=e59adb2e0267339ae9aa40a0c1da0d94.30. Torres D, Zoltowski CB, Buzzanell PM, Feister MK, Oakes WC. Using Social Network Theory to Elucidate the Impact of Diversity on the Social Processes in Design.31. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a Feather : Homophily in Social Networks. Annu Rev os Sociol. 2001;27:415-444. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2678628.32. Hoppe B, Reinelt C. Social network analysis and the evaluation of leadership networks. Leadersh Q. 2010;21(4):600-619. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.06.004.33. Smith DG, Schonfeld NB. The Benefits of Diversity: What the Research Tells Us. About Campus. 2000;5(December):16-23. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703993104.34. Astin AW. What Matters in College? : Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco
, no. 6, pp. 735–753, Dec. 2013.[28] K. A. Ericsson and H. A. Simon, “Verbal reports as data.,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 215–251, 1980.[29] A. Sassaroli and S. Fantini, “Comment on the modified Beer–Lambert law for scattering media,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 49, no. 14, p. N255, 2004.[30] Q. Chen, J. Zhao, C. H. Fang, and D. Wang, “Feasibility study on identification of green, black and Oolong teas using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy based on support vector machine (SVM),” Spectrochim. Acta. A. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 568– 574, Mar. 2007.[31] S. Tak and J. C. Ye, “Statistical analysis of fNIRS data: A comprehensive review
design.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Rex Hartson and Doug Bowman for their influence in theoriginal course design and guidance throughout. We also express our appreciation to thestudents who contributed to the development of this research study. Finally, many thanks toLindsay Wheeler for her guidance and reviewing of this work.References[1] J. Pirker, M. Riffnaller-Schiefer, and C. Gütl, “Motivational active learning - Engaging university students in computer science education,” in ITICSE 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference, 2014, pp. 297–302.[2] B. Simon, S. Esper, L. Porter, and Q. Cutts, “Student experience in a student-centered peer instruction
users. Table 1 Responses Citing the One-Week Chair of Scrap project Subject Q# Response (actual quotes in italics) I vividly remember the chair project that he assigned at the very beginning, and that probably had the biggest impact on me; I still talk about it med[ical] school interviews. Like when I was interviewing for med[ical] school I would always bring that up describing the engineering design process. Chris 7, 8, 12a It basically scared the s*** out of me. well, it didn’t scare the s*** out of me
[company name], in terms of actual technical work, was like a 30 second - oh, not 30 second - but it was like 30 minute, very short, design of a little Excel sheet to calculate heat recovered from a water stream using Q equals mcp delta t, which you learned like in high school. Like, its just literally multiplying numbers together, no integration, super simple, um, and yeah, that was the most serious thing I did. And I was astounded at the time, I was so surprised.Later in the conversation, Andrew expands on the main challenges that he actually did faceduring his internships, characterizing them as “cultural.” While we return to this theme below indiscussing the sociotechnical character of Andrew’s work, here it is
take steps to I guess get better at that certain skill set.” [person H] “…means having the motivation um, to be able to obtain the resources that you need to be able to achieve a certain goal.” [person T]Responsibility / OwnershipIn this “way of experiencing”,f the participants view the learning as being directed bythemselves. They take accountability for the actions of learning. They view themselves asthe “CEO” of their learning. “…being responsible and taking over without being told what to do.” [person Q] “I take responsibility for my learning; I don’t leave it up to an instructor per se. If they present a topic or use a word or a concept, it isn’t gone into detail in, in a course or during the
Simulations. International Journal of Engineering Education 28, 1019 (2012).17 Hardiman, P. T., Dufresne, R., & Mestre, J. P. (1989). The relation between problem categorization and problem solving among experts and novices. Memory & Cognition, 17(5), 627-638.18 Patton, M. Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 3 edn, (Sage Publications, Inc, 2002).19 NanoHUB.org. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2015, from https://nanohub.org/tools/oof20 NanoHUB.org. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2015, from https://nanohub.org/tools/gibbs21 Magana, A. J., Brophy, S. P., & Bodner, G. M. (2012). Student Views of Engineering Professors Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Integrating Computational
., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J., & Seller, R. (2012). Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. International journal of nursing studies, 49(1), 47-53.[15] Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual review of public health, 35, 29-45.[16] Pluye, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., & Johnson-Lafleur, J. (2009). A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. International journal of
, doi: 10.18260/1-2--28502.[18] Q. Li, H. Swaminathan, and J. Tang, “Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 361–376, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01033.x.[19] C. Paguyo, R. Atadero, K. Rambo-Hernandez, and J. Francis, “Creating Inclusive Environments in First-year Engineering Classes to Support Student Retention and Learning,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Seattle, Washington, Jun. 2015, pp. 26.418.1-26.418.16, doi: 10.18260/p.23757.[20] A. Sithole, E. T. Chiyaka, P. McCarthy, D. M. Mupinga, B. K. Bucklein, and J. Kibirige, “Student Attraction, Persistence and
Philosophy (e.g., HPL) Principles Q-E-M (iterative) FIE + (e.g., NRC) (research) Figure 1. INTRO Course OrganizationTo accomplish the goals of building community and developing identity within engineeringeducation, faculty centered course content on the development of a first set of engineeringeducation philosophy statements, including an engineering “elevator speech” (a response to thequestions “what is engineering?” and “what is your role?” as if
センター年報 Res. Clin. Cent. Child Dev. Annu. Rep. 6, 27–36 (1984).59. Kimball, D. R. & Holyoak, K. J. Transfer and expertise. Oxf. Handb. Mem. 109–122 (2000).60. Hatano, G. Cognitive consequences of practice in culture specific procedural skills. Q. Newsl. Lab. Comp. Hum. Cogn. 4, 15–18 (1982).61. Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L. & Bransford, J. Intercultural adaptive expertise: Explicit and implicit lessons from Dr. Hatano. Hum. Dev. 50, 65–72 (2007).62. Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D. & Sears, D. Efficiency and innovation in transfer. Transf. Learn. Mod. Multidiscip. Perspect. 1–51 (2005).63. Fisher, F. T. & Peterson, P. L. A tool to measure adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering students. in Proc. 2001 Am. Soc
“energy for all.”y Additionally, Practical Action partners with existing local organizationsto help specific communities secure energy access and meet other basic needs. For instance,Practical Action installed micro-hydropower and wind power schemes that provide electricity inisolated areas of Peru, Nepal, and Kenya. Through the Practical Answers database,z PracticalAction provides direct technical support to communities across a wide range of technologies.p Michael Roberts, “Creating value at farm level” 24 Aug 2010 http://blog.ideorg.org/2010/08/24/creating-value-at-farm-level/q IDE, Our Method, Water, www.ideorg.org/OurMethod/Water.aspxr IDE’s Sanitation Marketing Project Honored by World Toilet Organization, accessed at http://www.ide
University Press, 1987.21. M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Evaluation and Research. 2nd ed, Newbury Park, California: Sage, 1990. Page 13.42.1422. M. Miles and A. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed, ThousandOaks, California: Sage Publications Inc., 1994.A Framework for Understanding Engineering Practice page 1423. A. M. Huberman and M. B. Miles, eds. The Qualitative Researcher's Companion. 2002, SagePublications: Thousand Oaks, California.24. R. Zussman, Mechanics of the Middle Class: Work and Politics Among American Engineers