Maintaining Effective Research Teams. IEEEComputer Society.[7] Bernat, A., Teller, P.J., Gates, A., Delgado, N., & Della-Piana, C.K. (2000, July). Structuringthe student research experience. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE ITiCSEConference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pp. 17-20[8] Gates, A. Q., Hug, S., Thiry, H., Aló, R., Beheshti, M., Fernandez, J., & Adjouadi, M. (2011).The Computing Alliance of Hispanic-Serving Institutions. ACM Transactions on ComputingEducation, 11(3), 1–21. doi:10.1145/2037276.2037280[9] Villa, E. Q., Kephart, K., Gates, A. Q., Thiry, H., & Hug, S. (2013). Affinity Research Groupsin practice: Apprenticing students
was run to examine if LCDLMs offered differentialbenefits or effects based on the gender of participants. Four modes of engagement were assessed:Interactive, constructive, active, and passive scores. Participants were grouped by their gender:male and female. First, we checked preliminary assumptions, and results revealed that data wasnormally distributed, as assessed by inspecting the Normal Q-Q plots. There were no univariateand multivariate outliers, as assessed by boxplot; there were linear relationships, as evaluated byscatterplot, and no multicollinearity; and variance-covariance matrices were homogeneous, asassessed by Box’s test of equality of covariance matrices (p = 0.473); variances werehomogeneous, as assessed by Levene’s Test of
) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] A. K. Flatt, “A suffering generation: Six factors contributing to the mental health crisis inNorth American higher education.,” Coll. Q., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2013, [Online]. Available:https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1016492.pdf.[2] S. K. Lipson et al., “Trends in college student mental health and help-seeking byrace/ethnicity: Findings from the national healthy minds study, 2013–2021,” J. Affect. Disord.,vol. 306, pp. 138–147, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.038.[3] G. Boyraz, R. Granda, C. N. Baker, L. L. Tidwell, and J. B. Waits, “Posttraumatic stress,effort regulation, and academic outcomes among college students: A longitudinal
,” presented at the 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, Oct. 18-21, 2009. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5350571.[18] J. M. Holland, D. A. Major, and K. A. Orvis, “Understanding how peer mentoring and capitalization link STEM students to their majors,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 343-354, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2012.00026.x.[19] A. R. Rockinson-Szapkiw and J. L. Wendt, “The benefits and challenges of a blended peer mentoring program for women peer mentors in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM),” Int. J. Mentor. and Coach. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-16, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJMCE-03-2020-0011.[20
learning communities- Understanding the role of collaborative work in an undergraduate engineering program.Learning Sciences 1. Goleman, D., McKee, A., & Waytz, A. (2017). Empathy (HBR emotional intelligence series) 2. Ickes, W. (1993). Empathic Accuracy. 3. Kvalsund, R., Baardsen, B., & Allgood, E. (2016). Mindfulness Subjectivity through Q Methodology: Training and Practising Mindfulness in an Educational Program as Influential and Transformative. 4. Lebuda, I., Zabelina, D. L., & Karwowski, M. (2016). Mind full of ideas: A meta- analysis of the mindfulness–creativity link. 5. Oxley, J. (2011). The Moral Dimensions of Empathy Limits and Applications in Ethical Theory and Practice
Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 4th ed. SAGE Publications, 2021.[23] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.[24] A. Loignon, “RIEF Project Advisory Board Meeting,” Aug. 17, 2022.[25] P. P. Shah, R. S. Peterson, S. L. Jones, and A. J. Ferguson, “Things Are Not Always What They Seem: The Origins and Evolution of Intragroup Conflict,” Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 426–474, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0001839220965186.[26] A. Loignon and S. Wormington, “Psychologically Safe for Some, but Not All? The Downsides of Assuming Shared Psychological Safety among Senior Leadership Teams,” Center for Creative
, culturally relevant/ sustaining workshop designs. Author 1, had to rely onthe high school mentors’ knowledge and input because they are experts and participants in youthculture. Author 2 “To provide a more comfortable and safe environment for participants to share their ideas and thoughts, we told them all their ideas would be [anonymized post-workshop], and we don’t judge any ideas, we just share and learn. To encourage them to express more, we use a storytelling session instead of the traditional Q&A session to learn about participants’ background experiences with AI/ML and their attitude/perspective of teaching AI/ML. That was a successful attempt. Participants shared more
teacher’s belief system about science teaching and learning,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 835–868, 2003, doi:10.1002/tea.10113.[21] P. N. Johnson-Laird, “Mental models and human reasoning,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 107, no. 43, pp. 18243–18250, 2010, doi:10.1073/pnas.1012933107.[22] W. B. Rouse and N. M. Morris, “On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 349–363, 1985, [Online]. Available: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=related:QM4p5zGC8jMJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=e n&num=30&as_sdt=0,5.[23] K. Carley and M. Palmquist, “Extracting, representing, and analyzing mental models,” Soc
quantcrit to gifted education research: an introduction,” Gifted Child Quarterly, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 80–89, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1177/00169862221116636.[24] L. R. Bergman and K. Trost, “The Person-Oriented Versus the Variable-Oriented Approach: Are They Complementary, Opposites, or Exploring Different Worlds?,” Merrill Palmer Q., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 601–632, 2006, doi: 10.1353/mpq.2006.0023.[25] M. C. Howard and M. E. Hoffman, “Variable-Centered, Person-Centered, and Person- Specific Approaches,” Organizational Research Methods, vol. 21, no. 4, p. 109442811774402, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1094428117744021.
, M. Heagney, and L. Thomas, “Improving Student Retention in Higher Education: Improving Teaching and Learning,” Australian Universities’ Review, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 9–18, 2009.[25] T. D. Nguyen, J. W. Kramer, and B. J. Evans, “The Effects of Grant Aid on Student Persistence and Degree Attainment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 831–874, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.3102/0034654319877156.[26] Li, C. Q. (2021). Teaching Mechatronics to Non-traditional Mechanical Engineering Students-An Adaptive Approach. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 11(3).e[27] Turner, P. E., Johnston, E., Kebritchi, M., Evans, S., & Heflich, D. A. (2018
response. 𝑝𝑝: 𝑝𝑝 value of a Mann Whitney U-testcomparing pre- and post-survey distributions. Bias: Noting if the result was significant betweenpre- and post-survey responses and that the distribution does not appear to have acquiescencebias. 3.a. Responses from Hispanic/Latino(a) Population Pre-survey Response Post-survey Response Q. Mode Med. 𝜎𝜎 𝑓𝑓 Skew Mode Med. 𝜎𝜎 𝑓𝑓 Skew 𝑝𝑝 Bias 1 4 4 1.14 0.48 -1.23 5 5 0.80 0.65 -2.06 0.004 Yes 2 1 2 1.19 0.13 0.45 1 1 1.41 0.54 1.32 0.314 3 5 5 0.67 0.83 -3.27 5 5 0.32 0.88 -2.48 0.526 4 4
Education: The Need for a Plurality of Perspectives on Disability,” Remedial Spec. Educ., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 267–278, Jul. 2011.[49] T. Shakespeare and Others, “The social model of disability,” The disability studies reader, vol. 2, pp. 197–204, 2006.[50] R. R. Grinker, “Autism, ‘Stigma,’ Disability: A Shifting Historical Terrain,” Curr. Anthropol., vol. 61, no. S21, pp. S55–S67, Feb. 2020.[51] J. C. Sarrett, “Biocertification and Neurodiversity: the Role and Implications of Self- Diagnosis in Autistic Communities,” Neuroethics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 23–36, Apr. 2016.[52] Robertson and Ne’eman, “Autistic acceptance, the college campus, and technology: Growth of neurodiversity in society and academia,” Disabil. Stud. Q., 2008
. Svarovsky, C. Smith, V. Núñez, and A. Douglass, “Head Start on Engineering: Supporting engineering interest development in early childhood for low-income families,” Hands On! Magazine, vol. Fall, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.terc.edu/hands-on-magazine-fall-2019/[36] R. E. Stake, Multiple case study analysis. New York: The Guilford Press, 2006.[37] R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods, 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2018.[38] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2015.[39] K. Charmaz, Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2006.[40] S. A. Pattison et al
materials for free on the lab’s website and expand our offeredlanguages to include other minority language populations in Boston, such as Portuguese, CapeVerdean Creole, and Mandarin Chinese. We hope that by offering multilingual opportunities toaccess complex engineering systems through play, students will see ways that they can affecttheir local community issues and exhibit changed mindsets about who can call themselves anengineer.Supplementary MaterialsThe public version of the English/Spanish prototype of Next Stop! is available at this link:https://sites.tufts.edu/marvez/2022/12/13/next-stop-teaching-transit-engineering-through-board-games/Sources[1] Q. Wang and M. Abbas, “Designing web-games for transportation engineering education
at the 2023 Collaborative Network for Computing and EngineeringDiversity (CoNECD), Feb. 2023.[9] J. Martin and S. Newton, “Uncovering Forms of Wealth and Capital Using AssetFrameworks in Engineering Education,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionProceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 27087. doi:10.18260/p.27087.[10] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, and M. E. Allen, “Examining the CulturalWealth of Underrepresented Minority Engineering Persisters,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ.Pract., vol. 144, no. 2, p. 05017008, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000358.[11] K. A. Renn and K. D. Arnold, “Reconceptualizing Research on College Student PeerCulture,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 74
to engage deeply with the content, fostering theselection of more effective cognitive and metacognitive strategies for learning. At this stage, wewould like to encourage more instructors and researchers to join our effort in developing theLHETM model and examining its efficacy.AcknowledgementWe express our gratitude to Dr. Jing Liu for the meaningful discussion on data analysis.ReferenceAnderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., Liu, Q., Ding, L., Cui, L., & Luo, Y. (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning
.[6] Q. Liu, S. Kovalchuk, C. Rottmann, and D. Reeve, ‘Engineering co-op and internship experiences and outcomes: The roles of workplaces, academic institutions and students’, 2018.[7] M. Van den Bogaard and J. Strobel, ‘Workplace Spaces As Learning Spaces--Engineering Students’ Experiences With Co-Op’, 2023.[8] D.W. Shaffer and J.P. Gee, How computer games help children learn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.[9] L. Mann et al., ‘From problem-based learning to practice-based education: A framework for shaping future engineers’, European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 27–47, 2021.[10] Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, F. Trede, and J. Higgs, ‘Practice-based education
Gap for Parents and Educators,” in Visual-spatial Ability in STEM Education: Transforming Research into Practice, M. S. Khine, Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 195–224. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44385-0_10.[17] A. Haverkamp, M. Bothwell, D. Montfort, and Q.-L. Driskill, “Calling for a Paradigm Shift in the Study of Gender in Engineering Education,” vol. 1, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.21061/see.34.[18] D. H. Uttal et al., “The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 352–402, 2013, doi: 10.1037/a0028446.[19] S. A. Sorby and B. J. Baartmans, “The Development and Assessment of a Course for
, choice, and performance,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 79–122, 1994, https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027[9] Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G., “Contextual Supports and Barriers to Career Choice : A Social Cognitive Analysis,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 36–49, 2000[10] Bryan, E., & Simmons, L. A., “Family involvement: Impacts on postsecondary educational success for first- generation Appalachian college students,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 391–406, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0081[11] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, K. A. Foxx, and M. E. Allen, "Engineering self- efficacy, interactions
reforming a capstone design course.” Higher Engineering Education Research, (1), pp. 132-137, 2012.[32] B. K. Wan, Q. Li, C. M. Yang, and B. S. Ding, “Team Work: A Good Form to Cultivate Innovation Ability and Team Spirit.,” Higher Engineering Education Research, (2), pp. 83-84, 2004.
18:56:09, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00347-x.[13] S. Swartz, B. Barbosa, and I. Crawford, “Building intercultural competence through virtual team collaboration across global classrooms,” Bus. Prof. Commun. Q., vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 57–79, 2020.[14] P.-S. D. Chen, A. D. Lambert, and K. R. Guidry, “Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement,” Comput. Educ., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1222–1232, 2010.[15] C. C. Robinson and H. Hullinger, “New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning,” J. Educ. Bus., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 2008.[16] X. Du and A. Kolmos, “Increasing the diversity of engineering education–a gender analysis in a PBL
Conference & Exposition, 2011, p. 22.1656. 1- 22.1656. 15. doi: 10.18260/1-2--18492.[27] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications, 2014.[28] J. W. Creswell and T. C. Guetterman, Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research . New York, US. Pearson, 2019.
. for Eng. Educ., Washington, DC., USA, 2020.[34] M. Correll, D. Albers, S. Franconeri, and M. Gleicher, “Comparing averages in time series data,” in Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2012, pp. 1095–1104.[35] G. Affleck, A. Zautra, H. Tennen, and S. Armeli, “Multilevel daily process designs for consulting and clinical psychology: a preface for the perplexed.,” J. of Consulting and Clinical Psychol., vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 746-754, 1999, doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.5.746.[36] A. T. Jebb, L. Tay, W. Wang, and Q. Huang, “Time series analysis for psychological research: Examining and forecasting change,” Frontiers in Psychol, vol. 6: 727, pp. 1-24, June 2015, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00727[37
to student success in engineering education,” EuropeanJournal of Engineering Education, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 368–381, 2017.[5] M. Scheidt, A. Godwin, E. Berger, J. Chen, B. P. Self, J. M. Widmann, and A. Q. Gates,“Engineering students’ noncognitive and affective factors: Group differences from clusteranalysis,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 343–370, 2021.[6] S.-M. R. Ting and R. Man, “Predicting academic success of first-year engineeringstudents from standardized test scores and psychosocial variables,” International Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2001.[7] B. F. French, J. C. Immekus, and W. C. Oakes, “An examination of indicators ofengineering students’ success and persistence
Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, Virtual Event, Taiwan, 2022, pp. 245–250.[33] J. Egner, “#ActuallyAutistic: Using Twitter to construct individual and collective identity narratives,” Stud. Soc. Justice, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 349–369, Mar. 2022.[34] I. Vayansky and S. A. P. Kumar, “A review of topic modeling methods,” Inf. Syst., vol. 94, p. 101582, Dec. 2020.[35] D. Andrzejewski and X. Zhu, “Latent Dirichlet allocation with topic-in-set knowledge,” in Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2009 Workshop on Semi-Supervised Learning for Natural Language Processing - SemiSupLearn ’09, Boulder, Colorado, 2009.[36] Q. Bi, K. E. Goodman, J. Kaminsky, and J. Lessler, “What is Machine