Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shahriar Shamsian, University of Southern California; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Jeffrey Miller, University of Southern California; Michael Shindler, University of Southern California

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Assessment in Medical Electronics Course”, (2014) Lecture presented by Dr. Jean-Michel I. Maarek. 13. S. Zappe, R. Leicht, J. Messner, and T. Litzinger (2009) "Flipping" the Classroom to Explore Active Learning in a Large Undergraduate Course, presented at Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education.

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert G. Batson P.E., University of Alabama

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

organizationally aware engineer.Regarding the Myers-Briggs (MB) personality types and work-life, Kroeger and Thuesen [1]explained how the 16 Jungian personality types determine one’s success on the job. In particular,it is often noted that two types, ESFP and ENFP have the strongest people skills due to their E =Extaversion (focus on people and external environment), F = Feeling (make decisions based onhuman values and empathy for others), and P = Perceiving (react to events in a flexible,spontaneous way). The S = Sensing types and N = Intuitive types among E_FPs are evenlydivided (about 5% each) in entry-level employees according to Kroeger and Thuesen. A study at

Conference Session

The BEST InDEED

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University; Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

the writing components considered. Report 2 in Capstone 2 does not require a projectmanagement plan but does need to outline testing and analysis of the chosen solution(s).   Figure 5. Average ME achievement level for each representative writing element by term. Testing/Analysis was evaluated instead of Project Management at this stage of Capstone.  Figure 6. Average IE achievement level for each representative writing element by term. Testing/Analysis was evaluated instead of Project Management at this stage of Capstone. As seen in Figures 5 and 6 above, ME teams on average do better on abstracts, references, andbackground for the first report, whereas the IE

Conference Session

DEED Postcard Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Austin Talley P.E., Texas State University; C. Richard Compeau Jr, Texas State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

) which is costly. Raffles Done before winning projects are Must procure suitable prizes in advance. announced. Only corporate partners and students Physical tickets unwieldy for 300+ are eligible – no family, no faculty, no attendees; we assigned a number to guests. registered, qualified attendees and then Holds interest of attendees. used excel to generate random #’s. The Students and corporate partners enjoy Announcer read the random winning #, mementos. and the Assistant matched that to

Conference Session

Capstone Pedgagogy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nicholas A Baine P.E., Grand Valley State University; Karl Brakora, Grand Valley State University; Christopher P. Pung P.E., Grand Valley State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

] "Inclusion," Merriam Webster Dictionary Online, [Online]. Available: https://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/inclusion. [Accessed February 2019].[7] B. Beigpourian, D. M. Ferguson, F. C. Berry, M. W. Ohland and S. Wei, "Using CATME to DOcument and Improve the Effectiveness of Teamwork in Capstone Courses," in Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[8] E. L. Allen, "ABET Ad Hoc Committee for Diversity and Inclusion Stakeholder Listening Session," in 2017 ABET Symposium.Evaluation Survey Questions Table 9: CATME follow-up questions CATME Follow-up Questions TA: Task Attentiveness Being

Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Perry Parendo, University of St. Thomas; Jeff Jalkio, University of St. Thomas

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

availablespots. All indicators point to a successful educational model. Senior Design Interest 30 25 20 Quantity 15 Projects 10 Proposals 5 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 YearBibliography 1. Howe, S. and Wilbarger, J.”National Survey of Engineering Capstone Design Courses”, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition

Conference Session

Design Projects

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Conrad, University of North Carolina-Charlotte; Daniel Hoch, University of North Carolina-Charlotte; Frank Skinner, University of North Carolina-Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

TELEPHONEITEM QUAN-TITY UNIT DESCRIPTION NO. UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1 2 3Funds for this purpose in the amount of order total will be reserved in the account(s) listed. PG 1 SUB-TOTAL (If funded from more than one account, list accounts and amounts OR percentage by account.) Account % AmountAcct PG 2 SUB-TOTAL 1Acct O 2 R Tax (if needed)Acct 3

Conference Session

Design Methods and Concepts

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Voltmer, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Bruce Ferguson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

specifications, team roles, effective conduct of team meetings, written and oralECE 361 – Engineering Practice (Junior – 2 credit) communication skills, ethics and professionalism, completion of team project(s). System engineering, team project involving conception, design specifications, conceptual design, scheduling, project management, business plan, market survey, andECE 362 – Principles of Design (Junior – 4 credit

Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Goff, Virginia Tech; Janis Terpenny, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

CD-Rom6. Terpenny, J., Gao, R., Ritter, J., Fisher, D., Krishnamurty, S., “Senior Design Projects to Aid the Disabled,” Proceedings ASEE 2001 Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, New Mexico, June 24-27, 2001, CD-Rom Session 2325, 1-11.7. Terpenny, J.P., Sullivan, W.G., Singh, H., and Sward, K., “Utilizing the Internet to Improve Student Learning in a First Course in Engineering Economy with Real-World Unsolved Problems in Collaboration with Industry”, Proceedings ASEE 2002 Conference and Exposition, Montréal, Quebec, Canada, June 16-19, 2002, CD-Rom Session 2139, 1-17. (Winner of best paper award in Engineering Economy Division, first runner up in Professional Interest Council III.)8. Goff, R.M

Conference Session

Design Pedagogy and Curriculum 1

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jay R. Goldberg P.E., Marquette University; David B. Rank, Root Cause Consortium, LLC

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

was supported the LaffertyFamily and Award Number R25EB013070 from the National Institute of Biomedical Imagingand Bioengineering. The authors would like to thank the Lafferty Family and NIBIB for theirsupport of this project. Page 23.52.11References1. Teixeira, M. B., and Bradley, R. Design Controls for the Medical Industry, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2003.2. Pembridge, J., and Paretti, M. “The Current State of Capstone Design Pedagogy”, Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Lexington, KY, 2010.3. Howe, S., and Wilbarger, J. “2005 National Survey of Engineering Capstone Design Courses”, presented

Conference Session

Design Cognition I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan Gerard Spillane, University of Limerick; Niall Seery, University of Limerick; Donal Canty, University of Limerick; Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

testing was designed specifically to observe the type/use andefficiency of individual heuristic(s) employed in a successful attempt in communicating relevantinformation (as determined by participant) to complete level 1. The task was designed to elicitparticipant’s spacial abilities, reasoning abilities, and conceptual knowledge which could beinferred from the placement and positioning of portals and objects on the submitted sketch. Thisalso gave insight into participants reasoning abilities, and procedural knowledge in terms ofjustification and selection of communication procedure and whether the participant saw fit toinclude a pathway or methodology to inform the perceived player.Participants were asked to complete as much of the computer

Conference Session

Creativity and Innovation in Engineering Design

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Niall Seery, University of Limerick; Donal Canty, University of Limerick; Ronan Dunbar, University of Limerick

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

the conversion infrastructure. Figure 2 – Data conversion infrastructureHolistic assessment interfaceThe difficulty with encouraging divergent thinking is theinability of traditional criterion referenced assessment toaccurately measure the process of the activity. Themeasure beyond the artefact or finished product is criticalto ensuring the sustainable value of concept drivencompetency.A web based holistic interface together with the finishedartefacts formed the assessment mechanism. Thisnon-criterion reference formed the blank canvas forstudents to not only present the journey throughdesigning the solution, but also leading the assessortowards what they valued about their solution(s). • Students were given a blank

Conference Session

Capstone Design Pedagogy II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

M. Reza Emami, University of Toronto; Michael G. Helander, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

,” Proc. ABET Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, Oct. 2002.6. M. Brereton, “The Role of Hardware in Learning Engineering Fundamentals: An Empirical Study of Engineering Design and Product Analysis Activity,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, 1999.7. M.R. Emami, “Application of Learning Models to the Engineering Design Pedagogy,” 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Austin, U.S.A., June 14-17, 2009. Page 15.173.128. H.A. Latchman, C. Salzmann, S. Thottapilly, and H. Bouzekri, “Hybrid Asynchronous and Synchronous Learning Networks in Distance Education,” Proc. International Conference on

Conference Session

Capstone Design

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bob Rhoads, The Ohio State University; Clifford A Whitfield, Ohio State University; Jacob T Allenstein, The Ohio State University; Peter Rogers, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

engineering population.The authors also discussed their continuous improvement concepts to help improve the student’scapstone experience and to better prepare them for their future professional careers. The authorsare introducing new curriculum delivery concepts, emphasizing design concepts and extending Page 24.560.12the length of the industry-sponsored project.References1. Howe, S., “Where Are We Now? Statistics on Capstone Courses Nationwide”, Advances in Engineering Education, Spring 20102. Rhoads, B., Rogers, P. “Multidisciplinary Capstone Design Guide”, Engineering Education Innovation Center, College of Engineering, The Ohio State

Conference Session

Engineering Design in Pedagogy

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ibrahim F. Zeid, Northeastern University; Sagar V. Kamarthi, Northeastern University; Claire Duggan, Northeastern University; Jessica Chin, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education, K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

. American Association of University Women. 2000. Tech-Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. Washington, DC. AAUW Educational Foundation.11. CIO Insight: Strategies for IT Business Leaders, Women in IT: Where Girls Aren’t, April 2007. Available on-line at http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2110749,00.asp12. Daley, W. Speech of U.S. Commerce Secretary. Delivered at 1998 National Information Technology Workforce Convocation, Berkeley, California, January 12, 1998.13. Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D., and Leifer, L.J., “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning”, J. Engineering Education, pp. 103 – 120, January 2005.14. Conley, C. H., Ressler, S. J., Lenox, T. A., and Samples, J. W., “Teaching

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter J. Shull, Pennsylvania State University, Altoona; Carla Firetto, The Pennyslvania State University; L.J. Passmore, Pennsylvania State University, Altoona

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

each of thefollowing questions. a. ______________________ b. ______________________ c. ______________________Rate the members of your team (including yourself) for each of the following statements. You do not need to write theindividual names for each question, but make sure the letter for each individual corresponds to the letter for the individualidentified above (keep the same order). 1) Followed all of the agreed upon rules. (1 to 5: 1 strongly disagree –– 5 strongly agree) a. _______ b. _______ c. _______ 2) Attended lab(s) for this assignment. (Yes or No) If no, indicate how much notice was given to team members. a. _______ ________How much notice

Conference Session

DEED Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nabila A. Bousaba, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; James M. Conrad, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Claude M. Hargrove, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Valentina Cecchi, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Keys to Success in the IEEE Region 3 Student Hardware CompetitionAbstractSince the 1980’s, IEEE Region 3 has had an annual conference, named SoutheastCon, thatinclude student and professional programs. The student hardware competition is considered thecentral event within the student programs. It continues to maintain its original focus of thedesign and building of Robots that compete by performing a pre-defined task. Earlier names ofthis competition were solar car contest, “seeker” car and design contest. On the average about 49of the 101 member universities participate in the student competition each year. Electricalengineering programs continue to take advantage of this contest

Conference Session

Design Spine

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin P. Arnett P.E., U.S. Military Academy; Craig E. Quadrato, U.S. Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Project. Setterfield,Charlie, Dunn, Eric and Marcks, Russell. s.l. : American Society of Engineering Eduction: Annual Conference &Exposition, 2010.19. Learning and Teaching Styles In Engineering Education. Felder, Richard M. and Silverman, Linda K. 7, s.l. :American Society of Engineering Education, 1988, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 78.20. Wankat, Phillip C. and Oreovicz, Frank S. Teaching Engineering. New York : McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993.21. Experiences Implementing an Undergraduate Civil Engineering Course in BIM. Dupuis, Matthew, et al. s.l. :American Society of Engineering Eduction: Annual Conference & Exposition, 2008.22. Teaching Building Information Modeling as an Integral Part of Freshman Year Civil Engineering

Conference Session

Design Across Disciplines

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James M. Leake, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; David Weightman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

packages available to students.References1. Hey, J., Van Pelt, A., Agogino, A., Beckman, S., Self-Reflection: Lessons Learned in a New Product Development Class, Journal of Mechanical Design, ASME, Vol 129, No. 7, July 2007, pp. 668-676.2. Pink, Daniel, A Whole New Mind: Why Right-brainers will Rule the Future, Riverhead Publishing, 2005. Page 22.575.12

Conference Session

Design Spine

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Trivett, University of Prince Edward Island; Daria A. Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder; Pemberton Cyrus, Dalhousie University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

] Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board. (2008, Accreditation criteria and procedures. Canadian Council of ProfessionalEngineers.[2] V. R. Neufeld and H. S. Barrows. (1974, 11). The "McMaster philosophy": An approach to medical education. J. Med. Educ.49(11), pp. 1040-1050.[3] M. Harris and R. Cullen. (2009, 06). A model for curricular revision: The case of engineering. Innovative Higher Education34(1), pp. 51-63.[4] M. Savin-Baden. (2008, 04). Problem-based learning in electronic engineering: Locating legends or promising problems? IntJ Electr Eng Educ 45(2), pp. 96-204.[5] W. E. Eder and V. Hubka. (2005, 02). Curriculum, pedagogics and didactics for design education. J. Eng. Des. 16(1), pp. 45-61.[6] D.A. Kotys-Schwartz, D. Knight, G. Pawlas

Conference Session

Capstone Design Projects

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Michalson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Stephen Bitar, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Robert Labonté, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

for the past ten years: ≠ All faculty who advise capstone design projects (MQPs) should have participated in the teaching of ECE 2799 (or at least sat in on the lectures. This would communicate to the faculty the breadth and depth of the design process and would make them better understand the methodology their students are familiar with. ≠ All capstone design projects (MQPs) should follow the design methodologies taught in ECE 2799 and this methodology should be encouraged by the project advisor(s). ≠ Faculty should reaffirm the need for ECE 2799 success as a prerequisite to being accepted on a capstone design project (MQP) team. Current reductions in ECE 2799 class

Conference Session

The Best of Design in Engineering Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ernest Kim, University of San Diego; Thomas Schubert, University of San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

® layout package by working though the Ultiboard® Tutorial. ≠ Provide ports in and out of your circuit – use a header(s) for ease of interfacing ≠ Export the file to Ultiboard® after completing your MSim schematic. ≠ The maximum board size is 4” x 6”. Make the board smaller so that the cost is lower. ≠ The board is two layers of G-10 standard 63 mils thick. ≠ Minimize the number of vias. ≠ Increase the thickness of power and ground traces – make them at least 20 mils wide. Signal traces can be 10 mils wide. ≠ You will be using quad-pack MPQ3904 npn BJTs and MPQ3906 npn BJTs in DIP-16 packages. ≠ Upon completion of the Ultiboard® layout, provide the instructor with Gerber files of the layers, board, drill

Conference Session

Design Teamwork

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Junichi Kanai, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Mark Anderson, Rensselaer

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

students and academic advisors. Academic advisors can continuouslymonitor students’ efforts and progress and the quality of students’ design artifacts. It allowsacademic advisor to provide timely and helpful feedback to students.Although these students were not widely separated by distance, their class schedules made itdifficult to hold full team meetings outside of regularly scheduled class times. They learned toleverage Redmine to work independently but share results across the full team. This experiencehelps students transition to the business world after graduation. Our students learn theimportance of collaboration and gain exposure to the tools that can facilitate this.References 1. Sheppard S, Macatangay K, Colby A, Sullivan WM. Educating

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Lumsdaine, Michigan Technological University; Josh Loukus, Michigan Technological University; Jason Dreyer, Michigan Technological University; Steve Chenoweth, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Monika Lumsdaine, E&M Lumsdaine Solar Consultants, Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Page 14.637.13were impressed by the professional quality of the oral presentation skills of the students as wellas their teamwork. % of Teams Passing the Design Review 100 80 60 40 Figure 7 20 Improvement in the number of teams who passed the panel review “without 0 S 07 F 07 S 08 F 08 Class conditions”No formal assessment tools were used to evaluate the success of the capstone design course uponcompletion of the projects at the end of the second semester. However, achievements have beengauged by:a. Client/sponsor

Conference Session

Design Tools and Methodology II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward James Christie; Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Richard T. Buckley Ph.D., U.S. Air Force Academy; Devin A. Menefee, U.S. Air Force Academy; Kyle Kenneth Ziegler; Kristin L. Wood, University of Texas, Austin; Richard H. Crawford, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

feedback on issues like aesthetics,ergonomics, and theme, as well as for marketing research and cost analysis. Prototyping is usedby engineers to provide manufacturing and assembly data, to investigate system integrationissues and to develop analysis and testing strategies. In some cases, prototyping is also used inthe concept generation phase of the design process to assist designers to either expand or contractthe set of possible concepts. Clearly prototyping is an important part of most design processes.We define the prototyping strategy as the set of decisions that dictate what actions will be takento accomplish the development of the prototype(s). Prototyping strategies include a variety ofdifferent options. In the broadest sense, prototypes

Conference Session

Design Teams 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Margaret Garnett Smallwood, University of Texas at Dallas; Robert Hart P.E., University of Texas at Dallas; Todd W. Polk, University of Texas at Dallas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

leadership today, professional employment tomorrow,” New Directions for Student Leadership, pp. 91-109, May 8, 2019.[16] F. Moshiri and P. Cardon, “The state of Business Communication classes: A national survey,” Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, vol.77 (3), pp. 312-329, 2014. DOI: 10.1177/2329490614538489[17] M.S. Doran and S. Golen, “Identifying communication barriers to learning in large group accounting instruction,” Journal of Education for Business, vol. 73 (4), pp. 221-224, March/April 1998. DOI: 10.1080/08832329809601634 AppendixName: _________________________________ Team

Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mason Webster, Brigham Young University; Daniel Korth; Owen Carlson, Brigham Young University; C. Greg Jensen, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Todd, R. and Magelby, S. “Creating Successful Capstone Programs by Considering the Needs of Stakeholders” Journal of Engineering Education, 19934. Kirschman, J. and Greenstein, J. “The use of groupware for collaboration in distributed student engineering design teams,” Journal of Engineering Education, Oct 20025. Latcha, M. and Oakley, B. “Toying with a capstone design course,” Journal of Engineering Education, Oct 20016. Hargreaves, D.J., "Addressing Transition to Tertiary Education in Engineering," European Journal of Engineering Education, 1998, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 79-89.7. Hansen, J. and Andersen, A., “Engineers of Tomorrow and Beyond: Knowledge, Insight and Skills Needed to Work Across Borders”, Proceedings of

Conference Session

Capstone Design III

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Chang, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Jessica Townsend, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

in need of modification, and educators who find themselves with theopportunity to start a capstone program from the ground up.Olin College BackgroundFranklin W. Olin College of Engineering is a new, four-year engineering school in Needham,Massachusetts. The college was started and funded by the New York-based Olin Foundation,which has awarded grants totaling more than $300 million to construct and fully equip 72buildings on 57 independent college campuses. Starting in the late 1980's, the National ScienceFoundation and engineering community at large started calling for reform in engineeringeducation. In order to serve the needs of the growing global economy, it was clear that engineersneeded to have business and entrepreneurship skills

Conference Session

Design Communications

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keelin Leahy, University of Limerick; William Gaughran, University of Limerick

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. 2007: World Scientific Publishing Co.Pte. Ltd.5. Cross, N., Design as a Discipline: Designerly Ways of Knowing. Design Studies, 1982. 3(4): p. 221-227.6. Baynes, K., About Design. 1976: London: Design Council Publications.7. de Vries, M.J., Tamir, Arley. Shaping Concepts of Technology: What Concepts and How to Shape Them. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1997. 7(1 & 2): p. 3-10.8. Atkinson, S., Key factors which affect pupils performance in technology project work. IDATER 94, Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University, 1994: p. 30-37.9. Petroski, H., Design Paradigms - Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering. 1994: Cambridge University Press.10

Conference Session

Assessing Design Course Work

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology; Edward Blicharz, Stevens Institute of Technology; Peter Dominick, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Edmondson, A. "Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams." Administrative Science Quarterly 44, no. 4 (December 1999): 350-383.4. Jacques, D., Learning in Groups (3e), (2000), Kogan Page, London. Page 14.949.95. Kolb D. A. Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development (1984), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.6. Seat, E. and Lord, S., Enabling Effective Engineering Teams: A Program for Teaching Interaction Skills, J. of Engineering Education, Vol. 88, No. 4, (1999), pp 385-390.7. Besterfield-Scare, M., Shuman, L., Wolfe, H., Clark, R. and Yildirim, P., “Development of a Work