrative domains. His work includes the creation of predictive models and data visualization tools that aim to improve
about the significance of mathematics and their self-efficacy in thesubject contributed to greater motivation and achievement in math.Nevertheless, so much more can be learned about how math identity develops and how educatorscan support the development of a positive math identity for all students. [14] examined howacademic motivation influences high school students’ academic achievement. They surveyed1,100 high school students and measured their intrinsic, identified, external, and amotivationaltendencies, along with their GPA and standardized test scores over two years. The results showedthat students who were intrinsically motivated or motivated by personal values and interestsoutperformed those who were motivated by external rewards or
undergraduate students are made up of engineering and computerscience majors from the university. These students are referred to the PI of the lab based on theirlevel of professionalism in the classroom, self-efficacy, time management, and overall well-rounded student. The undergraduate students are interviewed and then finally hired as studentemployees of the lab. In addition, the research assistants receive aid from the GEMS director.The curriculum of Coding Academy has traditionally centered around the basics of programmingin Python, with emphasis on the development of solid fundamental programming skills [6], [7].In the latest iteration of Coding Academy, the curriculum emphasized multiple-day projects andteamwork to capitalize on the student's
-academic outcomes (e.g., self-efficacy,learning outcomes). Moreover, 9 articles exclusively examined student experiences within andbeyond the classroom. This research line predominantly emphasized students—both theiroutcomes and experiences, with only 2 articles addressing faculty members’ experiences inteaching.Comparatively less emphasized than student-centered studies, out of the 21 qualifying articles, 5addressed culturally relevant curricular content and/or pedagogies and one article coveredculturally relevant co-curricular programs and/or practices. Mirroring Garcia et al.’s [8] study, asmaller number of studies focused on leadership and decision-making (n = 6) and externalfactors (n = 2). Table 2 provides a breakdown of the frequencies for
. Manduca et al., “Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy ofdiscipline-based professional development,” Sci, Advs., vol. 3, pp. 1–16, Feb. 2017, doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600193.[20] T.L. Killpack and L.C. Melón, “Toward inclusive STEM classrooms: What personal role dofaculty play?” CBE-Life Sci. Educ., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1-9, Oc. 2017, doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0020.[21] K. M Mack and K. Winter, “Teaching to increase diversity and equity in STEM (TIDES):STEM faculty professional development for self-efficacy,” in Transforming institutions:Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century, G.C. Weaver, W.D. Burgess, A.L.Childress, & L. Slakey, Eds., West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2016, pp. 338–352.[22] K.M.S. Johnson
and delivered themin a face-to-face workshop. They stated team formation, team roles, teamwork experience, andassessment and evaluation are areas that should be clearly addressed to enhance the capabilitiesof engineering educators in establishing effective gender-mixed teams.Beigpourian and Ohland [20] conducted a systematized review on the role of gender and race inteamwork in undergraduate engineering classrooms to highlight pertaining factors in the area ofwomen and minorities' teamwork that have been investigated in prior studies. They extracted keyterms related to race and gender in engineering Teamwork including collaboration,communication, leadership and self-efficacy, peer evaluation, perceptions of professors andstudents, team
-awareness category involves not only understanding your ownemotions, values, strengths and self-efficacy, but also recognizing personal bias and how torecognize the interconnection of thoughts and feelings and actions across diverse contexts.Competencies in social awareness address empathy and compassion for those from same anddifferent backgrounds and cultures, understanding social norms for constructive behaviors andsupporting the collective well-being. Relationship skills include the ability to establish, navigateand maintain healthy relationships across social and cultural norms; communicating clearly,actively listening and working collaboratively whenever possible. Curriculum from thisorientation honors and connects to lived experiences of
with new and innovative solutions[37]; iv) self-management and self-development, understood as the capacity to work autonomouslyin a self-motivated and self-controlled manner [36]; and v) systemic thinking, i.e. the ability torecognize how a system functions [36] to make decisions about their elements and interactions[38].However, is possible to synthesize 21st century skills and positive attitudes toward STEM asengagement, interest, and self-efficacy [39], into STEM skills such as i) critical thinking, ii)problem-solving, iii) research, iv) creativity, v) communication, and vi) collaboration [28]. TheseSTEM skills can be complemented by the competency of computational thinking, which is veryimportant for STEM learning [40] and involves some
education; diverse students approach problem-solving in innovativeways when collaboration is not only supported but expected as an integral part of the learningprocess [13]. Additionally, educators and mentors should assess students' skills, prior knowledge,and experiences and use that information to tailor their teaching strategies to individual needs.The strengths students display such as resilience and persistence are often expected personalattributes, however, as [14] would contend, they are attributes that educators need to help buildup and support.Educators that learn about their student’s strengths have an opportunity to encourage deeperlearning, heightened levels of self-efficacy, and persistence in engineering programs that lead tothe
on graduatestudents who hold marginalized identities -- highlight the ongoing need to research the mentalhealth of STEM graduate students and how mental health influences various aspects of their livesand academic trajectories, aligning with the conclusion in the review conducted by Bork andMondisa focused on graduate student mental health in engineering (2021).Our findings reveal a significant shift in the focus on mental health publications during and afterthe COVID-19 pandemic. The observed shift in focus towards mental health publications duringand after the COVID-19 pandemic is indicative of an increased acknowledgment of the mentalhealth challenges that arose and the necessity for supportive measures and interventions toeffectively
]. Inengineering, where cultural norms, values, and practices converge to shape a unique discourse,the process of identity formation becomes particularly significant. Marginalized students,including those coming from underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds, LGBTQ+communities, and low-income households, often navigate complex dynamics of identity withinengineering spaces [6, 7, 16, 17]. The formation of one's engineering identity can profoundlyimpact marginalized students, influencing their sense of belonging, self-efficacy, and academicpersistence. Moreover, the negotiation of multiple identities, including race, gender, sexuality,and socioeconomic status, within the predominantly white, middle and upper class, male, andWesternized focus of
task and innovation self-efficacy,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017.[20] S. Correll, “Reducing gender biases in modern workplaces: A small wins approach to organizational change,” Gender & Society, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 725–50, 2017.[21] J. Acker, “Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations,” Gender & Society, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 139–58, 1990.[22] R. M. Kanter, Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977.[23] V. Ray, “A theory of racialized organizations,” American Sociological Review, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 26-53, 2019.[24] N. DiTomaso, C. Post, D. R. Smith, G. F. Farris, and R. Cordero, “Effects