in mind during conceptgeneration.To investigate how to support engineering designers in considering people throughout theirconcept generation we implemented a simple intervention: asking engineers to incorporaterepresentations of people within their concept sketches. In our single session study, mechanicalengineering students first generated concepts in response to a design prompt on their own. Thestudents talked aloud as they generated concepts in words and sketches for a short period. Then,we prompted the students to continue generating concepts for the same design task, but askedthem to include representations of “people, a person, or part of a person” within their sketches.Finally, we conducted a retrospective interview where students
research explores the varied trajectories taken by students as they attempt to enter professional disciplines such as engineering, and focuses on the dilem- mas encountered by students as they move through these institutionalized trajectories. He is co-editor of a 2010 National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Learning Research as a Human Science. Other work has appeared in Linguistics and Education; Mind, Culture, and Activity; Anthropology & Education Quarterly, the Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science; the Journal of Engineering Education; and the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. His teaching interests include develop- mental psychology; sociocultural theories of communication
AC 2009-371: COGNITIVE-PROCESSES INSTRUCTION IN ANUNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING DESIGN COURSE SEQUENCEEric Pappas, Dr. Eric Pappas is Associate Professor of Engineering at James Madison University. He developed, and was director of, the Advanced Engineering Writing and Communications Program in the College of Engineering at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) from 1993-2003. Dr. Pappas was on the faculty of Virginia Tech from 1987-2003 and taught classes in technical writing, creative writing, American literature, interpersonal communications and public speaking, creative thinking, leadership, engineering design, management skills, gender issues, and
developed as a technique to use with groups[15]. In practice, “brainstorming” refers to anymethod of idea generation where groups or individuals are instructed to generate as many differentideas as possible[21]. Engineering instructors, in many cases, encourage their students to generateideas using “brainstorming,” but may not provide students with specific instruction on how toexecute it (following Osborn). Instead, the term may be used to suggest a “natural” approach tothinking of ideas, pursuing whatever comes to mind in the moment. The expectation is often thatideas should arise without using any cognitive strategy, and without any instructions on how toideate successfully. This lack of instruction often prevents novice engineers from
includes two group projects: a smaller, minor, hands-on project where thestudents build, test, and redesign an engineering system and a larger, major project, which ismore theoretical with extensive research and design to solve an engineering problem. The groupsconsist of 3-4 students. Both projects follow the students through the engineering design cyclebut with different goals and lessons in mind. The minor design project is more hands on and the Page 24.811.3students get to test their designs and realize their mistakes, which is detailed in a paper by Jaeger,et. al2. This project is given mid-way through the semester and the students have 2
client.Ultimately, students will realize at the end of this course that to be an engineering designer onecan not purely be an engineer; they require a creative mindset, the ability to work in a team, theability to think analytically and remain open-minded, an understanding of experiment design andrisk mitigation, and experience with costing. Engineering design is a multidisciplinary process.The identified process is a result of this instructor’s ongoing industrial involvement and wealthof experience in both engineering and business as a design engineer as well as a financialengineer. It is his experience in these areas that has resulted in a Faculty position involving acombination of the two. He also believes in the importance of design and economics
Figure 4 HCD process and objectives21ConclusionsThis paper attempts to meld design curriculum with the methodologies of designing with humansin mind. No longer able to design simply for humans, the problem facing new design engineers ishow to exercise inclusionary design practices for a global market. As the opportunities afforded Page 24.1034.16to students continues to allow for greater interactions with society, students need to develop anew toolset that uses both their technical and their social skills.All the programs reviewed in this study offer various takes on the standard design pedagogies.The programs agree that interdisciplinary work
courseprepares students for a profession,” Educational Technology Research andDevelopment, vol. 53, no.1, pp.65-85. Mar. 2005.[15] B. A. King and S. Magun-Jackson, “Epistemological beliefs of engineeringstudents,” Journal of Technology Studies, vol.35, no.2, pp.56-64, Win. 2009.[16] B. A. King and S. Magun-Jackson, “Differences in engineering students' beliefsabout knowledge across educational levels,” Conference paper for the EducationDivision's 2011 ASQ.[17] W. G. Perry, Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years:A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.[18] M. F. Belenky, B. M. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger and J. M. Tarule, Women's waysof knowing: the development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books, 1986
AC 2011-2484: EMPLOYING ENGINEERING DESIGN TOOLS FOR DE-SIGNING/REDESIGNING OF COURSESZeshan Hyder, Virginia Tech & UET Lahore Zeshan Hyder is a PhD student in Mining & Minerals Engineering Department, Virginia Polytechnic In- stitute & State University, Virginia. He has completed his Masters Degree from University of Engineering & Technology Lahore, Pakistan and is currently working in Virginia Center for Coal & Energy Research (VCCER) under supervision of Prof Dr. Michael Karmis for research in Underground Coal Gasification.zulfiqar Ali, Department of Mining & Mineral Engineering,Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State universityVA, USA.Janis P. Terpenny, Virginia Tech Janis Terpenny is a
AC 2009-1370: APPLICATION OF LEARNING MODELS TO THE ENGINEERINGDESIGN PEDAGOGYM. Reza Emami, University of Toronto Page 14.220.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 APPLICATION OF LEARNING MODELS TO THE ENGINEERING DESIGN PEDAGOGYAbstractThis paper discusses the implementation of a hybrid framework for teaching cornerstone designcourses based on the behaviourist and constructivist learning models, which ensures adequateinstruction and scaffolding while students develop their design knowledge through hands-onprojects. The instructional design methodology is based on the Elaboration Theory that allows agradual transition from
interesting research study might be developing a hackathon like course as a realuniversity class. This class could help the engineering education community better understandthe effect on learning that hackathons have. Other studies could generate hackathons withspecific learning goals in mind and try to steer students into a curriculum while still maintainingthe typical structure of a hackathon. This event would help show the worth of hackathons as aneducational tool.Another point of view for future works could be project management. The types of time andresource managements that participants exhibit within classroom and hackathon settings may bedrastically different. These skills can be vital to a project and their appearance may differ withthe
? ● What experiences do you plan to take advantage of during your time here to help move you towards that goal?○ Design ■ In your own words, what is “design” as it relates to engineering? ■ In your opinion, what should the role of an engineer be in the design process? ■ ■ In your opinion, is it important for an engineer to interface directly with a person they’re designing something for? Why or why not? ■ In your opinion, is it important for engineering courses to explore topics that aren’t just technical? Why or why not? ● If so, what topics or concepts come to mind? ■ What’s important for you to have in a class project? ● Creativity/freedom
predominantlylanguage, history, and social science majors had resulted in the development of four generalizedattitude groups, loosely identified by responses provided in their initial entry surveys: the firstgroup was composed of students who had come to the conclusion that engineering was next toimpossible to understand, much less excel in. These students were discouraged by difficultiesthey had experienced and intimidated by the prospects of another semester of engineeringinstruction. The second group was typically composed of students who had been forced to takethe mechanical engineering sequence and, regardless of their previous performance, had made uptheir minds that engineering was irrelevant, both to their academic interests and to their futurecareers
AC 2008-2278: COLLABORATIVE PRODUCT DESIGN AND REALIZATION INMECHANICAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY CURRICULAVukica Jovanovic, Purdue University, West Lafayette Vukica Jovanovic began her academic career in 2001 when she graduated at University of Novi Sad, majoring in Industrial Engineering and Management, Minor in Mechatronics, Robotics and Automation. She was working as Graduate Research and Teaching assistant and lectured various courses at departments of Industrial Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics from 2001 until 2006. She was an active member European organizing committee of student robotic contest Eurobot and chief of Eurobot organizing committee of Serbian student
knowledge yields from the common lecture14. Yet, the suggested avenues, and many othersstill only address a passive lower-order thinking and learning style15. Greater understanding andsatisfaction comes of a learning style called active learning, which is necessary for the student totruly learn the material16. This learning style engages the minds of the students and allows themto not just passively regurgitate what they have heard in some bygone lecture but to activelythink about what they are doing using any number of different techniques17.The active learning methods used in design engineering courses such as IDE 20, IDE 105, andIDE 401 adhere to these requirements by letting the student dissect safe, common products andtoys during the reverse
period of time has elapsed? 3) what are the areas that studentshave the most difficulty learning? With similar purposes in mind our team has evaluated theliterature to determine what instruments exist that are intended to measure engineering designknowledge and how these instruments have been used in other engineering schools. After ourextensive review, we concluded that available instruments were not as comprehensive as we hadhoped. Accordingly, we have teamed up with learning specialists and embarked on thedevelopment of a new instrument. This paper documents this effort.In the paper, first we provide a summary of our investigation on the availability of knowledgeassessment tools on design, and then provide details on the development of the
2006-1676: CAPSTONE DESIGN, MECHANICAL ENGINEERING PROJECT ORPERSONNEL MANAGEMENT CHALLENGE?Richard Goff, Virginia Tech RICHARD M. GOFF Richard Goff is an Associate Professor and Assistant Department Head of the Department of Engineering Education in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech. He is also the Director of the Frith Freshman Engineering Design Laboratory and the Faculty Advisor of the VT Mini-Baja Team. He is actively involved in bringing joy and adventure to the educational process and is the recipient of numerous University teaching awards.Janis Terpenny, Virginia Tech JANIS P. TERPENNY Janis Terpenny is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering
Paper ID #9172Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone DesignProgramMr. Bob Rhoads, The Ohio State University Bob Rhoads received his BS in Mechanical Engineering from The Ohio State University and his Masters in Business Administration from Regis University. He is also a P.E. He is the Engineering Capstone Program Coordinator for The Ohio State University.Dr. Clifford A Whitfield, Ohio State University Cliff Whitfield has a PhD in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and is currently working as an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department and
), “Exploration of Collective Efficacy Beliefs in Student Project Teams: Implications for Student and Team Outcomes,” Proc.,, ASEE Conf.& Exhibition.22. de Graaf, E., and Kolmos, A.,(2003), “ Characteristics of Problem- Based Learning,” International Journal of Eng. Education, Vol.19, No.5, pp.657-662.23. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R.,(1999), “How People Learn: Brain, Mind , Experience and School,” Wash. .D.C.: National Academy Press.24. Wessel, D., “Building a Better Engineer,” Wall Street Journal, December 20, 2003, p.B1.25. Saddler, P.M., Coyle, H., and Schwartz, M., (2000), “Engineering Competitions in the Middle School Classroom: Key Elements in Developing Effective Design Challenges,” Journal of the Learning
AC 2010-1221: AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE INNOVATIONCAPABILITIES OF ENGINEERING STUDENTSNicole Genco, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Nicole is a graduate student in Mechanical Engineering at University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.Katja Holtta-Otto, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Katja is an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.Carolyn Conner Seepersad, University of Texas, Austin Page 15.151.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation Capabilities of
AC 2010-136: AN AUTOMATED BOTTLE FILLING AND CAPPING PROJECTFOR FRESHMAN ENGINEERING STUDENTSKala Meah, York College of Pennsylvania Kala Meah received his B.Sc. from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology in 1998, M.Sc. from South Dakota State University in 2003, and Ph.D. from the University of Wyoming in 2007, all in Electrical Engineering. Between 1998 and 2000 he worked for several power industries in Bangladesh. Dr. Meah is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Department of Physical Science at York College of Pennsylvania. His research interest includes electrical power, HVDC transmission, renewable energy, power engineering education, and energy
Paper ID #9921Measuring Qualities of Different Engineering Design Process Models: A Crit-ical ReviewJames Logan Oplinger, Arizona State UniversityDr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dr. Micah Lande teaches human-centered design innovation at Arizona State University and researches how engineers learn and apply a design process to their work. He is an assistant professor in the Depart- ment of Engineering on Arizona State University’s Polytechnic campus. Page 24.893.1
.,, ASEE Conf.& Exhibition. Page 24.948.1122. de Graaf, E., and Kolmos, A.,(2003), “ Characteristics of Problem- Based Learning,” International Journal of Eng. Education, Vol.19, No.5, pp.657-662.23. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R.,(1999), “How People Learn: Brain, Mind , Experience and School,” Wash. .D.C.: National Academy Press.24. Wessel, D., “Building a Better Engineer,” Wall Street Journal, December 20, 2003, p.B1.25. Saddler, P.M., Coyle, H., and Schwartz, M.,(2000), “Engineering Competitions in the Middle School Classroom: Key Elements in Developing Effective Design Challenges,” Journal of
Characteristic Roles Page 24.837.4Throughout K-WIDE students were encouraged to be mindful of several different archetypal roles.The idea of an archetype was popularized by Carl Jung, but has been co-opted by several others.For example, De Bono created the Six Hats brainstorming technique 32 to balance convergent anddivergent thinking. Likewise IDEO has published the Ten Faces of Innovation that describes thekey personnel of a creative and productive team 33 .Six idealized roles emerged from K-WIDE. Some are more associated with engineering, whileothers are associated more with the entrepreneurial mindset. The goal for the student, however, isto be
Paper ID #18282Case Studies of Problem Exploration Processes in Engineering DesignMs. Jaryn Studer, Iowa State University Jaryn Studer is a Graduate Research Assistant at Iowa State University pursuing her M.S. in Human Computer Interaction. She received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering at West Virginia University. Her research interests include design and strategies to develop creative thinking.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in
: pre-determination, direct experimentation, indirectexperimentation, and automated identification. Direct experimentation would be most applicablefor reverse engineering, but indirect experimentation such as “thought experiments” may beuseful if the natural systems in question do not readily lend themselves to direct experimentation. Page 14.751.7Automated identification is an intriguing concept in which a computer database of knownaffordances is used as a reference to match patterns discovered in system geometries. However,in order to be effective, this must be conducted with a specific user group in mind. Althoughsuch a database of
incorporatesexposure to ill-structured, unusual situations that accustom engineers to get disequilibrated andwork towards equilibration by creating and recreating schema for knowledge absorption and itsapplication. Our assignments are designed keeping in mind this need. Social constructivism [7] suggests that learners first construct knowledge in a socialcontext. The process of discussing/ (arguing for) one’s understanding of an experience with peersand/or more knowledgeable others (teachers, parents) is in effect, the process of knowledgeconstruction (“first between people”) which is followed by the individual process of internalizingthe knowledge (“and then inside the child”). Social interaction may thus act as a trigger and/or acatalyst to the
Paper ID #21390Methods to Study Elements of the Instructional Scaffolding Strategy Modelfor Enhancing Engineering Students’ Knowledge Construction in an OnlineSocial Collaborative Learning EnvironmentMiss May-Ling Tan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Miss Tan May Ling as an Engineering Education postgraduate student in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). Her major study in Online Learning such as social collaborative learning (SCL) integrates with web-based instructional scaffolding which is conducted to the engineering students who study in one of pioneer polytechnic namely Ungku Omar Polytechnic. They are technical engineers
sketches. Parametric solidmodeling has following advantages: 1) Accurate description of the part/concept/idea 2) Easier to find errors and solution 3) Fast calculations of the consequences and simulation 4) Easy modification of the model 5) Direct data transfer for the CAM.Currently, the ability to use a 3D parametric solid modeling software package has become one ofthe standard tools acquired by mechanical engineering graduates. 3D solid modeling allowsdesigner to rotate, zoom or pan the graphics on the screen. These visual objects give himimmediate and satisfactory feedback of his work. But, again some feeling is missing. Sinceaesthetical success of the design needs to be verified by ones mind, nothing can
Research Journal, Vol. 19, 2007, pp. 69-90.11. Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2006), “Dimension of creative climate: A general taxonomy,” K. Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, Vol. 15, 2006, pp. 97-116.12. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Development Initiative: Integrating the Product Realization Process (PRP) into the Undergraduate Curriculum, New York: ASME, pp. C2-C5, December 1995.13. McGraw, D. (2004), “Expanding the Mind,” ASEE Prism, Summer 2004, pp. 30-36.14. Lumsdaine, M. and Lumsdaine, E. (1995), “Thinking Preferences of Engineering Students: Implications for Curriculum Restructuring.” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 84, No. 2, 1995, pp. 194-204.15