categories with well-defined learninglevels selected for the classification of specific PIs. The Learning Domains Wheel wasimplemented with Venn diagrams to represent details of the relationship of popular learningdomains categories, interpersonal skills, and the types of knowledge. INTERPERSONAL IT skills Teamwork Affective Professional ethics Leadership Drawing Life-long learning
visual communication. 5. function effectively both individually and on teams. 6. be able to identify, analyze, and solve problems creatively through sustained critical investigation. 7. be able to make connections between disciplines and to integrate information from multiple sources. 8. be aware of how their decisions affect and are affected by other individuals separated by time, space, and culture. 9. be aware of personal, societal, and professional ethical standards. Page 23.874.4 10. have the skills, diligence, and commitment to excellence needed to engage in lifelong learning.The two required
as to analyze and interpret data; (c) an ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability; (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams; (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; (g) an ability to communicate effectively; (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental and societal context; (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, life
,economic issues, and workplace dynamics as reasons for engineers to value diversity.Social justice can be defined as “…full and equal participation of all groups in a society that ismutually shaped to meet their needs” (Adams, Bell and Griffin 2007). This definition relates toengineering in more than one way. First, to achieve social justice, all members of society withthe interest and aptitude must have the opportunity to fully participate in engineering practices.Thus the changing demographics of the United States might be one reason engineers should careabout diversity (Change the Equation, 2015). Second, as described in the preamble to theNational Society of Professional Engineers Code of Ethics, “Engineering has a direct and vitalimpact on
No effect.5. If I could decide how homework Problems come from (Textbook, Unknown sources, Instructor’swas assigned and graded, written) Problems are graded (Always, Never, Sometimes) Solutions available? ( Yes, No, After homework is turned in)6. Do you think it is ethical for Yesstudents to use solution manuals? Yes, but only if it is used for learning and not just copying No I don't knowComments Table 2. Faculty survey questionsFaculty survey1. Use of solution manuals has a Strongly Agreedamaging effect on student learning
Complete a research boot campFocus on foundations of engineering process and the (training on research skills,introduction scientific method, scientific writing and scientific writing, presentation,to cancer presentation, and literature research skills. All ethics, team-building andresearch, lectures are heavily weighted toward laboratory safety)—first offeringresearch discussion and student participation. Students was in conjunction with existinginitiation produce two videos (5 min each) in a team for REU boot camp a broader audience. Students identify a faculty
, academician of the Chinese Academy ofEngineering, mentioned in his speech that China's engineering education shouldlearn from Germany and cultivate senior technical engineering talents withcraftsman spirit.[12] “Tianjin University Action” emphasizes that engineeringstudents should strengthen their patriotism, global vision, legal awareness andecological awareness, cultivate design thinking, engineering thinking, criticalthinking, and digital thinking, and improve innovation and entrepreneurship,interdisciplinary integration, independent lifelong learning, communication ability,and engineering leadership.[13] “Beijing Guidance” stresses the importance ofcultivating people with morality and ethics, and strengthens engineering students'sense of
). Valli (1997, p. 70) asserts that “[Reflectiveteachers] can look back on events; make judgments about them; and alter their teachingbehaviors in light of craft, research, and ethical knowledge. Teachers who are unreflective wouldbe limited in their ability to make good decisions, to consider the consequences of their actions,or to alter their actions”. Loughran (2002, p.35) adds that “experience alone does not lead tolearning; reflection on experience is essential”. Additionally, adequate reflection requiresconsideration of alternate perspectives as well as one’s own, for the purpose of reframing theproblem for deeper understanding (Schӧn, 1987). It is for this reason that reflection in thecontext of considering peer observation feedback is
their undergraduate programs and educateinclusive communities of engineering and computer science students prepared to solve 21st-century challenges.”The idea for RED emerged from a high-level review of Engineering Education investments at theNSF. Informed by both internal program evaluations of current and prior programs and externalassessments in the engineering education literature [1, 2], the review revealed that while therehad been significant progress made in diffusing engineering education innovations in first-yearengineering and in capstone design, change had been much slower in the middle years of thecurriculum. In particular, while certain workplace-relevant engineering skills such ascommunication, teamwork, design, ethics, and socio
standard that covers mainengineering skills in sciences, mathematics and design. Students are prepared through arigorous curriculum. However, Universities fail to fully prepare students for aspects of theirlives beyond the academic scope. While the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology(ABET) requires student training in ethics, lifelong learning, communication, and working inmultidisciplinary teams, students remain insufficiently prepared with skills that help overcomemany challenges they face after leaving University.University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) is a public research university registering greater than20,000 students. One of the colleges at the University is the College of Engineering (COE). TheDepartment of Mechanical and
, resource recovery from waste, and bioremediation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Integration of a Local ‘Wicked’ Problem into the Environmental Engineering Laboratory CurriculumINTRODUCTIONThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology Inc. (ABET) works to ensureconfidence in programs and ensure graduates are prepared for the workforce. One outcome ofspecific importance is ABET outcome j, which is for students to ‘gain a knowledge ofcontemporary issues’ or outcome 4 which comes into effect in 2019 and states that students musthave “an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situationsand make informed judgments, which
industry. Such courses are bringing to the forefront many of the AccreditationBoard for Engineering Education (ABET) outcomes, e.g. project management, lifelong learning,design, teamwork, communication, problem solving, economics, ethics and contemporary issues[]. Even the sustainability is included in ABET design considerations, it is not very often fullydiscussed in student projects. However, students have often expressed the desire for the inclusionof renewable energy projects and sustainability concepts in senior design course sequence [6-10]. Such projects are providing multi-disciplinary collaboration, valuable hands-on experience, aswell as a working demonstration of green energy and design. Senior design projects are alsointended to
to our customers is of utmost importance.” • Share ideas on how best to work together. • Sketch fully-labeled process flow diagrams comparing our current design with one utilizing the exciting new additive. • Brainstorm specific engineering questions that need to be answered, then choose at least one and describe how you would recommend addressing it using the scientific process: o Hypothesis o Research/experiment (details, e.g. qualitative size, concentrations, flows, etc.) o Analyze/conclude (e.g. If we see this, then… If that, then….) • Provide me [supervisor] any feedback you might have on my ethical approach to investigating this opportunity.Data CollectionVideo data of
of individual assessments (points in time) are stated, includingbreadth and depth limitations, coverage limitations, and circumstantial limitations.Since Nyquist-Shannon’s sampling theorem uses ideal sampling to address the question ofsampling frequency, and because ideal sampling is based on the so-called unit impulse function,the widely accepted one-or-two-hour exam is suggested as a practical approximation of the unitimpulse function. Under this assumption, it is argued that an adequately weighted homeworkassignment could also be considered as a practical approximation of the unit impulse function,provided a high ethical standard is adhered to. This brings up the issues of ethics and plagiarismin modern engineering schools, and the need
and empirical contributions,” ZDM Mathematics Education, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 307–322, Jun. 2017.[12] R. Pekrun, T. Götz, and R. P. Perry, “Achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). User’s manual,” Dep. Psychol. Univ. Munich Munich Ger., 2005.[13] S. J. Derry et al., “Conducting video research in the learning sciences: guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 3–53, Jan. 2010.[14] S. Elling, L. Lentz, and M. de Jong, “Retrospective think-aloud method: using eye movements as an extra cue for participants’ verbalizations,” presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2011, pp. 1161– 1170.[15] V
approaches with technical engineering skills. This requires anenhanced curriculum with a focus on student teamwork, a greater consideration of social context,improved communication with diverse constituents, and reflection on an ethical understanding oftheir decisions and solutions. Effective faculty members need to mirror these values and skills intheir instruction and mentoring. Efforts have begun to reimagine the “engineering canon” whichrequires a shift from positioning engineering as a purely technical endeavor to framing it associo-technical. We are developing a new General Engineering program that incorporates thisperspective [30]. In addition, we are developing modules that emphasize the sociotechnicalnature of engineering for traditional
1 Grit/Work • “Engineers have to have perseverance […] I feel like I have (“I have” or “I Approach perseverance” (Francis) am”) • “I do have a very strong work ethic” (Tranlin) Mindset/ • “Engineering is very much a personality thing” (Kathie) Brain • “It’s just the way my brain works” (Eric) • “I’m pretty good at communicating” (Dominic) Social • “I like to help people” (Elizabeth) • “I enjoy group work and working with people” (Bradley) • “I like when things
instruction • interactive fundamentals to a variety of • provides for • efficient instruction • interested and problems lifelong learning • engaged instruction motivated students • creative • a seamless web • ethical awareness • international • culture for life-long learning • ubiquitous • flexible connectivity across • multidisciplinary • enthusiasm for learning programs and institutions • personalized • intellectual spirit • professional discernment • precise • knowledge and experience in • provides professional and
in a particular discipline or domain. The three should of a necessity be aligned such thatthey support each other for learning efficiency 32. Furthermore, decisions on instruction andassessment should be based on the current best model of learning in the domain.Significant learning and Fink’s taxonomyFink defined significant learning as learning that would “produce a lasting change in terms of thelearner’s life” and proposed a non-hierarchical, relational and interactive taxonomy 23 that hebelieved could succeed the popular though hierarchical Bloom’s taxonomy 33. This taxonomytranscends the classical Bloom’s cognitive taxonomy in two main ways 1) includes otherobjectives like learning about learning, ethics, team skills and character, which
, engineering ethics, and environmental justice.Erica D. McCray, University of Florida Dr. Erica D. McCray is an Associate Professor of Special Education at the University of Florida. Prior to joining the faculty, she served as a special educator for students with behavioral and learning disabilities in Title I elementary and middle school settings. Dr. McCray has been recognized on multiple levels for her teaching and research, which focuses on diversity issues. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: An Exploration of the In/Authentic Experiences of EngineersAbstractThis paper is a work in progress
research.Different ways of thinking facilitate different strategies and subsequent actions to innovate. Thestudy uses the Sustainability Education Framework for Teachers (Warren, Archambault, &Foley, 2014) that embraces four ways of thinking including futures, values, systems, andstrategic thinking to address complex educational challenges.Futures thinking focuses on working to address tomorrow’s problems today with anticipatoryapproaches to understand and prepare for future changes, problems, and solutions (Warren et al.,2014). Values thinking is about recognizing the concepts of ethics, equity, and social justice(Warren et al., 2014). It involves understanding these concepts in the context of varying culturesand accordingly making decisions. Systems
which students miss critical opportunities to build theirprofessional portfolio.For the purposes of this work, and in agreement with current research on the topic [17, 18, 19], theauthors will use the list of competencies described in items d-j of ABET’s criterion 3 as a definitionof professional skills. These competencies are shown below d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g) an ability to communicate effectively h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context i) a recognition of the need
Program (IPRO) at Illinois Institute of Technology is aproject-based experiential learning experience with the primary learning objectives of [1]strengthening multidisciplinary teamwork skills, [2] improving communication skills, [3]learning project management, and [4] recognizing ethical behavior. In the last four yearswe have developed a multipart assessment system for the purposes of measuring ourachievement of these and other IPRO learning objectives. In this paper we will discusshow we measure learning objectives attainment at the project team level and theinconsistencies in those measures that prompted us to better define our learningobjectives, and align our assessment measurement instruments with these newdefinitions. We conducted rank
-university collaborative research study assessing the ethical outcomes associated with the curricular and extra-curricular experiences of engineering undergraduates on a national scale, she leads projects to evaluate the effects of different kinds of instructional consultations on teaching, to assess the impact of an interactive theater sketch on student teamwork skills, and to determine the effects of an applied honors math course. Dr. Finelli is Chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of American Society of Engineering Education, is a member of the International Planning/Advisory Committee for the 2009 Research in Engineering Education Symposium, and is
,4 the life cycleapproach has wider potential to help students attain two of the ABET “a through k” outcomes:“(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability” (emphasis added); and “(h) the broad education necessaryto understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, andsocietal context.”To date, most of the engineering education literature’s treatment of life cycle has been limited todiscussion of innovative exercises and courses. 2,4,5 In particular, there has been littleexamination of how much engineering students consider life
engineering education and related research by adoptingnew ways of thinking (ASEE, 2014; NAE, 2004; UNESCO, 2012). The Engineering EducationResearch (EER) Colloquies (JEE, 2006) specifically called for “research that will helpcharacterize the nature of engineering knowledge (i.e., its technical, social, and ethical aspects)and ways of engineering thinking that are essential for identifying and solving technicalproblems within dynamic and multidisciplinary environments” (p. 260). The ways of engineeringthinking need to be reconsidered to not only meet changing workforce demands, but also toincrease awareness of the social impacts of engineered solutions, to promote diversity andinclusion in the profession, and to solve chronic issues of student
achieved by a university graduate [9]. This may engage companies anduniversities in an ongoing dialogue on the expected skills and identifying areas of collaborationto enhance student learning. In engineering education, scoring rubrics have been used in the performance evaluation of awide range of ABET and other outcomes, including professional skills [10], ethics [11], writingskills [12], design competency [13, 14], and students’ software skills [15]. The motivation to usescoring rubrics in engineering education also is due to the lack of satisfaction emanating from theuse of the traditional grading process which have been criticized for their bias, and unrealisticstandards [2, 9, 15]. Rubrics are attractive since they can be adjusted to
provide a methodfor improving student design processes that has been experimentally validated, which would beof interest to educators interested in engineering design. Second, we describe a cross-overexperimental method which can be useful to a broad range of education researchers wanting totest pedagogical tools/methods experimentally. The experimental design has simple but stronginternal and external validation indicators, and overcomes some of the ethical issues which oftensurround experiments in an educational setting. Page 11.623.2BackgroundThe first design phase following need identification is generally concept design; that is,addressing a
totinkering and technical characteristics corresponded to Criterion 3 outcomes. There was notmuch correspondence, however, to the soft outcomes such as Criterion 3 (f), an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility and Criterion 3 (d), an ability to function onmultidisciplinary teams. The lack of correspondence indicates that the soft outcomes do notappear to be explicitly incorporated with tinkering and technical activities, thinking processes, ordecision making processes of students, faculty and practicing engineers. Additionally, themesrepresenting curiosity and creativity, which were of the utmost importance to engineers, with aranking as first and second as tinkering characteristics, do not appear in the Criterion 3 a-koutcomes