AC 2012-5066: IMPACT OF AN UPDATED ROBOTICS LABORATORY INAN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMDr. Richard A. Pitts Jr., Morgan State University Richard Pitts, Jr. is currently an Associate Professor in the Industrial & Systems Engineering Department at Morgan State University (MSU). He received his B.S.I.E. degree from MSU in 1991. Later, he received both his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in industrial engineering from yhe Pennsylvania State University in 1995 and 2006, respectively. Page 25.715.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Impact of an Updated
AC 2012-3136: USING A SYSTEMS ENGINEERING APPROACH FORSTUDENTS TO DESIGN AND BUILD LABORATORY EQUIPMENTDr. Tim L. Brower, University of Colorado, Boulder Tim L. Brower is currently the Director of the CU, Boulder, and Colorado Mesa University Mechanical Engineering Partnership program. Before becoming the Director of the partnership three years ago, he was a professor and Chair of the Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering and Technology Department at Oregon Institute of Technology. While in Oregon, he served as the Affiliate Director for Project Lead the Way - Oregon. In another life, he worked as an Aerospace Engineer with the Lockheed Martin Corporation in Denver, Colo. He is an active member of ASEE, ASME, and
Theodori, Johns Hopkins University Whiting School of Engineeering Ms. Theodori is a Program Coordinator for the Johns Hopkins University Whiting School of Engineer- ing’s Technical Management, Engineering Management and Space Systems Engineering. She also has developed online and blended classroom courses for the program and lectures in Information Research and Advanced Technology. Ms. Theodori is a Principal Staff member at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory working in information management, policy and communication. Judith re- ceived her Bachelor’s in Labor Relations from San Francisco State University in 1983, and her Masters in Library Science from Queens College in 1998.Dr. James D Beaty
identified as containing non-conformity. The web-based modulewas written in Netbeans and utilizes the Glassfish application server. A MySQL databasemaintains the Mouse Factory information and student records. A major advantage of thisapproach is that Netbeans, Glassfish and MySQL are all open-source software packages.Figure 2. Bill of Materials Page 15.1185.4 Page 15.1185.5Figure 3. Critical Point - CoverSPC Lab OneThe first SPC laboratory allows students to collect and analyze historical quality data using SPCtools to formulate a quality improvement plan. The first SPC laboratory currently contains fourcomponents
singlesetpoint for establishing benchmarks and the ability to run a design of experiments. A table isdisplayed that contains the students’ results with an option to export the results to MicrosoftExcel. The web-based module was written in Netbeans and utilizes the Glassfish applicationserver. A MySQL database maintains the Mouse Factory information and student records. Amajor advantage of this approach is that Netbeans, Glassfish and MySQL are all open-sourcesoftware packages.Figure 2. Bill of Materials Page 22.1383.4 Page 22.1383.5Figure 3. Critical Point - CoverDOE Lab OneThe first DOE laboratory allows students to
often small6. There are many excellent textbooks, such as Montgomery,that provide explanations and practice problems. However the use of textbook and homeworkproblems stress the categories of knowledge, comprehension and application in Bloom’sTaxonomy7 of cognitive skills. But this mode of instruction is less likely to emphasize thehigher-order cognitive skills of analysis, synthesis and evaluation. In the laboratory teachingcontrol charts for variables, students must design a control chart that involves select the subgroupsize and the sampling interval. Students are able to implement their control charts and evaluatethe effectiveness of their control charts upon the number of good parts produced and the defectrate. These activities emphasize
control chart signals but returns to the process at a later random time. The web-basedmodule was written in Netbeans and utilizes the Glassfish application server. A MySQLdatabase maintains the Mouse Factory information and student records. A major advantage ofthis approach is that Netbeans, Glassfish and MySQL are all open-source software packages. Page 25.1244.4Figure 2. Bill of Materials Page 25.1244.5Figure 3. Critical Point - CoverSPC Lab FourThe fourth SPC laboratory allows students to design, implement and evaluate the impact ofimplementing a c control chart within the Mouse Factory. In the first SPC
BerkleyNational Laboratory the importance of the energy efficiency services sector (EESS) to the U.S.economy is growing rapidly 3. Climate changes, issues regarding energy supply, a desire andperceived security need for energy independence, and uncertain but rising energy prices have ledto an increase in interest, funding and policies that support and promote energy efficiency inresidential, commercial and industrial buildings. The federal government and a number of stategovernments have also valued energy efficiency as an economic recovery strategy 4.As a result there has been significant growth in the energy efficiency services sector (EESS) inrecent years. According to a 2010 study the growth is projected to continue and to accelerateover the next ten
management.The course consists of a one and one half hour lecture period once per week to the entire class ofstudents on topics necessary to engineering design and engineering management. There are alsoone and one half hour laboratory sections each week given to three separate sections in whichstudents work in teams and at computers in a computer lab on tutorials and team designactivities. In the first semester, the student teams are led through the process of engineeringdesign to create a structured design. The students learn and use various engineering tools todesign a set of medicine balls and a medicine ball rack to meet specific criteria for a commercialgym.Engineering management majors at this university are also taking their math and basic
Paper ID #6283Teaching Gage Reproducibility and Repeatability using the Mouse FactoryDr. Douglas H Timmer, University of Texas, Pan AmericanDr. Miguel Gonzalez, University of Texas, Pan American Page 23.1144.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Teaching Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility using the Mouse FactoryAbstractThe Mouse Factory contains a set of web-based, active learning laboratories for teachingstatistical quality control and design of experiments. The sixth laboratory in the Mouse FactoryLearning suite is
current state of industrial education in institutions ofhigher learning in America. The influence of earlier apprentice programs, which provided youngpeople with an education that prepared them to become gainfully employed in a trade, seems tobe evident in the values and views of modern day industrial education programs, particularlythose in community colleges. Indeed, it may not be a stretch to suggest that many programs incolleges and universities still see value in “hands-on” or “experiential learning,” a desired featureof the modern curriculum.Current Challenges Facing Technology ProgramsGiven the high cost associated with using and maintaining industrial equipment, 8 many schoolshave begun replacing existing laboratories with newer modular
sciences is required. One year is defined as 32 semester credits or one-fourth of the creditsrequired for graduation in the program. Basic sciences are defined as biological, chemical, andphysical sciences. Most of the engineering management programs meet this criterion through acombination of math, physics and chemistry courses, some with laboratory experiences.Figure 2 3,4,5,6,7,8,9 displays the most commonly required math and basic science courses and thepercentage of the engineering management programs that require these specific courses. It canbe seen that all programs require some calculus, some calculus-based physics and some statistics.Most also require some chemistry, differential equations and a second calculus-based physicscourse
, Product Design, Specification, and Measurement,which includes the course syllabus, course project, and detailed steps for the course project. Thecourse aims to provide an introduction to product design with an emphasis on the tools, standardsand methods used for product and part representation, specifications and measurements. Itinvolves hands-on learning and exercises in CAD and metrology laboratories. The class includeslectures, quizzes, laboratory assignments and reports, a CAD modeling project, exams, and in-class participation. The course content covers three main parts: product design and specification,dimensioning and tolerancing, and metrology. Product design and specification focuses on theproduct design process and basics of engineering
Main process designPPL Process Develop practical base for process Logistics process Level 1 –Design design using simulation software design sem. V (lectures & laboratory)PPL Industrial Prepare project proposal for Models, Level 1 –project industry. Form consulting Proposal for sem. VI company (8 students). Project industry realization in industry. industrial projectPSPL Process Base for process management and Proposal for Level 2Management & optimization using specialized factory
community service learning course projectsand capstone course design projects. Students have access to the well-equipped laboratories,including computing laboratories with discipline-specific software that are essential toachievement of program objectives. (CSUN, 2014)This was further emphasized by Sorto (2008) when he stated that increasing competition in themarketplace as well as the need for improved productivity had put more of an emphasis on amore effective management of technical functions of a company. Moreover, in search of betterflexibility and efficiency, many companies have reduced the numbers and levels of managementpositions and instead are giving more decision making power to the teams at the operationallevels. In high tech companies
AC 2012-4343: SYSTEMS ENGINEERING EDUCATION THROUGH PAR-TICIPATION IN ENGINEERING COMPETITIONSDr. Fernando Garcia Gonzalez, Texas A&M International University Fernando Gonzalez is an Assistant Professor of engineering at Texas A&M International University in Laredo, Texas. Previously, he was a technical staff member at Los Alamos National Laboratory and an Assistant Professor at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, Fla. Gonzalez holds a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include intelligent control of autonomous systems, robotics, and modeling and simulation
ratheran introduction to project management and spreadsheets as an Engineering design tool. The classhas a very strong hands-on component using Microsoft Excel and MS Project. The students arethen required to use both tools in their later courses, particularly in their laboratory courses andplanning/tracking of the Capstone Design course. These students also take a Technical Writingcourse from the English Department to prepare them for report writing.We use several assignments of increasing difficulty to expose the students to Excel as a designtool and Project to organize and track a project. The quarter culminates with small teams ofstudents using both tools to design, plan, and track a virtual project of their choice such asstarting a small
means for delivering PBL effectively. A senior-levelproject will demonstrate how PDSA and design of experiment can be used together to both learnabout a manufacturing process and how to improve it.Students will be using three existing laboratories with manufacturing processes to demonstratethe proposed method with the 3-D printing as the featured project. As additive manufacturing inthe form of 3-D printing is becoming more popular in research and in limited production runs, itstill has many challenges when it comes to manufacturing at a large scale. These challengesinclude cost of making the product as well as speed of production. While these challenges aretechnology-based, studying current 3-D printing processes for improving quality and
and implemented, and show the successful outcomes.Ramasundaram et al. [9] developed an environmental virtual field laboratory to studyenvironmental properties and processes that stimulate the higher-order cognitive skills of Page 13.472.3students to enhance existing on-campus courses and/or distance education courses. The work ofDickey[3] describes virtual worlds as an emerging medium currently being used in bothtraditional classrooms and for distance education. They also provide an overview and analysis oftwo specific environments, Active Worlds Educational Universe and Adobe. They also discussthe implications of using each application
future roles engineering and technology students will undertake, instructors can use PBL to help students develop ideas for dealing with specific problems they will likely encounter in the workplace. Case Studies: Instructors can use PBL with individual students or student teams when discussing case studies on engineering/technology concerns. Laboratory Work: For courses involving laboratory work, instructors can use PBL when discussing appropriate laboratory behavior and relate that behavior to appropriate workplace behavior. The instructor can relate lab problems to similar problems encountered in the workplace. Employed Students: If there are students who are currently employed, PBL can be
Page 12.645.2 Table 1 PSM Programs in the Midwestern U.S.3 University PSM Program AreasCase Western Reserve Biology, Chemistry, Mathematics, Physics, or Statistics for EntrepreneurshipDayton Financial MathematicsEastern Michigan BioinformaticsGrand Valley State Bioinformatics, Biotechnology, BiostatisticsIllinois Institute of Materials and Chemical Synthesis, Analytical Chemistry,Technology Health Physics, BiologyIUPUI Laboratory InformaticsMichigan State Industrial Microbiology, Industrial Mathematics, Zoo and Aquarium Science
deficiencies are in order to improve those characteristicsthat an effective team player should have.Introduction The Effective Teaming Laboratory at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln developed theTeam Effectiveness Questionnaire (TEQ) in 2001 to measure team effectiveness. It is composedof seven constructs considered to be necessary for effective performance of the team. The TEQhas three parts. The first part is used to collect demographic data and information on individualpreferences regarding teams and previous experience in teams. The second, where scoring is thefocus, is related to the seven constructs. Forty eight questions are asked in relation to theconstructs. The third section asks questions about teaming issues and the level of
course curriculum content. The author has previously used a similar approach in other research projects to obtain meaningful results. 1. What should be counted as appropriate goals and accomplishments in an undergraduate engineering course that has a significant laboratory component? 2. Does the discovery approach practices utilized by the instructor providing reasonably acceptable paths toward accomplishing the specified learning goals in the chosen course? 3. What do students actually accomplish in the designed course and the laboratory exercises? How has discovery approach helped them in meeting their learning goals? 4. How has the instructor’s organizational techniques contributed towards students
Paper ID #6547The Case for On-Line College Education - a work in progressDr. Brian E. White, CAU-SES Brian E. White received Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Computer Sciences from the University of Wiscon- sin, and S.M. and S.B. degrees in Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. He served in the United States Air Force, and for 8 years was at M.I.T. Lincoln Laboratory. For five years Dr. White was a principal engi- neering manager at Signatron, Inc. In his 28 years at The MITRE Corporation, he held a variety of senior professional staff and project/resource management positions. He was Director of MITRE’s Systems En- gineering
opportunity for educational collaboration and provided an opportunity for instructors at the three universities to experience and understand the international project issues first hand. These “lessons” are directly transferable to students as a mini-laboratory experience. 7. While SUST expressed interest in the project, the level of interest varied inversely with organizational level. The Dean was very interested but delegated responsibility to subordinates who demonstrated limited initiative and interest. Again similar to a risk- reward free international or domestic project.The last video-conference test has been completed. This was a demonstration of the video linkin the actual
design.The Engineering Management Curriculum at West Point The EM program at West Point provides cadets a nationally recognized major with amulti-disciplinary modern curricula supported by state of the art laboratory facilities. Theprogram has been accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) of ABETsince 1996, with re-accreditation granted in 2002. The American Society of EngineeringManagement (ASEM) awarded our program the 2005 Founders Award for Academic Excellencefor Leadership of Engineering and Technical Management for Undergraduate Programs. TheEM Program received this same recognition as the best undergraduate program in the nation byASEM in 1992, 1999 and 2002. The USMA Student Chapter of ASEM was also recognized
publications.ConclusionsThis paper describes the various ways universities and industries can collaborate tostrengthen relationships between industries and universities. Gannon University hasemployed many of these collaborations for mutual benefits. As a result of thesecollaborations, faculty has obtained numerous patents, furnished laboratories withmodern equipment either through loan or purchased using industrial funding. Studentsparticipating in these programs are able to gain valuable work experience and themajority of the students receive full-time employment offers as a result of theseinteractions.References 1. Joos, G., Marceau, R.J., Scoot, G., Peloquin, D., An innovative industry- university partnership to enhance university training and industry
consuming. Furthermore,breaking risk analysis down to these fundamental steps clouds the overall goal and point to riskanalysis: making a good decision. To overcome this, case studies or projects may be assigned tohelp instill these skillsets and allow for practice in their application. However, as these aregenerally completed in teams, there may also be a need to devise individualized testing of thissubject matter in an appropriate context.For the past several years, the author5,6 has employed a “one question” final exam in which thestudents are provided an investment scenario and background information from which they havetwo hours to make a compelling argument of whether the investment should be pursued or not.A university computer laboratory is
labs in industry, university, and government laboratories. Some of the equipments deal with metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) for LED’s and solar cells, and molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) products. The financial health of the company (all number in 1000’s) as described in its income statement is as follows5 -Year 12/2007 12/2008 12/2009 12/2010Total Revenue $402,475 $442,809 $380,149
task conflict tended to have negative effects ongroups with routine tasks and positive impacts on teams with non-routine work [5]. Taskconflict’s impact on performance has also been found to be dependent upon how the conflict isaddressed and the levels of trust and cooperation within a group [16], [17]. The team’s purposeand the length of its lifetime can affect conflict and productivity’s relationship as well. In theirmeta-analysis, O’Neill and colleagues found relationship and process conflict to be mostdetrimental for organizational teams and least detrimental for laboratory teams; they also foundthat teams which have a larger lifetime are more negatively impacted by these forms of conflict[8]. The medium over which a group