thatwhat you see is a description for a book that we have in our library?” This led to a briefdiscussion of online and/or card catalogs available to them at their school libraries. Afew indicated that they still used card catalogs to find books. Despite the best intentionsof the librarians in planning the lecture, realistically, the SEE students were not going tobegin researching their topics by using the most appropriate subject headings.Introducing the databaseThe University Libraries subscribe to the online encyclopedia, AccessScience. Thischoice was more appropriate for locating background information. In hindsight, anonline encyclopedia may have been a better starting point than an online catalog. Thisresource features easy to locate subject
. For the last twodeliveries, the instructors have invited an engineering librarian to offer information literacysessions to help guide the students. While the librarians and instructors feel that it is importantfor students to become familiar with and know how to use specialized engineering researchdatabases, e.g. Compendex, Web of Science, ASCE Digital Library and others, we wonder whatinformation sources students actually use. And why? These questions have puzzled us and havemotivated this study.MethodologyIn this study, we used three sets of questions to obtain predominantly qualitative data: first, weasked the students to identify in writing the information tools or sources they plan to use toconduct their research. Then an engineering
slightlymore value in the synchronous class meeting (81.8% rated it extremely or very valuable) than inthe asynchronous module (72.8% extremely or very valuable). Students also made suggestionsfor improvements, such as providing more time for in-class assessment items to provide morehands-on search practice, which they found engaging, and to account for technical issues thatslowed them down, such as Internet lag and navigating multiple windows.Other lessons learned include planning for the significant time and effort it takes to redesign aworkshop for a new delivery mode, to simplify implementation wherever possible, and thatengagement needs to be much more intentional in the online environment. Overall, given thelimited timeframe in which to redesign
textbooks and discussing with classmates or friends during self-study for theircomprehensive examinations. There are minor variations in this pattern between the freshman (first year) andother students. The major contribution of the paper is to analyze students’ use of resources for their self-study for the comprehensive examinations so that teachers can plan their teaching and administrators andlibrarians can plan their resources. The next section outlines the research design that includes analysis andinterpretation of the collected data and concluding remarks.Research DesignOur study analyzed resources that undergraduate engineering students use while doing regular study forcomprehensive examinations. We have outlined the overall research design
Librarian held peer mentor meetings on a monthlybasis during the Business Librarian’s first year at JMU. Early meetings focused on campusculture, library procedures, and the promotion and tenure process. As the Business Librariansettled into her role, they began to spend more time talking about specific issues in her work as aliaison. These topics also arose during casual interactions in the office suite.Through these conversations, both librarians became more aware of the overlap between theirsubject areas. For instance, students working on business plan proposals often need to search forpatents, engineering standards, and information on materials science and manufacturingprocesses. The Business Librarian had sometimes struggled to help these
Engineering Students in Acquiring Information Literacy Skills – A Report on Survey FindingsAbstract This study investigates challenges related to information literacy that Chineseundergraduate engineering students face in comparison with their native English speaking peersin completing a research paper. Steps of a typical research process are examined including:selecting a topic, finding information sources, planning search strategies, and gathering,evaluating, managing and presenting information. Both survey and interview methods were usedto gather data. The SCONUL Seven Pillars of Information Literacy framework was adopted todevelop the survey and interview questions, and the ACRL Information Literacy Standards
science resources. With input from the EngineeringLibrarian, the UEL and STEM librarian developed a lesson plan to introduce students to a varietyof resources in a fast-paced manner. Rather than provide in-depth introductions to one or tworesources, the workshop would provide a high-level overview of a variety of resources. As first-year students were likely unfamiliar with the library, the workshop started with an introductionto the library as a physical space and the library website as a virtual space. Students learned howto use the library catalog to find books and e-books. They were also introduced to the library’sresearch subject guides, which provide relevant resources for individual subject areas. The bulkof the workshop featured
faculty provided some wonderful insights about how theytaught their courses and where the library could fit into that picture. However, as the authorserves as the liaison to engineering, not business, a similar study with engineering faculty at UBwas planned. Since every interview conducted with business faculty had been a brand newacquaintance, the author aimed to interview engineering faculty who had never requested alibrary resources guest lecture in their classes. This study intended to better understand how thelibrary and the engineering librarian, the author of this paper, could better support faculty in theirteaching, even if library resource instruction was not a direct part of the course.Literature ReviewExploring how engineering faculty
Marquand Library of Art and Archaeologyrenovation and expansion was completed in 2003, and five science branch libraries merged intothe new Lewis Library, designed by renowned architect Frank Gehry, in 2008. But the lastdecade has also been marked by profound technological changes, changes in the library’scollecting focus, as well as changes in users’ information seeking behavior. These changesaffected not only space planning, but also staffing requirements and service delivery methods,making it necessary to take a critical look at our existing libraries even when they are only eightyears old. In the wake of planning and building Lewis Science Library, new user needs wererevealed and valuable lessons were learned, which have been applied to the
chats asked exactly where the noise was located, he was ableto identify areas where loud spaces (such as the bathrooms, elevators, and group study rooms)abut quiet zones as the most problematic spaces [6]. Drexel University aimed to solve noise andbehavior issues in the library by installing a Courtesy Clerk, a full time staff member whomaintains a “safe, pleasant, and courteous atmosphere in the library” [7]. Most academic libraries with noise issues are also facing space and design challenges.One of the more common problems occurred as libraries shifted to function primarily as studyspaces, or were rebranded as “learning commons,” with open floor plans and fewer—ornonexistent—book stacks [8]. Electronic resources better suit today’s
Wyoming Associate Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Teaching Research Data Management: It takes a team to do it right! ASEE Annual Conference 2018Introduction:Research Data Management (RDM) is an important competency that is beneficial for graduateand undergraduate students across the disciplines. Not only are many funding agencies requiringa Data Management Plan (DMP) for new grant proposals [1,2,3,4], there is also a shift towarddata driven research, data driven analyses, data visualization and new distributed computationalsystems that use “big data”. One piece of data management is metadata and the problems thatinsufficient or bad
to theliterature as well as our fellow liaisons for guidance. The job of a liaison librarian is busy andmulti-faceted. The Reference and User Services Association division of the American LibraryAssociation includes expectations ranging from formal activities—"surveys of library users,faculty, staff and students to evaluate their satisfaction with library resources; regular meetingswith faculty to ascertain planned curriculum developments and to identify new resources;communication of available materials and services; and establishment of a process by whichlibrary users can suggest purchases"—to the informal "participation in campus organizations andactivities, monitoring campus media for activities and events that affect collections
engineers may use different words,there are many similarities between the ISP and the process that engineers use in design.Engineering design extends beyond the scope of ISP, but nonetheless, the skills used in ISP aredirectly applied when engineers approach a design problem. Author proposed that librarians canassist in preparing engineering students by framing information literacy around the engineeringdesign process. For example, Kuhlthau’s task initiation is a similar process to task definition,problem scoping, and creating a plan of action (see Table 1). Table 1. Alignment of SAPSS Categories and Information Search Process Stages ISP Stages Assessment
to use Adobe Captivate, exploring video options,operating a Flip camera and editing video. The entire experience has made the librarian moresympathetic to users, especially those less comfortable with technology. A description of theprocess follows. Student input is critical to the usability of the guide and tutorials.IntroductionThe WVU Libraries’ information literacy efforts are becoming more visible on the campus. TheLibraries’ dean and the Provost’s Office have demonstrated the importance of informationliteracy through its inclusion in the current strategic plan and with financial support for facultysummer stipends to work with librarians to create course-related instruction modules. ABET’semphasis on literacy adds another reason to
directors to try to determine expected and potential student needs. As will be addressed,our experience is that these students’ needs push the boundaries of traditional academic librarysupport. However, the more planning done prior to the launch of the program, the better for allparties involved.Our purpose is to provide insight on how the librarians and professional staff in one universitylibrary collaborated with one another and program faculty to identify the needs of students in theUniversity’s DSA graduate program, and then collectively developed and implemented supportservices and tools to address those needs.BackgroundAbout the UniversityGeorge Mason University is a comprehensive, doctoral institution which is classified a Research1
enhancing mentorshipof upcoming librarians, and the mentoring of practicum students. We will also discuss thementoring of new librarians by experienced librarians within UTL, including the creation of the“Mentoring Interest Group”, mentoring for permanent status and promotion, mentoring contractlibrarians and the impact of direct mentoring in a medium sized library from the head librarian.Future mentoring initiatives currently in the planning stages at ECSL for the engineeringlibrarian community at large will also be explored.3. Mentoring at University of Toronto Libraries and the Engineering & Computer ScienceLibrary3.1 The University of Toronto and the Engineering & Computer Science LibraryThe University of Toronto (U of T) consistently
UPP to engage students in more interesting and interactiveways, such as planning a campus-wide library campaign. After the IEEE UPP launch, theconnection between the library and the Peking IEEE Student Branch was officially initiated. Thelibrarians, the SB and the author had several kick-off meetings and decided the SB would play amajor role throughout the campaign.The library campaign, under the theme of “Robots, Us”, aimed to make advanced technologiesand developments understandable for everyone, not just science and engineering students. Thegoal was to attract more users into the library, thus promoting library resources and serviceseffectively. The event was planned in three phases: exhibition, interaction and presentation.About 20
before they come to the library for an instruction session. With a simple web formwe find out which library databases students have used before, how confident they are withacademic research, their working definition of scholarly resources, and what search conceptsthey have heard of before. With this information in hand, we have a better idea of what weshould focus on in the library session. Having the results of the background knowledge checkalso provides us with a jumping-off point for questions to actively engage students in theclassroom.Active learning in the classroom Page 22.554.3In Fall 2009 we began jointly revising the lesson plan for the
drawbacks could largely be addressed with careful planning and training throughout the process. There are many instances in the literature of modifying information literacy instruction for 14,15,16engineering students after assessment . Modifications are often done in the specific context of the given course, student level, instructor, and institution that the librarian is working within. In addition to modifying our instruction based on our assessment results and our given context, we also took into consideration the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy3 . This document outlines key threshold concepts
grant is to incentivize faculty to adopt, adapt, and create OER for their courses. Thisprogram has already brought OER into 26 courses and are now saving enrolled studentsapproximately $150 each.The first cycle of CDHE grant included a detailed plan to provide faculty with educational forumsand workshops on various OER topics, including open pedagogy, copyright, and licensing.However, an unfunded Term OER Librarian position made it difficult for the team to provide thissupport to the funded faculty. While the team had the expertise to provide this training, theylacked the capacity to realize this aspect of the grant as intended. The OER Steering Committee atMines developed the OER @ Mines Champion certificate program as a solution for
“Relate-Create-Donate.” 1. Relate – “Emphasizes team efforts that involve communication, planning, management and social skills.” Although IRRAE is “Independent,” it flourishes within the context of the MEPP student cohort and benefits from peer review and group expertise in an engineering community of practice. 2. Create – “Students have to define the project (project domain) and focus their efforts on application of ideas to a specific context.” The work for IRRAE is the creation and completion of a useful applied engineering project. 3. Donate – “Stresses the value of making a useful contribution while learning. Ideally, each project has an outside ‘customer’.” IRRAE projects are expected
%) had no mention of the author's’institutional affiliation. Moreover, 502 (84.5%) publications lacked controlled vocabulary, 485(81.6%) did not include uncontrolled vocabulary, and 489 (82.2%) missed classification codes.Additionally, none of the publications has incorporated citations. Acknowledging that thesenumbers greatly influence the accuracy of the planned analyses, the authors accepted the fact thatno citation analysis was possible and decided to carry on the authorship and affiliation analyses asinitially planned, but continue with the other planned investigations as a proof of concept only.First, the collaborations between the ELD members were investigated by developing the co-authorship network based on the co-occurrence of author's
USB drives. Sincecomputer manufacturers are phasing out optical drives, users now have few options forusing library materials that are formatted on disks of any kind. This “technologicalobsolescence” has prompted the engineering librarians at U-M to investigate how tocontinue providing access to materials that are published on computer disk in a future agewhere computer users will not have the required hardware or software available forreading the disks. Working with the library’s Digital Preservation Librarian, theengineering librarians will determine which of the engineering resources that are publishedin disk format must be preserved, and they will plan for best practices for preservation of,and access to, the selected resources. Only
areas an incomingfreshman would most likely 1) be interested in, and 2) find useful. The focus of this preliminarymodule would be a quick introduction to guides and services. It would be composed of twosections: Welcome to Dibner Library (a filmed welcoming video featuring the InstructionalLibrarian) and Access and Services (library space, hours, where students could go and whatthey could do within the library system). An additional section was later added because theteam came to believe that it would be nice to end on a note of fun and professionaldevelopment: Learning and Events which highlights the weekly engagement activities and thesemester schedule of library workshops. Workshops enabled the library to publicize itspre-planned workshop
Paper ID #15375An Academic Library’s Role in Improving Accessibility to 3-D PrintingMr. Daniel P Zuberbier, East Carolina University Dan Zuberbier is the Education & Instructional Technology Librarian at East Carolina University (ECU). He planned for, launched, and currently manages the J.Y. Joyner Library 3D printing service which makes 3D printing accessible to all students, faculty and staff at ECU, and is currently developing a course on 3D printing for the North Carolina Summer Ventures in Math & Science Program. He previously worked as a high school Social Studies teacher in Arizona and Michigan, and holds
feedback from researchers regarding their changing needs and practices.Samuel and others analyzed twenty-nine data management plans (DMP), specifically related toNational Science Foundation grant proposals, to understand better, how faculty approach datamanagement. The results help librarians build a foundation for future DMP services [2]. Coatesand others examined five case studies that highlight common challenges for librarians to evaluateexisting research data services in academic libraries, and suggested that evidence-based approachprovides valuable information for assessing the still-emerging services [3]. Goben and Griffin’sstudy confirmed, “Researchers are most worried about storage, sharing, and issues that revolvearound longer term access
engagement:student to library, library to faculty, and faculty to student, (3) be easily adaptable by otherlibraries, and (4) create opportunities to develop students’ information literacy skills. Toachieve these goals, we started with a broad challenge statement, “To enhance user experience inthe library through technology.” The challenge statement of Hack Dibner, which allowed formore avenues of entry than Project Shhh!, along with a well-planned marketing strategy, resultedin a 400% increase in registration from the previous competition. Students were allowed toparticipate as individuals or as teams, and were required to submit three deliverables throughoutthe semester: an initial concept, a written proposal, and a presentation. These
library collaboration.The Library plans to study the effectiveness of information literacy instructional techniquesthrough the contextual setting of the Smart House. The Library seeks to improve the ability ofparticipants to access, evaluate, and use high quality research materials effectively through avariety of instructional strategies. By developing and maintaining a virtual infrastructure forinformation awareness and access using relevant technologies, the library will be able to assiststudents at their point of need. More direct instruction will be provided through a series of activelearning workshops combined with specialized research consultation. We believe that this projectwill promote the lifelong learning skills necessary for the
• Piloting two sections of a flipped classroom approach of information literacy instruction for deployment across all sections, traditional and online. This pilot included: o Creating a series of information literacy videos on understanding important engineering subjects such as scholarly and professional literature, standards, and patents o Implementing active learning curriculum focused on information literacy via 5 25-minute sessions strategically planned throughout the semester o Developing an assessment instrument to gauge the impacts on student learning outcomes of flipped versus traditional one-shot instruction.The task was conceptualized broadly as
290 video card orgreater. A photo after deconstruction of the wall between the classroom and the storage room canbe seen in Figure 1, and a full floor plan can be seen in Figure 2.Figure 1: The computer classroom right after the wall was removed. Figure 2: Floor Plan of the Creative SpaceWith the new space, sixty-one items were added to enrich the Tool Library. Twenty-nine werecables, adapters and chargers.The other thirty-two are all related to the three central themes of the creative space:Prototyping four types of 3-D scanners drawing tablets various measuring and hand tools needed to build items from scratchVirtual Reality Oculus Rift headset Movio BT-300 augmented reality headset leap motion