, “Embodied interactive video lectures for improving learning comprehension and retention,” Comput. Educ., vol. 117, pp. 116–131, Feb. 2018.[19] J. Wang and P. D. Antonenko, “Instructor presence in instructional video: Effects on visual attention, recall, and perceived learning,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 71, pp. 79– 89, Jun. 2017.Appendix 1: ENC 3246 Section BreakdownAppendix 2: ENC 3246 Individual and Group Assignment BreakdownAppendix 3: Credible Source Checklist on Course’s LMS Page Credible Source ChecklistJournal Articles q Targets scholars, researchers, students q Written by scholars and researchers in the field q Authors’ credentials provided or easily found q Provides evidence of
search engine other than Google and send it to the instructor. After his approval, evaluate and test the engine to answer the following questions. The questions are answered for Google here. Compare your answers with these results. You may wish to get the most updated data from Google for the comparison. Q: Name of the engine: Answer for Google: Google.com Q: When was it introduced to public? Answer for Google: 1997 Q: How does it work? Answer for Google: The engine search information that was indexed by a crawler. Q: How the results are ranked? Answer for Google: The rank of each page is determined based on the number of web pages that linked to a particular web page. However, there are so many other
MATH 2280 or 2250 or MATH 2250) & MECH 3200 & 3300 MECH 3650 & 3250 MATH 1210 MECH 1000 MECH 4000Admission MECH 1200 MECH 2210 MECH 2250 & 2030 MECH 2160 MECH 1100 & 1150 q Apply to DSU MECH 1000 MECH 1200 MECH 2210 MECH 2250 MECH 3200 MECH 3250 MECH 4000 MECH 4010 q Declare
purposes, withoutreleasing personal information.Real-time information literacy course delivery at social mediaAs stated earlier, little research has been conducted in using social media for libraryinstructional activities. The IEEE Client Service team in China has offeredinformation literacy courses since late 2016 via social media (WeChat and QQ). Thecomparison of real-time course delivery between social media and WebEx platformwas published in an earlier paper [16]. The information literacy courses offered atWeChat and QQ include Searching IEEE Xplore Effectively, IEEE Paper SubmissionGuidelines & Process, Technical Paper Writing, and Boosting Your Career with IEEE.Each course consists of a 45-min presentation with 15-min Q&A.We choose
languageknowledgebase powered by IntelliResponse that can be updated every time a user asks a new butimportant question. There are many benefits of this empowering program such as reduction ofemail volume, phone calls and chat sessions and reduced navigation linked with website Q&A orFAQ solutions. The quality of end user experience is measured objectively via system generatedreports. Potential exists for institutions to collaborate and build such knowledgebases moreefficiently and for development of self-learning tools.IntroductionAsk the library, ask the registrar, ask the IT help desk, ask the calculus professor, ask theXXXXXX, and receive an immediate, consistent and accurate online answer to your question24x7, 365 days per year. Imagine that each time
wereidentified as A1,B3, E4 .. etc.The response rate to the survey was 66% from 42 students representing the 20 project groups.The number of respondents who belong to the same project group varies as shown in Table 2.Table 1. Project assignment of the survey respondents Project# No. of respondents No. of groups Subtotal of respondents per project E 4 1 4 A, B, C, D, F, G 3 6 18 H, I, J, K, L, M, N 2 7 14 O, P, Q, R, S, T 1 6 6 Total
educational objectives. (Allyn & Bacon, 2001).15. Mellon, C. A. Library Anxiety: A Grounded Theory and Its Development. Coll. Res. Libr. 76, 276–282 (2015).16. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Jiao, Q. G. & Bostick, S. L. Library Anxiety: Theory, Research, and Applications. (Scarecrow Press, 2004).17. Jiao, Q. G., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Lichtenstein, A. A. Library anxiety: Characteristics of ‘at-risk’ college students. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 18, 151–163 (1996).18. Molteni, V. E. & Chan, E. K. Student Confidence/Overconfidence in the Research Process. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 41, 2–8 (2015).19. Head, A. J. & Eisenberg, M. B. Truth Be Told: How College Students Evaluate and Use Information in the Digital
=7913. [Accessed: 26-Jan-2018].[6] M. J. White, “The history of the Engineering Libraries Division, part 1 - 1893 to 1960,” in 2016 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2016. https://peer.asee.org/26170.[7] M. Borrego, M. J. Foster, and J. E. Froyd, “Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 45–76, Jan. 2014.[8] A. Brettle, “Information skills training: a systematic review of the literature,” Health Info. Libr. J., vol. 20, no. s1, pp. 3–9, Jun. 2003.[9] R. J. Jacobs, J. Q. Lou, R. L. Ownby, and J. Caballero, “A systematic review of eHealth interventions to improve health literacy,” Health Informatics J., vol. 22, no. 2
, Thailand, August 20 - August 28, 1999[7] R. Ali, N. Abu-Hassan, M. Y. M. Daud, and K. Jusoff, "Information literacy skills ofengineering students," International Journal of Recent Research and Applied Studies vol. 5, no.3, pp. 264-270, 2010.[8] Q. Q. Zhang, M. Goodman, and S. Y. Xie, "Integrating library instruction into the coursemanagement system for a first-year engineering class: An evidence-based study measuring theeffectiveness of blended learning on students' information literacy levels," College & ResearchLibraries, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 934-958, Nov 2015.[9] P. Ramamurthy and E. Siridevi, "Information literacy search skills of students in fiveselected engineering colleges in Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh: A
,” 2012.[4] Committee on Undergraduate Science Education National Research Council, “Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology.”[5] R. W. Lent, G. Hackett, and S. D. Brown, “A Social Cognitive View of School-to-Work Transition,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 297–311, 1999.[6] M. McCartney, “On-ramp to greater STEM diversity ,” Science , vol. 352, no. 6286. pp. 669–670, 2016.[7] “A Framework for K-12 Science Education,” National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., Feb. 2012.[8] C. M. Vest, “The Image Problem for Engineering: An Overview,” Bridg. Link. Eng. Soc., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 5–11, 2011.[9] “The Rockefeller University » RockEDU: Rockefeller
-269.9. White, H. D.; Griffith, B. C., Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectualstructure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1981, 32 (3), 163-171.10. Small, H., Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society forInformation Science 1999, 50 (9), 799-813.11. Morillo, F.; Bordons, M.; Gómez, I., An approach to interdisciplinarity throughbibliometric indicators. Scientometrics 2001, 51 (1), 203-222.12. He, Q., Knowledge Discovery Through Co-Word Analysis. Library Trends 1999, 48 (1),133-159.13. Peters, H. P. F.; Van Raan, A. F. J., Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis.Scientometrics 1991, 20 (1), 235-255.14. Borgman, C. L.; Furner, J
our workshops were getting easier toplan and host, we chose to add to our repertoire of offerings. We created a series of weekly dropin sessions that we branded our Library Clinics (Figure 8). Our clinics were meant to beinformational and flowing, not a lecture style or hands on workshop. We hosted these in thelibrary itself, right in the flow of traffic so we would be noticed. Topics for our library clinicsincluded citation management software, 3D printing, arduino demos, oculus rift demos, and evenBloomberg terminal Q and As. We decided at first to hold these sessions on Friday mornings at atime that would be least disruptive to our patrons. Shortly after realizing that least disruptive alsomeans lowest attended, we switched these clinics
Literacy across the Curriculum: ExpandingHorizons. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 16(2), 180-193.5. Loendorf, W. (2010). The social, economic, and political impact of technology: An historical perspective.Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Retrievedfrom http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings6. Jing ,Y. Gao, S. & Dong, Z.. (2010). Analysis on the cultivation of the humanistic qualities of college students bysocial history education. In Q. Lou, International Conference on Optics Photonics and Energy Engineering (OPEE2010), Vol. 2, pp. 99-102. doi:10.1109/OPEE.2010.55080527. Condoor, S. (2004). Importance of teaching the history of technology. Frontiers in Education, 2004
: Gaming Against Plagiarism project will create an online, self-directed, interactive gamethat will provide a role-adopting environment in which Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM) graduate students will learn to recognize and avoid plagiarism. Increasinggraduate students‘ awareness will help move these new researchers in the right direction.Note: This paper is based on the recently awarded National Science Foundation Grant, ―GAP:Gaming Against Plagiarism‖ http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00098766/, 2010.Bibliography Page 22.734.101. Choi, C. Q. (2009). The pull of integrity. PRISM, March 2009. Retrieved from http://www.prism
, B., C. Fuchs, and A. Todman, Static vs. Dynamic Tutorials: Applying Usability Principles to Evaluate Online Point-of-Need Instruction. Information Technology & Libraries, 2015. 34(4): p. 30-54.7. Sachs, D.E., et al., Assessing the Effectiveness of Online Information Literacy Tutorials for Millennial Undergraduates. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 2013. 20(3/4): p. 327-351.8. Mery, Y., et al., Evaluating the Effectiveness of Tools for Online Database Instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 2014. 8(1): p. 70-81.9. Zhang, Q., M. Goodman, and S. Xie, Integrating Library Instruction into the Course Management System for a First-Year Engineering Class: An Evidence-Based Study Measuring
, doi: 10.5860/crln.79.5.248.[8] J. Boice, “An Exploration of Systematic Review Publication Trends in Conservation Biology Journals,” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no. 91, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.29173/istl2.[9] D. Koufogiannakis, “The State of Systematic Reviews in Library and Information Studies,” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 91–95, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.18438/B8Q021.[10] J. Xu, Q. Kang, and Z. Song, “The current state of systematic reviews in library and information studies,” Library & Information Science Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 296–310, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2015.11.003.[11] R. Miranda and E. Garcia-Carpintero, “Overcitation and overrepresentation
librarian’s services to gather literatureresearch material (in question 2), but did not state the percentage of this material that was relevantto their objectives (in question 4).***Q: see survey in Appendix ASurvey AnalysisThe following analysis was performed using the data from Table 1:• Based upon the answers to survey question 1 (Appendix A, Q1: Over the last year, approximately how many hours did you spend on background research? i.e., background searching to acquire data that would be used for either scholarship activity or classroom teaching), the total number of hours per month over the last year spent by all the faculty members (14 in total) within the College of Engineering and Technology on acquiring background research
Research Evaluation: A New Task Area Strengthening the Jurisdiction of Academic Librarians. Proc IATUL Conf. Available at http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2014/performance/1/30. Roemer RC, Borchardt R. 2015. Meaningful Metrics: A 21st Century Librarian’s Guide to Bibliometrics, Altmetrics, and Research Impact. Chicago, IL: ACRL.31. MacColl J. 2010. Library Roles in University Research Assessment. Lib Q. 20(2):152-168. doi:10.18352/lq.7984/.32. Åström F, Hansson J. 2013. How implementation of bibliometric practice affects the role of academic libraries. J Librariansh Inf Sci. 45(4):316–322. doi:10.1177/0961000612456867.33. Pan R, Breen E. 2011. MyRI: An open access bibliometrics toolkit - collaboration in research
Education Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, 2003.[22] M. J. White, "Patent Classification Reform: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Using the Patent Literature," presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas USA, 2012.[23] M. J. White. (2008, January 27, 2016). How are Engineering Librarians Using Patent Literature? A Pilot Survey. Q Space at Queen's University. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1377[24] M. L. Strife, R. A. M. Hensel, and M. G. Armour-Gemmen, "Integrating Information Literacy in Engineering: Librarians/Faculty," presented at the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 2012.[25] D
/ssie/under- grad/objectives-outcomes.html. 4. Large, J. (2006). Communication is engineering: Responding to needs of industry in a capstone course. 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois, 1-10. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/838. 5. Retherford, J. Q., & Ellenburg, K. S. (2016). Impacts of a university-wide service learning program on a senior undergraduate capstone course. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1-10. doi:10.18260/p.25548 6. Wilk, R. D. & Anderson, A. M. (2002), Development of communication skills across the engineering curriculum. 2002 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Canada, 1-14. Retrieved from
be at multiple campus libraries, but only onecopy needed to be verified so additional processing needed to be done to select the libraries tocheck. Because the weeding reports are run by our call number range, there ended up beingmultiple checklists for each library. For example, we have one Physics monograph checklist forour A-P call number range and another for our Q-QC call number range.After duplicate copies were verified, there also needed to be coordination with the other librariesregarding items missing or found in poor condition. Sometimes the other libraries took ourcopies to replace their missing or poor condition volumes, sometimes they only wanted selectivevolumes, and sometimes they were not interested in any replacement
). Retrieved 3/6/2008 fromhttp://roar.eprints.org/index.php?action=home&q=&country=us&version=&type=institutional&order=recordcount&submit=Filter20. U.S. News & World Report. (2008). Best colleges - education - US news and world report. Retrieved 09/01/2008 from http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/college/engineering21. U.S. News & World Report. (2008). Search - engineering - best graduate schools - education - US news and world report. Retrieved 09/01/2008 from http://grad- schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/grad/eng/search%2022. Baldwin, V. (2009). “Using Google Scholar to Search for Online Availability of a Cited Article in Engineering Disciplines. Issues in Science & Technology
n br Q ar rs ai O discipline-specific databases and C Li
revolution, continued: Librarians lead the way with open educational resources. Library Issues. 35(5):1-4.11. Jensen K, West Q. 2015. Open educational resources and the higher education environment A leadership opportunity for libraries. College & Research Libraries News. 76(4):215-218.12. Mitchell C, Chu M. 2014. Open education resources: The new paradigm in academic libraries. Journal of Library Innovation. 5(1):13-29.13. Okamoto K. 2013. Making higher education more affordable, one course reading at a time: Academic libraries as key advocates for open access textbooks and educational resources. Public Services Quarterly. 9(4):267-283.14. Pitcher K. 2014. Library publishing of open textbooks: The Open SUNY
., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 341–346, 2009.[9] Dustin Wyatt, “The new college library: Fewer books, more noise, more space,” The Daytona Beach News-Journal, 16-Sep-2014.[10] P. Carter, Toni and Seaman, “The Management and Support of Outreach in Academic Libraries,” Ref. User Serv. Quarterly, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 73–81, 2011.[11] C. Forbes, G. Schlesselman-Tarango, and P. Keeran, “Expanding Support for Graduate Students: Library Workshops on Research Funding Opportunities,” Coll. Res. Libr., vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 297–313, 2017.[12] E. Phetteplace and K. Felker, “Gamification in Libraries,” Ref. User Serv. Q., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 19–23, 2014.[13] T. D. Porter, “Games and activities: An alternative foundation for
; expand thecontent for more advanced research; and transfer the content into additional platforms anddistribution channels outside of the current NYU Classes.[1] L. Holman, "A comparison of computer-assisted instruction and classroom bibliographicinstruction," Reference & User Services Quarterly, v ol. 40, (1), p p. 53-60, 2000.[2] C. A. Germain, T. E. Jacobson and S. A. Kaczor, "A comparison of the effectiveness ofpresentation formats for instruction: teaching first-year students," College and ResearchLibraries, v ol. 61, (1), pp. 65-72, 2000.[3] Q. Zhang, M. Goodman and S. Xie, "Integrating Library Instruction into the CourseManagement System for a First-Year Engineering Class: An Evidence-Based Study Measuringthe Effectiveness of
. basic science in a veterinary medicine setting,” Med. Ref. Serv. Q., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 21–37, 2002.[2] M. Hepworth, “A framework for understanding user requirements for an information service: Defining the needs of informal carers,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 695–708, 2004.[3] N. K. Sheeja, “Science vs social science: A study of information-seeking behavior and user perceptions of academic researchers",” Libr. Rev., vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 522–531, 2010.[4] E. Herman, “End-users in academia: meeting the information needs of university researchers in an electronic age,” Aslib Proc., vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 431–457, 2001.[5] B. M. Hemminger, D. Lu, K. T. L. Vaughan, and S. J. Adams, “Information seeking