Paper ID #11163Looking back: A Student Review and History of AerosPACE – a Multi-University, Multi-Disciplinary, Distributed, Industry-University Capstone ProjectMrs. Larissa Cannon, Brigham Young University Larissa Cannon participated in AerosPACE for her Senior Capstone project. She has since graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University and is currently working in the aerospace industry. Her undergraduate experience included three internships at Pratt & Whitney and one internship at ATK. She is the co-author of two published papers and has four years experience of
includes a beta-version of a faculty handbook for ageneral engineering undergraduate program.IntroductionPaliwal and Sepahpour1 suggest that the capstone process causes students to think aboutengineering, technology, society, the world around them and themselves. According to Paretti, etal.2, capstone projects afford engineering students an opportunity to integrate the disparatecomponents of technical knowledge gained in an academic environment where courses arepresented as standalone bodies of knowledge. As a culminating experience, senior capstone is asingular significant experience where students: apply and reinforce the knowledge, skills andabilities (KSAs) learned from course work; enhance communication KSAs; developinterpersonal KSAs
Paper ID #11556Student Perspectives on Capstone Design LearningMr. Ben David Lutz, Virginia Tech Ben Lutz is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests include capstone design teaching and learning, mentoring in design and project work, student experiences of senior design, and the transition from senior design into the workplace. His current work is related to understanding how students describe their own learning in capstone and how that learning supports the transition from engineering school to professional practice.Mr. Mike Ekoniak, Virginia TechDr. Marie C
civil capstone projectsAbstractProject-based learning pedagogies have been shown to be effective at teaching many of thetechnical and professional skills desired of engineering education programs. They allow studentsto engage in more authentic engineering designs, helping to develop the technical andprofessional skills. This type of approach, however, makes traditional assessment more difficultdue to variability in project content, difficulty, and types of deliverables from team to team.In our engineering program, all seniors engage in year-long, industry sponsored capstoneprojects with the guidance of both faculty mentors and corporate liaisons. These projects aregenerally conceived of and sponsored by local
of Texas at Austin, masters degree from Penn State, and PhD from Georgia Tech, all in Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include manufacturing processes and quality techniques. He also serves as the program director for Engineering Technology at WCU. Page 26.1074.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 LEARNING OUTCOMES OF A JUNIOR-LEVEL PROJECT-BASED LEARNING (PBL) COURSE: PREPARATION FOR CAPSTONEAbstractThis paper evaluates the learning outcomes of a junior-level course designed to serve as apreparation for the Capstone project in the senior year
Paper ID #13763Preparing Capstone Design Instructors and Project Mentors to Deal with Dif-ficult Students and Problem TeamsDr. R. Keith Stanfill, University of Florida Keith Stanfill holds the academic rank of Engineer and serves as the Director of the Integrated Product and Process Design (IPPD) Program for the University of Florida (UF) College of Engineering. He received his B.S., M.E., and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from UF in 1985, 1991 and 1995, respectively. He joined the UF Industrial and Systems Engineering faculty in 1999 as the IPPD Associate Director and was promoted to IPPD Director in 2001
Paper ID #12099Mini-Design Projects in Capstone: Initial Design Experiences to EnhanceStudents’ Implementation of Design MethodologyMajor Cory A Cooper, United States Air Force Academy Major Cory Cooper is currently an Assistant Professor of Systems Engineering and Capstone Coordinator at the US Air Force Academy (USAFA) in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He holds a PhD an MSc in Systems Engineering from the Technical University of Delft and the Air Force Institute of Technology respectively. He has held various developmental engineering and program management positions in the US Air Force, to include Deputy Director for
sustainable engineering design skills. Moreover, thestudents can practice and demonstrate their capability on sustainable engineering design throughtheir capstone senior design experience. Typically, our engineering students select project ideasand work in teams to prepare their senior design proposals in a fall Senior Seminar course andcomplete them in the following spring semester. Hence, this new module was designed to beimplemented in fall, right after each team was formed and selected a senior design topic.This new module included lectures, group discussions, in-class activities, team assignments, andsurvey. It started with an in-class discussion about the relationship of sustainability toengineering. Then, a six-factor table was introduced as a
Paper ID #13710Incremental Self-Assessment Rubrics for Capstone Design CoursesProf. James Trevelyan, University of Western Australia Professor James Trevelyan works part-time as a Winthrop Professor in the Mechanical and Chemical En- gineering School at The University of Western Australia, Fellow of Engineers Australia, and also practices as a mechanical and mechatronics engineer developing new air conditioning technology. His main area of research is on engineering practice, and he teaches design, sustainability, engineering practice and project management. He is well known internationally for pioneering research that
of complex, multi-disciplinary, systems engineering focused student de- sign and development projects. Page 26.1509.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 “Work-in-Progress:” The Capstone Marketplace: An Online Tool for Matching Capstone Design Students to Sponsors with Challenging ProblemsThe Capstone Marketplace is an online tool developed and maintained to match multi-disciplinary student teams with challenging engineering projects. While web based tools exist formatching students to projects at individual institutions, the Capstone
design reviews prepares students for professional practice, enhances achievement ofboth professional development and solution development, and provides valuable exhibits for students’professional portfolios. The authors of this work-in-progress paper seek collaborators for implementingand testing the proposed assessment structure in capstone design courses.IntroductionConsider this scenario: An engineering graduate walks into a job interview and hands the interviewerachievement scores for his or her teamwork, communication, problem solving, project management,ethics and professional responsibility, willingness to take risks, motivation to continue learning, and otherknowledge, skills and abilities important to the employer. The interviewer
two-semester Capstone Design course for students in their senior year of anundergraduate engineering degree program affords the opportunity to assess many attributes asstudents ready themselves for graduation because of the comprehensive nature of the project-based course. This paper explores how graduate attributes (GrAtts), as defined by the CanadianEngineering Accreditation Board (CEAB), are assessed within a Mechanical EngineeringCapstone Design course. Assessment of GrAtts is necessary for CEAB accreditation, not onlyfor demonstrating that students have been exposed to and assessed on these attributes, but it alsoprovides valuable information necessary for continuous improvement activities within programs.The Mechanical Engineering
published in the leading technology manage- ment journals and he has published four books. His research has received several awards. In 1999 at the Rent 13 Conference in London he received the best Paper Award. In 2010 he received the PMI Project Management Journal Paper of the Year Award. He has received several research grants from NSF and from other funding organizations. From 2003-2005 he was appointed NASA research fellow in project management. Page 26.81.3 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Pilot for Integrating Capstone Design with a Two-Semester
to address this gap in the literature by determining what students perceive therole of stakeholders should be during the design process and identifying the design project traitsthat facilitate learning the value of human-centered design processes.Research DesignStudy PurposeThe goal of this study was to determine how student perceptions of stakeholders differed beforeand after their capstone design experience, and to determine if and how the students’ interactionswith stakeholders during the semester changed their perceptions. We also explored how different Page 26.1695.2design project traits may have affected the level of stakeholder
Erie we are limited to three 50-minute class periods to teach concept generation.Given this limitation, a balance must be chosen between quantity of the methods taught, and thedetail in which students learn them.In spite of the wide array of ideation methods, undergraduate students often end upimplementing only the basic brainstorming method for their capstone projects. The senior designprojects in the Mechanical Engineering (ME) capstone program at Penn State Erie, the BehrendCollege vary widely from traditional mechanism design and construction projects where standardconcept generation techniques are appropriate, to design optimization problems with a strongfocus on mathematical modeling where concept generation relies heavily on the results
. Simultaneously, the team surveyed the capstone community regardingwhat aspects of a hub would be important to them and how they could envision using the hub.1Based on this input, the development team built the CDHub 1.0 pilot on a WordPress2 platformand populated it with sample resources. This pilot hub focused on communication (per therequirements of the funding agency) and included multiple files and strategies related to capstonedesign communication such as project definition, project management, and intellectual property.The hub developers held a workshop at the 2012 Capstone Design Conference to demonstrate thehub functionality and solicit user feedback. The 60 attendees were overwhelmingly supportive ofthe hub concept and offered numerous
Faculty Advisor for Senior Capstone Design and graduate-level Challenge Projects in Northeastern’s Gordon Engineering Leadership Program. Dr. Jaeger has been the recipient of numerous awards in engineering education for both teaching and men- toring and has been involved in several engineering educational research initiatives through ASEE and beyond. Page 26.852.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 How Did We End up Together? Evaluating Capstone Project Success as a Function of Team and Project Formation Methods and
provide students with multiple opportunitiesto experience a realistic design challenges before their Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) mandated capstone design-build project.1,2 The literature shows the Page 26.202.2importance, effectiveness and student enthusiasm for real-world design projects performed aspart of capstone design experiences.3-5 However, creating exciting, customer driven andrelevant design experiences for classes other than the capstone design classes has provenchallenging.In the past the authors have struggled to integrate customer driven design and build projects intoexisting courses. When a working
concepts, which is the ultimate goal of the casestudy and its activities.The course analyzed the use of case studies in order to improve students’ skills in handling open-ended design and applications of engineering science principles. This type of experience isdrastically different from secondary education and should not be a single experience duringundergrad (most commonly a fourth year design project/capstone project). The advantage ofengineering case studies is that they provide a similar experience as a capstone project and areable to engage students in design thinking on a topic-by-topic basis21. The goal is to have thesetypes of initiatives throughout the entire program; however, since the students struggled so muchwith open-ended problems
Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USAOptimal team selection in introductory and capstone mechanical design courses is vital to thesuccess of the project, and, as such, many studies have been conducted to determine themeans of generating ideal design teams. This work seeks to employ multiple areas of designteam theory, including the use of Myers-Briggs Type Indicators (MBTI) for personalityassessment and the capability for students to be placed in teams with respect to certaincourse-specific constraints, including project preference and teaming constraints, in order toautomate the optimization of design team selection. Various test cases are shown that indicatethe weighted multi-objective Mixed-Integer Linear Programming approach can
heavily emphasized scientific theory while abandoning engineering design and creativesynthesis 2. The hands-on training and applied learning methods of earlier engineering educationwere re-introduced to the curricula, and design became a major focus in the reform ofengineering education. The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology 3 influenced thedevelopment of capstone design courses offered to senior-level students to meet the need ofdesign implementation in engineering curricula 4. Capstone design courses enable students tobecome familiar with the engineering design process through a class project requiring theapplication of knowledge and training received in freshman, sophomore, and junior levelcourses. While the addition of
literature on teaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses. J. Eng. Educ. 2, 17–28 (1997).7. National Academy of Engineering. Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education. 40 (2012). Page 26.165.15 at 8. Ro, H. K., Merson, D., Lattuca, L. R. & Terenzini, P. T. Validity of the Contextual Competence Scale for Engineering Students. J. Eng. Educ. 104, 35–54 (2015).9. Hotaling, N., Fasse, B., Bost, L. F., Hermann, C. D. & Forest, C. R. A quantitative analysis of the effects of a multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course. J. Eng. Educ. 101, 630–656 (2012
Paper ID #13095Comparing Organizational Structures: Two Case Studies of Engineering Com-paniesCarlye Anne Lauff, University of Colorado, Boulder Carlye is a 2nd year PhD student in Mechanical Engineering with a concentration in Design. She is originally from Pittsburgh, PA and received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University. At the University of Colorado Boulder, she is advised by Dr. Mark Rentschler and co-advised by Dr. Daria Kotys-Schwartz. For the past two years, she has worked as a Graduate Research Assistant on the NSF-funded project entitled ”Cognitive Ethnographies of Engineering
. Page 26.1455.7The analysis of the EduDesignathon projects occurred as the author, Jessica A. Artiles, began herwork as a mentor for 2.009 Product Engineering Process 13 , the MIT Mechanical EngineeringFigure 5: EduLinks, a Designathon hack to capture the direct and indirect influences each player,stakeholder, and theory has within the education system.Department’s senior capstone class, instructed by Professor David R. Wallace, co-author on thispaper and Thesis advisor to Jessica. The course takes graduating seniors on an adventure throughproduct design teaching them the virtues of following a deliberate process, and slowly engagingthem to think like designers.Figure 6: Schematic of the 2.009 Product Engineering Processes project workflow
problem-based learning and service learning alsobecame popular approaches to connect course material with field applications, often using client-driven scenarios and open-ended challenges.5,6 This attention to increasing student engagementwas in part prompted by an increased awareness of the value of active learning and team-basedproblem solving.These initiatives manifested themselves in a variety of fashions, including improving studentexperiences using cornerstone and capstone design projects as well as the creation of U.S.Government sponsored initiatives. For example, the grant-funded “Learning Factory” projectwas developed to simultaneously create a practice-based curriculum and the supporting physicalfacilities required to design/fabricate
experiences.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication
the final year of engineering education, as part of the capstone design experience. Studentsfirst begin to develop design skills while they are also integrating their engineering contentknowledge and learning to apply it in authentic (or pseudo-authentic) contexts. In some cases,design is also introduced as part of a “cornerstone” experience in the first year of an engineeringprogram. Generally, however, the bulk of the engineering curriculum consists of engineeringscience courses that rely heavily on theoretical mathematics and closed-ended problem solving.Many design studies have investigated the difference between novices and experts in practicingdesign. Novice designers perceive the design task as a well-structured problem5 and
Paper ID #12282An Examination of ME449 Redesign and Prototype Fabrication: A New Se-nior/Grad Design and Fabrication Course at the University of Wisconsin –Madi-sonMr. Kim J Manner, University of Wisconsin, Madison Kim Manner is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin – Madison. He has been an instructor in the UW- Madison College of Engineering since 1988. He holds both BS and MS degrees from the UW- Madison in Engineering Mechanics. He has taught undergraduate classes in Capstone Design, Geometric Modeling, Computer-Aided Design, Product Dissection, Product Redesign and
student reflective learning outcomes during a final Leadership/Mentorshipcourse, after their participation in significant, experiential design projects in the University ofMichigan’s Multidisciplinary Design Program in the College of Engineering. Throughout thecourse, class discussions and assignments prompted students to reflect and examine theirpersonal experiences in engineering design projects, their learning (both technical andprofessional), leadership, and team styles as well as understand group development anddynamics.A feature of the projects was the integration of students from diverse disciplines in engineeringwith other programs such as: Art, Architecture, Primary Sciences, Kinesiology, and Business.The diverse teams provided a rich
fromthe knowledge, skills, and attitudes of toy Makers to advance teaching in the engineeringclassroom? Findings are presented to inform possibilities for design in engineering contexts anda multi-disciplinary, holistic attitude towards engineering education that is rising fromdiscussions on the future of engineering education.IntroductionIn undergraduate engineering academic programs, engineering design often serves as acornerstone or capstone experience, supplying context and motivations for how to construct andredesign the world. There is usually an undue burden on the instructor to seed such classes withcompelling and technically sufficient projects and provide enough structure to make a goodlearning experience.1 With this concern, it is