Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yogesh Velankar, Purdue University; Sean Brophy, Purdue University; Masataka Okutsu, Purdue University; Daniel Delaurentis, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Collect team answer sheet 7. Provide correct responses 8. Students self grading- compare individual average scores and team based average scores 9. Team reflection and reworking the incorrect responses 10. Collect all remaining materials and end the sessionAnalysisIn this section, we present a description and analysis of selected episodes from the recordedobservational data of the two teams working on the rocket configuration quest. These episodeswere selected as they relate to our research goals to determine the major events teamstransitioned through to select a shared team answer. Our unit of analysis is at the team level.Team A spent a bulk of their time in negotiating a response to Q.1., and team B had extensiveinteraction negotiating

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ricardo G. Sanfelice, University of Arizona; Giampiero Campa, MathWorks; Manuel Abraham Robles, University of Arizona

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

measurement noise e when points are near −1, the results of sgn(ξ2 + e) will push solu-tions towards −1 and end in this aforementioned“stuck” scenario. The challenges with this uniquetracking problem are explored in [6]. To mitigate this hysteresis behavior, a supervisor controllerwith two modes is used for pushing the state of the plant towards the stabilization point when awayfrom −1. Now introduce a discrete logic variable q ∈ {1, 2} that will be used for assuring thevalue of u “agrees” with the direction for the system to turn. For the case when q = 1, the state ξis pushed away from −1 in the CW direction. And for the case when q = 2, the state ξ is alreadypushed away from −1 and is pushed to the stabilization point. To achieve robust global

Conference Session

1st and 2nd Year Instruction in Design

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marjan Eggermont, University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

how to translatewritten material into a visual document. Engineers often have to ‘make visible’ complexdescriptions of projects.Figure 5: Rover drawings by students A. J. and M. B.2.9 Week 10The chapters that students read during week 10 were perfect for multiple-choice questions sostudents answered a Q & A module during the course of the week. The main charactercommunicates with Earth via Morse code and one of the module questions had 4 answers inMorse code (Fig. 6), which students had to translate before answering.Figure 6: Q & A module Morse code question2.10 Week 11Mark, the astronaut stranded on Mars is packing his rovers for the big trip to the meeting point.Students were asked to use the data from the book chapters and generate

Conference Session

Design in Freshman and Sophomore Courses

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Smitesh Bakrania, Rowan University; William Riddell, Rowan University; Krishan Bhatia, Rowan University; Leigh Weiss, Rowan University; Kevin Dahm, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

a wind turbine depends on (a) the available windenergy and (b) the rotor design that determines the portion of the available energy that can beharnessed, and (c) losses due to friction and generator efficiency. The ratio of the powergenerated by a wind turbine to the available power from the wind is the coefficient ofperformance Cp. Neglecting losses from friction and generator efficiency (which can besignificant), equation 1 represents the coefficient of performance Cp, where the product of totaltorque Q and rotational speed ψ provides the rotor power; and the denominator is a function ofair density τ, swept area A and average wind velocity parallel to the axis of the turbine, U♣. Qψ

Conference Session

Design Pedagogy 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sarah Rajkumari Jayasekaran, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Education, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 162-177, 2000/12/01 2000, doi: 10.1080/08886504.2000.10782307.[2] G. M. Rafique, K. Mahmood, N. F. Warraich, and S. U. Rehman, "Readiness for Online Learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of Pakistani LIS students," The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 47, no. 3, p. 102346, 2021/05/01/ 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102346.[3] AUTODESK. "Autocad." https://www.autodesk.com/education/home (accessed.[4] F. Shines. "Distance learning and student services." https://dlss.flvc.org/qm-about (accessed 2/2/2021, 2021).[5] Q. Matters. "Quality Matter." https://www.qualitymatters.org/ (accessed.[6] U. o. F. O. o. T. Excellence. "UF's pathway to

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter L Schmidt, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Daniel Hoch, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Nabila A. Bousaba, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; William F. Heybruck, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Deborah L Sharer, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Valentina Cecchi, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Gary Teng, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Elizabeth Sharer, Francis Marion University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Page 22.198.15Public gen As IntegerPublic maxGen As IntegerPublic bestFV As DoublePublic bestFVIndex As IntegerPublic historyBestFV As DoublePublic historyBestFVIndex As IntegerPublic feasibilityArray() As DoublePublic x As DoublePublic y As IntegerPublic z As IntegerPublic t As IntegerPublic start As IntegerPublic finish As IntegerPublic feasibilityBestIndex As IntegerPublic feasibilityBestProjNum As IntegerPublic feasibilityBestWeight As IntegerPublic infeasibleIndex() As IntegerPublic infeasibleTemp() As IntegerPublic Sum As IntegerPublic infeasible As IntegerPublic q As IntegerPublic r As IntegerPublic Form As BooleanPublic sheetName As StringSub Main()'Student Assignment Problem'January 4, 2011

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mario Blanco, California Institute of Technology; Kenneth Pickar, California Institute of Technology; Luz Marina Delgado, GEMA; Oscar Arce, Universidad Rafael Landivar; Jeff Kranski, California Institute of Technology; Francoise Herrera, Universidad Rafael Landivar; Charles MacVean, Universidad Rafael Landivar

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

todeliver their baskets. They spend around Q. 20.00 (US$ 2.50, 1 Quetzal=$0.13), in lightningproducts like candles and charcoal, and another Q.22.00 (US$ 2.55), in batteries for theirportable radios per month. That is Q. 42.00 (US$ 5.00) per month, almost 30% of their totalmonthly income.3.2 Example 2: Independence through Mobility, An Affordable WheelchairMission: To provide alternative, inexpensive means of transportation for poor, disabled peoplein Guatemala and later, other developing countries.Market Research: Generally, it is estimated that over 20 million people in developing countriessuffer from disabilities that severely limit their mobility, independent of assistive mechanisms.In the case of Guatemala, the major causes of handicap include

Conference Session

Professional Skills development in Design

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ibrahim Mohedas, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan; Grace Louise Cravens; Linh Huynh

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Ashok, K., David, L., Gupta, A. K. & Wilemon, D. L. Accelerating The Development Of Technology-Based New Products. Calfornia Manag. Rev. 32, 24–44 (1990).5. Sugar, W. A. What is so good about user-centered design? Documenting the effect of usability sessions on novice software designers. J. Res. Comput. Educ. 33, 235 – 250 (2001).6. Scott, J. B. The Practice of Usability: Teaching User Engagement Through Service- Learning. Tech. Commun. Q. 17, 381–412 (2008).7. Mohedas, I., Daly, S. R. & Sienko, K. H. Requirements Development: Approaches and Behaviors of Novice Designers. J. Mech. Des. 137, 071407 (2015).8. Mohedas, I., Daly, S. R. & Sienko, K. H. Design Ethnography in Capstone Design

Conference Session

Capstone Design

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gene Dixon, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

prior art, customer objective(s), customer requirements,design economics, drawings, analytical results, engineering changes, test reports, and an openissues list4. Patent search results may also be included. As the design develops, the presentationshould provide insights into design activities, design alternatives considered and selected,technical/economic trade-off analysis and justifications, and conclusions21. Often the TDR process includes oral presentations. During oral presentations, designassumptions, analysis, alternatives and design methods are challenged during question andanswer (Q&A) portions of the TDR. Duesing4 (2004) states that it is “…critical that engineersexplain their concepts and designs to an engineering and

Conference Session

Design Across Curriculum 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Courtney C. Rogers, University of Virginia; Rupa S. Valdez, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, 2018.[2] V. Eubanks, Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press, 2018.[3] C. C. Perez, Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Random House, 2019.[4] D. Norman, The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books, 2013.[5] D. E. Forsythe, “New Bottles, Old Wine: Hidden Cultural Assumptions in a Computerized Explanation System for Migraine Sufferers,” Med. Anthropol. Q., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 551– 574, 1996.[6] National Science Foundation, “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering,” 2017. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/digest/occupation/overall.cfm (accessed Jun. 23

Conference Session

Design Across Curriculum 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; George Toye, Stanford University; Felix Kempf, King's College London; Nada Elfiki, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

/fpsyg.2017.00875. [Accessed July 1, 2020].[5] Gilmartin, S.K., Chen, H.L., Schar, M.F., Jin, Q., Toye, G., Harris, A., Cao, E., Costache, E.,Reithmann, M., & Sheppard, S.D. (2017). Designing a Longitudinal Study of EngineeringStudents’ Innovation and Engineering Interests and Plans: The Engineering Majors SurveyProject. EMS 1.0 and 2.0 Technical Report. Stanford, CA: Stanford University DesigningEducation Lab.[6] Hogrebe, F. (2018). Entrepreneurial Intentions in the Social Cognitive Career Theory:A Stanford Alumni Study. Master’s Thesis. Munich, Germany: Technische Universität MünchenTUM School of Management.[7] Brunhaver, S. R., Matusovich, H. M., Streveler, R. A., Sheppard, S., Carrico, C., & Harris, A.(2016). “Understanding

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Mental Frameworks

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joanna Tsenn, Texas A&M University; Heather S. Lewis, Texas A&M University; Astrid Layton, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

hours (gray), 4-8 hours (diagonals), 8-12 hours (dotted), or more than 12 hours per week (white). Table 6. Summary of Tukey HSD results for weekly effort groups with statistically significant differences. Self-Concept Group 1 Group 2 Q statistic p-value Confidence < 4 hours 12+ hours 3.833 0.035 Motivation < 4 hours 4-8 hours 5.479 0.001 Motivation < 4 hours 8-12 hours 6.072 0.001 Motivation < 4 hours 12+ hours 5.892 0.001

Conference Session

Design Communications & Cognition II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Goncher P.E., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Aditya Johri, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

the video data. Table 1. Constraint Codes Code ExplanationDesign ConstraintsManufacturability DC/M Ease of manufacturability of final designHealth & Safety DC/HS Health and safety of end users engaging with final designLife Cycle DC/LC Life cycle concerns of final designEthical DC/E Ethical considerations associated with final designErgonomic DC/ERG Ergonomic considerations associated with final design and end usersQuality DC/Q Overall quality of final designFunctionality

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Design in the Classroom

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Creese, West Virginia University; Deepak Gupta, West Virginia University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

30 40 15 Al Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al 4 Q& St St e

Conference Session

Design Teams 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Peter Schuster, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Eltahry Elghandour, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lauren Anne Cooper, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, an adaptation of student-formed teams that leaves the final team- forming decision in the hands of the instructorsAll of these team-forming approaches start before the first term begins by providing studentswith project proposal descriptions, sponsor contact information, and guidelines on what toconsider when looking at potential projects (e.g. personal interest, career goals, prior experience,special skills, anticipated workload). This material allows students to start thinking about thetype of the project before classes begin. At the first class meeting, after discussing courselogistics, explaining the team-forming process, and answering questions, students attend a‘Sponsor Q&A Expo’ where they meet with sponsors of projects

Conference Session

Design Pedagogy

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University; Wesley L. Stone, Western Carolina University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

), ordisagreeing (4), or strongly disagreeing (5) to specific questions (1, 2, 3, 4) in the surveydiscussed in Section 3. Table A.1. Data Collection – Sections 1 & 2. Section 1 Section 2 Q 1 2 3 4 5 Q 1 2 3 4 5 Overall 1 15 3 1 0 0 1.26 1 20 11 1 1 0 1.48 1.37 2 14 4 1 0 0 1.32 2 22 8 2 1 0 1.45 1.39 3 14 4 1 0 0 1.32 3 21 11 0 1 0 1.42 1.37 4 12 5 2 0 0 1.47 4 19 11 0 3 0 1.61

Conference Session

Design Methodologies 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

James Righter, The Citadel; Joshua D. Summers, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Brown and K. Finstuen, “The Use of Participation in Decision Making: A Consideration of the Vroom-Yetton and Vroom-Jago Normative Models,” J. Behav. Decis. Mak., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 207–219, 1993.[23] V. H. Vroom and A. G. Jago, “Situation Effects and Levels of Analysis in the Study of Leader Participation,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 169–181, 1995.[24] V. Vroom and A. G. Jago, The New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988.[25] E. Fleishman and D. Peters, “Interpersonal Values, Leadership Attitudes, and Managerial ‘Success,’” Pers. Psychol., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 127–143, 1962.[26] S. J. Zaccaro, A. L. Rittman, and M. A. Marks, “Team Leadership,” Leadersh. Q., vol

Conference Session

Best In DEED

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert P. Loweth, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan; Amy Hortop, University of Michigan; Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Empathy and Human-Centered Design 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Devanshi Shah, University of Georgia; Xiaoou Yang, University of Georgia; Beshoy Morkos, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Questions Never % Rarely % Sometimes% Often% Always% Figure 2 : Level of agreement post-moduleFigure 2 shows the percentage response after completing the group-based productdesign/empathy module. Below is a breakdown of the responses from the class to the questionsmentioned in Table 4.Q.1 “When I don’t understand someone’s point of view, I ask questions to learn more”. The average class response was 4.3. Standard deviation for this question was 0.2561.58% of the class responded “often” and 0% as “never” and “rarely”.Q.2 “When a friend is upset, I try to show them I understand how they feel”. 61% of the class responded “often” which was the highest

Conference Session

Design Methodologies 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jenn Campbell, University of Virginia; Leidy Klotz, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Manag. Rev., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 295– 308, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.09.002.[3] J. Mathieu, M. T. Maynard, T. Rapp, and L. Gilson, “Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future,” J. Manag., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 410–476, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0149206308316061.[4] I. Aggarwal and A. W. Woolley, “Team Creativity, Cognition, and Cognitive Style Diversity,” Manag. Sci., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1586–1599, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.3001.[5] A. Edmondson, “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams,” Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 350–383, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.2307/2666999.[6] L. Meadows et al., “Interactive Panel: Improving the Experiences of Marginalized

Conference Session

Design Methodologies 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Hannah D. Budinoff, The University of Arizona; Vignesh Subbian, The University of Arizona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Proceedings, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2--30204.[56] J. A. Mejia, D. Ruiz, V. Popov, A. Esquinca, and D. Gadbois, “Board 104: Asset-based Practices in Engineering Design (APRENDE): Development of a Funds-of-Knowledge Approach for the Formation of Engineers,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[57] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, and M. E. Allen, “Examining the Cultural Wealth of Underrepresented Minority Engineering Persisters,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 1–9, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000358.[58] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, K. A. Foxx, and M. E. Allen, “Engineering self- efficacy, interactions with faculty

Conference Session

Impact of COVID-19 on Design Education 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kevin Schmaltz, Western Kentucky University; H. Joel Lenoir, Western Kentucky University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

MathCAD MathCAD MathCAD SW Sim SW Sim SW Sim Ethics #1 Morales Sketch PLCObjectives Q#1 Q#2 HW#3 mini #1 quiz Takata Report Total 50 75 75 50 25 25 100 100 10 10 10 10 5 20 10 25 20 50 Avg 42.4 63.6 62.7 42.3 20.9 21.7

Conference Session

Design Mental Frameworks

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laura R. Murphy, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Colleen M. Seifert, University of Michigan; Eytan Adar, University of Michigan; Sophia Brueckner, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Research in 2006,” Des. Res. Q., Sep. 2006.[2] E. Sanders, “An Evolving Map of Design Practice and Design Research,” Interactions, pp. 13–17, Dec. 2008.[3] IDEO, The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. 2015.[4] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and M. E. Cardella, “Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 28–59, 2012.[5] I. Mohedas, S. Daly, and K. Sienko, “Design Ethnography in Capstone Design: Investigating Student Use and Perceptions,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 888–900, 2014.[6] R. P. Loweth, S. R. Daly, J. Liu, and K. H. Sienko, “Assessing Needs in a Cross-Cultural Design Project: Student Perspectives and Challenges,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 2, pp

Conference Session

Professional Skills development in Design

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Deininger, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Jennifer Chen Lee, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

-long learning. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2014 IEEE (pp. 1-8). IEEE.20) Dreyfus, S., & Dreyfus, H. (2014). A five stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition [monograph]. California University Berkeley Operations Research Center; 1980.21) Yock, P. G., Zenios, S., Makower, J., Brinton, T. J., Kumar, U. N., Kurihara, C. Q., ... & Watkins, F. J. (2015). Biodesign. Cambridge University Press.22) Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.23) Patton M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, Sage Publications Inc.; Fourth Edition, 201424) NVivo qualitative data analysis software; QSR

Conference Session

Design Methodolgy

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rudolph Eggert, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

2003 National Industry Academia Dif. Design Phase Q Topic % % % Problem 1 Benchmarking of competitive products 79 69 10 Formulation 2 QFD/House of Quality 78 68 10 3 Engineering design specifications 98 94 4 4 Function decomposition 67 71 -4 5 Function structure 72 63 9 Concept and 6 Reverse engineering 64

Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Soda, U.S. Air Force Academy; Gregory Toussaint, U.S. Air Force Academy; Albert Batten, U.S. Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

midterm and final surveys.Table 2 contains the responses from the systems engineering students and Table 3contains the responses from the electrical and computer engineering students. The tablecolumns display the question number, the number of responses, average score, andstandard deviation for questions from both the midterm and the final surveys, the changein the average score between the midterm and the final surveys, and the complete text ofthe question. The results merit some detailed comments. Table 2. Survey results for questions asked of systems engineering majors. Midterm Final Std Std Change Q n Avg Dev n Avg Dev in Avg

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robb E. Larson, Montana State University; David A. Miller, Montana State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

to q 2 which was also pertinent to q 3)4: Yes, I think there would be an increased emphasis on simplicity and practicality.differencesin the design I think it poses an interesting dynamic of having to build someone else’s design.process This is something that can definitely occur out in industry so it gives them someknowledge real world experience on how to fit in within an existing design team. I door design however think students entering this kind of experience in academia might feelphilosophy like they are along for the ride and not really included in any of the decision making processes. To a small degree I would expect them to be

Conference Session

Design Methodologies 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ulan Dakeev, Sam Houston State University; Reg Recayi Pecen, Sam Houston State University; Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University; Y. Luong, Sam Houston State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Cardoso, L. F., Mariano, F. C. M. Q., & Zorzal, E. R. (2019). A survey of industrial augmented reality. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 106159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106159Ha, I., Yoon, Y., & Choi, M. (2007). Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & Management, 44(3), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.01.001Hsi, S., Linn, M. C., & Bell, J. E. (1997). The Role of Spatial Reasoning in Engineering and the Design of Spatial Instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00278.xIbáñez, M. B., Uriarte Portillo, A., Zatarain Cabada, R., & Barrón, M

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Willis, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; James Conrad, University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

eines objektes aus zwei perspektiven mit innerer orientierung,” Sitz.-Ber. Akad. Wiss., Math. Naturw., Kl. Abt. Ila, vol. 122, pp. 1939–1948, 1913.[3] D. J. Felleman and D. C. van Essen, “Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, pp. 1–47, 1991.[4] Q. Chen and G. Medioni, “Efficient iterative solutions to the m-view projective reconstruction problem,” in Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. II, pp. 55–61, 1999.[5] A. Tirumalai, B. Schunck, and R. Jain, “Dynamic stereo with self-calibration,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1184–1189, 1992.[6] Y. Xiong and L. H. Matthies, “Stereo

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kanti Prasad, University of Massachusetts-Lowell

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

theoretically calculate the p-njunction depth “xj” from the diffusion equation based on Fick’s Laws Q  xj2  C( x ,t ) = exp −  πDt  4 Dt   but measure the p-n junction depth experimentally with the help of Philtec’s sectioner. They notonly calculate the oxidation thickness‘d’ theoretically based on Deal-Groove Model. d 2 + Ad = B(t + τ )but measure it experimentally with the help of ellipsometer. In addition, devices are emphasizedin several other courses, such as, Electronics I and II and Semiconductor