persons. James received his Ph.D. in engineering education and his his M.S. in electrical and computer engineering, both from Purdue University. He received his bachelor’s in computer engineering at Harding University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Mindful Methodology: A transparent dialogue on adapting Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis for engineering education researchThis research methodology paper investigates the pragmatic adaptation of InterpretativePhenomenological Analysis (IPA) in two studies that contribute to engineering educationresearch (EER). IPA is a qualitative methodology used to examine subjective livedexperiences of
Paper ID #19569Cargo Cults and Cognitive Apprenticeships: Two Frameworks for AdoptingUnfamiliar Curricular CulturesMel Chua, Olin College of Engineering Mel is an engineering education researcher who works with postmodern qualitative methodologies, cur- ricular cultures within and inspired by hacker/maker communities, and engineering faculty formation. She is also an electrical and computer engineer and auditory low-pass filter who occasionally draws research cartoonProf. Lynn Andrea Stein, Olin College of Engineering Lynn Andrea Stein is Professor of Computer and Cognitive Science at Olin College of Engineering in
farm operation harvest crops sustainably.Throughout the curriculum experiences students document plans, observations and test results,and sketches of their work. These design notebooks also enable a final demonstration of theirgripper and “training” on their gripper design in a class presentation. The lesson aligns withStandards for Technological Literacy 8 – 11 26 and Next Generation Science Standards HS-ETS1-1 – HS-ETS1-4 27, related to engineering design, modeling, and troubleshooting.In addition to alignment with national standards, we feel that the design experience aligns withthe psychosocial factors just described. First, for societal relevance, the design experience isintended to be human-centered, with an end user in mind
Paper ID #20033Characterizing the Alignment in Faculty and Student BeliefsDr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for nearly 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country. His current research
-structured interview, impacted the qualityand trustworthiness of the data. With this broader theme in mind, two more specific objectivesare the primary foci of this paper: • Objective 1: What do the reflection data and follow-up interviews make visible about engineering practice, including in terms of boundary spanning? • Objective 2: How do participants respond differently in the reflections and interviews, and how is this potentially related to personality or other individual characteristics?In support of these objectives we first consider the challenges of studying engineering practiceand how others have conducted such research. Second, we report on the types of reflectionprompts we developed, justification for their use
involved the creation of interpretative codes to identifypatterns within and across EDSs’ interviews. For each participant, a mind map, or graphicorganizer, was generated after analysis to identify the relationships based on those identifiedcodes. This process ultimately led to the increased discerning of EDS phenomenon as theresearcher’s familiarity with the interview increased.11 IPA’s recursive process facilitated theunderstanding of EDSs’ salient identities as presented during their interviews by providinginsight into the successes and barriers students encounter on their way to graduation. This studyis a small portion of a larger project that seeks to understand how engineering graduate programscan be improved based on the development of
peers.Five FG engineering students with high quantitative belongingness were selected for aninterview. A semi-structured interview protocol based in interpretive phenomenological analysiswas used to elucidate the students’ experiences that fostered belongingness. Separate themesfrom each student were created from coding and then overarching themes unified a sharedexperience.The following overarching themes were prevalent among the participants: similarity toclassmates, recognition as an engineer by peers, limited questioning of belongingness, andbelongingness is a state of mind. The results depict that elements of engineering identity play apart in making students feel they belong (e.g., recognition), but in some cases, belongingness isdistinct from
Paper ID #18919Life after University for Engineering GraduatesProf. Houshang Darabi, University of Illinois, Chicago Dr. Houshang Darabi is an Associate Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (MIE) at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). Dr. Darabi has been the Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of MIE since 2007. He has also served on the College of Engineering (COE) Educational Policy Committee since 2007. Dr. Darabi is the recipient of multiple teaching and advising awards including the COE Excellence in Teaching Award
inengineering.In this work-in-progress paper, we describe a design-based research project that explores howstudents adopt positive learning behaviors and dispositions through a course, because positivelearning behaviors and dispositions have been shown to increase persistence through challengesand setbacks4.We have designed a course titled Engineering the Mind as an eight-week, second-half semestercourse that is offered for one semester-hour of credit. We plan to pilot this course in Spring 2017to prepare for the Fall 2017 offering.BackgroundDesign-Based ResearchDesign-based research (DBR) is a research paradigm that attempts to bridge laboratory studieswith complex, instructional intervention studies5. DBR is described as “theoretically-framed,empirical
Paper ID #19124Laying the Foundations of a Learning Platform for Humanitarian Engineer-ing: Methodological Approach and ResultsDr. Andrea Mazzurco, University of Queensland Andrea Mazzurco is currently an Educational Researcher at The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. He is part of the Enhancing Student Experience team and, in this role, is tasked to work with the engineering, architecture, and IT faculty to enhance learning and teaching in classroom and across programs. He earned his PhD at Purdue University in Engineering Education and also has a M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering
recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Borkowski, J. G., Carr, M., & Pressley, M. (1987). “Spontaneous” strategy use: Perspectives from metacognitive theory. Intelligence, 11(1), 61-75.2. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council.3. Chopra, S. K., Shankar, P. R., & Kummamuru, S. (2013, August). MAKE: A framework to enhance metacognitive skills of engineering students. In Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 2013 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 612-617). IEEE.4. Cross, D. R., &
students who preferred the online mode. Attendance was not enforced, thus thepercent of students who attend class sessions (both face-to-face and online synchronous) variedfrom lecture to lecture, from about 75% to 100%.The variability in student enrollment and participation necessitate special teaching techniques tohelp students in their learning process. With that in mind and with the objective of helpingstudents to achieve preparedness for the workforce, the instructor assigns a semester-long projectwhere the students have to use all the engineering tools learned in class to design four pumpedpipeline systems in a hypothetical new plant facility. The students are required to work in groupsas working in teams is a healthy habit for their future
Paper ID #17980Work In Progress: Methodological Considerations for Constructing Nontra-ditional Student Personas with Scenarios from Online Forum Usage Data inCalculusDr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela Minichiello is an assistant professor the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State Uni- versity (USU) and a registered professional mechanical engineer. Angela earned a BSME degree from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, a MSME degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and a PhD in Engineering Education from USU. Her research examines issues of access, diversity, and
education is critical to thisprocess of improvement. Engineering, like other disciplines, has unique ways of thinking andknowing (habits of mind) and particular practices of teaching and learning3. These uniquepractices, called ‘signature pedagogies’, organize how future engineers are educated in theprofession.4 Lucas, Hanson and Claxton5 propose that the predominant pedagogy of engineeringdoes not align with true engineering habits of mind (EHoM). This work in progress aims todefine the surface characteristics of engineering education pedagogy by analyzing topicspresented at recent ASEE international conferences. The results of this study will inform a largerstudy which looks at potential disconnects between the way we teach engineering
Paper ID #18454Development of the Engineering Learning Classroom Observation Tool (EL-COT)Ms. Timeri K. Tolnay, Colorado School of Mines Timeri joined Mines in November of 2015 to support the growth and Development of the Trefny Innova- tive Instruction (I) Center, and to bring her extensive background in instructional coaching to the college level. Prior to joining Mines, Timeri worked for a nationally recognized online Learning and Assessment System called ShowEvidence where she supported educational institutions in transferring their teaching, learning, and assessment practices online to create greater coherence
the United States in 2015.3 However, only a subset of these new engineering graduatesgo on to careers in the engineering field. Based on the 2006 National Survey of RecentCollege Graduates (NSRCG), 60% of those who graduated with engineering degreesbetween 2002 and 2005 were employed in engineering positions (based on self-reportedjob type classification).4 Reasons for working in a field unrelated to one’s degreeincluded “job in highest degree field not available,” “change in professional/careerinterests,” and “pay/promotion opportunities,” keeping in mind that these are broadcategories with little visibility into what precisely happened, for example, when a job inone’s field was not available, or what about pay or promotion led a graduate to
Paper ID #18098The RED Teams as Institutional Mentors: Advice from the First Year of the”Revolution”Dr. Jeremi S. London, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Arizona State University. She holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue Uni- versity. Prior to her PhD, she worked in quality assurance and logistics roles at Anheuser-Busch and GE Healthcare, where she was responsible for ensuring consistency across processes and compliance with federal regulations. For four consecutive summers
) who, in turn, has in mind a set of users(or customers) for whose benefit the designed artifact is being developed” [10].In the work presented in this paper, “engineering design” refers to situations where an individualor team begins with a fairly vague notion of a problem or a set of needs that their design willaddress, as opposed to a situation where a very strict set of immutable requirements are handedto the team at the start. For example, a team could be tasked with designing a system to detectthe posture of a user sitting in a chair and use that information to improve posture. Or, a studentcould be tasked with designing a system to automatically detect bruised bananas as they speed byon a conveyor belt. Or, a team could be tasked to
Paper ID #18611Work In Progress: Knowledge Integration to Understand WhyProf. Tom Chen, Colorado State University Tom Chen received his Ph.D. from the University of Edinburgh. After spending 4 years with Philips Semiconductors in Europe, he joined the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Colorado State University. Prof. Chen published more than 180 journal and conference papers in the areas of analog and digital VLSI design and CAD for VLSI design. Prof. Chen served as the General Chair of 2015 IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, and as the Guest Editor of IEEE Trans. on Computer- Aided
Paper ID #18147Developing a Shared Vision for Change: New results from the Revolutioniz-ing Engineering Departments Participatory Action ResearchDr. Cara Margherio, University of Washington Cara Margherio is the Senior Research Associate at the UW Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE). Cara serves as project manager for program evaluation on several NSF- and NIH-funded projects. Her research interests include community cultural wealth, counterspaces, peer mentoring, and institutional change.Dr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the director of the University of
mindfulness and its impact on gender participation in engineering education. He is a Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Stanford University and teaches the course ME310x Product Management and ME305 Statistics for Design Researchers. Mark has extensive background in consumer products management, having managed more than 50 con- sumer driven businesses over a 25-year career with The Procter & Gamble Company. In 2005, he joined Intuit, Inc. as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and initiated a number of consumer package goods marketing best practices, introduced the use of competitive response modeling and ”on- the-fly” A|B testing program to qualify software improvements. Mark is the Co-Founder
Paper ID #18272Work in Progress: Engineering Invisible Mountains! Mental Health andUndergraduate-Level Engineering Education: The Changing Futures ProjectDr. Jane Andrews, Aston University Dr Jane Andrews is currently a Senior Lecturer in Engineering Education at the School of Engineering & Applied Science, Aston University, UK. The only Sociologist in the UK to hold a lectureship in Engi- neering, Jane’s research interests include all aspects of engineering education with a particular focus on elementary level engineering education and gender issues within engineering.Prof. Robin Clark, Aston University
Paper ID #18338Work in Progress: Examining the Value of Reflection in Engineering Practiceand EducationDr. Kristine R. Csavina, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Kristy Csavina is a Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. She has her bachelors degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Dayton and her doctorate in Bioengineering from Arizona State University.Dr. Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University Dr. Adam Carberry is an assistant professor at Arizona State University in the Fulton Schools of Engineer- ing, The Polytechnic School. He earned a B.S. in
parts of the project,including sample chain of custody and were expected be productive, contribute significantly, andunderstand all aspects of analysis required for the project. The experimental design proposal wasthe starting point for experiments.Data Collection and Program EvaluationOnce experiments were underway, students needed to adjust and refine their procedures andhypotheses since instrumental analyses rarely worked the first time exactly as planned. Problemsoccurred and new questions arose. Students modified their experiments to solve the problemsand/or answer those questions. This process was repeated multiple times over the course of thePBL and semester and cemented the process of engineering design in the mind of the students.PBL
Paper ID #18567Evaluating the Potential of fNIRS Neuroimaging to Study Engineering Prob-lem Solving and DesignDr. Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech Jacob Grohs is an Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with Affiliate Faculty status in Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics and the Learning Sciences and Technologies at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics (BS, MS) and in Educational Psychology (MAEd, PhD).Dr. Tripp Shealy, Virginia Tech Tripp Shealy is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech and prin- cipal faculty in the Myers-Lawson School
Paper ID #18578Challenges and Benefits of Applied Experience as an Engineering Returnerin a Ph.D. ProgramMs. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a PhD candidate in Higher Education at the University of Michigan. She also earned a Master’s in Higher Education at Michigan and a Bachelor’s in Psychology and Sociology from Case Western Reserve University. Before pursuing a PhD, Erika had a dual appointment in UM’s College of Engineering working in student affairs and as a research associate. While grounded in the field of higher education, her research interests include engineering education
Paper ID #17913Improving Student Engagement in Engineering Using Brain-Based LearningPrinciples as Instructional Delivery ProtocolsDr. John T. Solomon, Tuskegee University John T Solomon is assistant professor in the mechanical engineering department of Tuskegee Univer- sity. He received Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering from Florida State University, USA in 2010. Prior joining Tuskegee University he was working as a Research Associate in Florida Center for Advanced Aero Propulsion and an Adjunct Faculty at Florida State University. Dr. Solomon’s research interests include high speed flow control, actuator development
Paper ID #18841Gender and Ethnic Differences in Classroom Engagement and KnowledgeBuilding in Engineering Energy Science CoursesDan Haskett, Georgia Southern University Georgia Southern StudentDr. Jonathan C. Hilpert, Georgia Southern University Dr. Jonathan C. Hilpert is an Associate Professor of Educational Psychology in the Department of Cur- riculum Reading and Foundations in the College of Education at Georgia Southern University. His re- search interests include student motivation, engagement, and interactive learning; emergent and self- organizing properties of educational systems; and knowledge construction of
Paper ID #19066Measuring Students’ Subjective Task Values Related to the Post-UndergraduateCareer SearchDr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Dr. Brunhaver joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and
thesolution. The active dimension of design is more relevant to modern engineering, as innovativeprojects mean nothing if they cannot be successfully implemented and sustained. The Engineerof 2020 [4] will however, need to have some traits of the adaptive expert.McKenna [16] characterizes the adaptive expert with engineering design in mind, and Figure 2below shows how she defines the dimensions of design thinking in relation to these experts, andthe characteristics of design processes used by experts of those dimensions. Figure 2: Adaptive expertise as a balance between two dimensions for learning and assessment: Efficiency and innovation. [16]Within this optimal adaptability corridor, or adaptive dimension, innovation and