CMOS In- tegrated Circuit designer and a system engineer at NewLANS, Inc. in Acton, Massachusetts until 2010. He became a Visiting Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of North Florida in Jacksonville, Florida in 2010. Since August 2012, he has been with the School of Engineering at Western Illinois University, Quad Cities as an Assistant Professor of Engineering. His current academic interests include project-based learning with real-world problems, training in critical thinking for students to improve efficient problem solving skills, and enhancement of interactive teach- ing/learning inside and outside classroom. His main research interests are integration of high performance
(NSF BRIGE grant), advancing problem-based learning methodologies (NSF CCLI grant), assessing student learning, and un- derstanding and integrating complex problem solving in undergraduate engineering education (NSF CA- REER grant). Her other research interests lie in cardiovascular fluid mechanics, sustainability, and K-12 engineering outreach.Anna ZilberbergDr. Christopher W. Swan, Tufts University Chris Swan is an Associate Professor of civil and environmental engineering with additional appointments in the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service and the Center for Engineering Edu- cation and Outreach at Tufts University. He has served as Chair of Tufts CEE Department (2002-2007) and has
additional resources. In order to make the curriculum moreengaging and socially relevant, efforts should be made to tie it explicitly to national priorities,like the Grand Challenges, and to better integrate the engineering curriculum with the generaleducation component, for example through co-taught courses.Feedback from Participants:In an effort to gauge the effectiveness of the session format, we asked all participants to fill outan exit questionnaire. We collected 54, some of which were only partially filled out. Participantswere asked to rate the quality of the session overall on a 3 point scale, from which we got: 50%“Great”, 30% “OK”, 20% No response. A similar question on the quality of the small groupdiscussion format in particular resulted
a new Engineering Leadership Program to enable students to bridge the gap between traditional engineer- ing education and what they will really experience in industry. With a background in both engineering education and design thinking, her research focuses on how Latina/Latino students develop an identity as an engineer, methods for enhancing student motivation, and methods for involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction.Dr. Ines Basalo, University of Miami Dr. Basalo is an Assistant Professor in Practice in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Uni- versity of Miami. Prior to joining the University of Miami in 2014, she worked as an adjunct professor at
Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin-Madison.Dr. Chi-Ning Chang, University of Kansas Chi-Ning Chang (Ph.D., Texas AM University) is an Assistant Research Professor at the Life Span In- stitute at the University of Kansas. His research work centers on engineering graduate education, STEM motivation and diversity, and quantitative methods. He was a graduate researcher in several STEM ed- ucation projects funded by the NRT (National Science Foundation Research Traineeship) program and NSF-AGEP (Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate) program.Dr. Audrey Boklage, University of Texas at Austin Audrey Boklage is research assistant and director of the curriculum
AC 2008-242: DEVELOPMENT OF AN ELECTROMAGNETICS COURSECONCEPT INVENTORYGerard Rowe, University of Auckland Gerard Rowe completed the degrees of BE, ME and PhD at the University of Auckland in 1978, 1980 and 1984 respectively. He joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Auckland in 1984 where he is currently a Senior Lecturer. He is a member of the Department’s Radio Systems Group and his (disciplinary) research interests lie in the areas of radio systems, electromagnetics and bioelectromagnetics. Over the last 20 years he has taught at all levels and has developed a particular interest in curriculum and course design. He has received numerous teaching
students in the universities of science andtechnology is a crucial issue for engineering education in Taiwan. In the present study, a modified Delphi method was used for establishing the importanceindex of chemistry competence in terms of occupation domain. Additionally, a number ofsemi-structured interviews with experts were conducted in order to investigate the experts’views about chemistry education. The findings of this study might be implied in theassessment of current curriculum design and teaching contents of chemistry in the universitiesof science and technology in Taiwan. By the same token, the findings could be further utilizedin an Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA
again.25-27 Thisknowledge reinforces the decision to administer peer evaluation in a formative way, allowingstudents to repeatedly receive feedback and try again within their groups. With each new attemptin using teamwork knowledge and skills, students receive peer feedback that can identify areasfor improvement and motivate future effort. This framework also presents a clear opportunity forrenewal if team members struggled due to conflict or free riding. Fourth, assessment should beintegrated into the curriculum and be perceived as a learning opportunity. According to Brew28: Assessment and learning must increasingly be viewed as one and the same activity; assessment must become an integral part of the learning process
grammar, punctuation,and spelling in primary and secondary schools, but once they reach university, they are nottaught as explicitly the approaches to writing within their discipline or how to write forprofessional purposes. Teaching this within an engineering curriculum could improve students’confidence in their ability to write in the professional world, addressing audiences with differentneeds and interests.We believe the same problem regarding lack of explicit instruction may exist for teamworkskills. Anecdotally, we know students are often asked to work in teams without being providedguidelines for how effective teams function. We can help students learn teamwork by discussingsuch simple things as how to develop an agenda for a meeting to
engineering (CVEN) program recently underwent acomprehensive Program (Re)Design (PRD) process in order to align the program with bothASCE’s second edition Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (BOK2) and ABET learningoutcome criteria. The integrated PRD process is detailed in an earlier paper (Brumbelow, Fowler,Morgan, & Anthony, 2014). The current paper illustrates the significance of the PRD systemapproach to inspire transformative change. Faculty who participate in the PRD process, as part ofthe program’s Curriculum Transformation Team (CTT), experience a major shift in perspectivefrom apprehension of the scope and need for the change to seeing the curriculum asinterconnected and an iterative process to enhance student learning. In addition
Paper ID #33775How Students Search Video Captions to Learn: An Analysis of Search Termsand Behavioral Timing DataMr. Zhilin Zhang, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Zhilin Zhang is a 5-year BS-MS student in Computer Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign (UIUC), co-advised by Professor Lawrence Angrave and Professor Karrie Karahalios. His research interests are in Human-Computer Interaction and Learning Sciences. He studies, designs, and builds intelligent systems to support scalable and accessible teaching and learning through a computa- tional lens.Ms. Bhavya Bhavya, University of Illinois at
JOHN J. DUFFY is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department, the Coordinator for the Solar Engineering Graduate Program, and the Director of the Center for Sustainable Energy at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. He has written over 70 papers on solar engineering, environmental analysis, and education. He has integrated service-learning into nine engineering courses at the undergraduate and graduate level with local and international projects and is the principal investigator on an NSF grant to integrate service-learning into the entire curriculum of the college of engineering at UML. He also coordinates the Village Empowerment project which has designed and installed over
. ≠ Create a formal program to connect faculty to community groups (local andinternational). ≠ Develop appropriate projects/experiments for integration of S-L into about fortycore courses in the undergraduate engineering curriculum at UML. ≠ Become an engaged college--engaged with the students, each other as facultyacross departments, and with the community19.The SLICE partnerships include many nonprofit organizations in the local Lowell areaand international projects including a partnership with villages in the remote AndesMountains of Peru. Professor John Duffy has worked to establish on-going partnershipswith villages in remote areas of Peru where students can apply engineering solutions33.His work has included building partnerships with
, and was invited to participate in the NSF Project Based Service Learning summit. He recently received the Cal Poly 2008 President’s Service Learning Award for innovations in the use of service learning. In 2004 he was named a Templeton Research Fellow by the Center for Academic Integrity. Page 14.189.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 An Examination of Student Experiences Related to Engineering Ethics: Initial FindingsKey words: engineering ethics, focus groups, interviews, survey developmentIntroductionIn today’s technological society, the ethical behavior
just recently published a co-edited volume on Multi-Level Issues in Creativity and Innovation. Page 13.195.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 An Investigation of Gaps in Design Process Learning: Is there a Missing Link between Breadth and Depth?AbstractTeaching ‘design’ is an integral part of undergraduate engineering preparation. Most four yearengineering programs include a first year course focused on the engineering design processwhere students are exposed to the wide range of issues that must be considered with regard to the‘real life’ activity of designing a product or a process
Education, 37(2), 125-132.7. Andrews, T., & Patil, R. (2007). Information literacy for first-year students: An embedded curriculum approach. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 253-259.8. Berland, L., McKenna, W., & Peacock, S. B. (2012). Understanding Students' Perceptions on the Utility of Engineering Notebooks. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(2).9. Berndt, A., & Paterson, C. (2010). Global engineering, humanitarian case studies, and pedagogies of transformation. In Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments, 2010 IEEE (pp. 1-19). IEEE.10. Brophy, S., Hodge, L., & Bransford, J. (2004, October). Work in progress
students that are effective and authentic to the discipline. Much of this work has been centered on model-based inquiry and the integration of scientific practices in a supportive and structured way. He has been funded by NSF and other agencies to conduct research on preservice teacher education, undergraduate engineering education, and community partnerships in secondary education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018The Challenges and Affordances of Engineering Identity as an Analytic LensAbstractIn this theory paper, we seek to review recent scholarship on the construct of engineering identityto help identify the challenges and affordances of its use in engineering education research
AC 2010-1970: REFINEMENT AND INITIAL TESTING OF AN ENGINEERINGSTUDENT PRESENTATION SCORING SYSTEMTristan Utschig, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Tristan T. Utschig is a Senior Academic Professional in the Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning and is Assistant Director for the Scholarship and Assessment of Teaching and Learning at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Formerly, he was Associate Professor of Engineering Physics at Lewis-Clark State College. Dr. Utschig has regularly published and presented work on a variety of topics including assessment instruments and methodologies, using technology in the classroom, faculty development in instructional design, teaching
Paper ID #14839Utilization of an Engineering Peer Tutoring Center for Undergraduate Stu-dentsDr. Ben Pelleg, Drexel University Dr. Ben Pelleg is an Assistant Teaching professor for the engineering core curriculum department at Drexel University. He earned a B.S. degree in applied and engineering physics from Cornell University in 2008 and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Drexel University in 2014.Miss Kristin Imhoff, Drexel University Kristin Imhoff graduated from Drexel University with her Bachelor’s in Mechanical Engineering in 2009. She began her career at Drexel in 2009 as an academic advisor for the Mechanical
. To do this work, she integrates methods from de- sign, human-computer interaction, and education to understand how collaborative discourse and learning occur.Dr. Emma Mercier Emma Mercier is an associate professor in Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign. Her work focuses on collaborative learning in classrooms, and in particular, the use of technology for teachers and students during collaborative learning. Most recently Mercier’s projects have focused on collaborative learning in required undergraduate engineering courses. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WIP: Investigating the
and development of science curriculum, technology, and assessment that can help middle and high school students develop an integrated understanding across topics and disciplines over time. Page 14.450.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Developing an Instrument to Measure Engineering Design Self-Efficacy: A Pilot StudyKeywords: self-efficacy, engineering designAbstractThe following pilot study is an investigation of how to develop an instrument thatmeasures students’ self-efficacy regarding engineering design. 36 items weredeveloped and tested using three types of validity evidence
) the integration of different constructsassociated with workplace engineering practices that can enable us to propose an analyticalframework to investigate them concurrently. Curriculum at engineering schools should bebalanced with theoretical knowledge and promote the idea of coupling the content with real wordsituations30. Computational modeling and simulations are now highly relevant to solve these real Page 26.185.15world complex problems.The results suggest that the use of computer simulations can be helpful in the process of problemsolving enabling students to validate theoretical constructs. We recognize that other types ofintervention
, broader impacts associated with scientific and engineering research, and innovative curriculum design in STEM-related fields. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 An Earthquake Engineering Education Research Methodology for Game-Based LearningAbstractThe authors present a research paper about an innovative research and development (R&D)methodology for game-based learning to integrate engineering education and 21st centurylearning. Prior to game development, a literature review on gaming revealed a lack of systematicmethods for integrating research into design and implementation strategies of many game-basedlearning environments, much less one for
with a focus in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering. He is currently conducting Engineering Education research while pursuing a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include situated cognition and engineering curriculum development.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction and in the Civil & Environmental Engineering Department, and an affiliate faculty of the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She holds a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in civil engineering and
AC 2008-897: EVALUATING DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF PEER INTERACTIONUSING AN ON-LINE INSTRUMENTAlan Cheville, Oklahoma State UniversityJames Duvall, Oklahoma State University James Duvall is completing his BSEE degree at Oklahoma State University and expects to attend graduate school studying microwaves or photonics. Page 13.575.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Evaluating Different Aspects of Peer Interaction Using an On-Line InstrumentBackground and ContextAs universities move towards integrating in-depth team-based design experiences there is anincreasing need to train
AC 2007-2721: SPONTANEOUS GROUPS VERSUS LONG-TERM TEAMS: ANINVESTIGATION USING COMPLEX PROBLEM SOLVING IN A FIRST-YEARENGINEERING COURSETamara Moore, University Of Minnesota Tamara Moore is a Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Minnesota. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, her M.S.Ed. in Mathematics Education and her B.S. in Mathematics from Purdue University. Tamara taught high school mathematics for seven years prior to pursuing her doctorate. Her research interests include curriculum development, the learning of complex problem-solving in mathematics and engineering, teamwork, and integration of
materials--students learn simple models that require many assumptions to use. Asstudents advance in their studies and specialize, the models become more complex as fewerassumptions are made.Engineering science courses are typically taught with a lecture-based pedagogy and assignstudents sets of homework problems to engage them in practicing the course material outside ofclass time. Problem sets usually comprise problems from the course textbook or are written bythe professor. Although the number and length of problem sets varies by instructor, a problem settypically takes several hours of work (and in the U.S., a 3-credit-hour 12-week undergraduatecourse assumes 6 hours per week of out-of-class work). In an undergraduate curriculum, studentsare
Paper ID #30346WIP: Validating a Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)in an Active, Blended, and Collaborative (ABC) Dynamics LearningEnvironmentMs. Wonki Lee, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Wonki Lee is pursuing Ph.D. in Education, Curriculum Instruction, Language and Literacy program at Purdue University. She received her bachelors and masters, specializing Korean language education as second/foreign language from Seoul National University, South Korea. Prior her doctoral studies in United States, she worked as a Korean teacher for 6 years and pursued her Ph.D. in
, beliefs, self-regulation, and achievement.Min Tang, College of Education, Learning and Cognition Program,Florida State University The research interests of mine are: 1) to understand teachers’ pedagogical practices and the potential effects of those practices on students’ critical thinking and epistemic beliefs in engineering domain, 2) to quantify epistemically-related emotions that occur during the epistemic activity, 3) to explore the best pedagogical practices to improve the efficiency integrating classroom project-based learning and students’ real-world problem-solving practice. I have MS degree from Florida State University in Curriculum and Instruction and BA degree from China Nanchang University in English
Paper ID #28808Oral Formative Assessment as a Means to Increasing Total Learning andEngagement in an Engineering University ClassroomDr. Kristen M Ward, Arizona State University Kristen Ward has been teaching engineering at Arizona State University for the past six years. She is motivated by the individual successes of her students and continues to search for new ways to teach engineering and connect with her students.Dr. Yingyan Lou, Arizona State University Dr. Lou is an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering at ASU specializing in intelligent transportation systems. She has been teaching the Numerical Methods for