Paper ID #41624Preparing Future Generations for Executive Leadership Roles in TechnicalOrganizationsMr. Richard (Rick) Warren Blank, Johns Hopkins Engineering for Professionals Richard W (Rick) Blank, B.A., B.S., M.S. Mr. Blank is a Lecturer in the Engineering for Professionals Master of Engineering Management Program at the Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering. In this program he teaches Planning & Managing Projects; Finance, Contracts, & Compliance for Technical Professionals; Strategic Communications in Technical Organizations; and Executive Technical Leadership. He also holds an appointment as the
University Mazen is an Associate Professor in the General and Basic Engineering Department at Regional University. His research interests include: Freight modeling and logistics, facilities planning and material handling, optimization and simulation modeling, production planning and control, reverse logistics and recycling, modern manufacturing systems, microalloying and mechanical behavior, teaching statistics and increasing the data analytics content in engineering curricula, and the impact of the administrative policies on the engineering education. Memberships: Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers, American Society for Quality, Institute for Supply Management, and Institute for Operations Research and the
quantitative data.Concurrently, qualitative data was thematically analyzed to gain insights into usage andperceptions surrounding AI.Results: The study revealed a growing trend among project management professionals inleveraging AI tools for a variety of tasks, including project planning, task assignment, tracking,and crafting emails, reports, and presentations. A strong correlation was observed betweenfamiliarity with ChatGPT and its likely usage in project management tasks. While someparticipants found AI tools convenient and efficient, they were frustrated with potentialinaccuracies and the need for specific input prompts. Overall, industry professionalsdemonstrated the usage of AI in project management, with a notable emphasis on taskautomation
practice.Organizations use the Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) for financial and operational strategicplanning. An FCA facilitates; knowledge management of assets under ownership, riskmanagement, capital planning, and real estate decisions [23]. FCA practice includes architectural,mechanical, electrical and structural engineering disciplines towards an integrated engineeringpractice for buildings. Further, the increasingly complex software and digital operation ofbuildings includes software and technological engineering including digital twins, AI interfaces,and Building Information Modeling (BIM), and other built environment advances. [1]. Currently,there is no research associated with engineering education and the practice of FCA’s. As a startingpoint
, and Recognition (R3).The Center’s mission is to recruit diverse and talented students, provide evidence-basedprogramming for retention, and celebrate students’ success by recognizing their hard work andaccomplishments. This mission is tied to the state’s mandate to increase enrollment in highereducation [7] and to boost STEM education to meet the growing STEM workforce needs [8].Tennessee Tech University’s strategic plan to increase freshmen-to-sophomore retention rates to82% and to reach a 50% 4-year graduation rate by 2025 [9] is also reflected in the Center’smission.The CoE SSC activities and outcomes have been through substantial growth in the past threeyears, the staff have been intensifying recruitment efforts, developing and
the active involvement of others: direct reports, other managers, other team members, other department employees, and those above them on the organizational chart. Sometimes even their suppliers or customers! In this course, you will learn about teamwork and people management, and gain an introduction to strategy, finance, and project management. You will practice writing concise, persuasive analyses and action plans and verbally defending your ideas.ABET student outcomes are listed below in Table 1 [3]. Outcomes that are taught and assessedin EML are denoted in the table:Table 1. Student Outcomes taught in EML: ABET # Student Outcome Taught in EML course 1 an
Technical Managers2023 ASEE Engineering Management Division (EMD) Abstract This work in progress (WIP) paper aims at demonstrating the innovative design ofintegrating a communication course with the Capstone course, which is part of the Master ofEngineering Technical Management (METM), a 21-month online graduate program for workingprofessionals in the engineering technical management fields. As the culmination of theirgraduate study, students must identify an organizational/technical challenge, formulate a feasibleproject plan to address the issue to bring impact to the organization. During this process, theywill conduct research, create a strong business case for their industry sponsors
from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Trenton Robert Douthwaite ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Engineering Management Student Study-Abroad Opportunities: Design Considerations for EM Programs and Faculty MentorsAbstractLeading an undergraduate program in Engineering Management (EM) can be challenging due tothe need to balance the requirements of accreditation engineering topics (ET) and the desire toinspire students through study-abroad opportunities. Often, foreign colleges do not offer thesame level of ET rigor, putting students at risk of falling behind and not graduating on time. Thispaper proposes one approach to planning and creating student opportunity. It begins
leadership positionsattained, and alums' sense of preparedness for leadership roles. Assessment in these areas requiresthe measurement of downstream variables many years after graduation, and, ideally, includes theability to connect in-program assessment measures and control variables to these downstreammeasures. We proceed to share GEL's conceptual plan for a longitudinal assessment system thatwill examine students' development and achievement during and after the years spent in theprogram. Though these plans are still in-process, we describe them at a high level to providecontext for the alumni-specific outcomes discussion that is the prime focus of this paper.Historical overview of the GEL programLaunched in 2007, the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT
struggle during thehardest period, but others even were helped during the same. This WIP paper analyzes literaturethat focuses on Organizational Resilience (OR) for Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). OR is“the organization’s capability to face disruptions and unexpected events in advance thanks to thestrategic awareness and a linked operational management of internal and external shocks” [2]. 3. MethodThe SLR approach used for this research considers the method used in [3]. The methodologyconsiders three different stages of SLR development. First, planning the review focuses on theidentification of the need for a review, the preparation of a proposal, and the development of thereview protocol. The second stage of conducting the review focuses
Paper ID #38706Shaping the Engineering Leadership Research Agenda: Results of a 2022Special SessionCol. Brian J. Novoselich, United States Military Academy Brian Novoselich is an active duty Army Colonel currently serving as an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy (West Point) and the Director of Strategic Plans and Assessment. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech in 2016 and a Master’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2006. He is a licensed professional engineer in the Commonwealth
implement, andSafety Planning problem-solving, investigation, risk communicate safety collaboration assessment programs and practices Communication, Project management Develops skills to lead andET 6300 leadership, teamwork, software and techniques, deliver technical projectsPMI Project problem-solving, applying PM
. In the unrelatable role model condition, students watched a video similar to theone described above, but the individuals who appeared in the video were older and dressed informal or somewhat outdated clothing. After watching the assigned video, participantscompleted a survey. The research plan and analysis were preregistered and are available at theCenter for Open Science registration platform (osf.io). Preliminary analysis indicates thatexposure to the relatable role model video increased the entrepreneurial intention of both femaleand male students, and the entrepreneurial identity aspiration was the underlying process drivingthe effect. This research makes several important contributions. First, we develop and test a theorythat
HEI contexts is the one previously published as Work-in-process19.Methodology The SLR methodology used for this study considers the same used previously19, whichwas developed by Tranfield and colleagues in 20031. This methodology considers three differentstages with multiple phases on each. First, planning the review, where the main goal is toidentify the need for a review, the respective preparation, and the development of the reviewprotocol. The second stage of conducting a review considers the identification of research,selection of studies, their quality assessment, data extraction, and progress monitoring, to endwith the data synthesis. Finally, the third stage considers the report and recommendations, andgetting evidence into
members treatedRelationships each other with respect and appreciation). We laughed together, joked, poked fun good naturedly, and sharedHumor lighthearted moments. The team exercised perseverance, resilience, didn't get down, mood didn't getGrit down, kept trying, even keeled, drive, work ethic, avoided burnout.Problem Solving The team was effective at overcoming challenges. The team had a solid approach to identifying, planning for, and minimizingRisk Management risks to the project.Innovation/ The team used creativity and outside-the-box-thinking to improve theCreativity project.Collaboration
opportunity for students to build on thework of EPICS teams and broaden the impact of those projects beyond their immediatecommunity partners. The final experience is the New Venture Challenge in which teams presenttheir business or social venture plan to individuals and organizations who may be willing to fundtheir for-profit or not-for-profit venture during the Entrepreneurial Expo at the end of the year.EvaluationThe first cohort of 94 students is in their second year with a 90.1% retention rate. The overallacademic performance has been strong examining their overall grades shown in Figure 1 as wellas the grades earned in their engineering courses shown in Figure 2Figure 1 Overall Grades for IBE Students (N=94)Figure 2 Grades for IBE Students in
isassociated with the “Driving Onward” function, while intuition contradicts sensing in this role.Similarly, the “Planning Ahead” role aligns with the judging function, while the perceivingfunction opposes it. However, introversion, feeling, and thinking do not exhibit explicitassociations with specific roles, suggesting the complexity of team personality dynamics.Despite these insights, there remains a lack of understanding of the direct influence of teampersonality on effectiveness and success.This study attempts to provide evidence by investigating the relationship between teampersonalities and performance within an interdisciplinary research group at a historically blackcollege and university (HBCU). This group, operational for over four years
a member as well as a leader on technical teams.These criteria appear simple and straightforward but they describe a wide range of skills. Forexample SO-1 describes competence on the body of knowledge (BOK), correct application oftechniques or methods, and use of appropriate tools of STEM to solve discipline-specificproblems. Competency in any of the five (5) student outcomes is developed gradually in aprogram through introductory lectures, experiential learning in laboratory sessions, followed upand reinforced in mid-level courses and finally mastery level skills that are taught at the highestcourse levels of the program.Table 1 presents a generalized assessment plan for any four year ET program. Here wedeconstruct each of the five
networking opportunities and global awareness.Suggestions were made to address these shortcomings.This study offers practical insights for advancing engineering education through innovativeinfrastructure and serves as a reference case for planning, executing, and managing similarinitiatives in higher education institutions.Keywords Innovation center, student-centered approachIntroductionIn 2016, the engineering faculty at the University of Hong Kong initiated the Tam Wing FanInnovation Wing (a.k.a. the HKU Inno Wing) project with the goal of establishing and operatingan innovation center at a prominent location on campus. The primary educational objective of theInno Wing is to empower students, allowing them to unleash their creative potential
CourseAt USMA, EM411 Project Management, is an undergraduate-level course that all Studentsmajoring within the Department of Systems Engineering (DSE) complete. Students learn toinitiate, plan, execute, monitor, and control a project. Topics include project selection, projectmanager roles and responsibilities, organizational structure, project planning, budgeting,scheduling, resource allocation, monitoring and controlling, risk assessment and responsemanagement, and evaluation and termination. The end state is that each student understands theapplication of project management and the complex interrelated tasks associated with completingprojects on time, within budget, and to specification.The authors served as course directors, responsible for the
-generatedcontent within the context of engineering management education, emphasizing the criticalimportance of upholding academic integrity. It explores the far-reaching impact of AI on theeducation sector, highlighting the emergence of AI detection tools that resemble plagiarismdetection tools aimed at evaluating the authenticity of student-submitted work. This studyexamines the efficacy of several leading AI detection tools, offering insights into their accuracyand dependability. Engineering management, with its diverse subfields encompassing leadership,organizational management, strategic planning, financial resource management, projectmanagement, and legal considerations, faces opportunities and challenges in integrating AI-generated material into