Paper ID #23691WIP: Unpacking the Black Box: How does a Cultural Engineering StudentOrganization Support the Persistence of Students of Color?Tasha Zephirin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Tasha Zephirin is a Ph.D. Candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is an Executive Assistant for the National Association of Multicultural Program Advocates (NAMEPA) Inc. and has served as the Graduate Student Representative on the Purdue Engineering Advisory Council. Her research interests include exploring the role of noncurricular engineering education initiatives in the
Paper ID #23510Efforts to Improve Undergraduate Grader Consistency: A Qualitative Anal-ysisNathan M. Hicks, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Nathan M. Hicks is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Florida and taught high school math and science for three years.Dr. Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Douglas is an Assistant Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on improving methods of
-regulated learning, self-efficacy,and general well-being [5]. In our study, we explored whether we could help students persist inengineering by encouraging such positive learning dispositions and behaviors.In this work-in-progress paper, we report preliminary results from a one-credit course called“Engineering the Mind.” We used design-based research and the Transtheoretical Model (TTM)of Health Behavior Change to design the course and assess the outcomes. The goal of the coursewas to encourage students to adopt positive learning dispositions and behaviors by teaching themhow the brain works.BackgroundDesign-based research (DBR) is a research method that evaluates theory-based interventions(that were developed in laboratory conditions) in complex
://trefnycenter.mines.edu/pedagogy-resources/engineered-learning/ 10. GP Wiggins & J McTighe. Understanding by design. ), Princeton, NJ: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). 2007. 11. SA Ambrose, M Lovett, MW Bridges, M DiPietro, & MK Norman. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 2010 12. JB Biggs & C Tang. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press. 2011. 13. J Bransford, AL Brown, RR Cocking, & National Research Council (U.S.). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press. 2000 14
Paper ID #23133Design Thinking in Engineering Course DesignDr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University Nicholas D. Fila is a postdoctoral research associate in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Industrial Design at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. His current research interests include innovation, empathy, design thinking, instructional design heuristics.Dr. Seda McKIlligan, Iowa State University Dr. McKilligan’s
analysis for a pilotof the SUCCESS survey (Studying Underlying Characteristics for Computing and EngineeringStudent Success). This survey was developed to measure underlying factors that may influencestudent success including personality, community, grit, thriving, identity, mindset, motivation,perceptions of faculty caring, stress, gratitude, self-control, mindfulness, and belongingness. Wemeasure these underlying factors because each engineering and computing student admitted to auniversity has clear potential for academic and personal success in their undergraduatecurriculum from admissions criteria, however, while some thrive academically, others flounder.In this project, we ask, “Why is it that highly credentialed and previously successful
student uses an understanding of constantsupplied power to the heater system to assume constant energy transfer into the process fluid.The student reasons through the physical system in his/her mind, a useful tool for practicingengineers. Engineering world codes tended to persist longer in the broader dialogue as it callsupon a deep understanding of processes. The school world example stands in contrast to thisphysical system reasoning. Representativeness resulted in students forming an idea of what thesolution should look like early in the problem-solving process. The example in Table 1 mentionsΔT log mean, a common solution to undergraduate heat transfer problems. School world codestended to be short and require less dialogue. Hybrid world
Paper ID #22887WIP An Interview Study of Faculty, Course Assistant, and Student Insightwithin Teaching and Learning Assistant Programs for Undergraduate Engi-neering CoursesHern´an Gallegos, Tufts University Hern´an Gallegos is currently a junior at Tufts University. He is studying Mechanical Engineering and minoring in Engineering Education. His academic interests lie in trying to aid students to understand engineering concepts and how they can enhance their learning through various resources. With this in mind, he is working within the Engineering Learning Systems lab under Professor Kristen Wendell, a Mechanical
. [Accessed: 08-Mar-2018].[8] M. L. Loughry, M. W. Ohland, and D. J. Woehr, “Assessing Teamwork Skills for Assurance of Learning Using CATME Team Tools,” Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 5–19, 2014.[9] M. W. Ohland et al., The Comprehensive Assessment of Team-Member Effectiveness. info.catme.org, 2005.[10] A. Godwin, A. Kirn, and J. Rohde, “Awareness without action: Student attitudes after engineering teaming experiences,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 36, no. 6A, pp. 1878–1891, 2017.[11] A. Kirn, A. Godwin, C. Cass, M. S. Ross, and J. L. Huff, “Mindful Methodology: A transparent dialogue on Adapting Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis for Engineering Education
ground their work in well-defined frameworks that include a collection of traitsdeveloped within the context. Although this perspective provides easily definable lenses foranalyzing identity, more research is needed into the factors that influence students’ identitydevelopment – particularly those that are within the control of engineering educators. This paperwill provide a review of an engineering identity study, explore the challenges and affordancesinherent in this work, and discuss the practical implications for engineering educators andscholars.IntroductionIn the early 17th century, the philosopher John Locke developed a theory of mind that advancedthe idea that individuals are born as tabula rasa, or blank slate: the mind arrives in the
University of Alabama. She has experi- ence working with many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution etc. on transportation and operations management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are integral part of her service-learning based logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies to
Paper ID #21710Data Visualization for Time-Resolved Real-Time Engineering Writing Pro-cessesDr. Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engi- neering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research interests include graduate-level engineering education, including inter- and multidisciplinary graduate education
Paper ID #21392Measuring Engineering Students’ Metacognition with a Think-Aloud Proto-colDr. Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the recently retired Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engineering at Montana State University (MSU). Plumb has been involved in engineering education and program evaluation for 30 years, and she continues to work on externally funded projects relating to engineering education.Rose M. Marra, University of Missouri Rose M. Marra is a Professor of Learning Technologies at the University of Missouri. She is PI of the NSF-funded
Paper ID #21635Understanding the Socializer Influence on Engineering Students’ Career Plan-ningRohini Abhyankar, Arizona State University Rohini Abhyankar is a second year graduate student at Arizona State University’s Engineering Education Systems and Design doctoral program. Rohini has a Master’s degree in Electrical Engineering from Syracuse University and Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in Physics from University of Delhi, India. Rohini has over ten years each of industry and teaching experience.Dr. Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech Cheryl Carrico is a part-time faculty Research Scientist for Virginia Tech and owner
Paper ID #23131Engineering Undergraduates’ Task Interpretation during Problem-Solving inThermodynamicsDr. Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University Dr. Oenardi Lawanto is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University, USA. He received his B.S.E.E. from Iowa State University, his M.S.E.E. from the University of Dayton, and his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Before coming to Utah State, Dr. Lawanto taught and held several administrative positions at one large private university in In- donesia. He has developed and delivered numerous international
Paper ID #22089Developing a Measure of Engineering Students’ Makerspace Learning, Per-ceptions, and InteractionsSarah Lanci, Colorado Mesa University Sarah Lanci is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Colorado Mesa University. She received her B.S. degree in Materials Science and Engineering at Michigan State University and her M.S. degree in Metallurgical Engineering at Colorado School of Mines. Following graduate school, Sarah worked as a part and process engineer at an investment casting facility, PCC Structurals, in Portland, OR for seven years before transitioning to her current position at CMU where
engineering students may find it hard to perform effectively. When faced withan unfamiliar problem, many engineering students may find it difficult to employ theirdivergent thinking skills and conceptualise ideas which are different from the first idea whichcomes to mind (either through ability or unwillingness to consider other ideas), or be able toproduce ideas which use a variety of concepts to try and resolve the problem [16-18]. Thisphenomenon is known as design fixation. Results found by Nazzal [9] suggest that thedivergent thinking skills and ability of engineering students to overcome design fixation,increases between the first year and following years of study. In the interest of furtherenhancing the creativity skills of engineering students
transferable to people and settings with similar characteristics, some limitations of our study should be noted. Our study did not evaluate the experiences of majority students in the field of engineering. By consequence, and as stated in the discussion section, we do not claim the experiences analyzed in this study are limited to the URM student community. However, we recommend these results be used keeping this intended scope in mind as it is possible that these experiences are not strictly unique to the demographics and identities of our participants. Additionally, the majority (six out of eight) of our participants are underrepresented women. This intersection of oppressed identities may have influenced the experiences detailed in this study due
Paper ID #22387Characterizing Students’ Intercultural Competence Development Paths Througha Global Engineering ProgramMs. Kirsten Davis, Virginia Tech Kirsten Davis is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also completed her master’s degree in Higher Education. She is the graduate assistant for the Rising Sophomore Abroad Program, a global engineering course and study abroad program for first year engi- neering students. Her primary research interests are engineering study abroad, developing intercultural competency in engineering students, and international higher
within Pattern 3(“I feel”) were Comfort and Enjoyment. These themes did not focus on responses aboutinternships, beliefs about engineering, or social networking in which students engaged. Instead,the themes focused on the ways students talked about themselves and their belonging inengineering contexts. Table 2—Summary of super-themes, themes, and example codes. Super- Themes Example Codes Themes Creative/ • “I have the creativity from when I used to dance” (Allison Scott) Innovative • “I’m very creative and open-minded […] I do like a challenge” (Bradley) • “The hard work and dedication I have” (John Smith) Pattern
. Zastavker, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Physics at Franklin W. Olin College of En- gineering. She earned her B.S. degree in Physics from Yale University in 1995 and her Ph. D. degree in Biological Physics from MIT in 2001. Dr. Zastavker’s research interests lie in the field of STEM educa- tion with specific emphasis on innovative pedagogical and curricular practices at the intersection with the issues of gender and diversity. Dr. Zastavker is currently working with Dr. Stolk on an NSF-supported project to understand students’ motivational attitudes in a variety of educational environments with the goal of improving learning opportunities for students
Paper ID #22404WIP: Curricular Renewal for System Engineering: Project-based CapstoneFramework to Hatch Autonomy and CreativityDr. Chao-Yang Cheng, National Chiao Tung University Chao-Yang Cheng is a postdoctoral researcher from the Institute of Electrical and Control Engineering of National Chiao Tung University in Taiwan. He majored in educational psychology and minor in multi- level linear models. Flow theory, daily reconstruction method, classroom experience, immediate process feedback module, capstone teaching and learning, and engineering education are central to his area of study.Prof. Yu-Lun Huang, National Chiao
KLI framework, for instance, but toposition it as a necessary and useful framework to balance constraining more of complexity withcapturing more of it. Furthermore, giving students practice with exploring and capturing complexphenomena is becoming ever more important in a world of increasing collaboration andincreasingly complex phenomena. All instruction molds more than just what knowledge we holdin our minds. Integrative pluralism might be a framework to help us attend to that “more”productively and consciously.References[1] S. Lane, A. Karatsolis, and D. R. Sadoway, “Materials Science and Engineering Reasoning: A New Tool for Helping Students See the Big Picture,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New
on the representativeness heuristic14 when weestimate the likelihood of an event by comparing it to an existing prototype in our minds,allowing us make decisions quickly. This heuristic could create a bias towards generalizing theseevents and create false stereotypes, such as judging a book by its cover. However, heuristics existbecause people find them as an easy guide to decisions that are often “good enough” or “reliableenough”15. Many disciplines have identified domain-specific heuristics based on expertise,including mathematical problem-solving16, artificial intelligence17, user interface design18,engineering design19–21, and decision research22.Previous research on engineering design has successfully utilized the theoretical framework
Paper ID #22574Cultivating the Next Generation: Outcomes from a Learning Assistant Pro-gram in EngineeringDr. Ying Cao, Oregon State University Postdoctoral Scholar in STEM education.Dr. Christina Smith, Brown University Christina Smith is the Assistant Director for Undergraduate Instructional Development at the Sheridan Center for Teaching and Learning at Brown University. She received her PhD from Oregon State Uni- versity in chemical engineering. Her research focused on how the beliefs of graduate students around teaching and learning interact with and influence the environments in which they are asked to teach. She
devaluation of the self in response to the failure to meet feltexpectations.1,2 A sociological perspective on shame is oriented to examine sociocultural context thatmight create the environment for individuals to experience shame in ways that are maladaptive to thesocial context.3,4 Thus, while the present case study is decisively oriented to unpack a single individual’sexperience of shame, we also recognize that the phenomenon occurs in a broader social frame.With this in mind, we have chosen to examine Rebecca’s case of experiencing shame in the context ofbeing a mechanical engineering student. Rebecca, who identifies as a White woman, was a junior-levelmechanical engineering student at the time of our interview with her. She discussed in the
Paper ID #22636Instructional Strategies in K-12 Informal Engineering Education - Deep CaseStudy Approaches to Educational ResearchDr. Sarah Hug, Colorado Evaluation & Research Consulting Dr. Sarah Hug is Research Associate at the Alliance for Technology, Learning, and Society (ATLAS) Institute, University of Colorado at Boulder and director of Colorado Evaluation & Research Consulting. Dr. Hug earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research and evaluation efforts focus on learning science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, with a special interest in communities
Paper ID #23827Work in Progress: A Case Study Exploring Teaching Strategies Employed ina Cornerstone Engineering Design CourseMr. Kevin Calabro, University of Maryland, College Park Kevin Calabro is Keystone Instructor and Associate Director in the Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 WIP: A Case Study Exploring Teaching Strategies Employed in a Cornerstone Engineering Design Course This work in progress (WIP) paper presents findings from the early stages of a case study that explores the teaching
andperhaps responsibility as working engineers, the use of reflection as a tool for making decisionsbecomes much more important. A challenge will be conveying to students this important use ofreflection, as only 8% of student respondents considered this form of use.Finally, it is important to note that remembering is a moderately important use of reflection forboth students and faculty, but not for practitioners. Keep in mind that remembering implieslooking back upon past events without actually attempting to make meaning from it. Whystudents and faculty would be more prone to use this relatively passive form of reflection isunclear. Perhaps there is something about working in industry that pushes practitioners to seereflection as a precious
a class community is established early in the program.The format of Engineering Design Days is very similar among the different implementations. Forthe first half-day, students are presented with constrained problems strongly tied to their coursecontent. These problems serve as warm-ups, introducing the problem space and leading studentsthrough an analysis of a related but simplified system. These warm-up problems also provide anassessment opportunity that can be used as an assignment in one or more courses, whichstrengthens the links to course content in students’ minds and makes the expectation clear thatthe time is not just about having fun as a team. The next two half-days are an open work periodfor students to design, construct and