. One of the main idea of Socratic principles oflearning is focusing on systematic questioning method (Overholser, 1993). This method isspecifically important for different liberal art fields such as in law (Hawkins-Leon, 1998; Kerr,1999), psychotherapy (Overholser, 1994) and other fields. Questions as sole method of teachingemphasizes involving students in conversations in which they would discover limits of theirknowledge and get inspired to learn more (Paraskevas & Wickens, 2003). Moreover, applicationof constructivism principles which focuses on arguments, discussions, debates, conflicts anddilemmas, sharing ideas with others, working towards the solution, creating reflections, addressingstudent needs and connecting what is learned to
geared motors, integrated motor drive circuits, three-axisaccelerometer/compass, piezo-electric buzzer, status light emitting diodes (LEDs), a userpushbutton, and an infrared reflectance sensor array for high contrast sensing. The mostadvantageous aspect of this chassis was the wide range of microcontroller boards it accepted.While we selected the well-known Arduino UNO Rev3 microcontroller, many others aresuitable, including all Pololu’s A-Star 32U4 family and other similar form factor third-partyofferings. One board and cable were given to each individual student, while one chassis wasshared across teams of two students.The most costly support equipment item was the rolling storage case by Lista. This five-drawer,tool chest style case was
andtroubleshooting. Additional reflection includes a summary of the short- and long-term benefitsof the experience and resulting infrastructure from the perspectives of both academia andindustry participants.OverviewCollaboration between academia and industry in engineering programs has a strong historyprimarily driven by and through research partnerships. While significant interactions have longexisted at the graduate level, interactions at the undergraduate level are more limited. Thoughthis trend is beginning to change; some challenges facing both industry and academia areprompting an increased level of interaction and new models of collaboration1,2.Technical programs, such as those found in applied engineering domains, have primarily focusedon
1 and the following are major definitions of assessment instruments that were embeddedinto the course: Project Journal: The maintenance of a bound design project journal is a requirement of the course by each team member. Teamwork (Peer-assessed): At least twice in the semester students are requested to complete a written evaluation of team members’ performance. Project Portfolio: This is an ongoing maintenance of a project portfolio. Records of team meetings, and updated plans for upcoming work are maintained in the portfolio, and are reviewed in project meetings with the instructor and industry’s sponsor. Standard contents of the portfolio reflects all proceedings of the team work on the
Pathways17. The newly developed courses providestudents with skills in mechatronics, automotive mechatronics, electro-hydraulics, simulation ofmechatronics systems, and are complementing already existing courses in the MET curriculumthat are focused on automation, industrial robotics, computer integrated manufacturing, computernumerical control. Along with developing new courses, some existing courses have beenmodified to reflect electrified mechanisms, such as a Solid Modeling course 18. Through thesecourses, students were exposed to areas specific to electrical engineers, such as electronicshardware, microprocessors, and microcontrollers programming and coding. While MET studentsget exposed to some topics in electrical engineering technology
, the STEM elements that are inherent in making can be made all the moreobvious. This could be attributed to one of three ways. First, it situates making in contexts thatare personal, culturally, socially relevant to students. Second, it can encourage students to be partof a production pipeline and contribute to something novel and useful to society. Third,involvement in this form of making places students in long-term scenarios acting as Makers fullyengaging in STEM. We believe this approach to making can enable students to gain a holisticview of their making ability as well understand how developed knowledge can be transferred.This reflects Grotevant’s process of identity formation as arising out of continual exploration andevaluation 9
person holds the idea that they are incapable of achieving success in a math class, they have a “fixed” mindset about math. These students place themselves at risk of failure because they do not work towards growing in their understanding of mathematics [9]. A person’s dislike for math often occur during the beginning stages of school [9]. Moreover, one’s dislike and uncomfortableness towards math may remain with a person for many years and can lead to a lack in self-confidence by hurting one’s rationale and thoughts [4]. Possessing a fixed mindset can hinder one’s potential for math success as this mindset lacks self-reflection and embracing new ways of learning [3]. A person with a fixed
take some pride in the work that they have completedincluding getting their work submitted to this university symposium. Additionally, steps arebeing taken to institute a seminar-type environment where students that complete undergraduateresearch will have the opportunity to present their work to the other students within thedepartment.Conclusions, Reflections, and the FutureAlthough having students do work with industry is not a new concept, recognizing the synergismof enhancing student growth and learning as well as advancing the success of local industry is amore recent concept. Eastern Washington University is situated close to many smallmanufacturing companies that are vital to the economic and technological success of thesurrounding area
. Furthermore, the descriptors describe what was rather than perhaps what ought to be.Finally, the data are also collapsed from numerous sources and may not necessarily reflect aparticular economic endeavor or locale.References1. Rogers, G. (n.d.). The Language of Assessment: Humpty Dumpty Had a Great Fall . . . . Retrieved October 14, 2007, from http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents- UPDATE/Assessment/Assessment%20Tips3.pdf2. U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Administrative Law Judges. (n.d.). Dictionary of Occupational Titles (4th Ed., Rev. 1991) – Parts. Retrieved January 17, 2008, from http://www.oalj.dol.gov/PUBLIC/DOT/REFERENCES/DOTPARTS.HTM3. O*NET Resource Center. (n.d.). About O*NET. Retrieved October 14, 2007, from
reasonable effort to acquire knowledge that was not previously taught. In the reference section of the final report, the students listed the library and internet resources used in the project.One possible weakness of this self learning experience is that the students might not acquireknowledge with significant depth. This is reflected in the self evaluation that the students werereluctant to give themselves a higher score. It is understandable as the capstone course is a 2-credit hour course and students would not be able to put the same amount of time as they wouldfor a 3-credit hour course.3. Rapid prototyping projectProject ObjectivesFor years, industry has strived to produce physical prototypes to demonstrate and promote newand innovative
, which in turn translates into Continuous Improvement of Outcome Based Education. Page 11.978.8IV. The Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology (ECET) Program’sContinuous Improvement PlanIV- a. The Teaching PhilosophyThe ECET department’s Teaching Philosophy is the reflection and commitment tostudent centered, Outcome Based Process Education.The Electrical & Computer Engineering Technology Department draws its teachingphilosophy from the secular scientific tradition of free inquiry leading to the unhamperedgrowth of knowledge.The Electrical & Computer Engineering Technology Faculty addresses the holistic needsof the society at large
, which are properties of themedium through which the wave passes13,16. Since the scattering and absorption are frequencydependent, attenuation can be used in the quality control of the materials. In this laboratorysession, the immersion technique is used for the measurements of the attenuation coefficient inPlexiglas. Three Plexiglas plates, which have the same mechanical and physical properties anddifferent thicknesses, are used in the experiments. At least two samples of the Plexiglas arerequired for the experiment, since the reflection coefficient of the Plexiglas is not known andshould be eliminated from the evaluation of the attenuation coefficient. The peak-to-peak voltageof the received signal is recorded by the oscilloscope and is saved
experiences andmany other activities. The main theme is experiential learning: “What I hear, I forget; what I see,I remember; what I do, I understand.” 9 High-impact learning practices can provide intensivelearning for students, improve learning motivation, retention, postgraduate attainment, and helpstudents reap economic, civic, and personal benefits from their educational experience. Manyhigh impact learning activities involve hands-on experience16. In addition to the learning, highimpact educational practices can help students build substantive relationships with teammatesand sponsors and provide opportunities for students to reflect on the person they are becoming
capacitance and specific heat values of various materials; categorize heat movement through reflection, absorption, radiation, and magnification. 3. Categorize the collection control, dissipation, storage and distribution of heat energy. 4. Maintain and repair mechanical equipment. E. ELMT 1302. Solar PV System. Course outcomes: 1. Design solar PV array. 2. Define industry terms. 3. Investigate certification requirements. 4. Install troubleshoot systems.IV. Plumbing Certificate – Solar Thermal Technology Specialization A. SOLR 2371. Solar Piping and Materials. Course outcomes: 1. Identify solar piping and materials; interpret specifications
, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Special thanks to theinstructors at the four South Carolina Technical Colleges that participated in the researchproject.References1. Perdomo, L., Shiratuddin, F., Thabet, W., and Ananth, A., "Interactive 3D Visualization As a Tool For Construction Education", proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, PF4B/23-8, Santo Domingo, DR, July 2005.2. Lee, S., Yoo, S., Kim, Y., Jung, H., Kim, S., Yun, M., Lee, J., and Kim, H., “Modeling and Localization of Web-based Fusion Image using VRML in Clinical Stroke Case
for the students in this course as evident from the animationproject described in Part III. The major difficulty students seemed to have had was switchingbetween the syntax of C and MATLAB, particularly in the area of arrays and for loops. The lastitem in Table 1 is the usage of the features in the respective software development environmentsDevC/C++ and MATLAB. Rather than making it a single topic, it was taught hands onthroughout the semester as the need and opportunity arose.part III: course projectsHomework typically reflects on the material covered in the lecture class. For any portion ofassignments that involve coding, students use DevC/C++ and MATLAB on Microsoft Windowsbased desktop computers in general computer labs. They develop the
, studentschose to undertake a deeper analysis of lead time variability thereby demonstrated how areduction in supplier lead time variability can improve the bottom lines of ABC Medical. Exhibit6 graphically describes the negative correlation between the lead time variability and theadditional revenue for the company. In other words, the reduction of lead time variability willreduce the need for safety stock thereby reducing the overall cost of inventory. This savings willeventually be reflected in the company earnings before profit, taxes & deductions (EBTDA), andreturns on net assets as shown in Exhibit 6. Page 25.751.10 Exhibit 6: Impact of reduction in lead time on the profitability
During the last 3 years, the EET Program has undergone significant improvements in teaching, advisement, and student engagement in project activities and professional organizations. o Overall student satisfactions with these efforts as reflected in student course outcomes and senior exit surveys.On the other hand, measurable decrease in outcomes (i), (j) and (k) were observed whichprompted actions to improve performance and awareness. The following continuousimprovement actions were implemented as a result of the mid-cycle assessment review: - Converting senior design project into 2-semester long course - Inviting IAB members to attend final senior project presentations
Page 24.731.10 development3.2 Manufacturing Competency clustersA set of competencies recommended in the literature [6, 7, 8, 9, and 11] is grouped to reflect in thecorresponding manufacturing courses shown in Table 10. The competencies, namely systemsthinking, anticipatory, normative, strategic, and interpersonal, are further developed into thesubcategories of competencies and presented in the second row of Table 10. These competenciesmight be included in the new or existing manufacturing engineering and technology courses asshown in Table 10. The competencies and outcomes can be achieved in the correspondingmanufacturing related courses at three different levels, namely introduce, develop, and
decision to join a graduate program.Using the above described factors, (Table 1), a numerical assessment can be made toreflect the distribution of strength and weakness (areas for improvement) for all thesefactors. Rating of four or higher in an attribute represents the strength and a rating belowthree reflects the areas for improvement. The generated assessment information can beused along with opportunities and threat to develop a strategic plan. It is also important toidentify relevant constraints that might have contributed to a lower rating of the attributesand if those constraints are financial constraints, policy constraints, economical issuesetc. The temporal nature of the identified constraints needs to be identified as well.2.2.2
continuous interaction between students and instructors whiledelivering complex subject matter. Although it may be true that many entry-level courses that aretraditionally taught in vast lecture halls are often characterized by little to no individualinteraction between students and professors, the options to interact within a face to faceenvironment has to be made available while teaching engineering subjects online. In addition,complex subjects taught via the Web has to reflect an environment where student progress can bemonitored. The engineering laboratory exercises where students learn applications have to bemade available online. Finally, very effective online methodologies have to be put in place toensure the effectiveness of online learning
are inherited from Computer Engineering Technologyrather than Computer Science. However, it is interesting and necessary to reflect upon theSoftware Engineering 2004 Curriculum Guidelines6 put forth by the Joint Task Force onComputing Curricula of the IEEE Computer Society and the ACM (Association for ComputingMachinery) simply because “software engineering” is the focus of the curriculum. It isinteresting to note that the IEEE/ACM Software Engineering Curriculum Guidelines do notconsider calculus as “core” as it does discrete mathematics and statistics. The guidelines statethat calculus is “not essential for a software engineering program.” The implication is thatgraduates in software engineering will work with domain experts in the
methods of instruction used. The pre and post training data collected will be reviewed by theproject staff to determine the extent that the faculty member has changed what they are doing inthe classroom as a result of the Access For All training received. Page 22.1657.10Conclusions, Reflection, and the FutureThis enrichment project will increase participation and success of students with disabilities atEastern Washington University (EWU) in the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (STEM) by focusing on recruiting high school and community college studentswith disabilities to enroll in STEM at EWU and at other institutions of
majority of thestudents (97%) identify themselves as a hands-on learner, which is typical forengineering technology students. This is also reflected in the response to Q6. The dataindicate that students are interested in having concepts reinforced by experimentation.Majority of the students in Non-metallic Materials course believe that lab exercise cancontribute to their learning of the class material, while many students in the Strength of Page 22.1686.10Materials course did not feel their learning experience is enhanced by lab activities (Q7)As the two courses surveyed are different in nature (knowledge vs skill), the studentresponse can be used to
sequential circuit design and thenuse Verilog to describe them rather than directly coding from the problem specifications.However they are introduced to the RTL coding style of finite state machines which follows theswitch-case statements in C language. For Section D, the sequential circuit blocks such ascounters, shift registers, and linear feedback shift register (LFSR) modules are taught alongwith Verilog RTL coding styles.Part III: class projects and laboratory experimentsLab assignments typically reflect on the material covered in the lecture class. Students useModelSim[9] for simulation and validation of their design work. They develop testbenches forverification of their designs. As the table 1 shows, lab assignment 7 introduces
mimimized.An ANOVA of the sample data shows that despite the small sample size, the grade relativeperformance of the Co-Lab group is statistically significant at power of p=0.304. With nearly70% confidence based on the small sample size, the statistical support for the effectiveness of the Page 22.653.8Co-Lab project is encouraging.An additional major benefit, it was discovered, was not reflected in the grades. Discussions witheach student were held and it was discovered that the students had the following importantoutcomes:1. interest in technology was increasedThe students were able to apply their skills to a problem in the way that they saw fit
does a good job at providing a reasonable project experience for the teams. Theproject is complex enough to provide challenging planning and team-oriented problem solvingtasks. Further, the project provides the ultimate challenge for any manager; it requires executionand control of the project plan. This "tire hitting the road" experience provides an objective, hardreality deadline for the teams. It makes the work they do reflect a real project, not some reportabout how a project could be carried out. However, it is difficult to envision how to rotateleadership roles in a meaningful manner. There are at least three options: 1. Have N unique projects for each team where N is the number of team members. In the current capstone, N is 4
more infusion time. Opportunities for students to try alternate approaches to problem solving with a fresh start each time. Lets students experience growth. Enhances opportunities for diversity. 6. The ‘Why? / How? / Prove it!’ concept is more hard-wired into the student. 7. Gives the student more time to ‘pick themselves up and try again’. This offers reiteration and reflection before moving onto the next phase. 8. There are more distinct gradable moments and more refinement in the detail.(Having had personal experience with a traditional senior capstone project both as a studentand an industrial representative for several projects, the author can say without a doubt that thedeficiencies stated in the above sections are real
- Perspectives from Both Sides of the Assessment Trench, Proceedings ofthe 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.6 Mayes, T. S. & Bennett, J. K. (2005). ABET Best Practices: Results from Interviews with 27 Peer Institutions,Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR.7 King, F. G. & Shamsuddin, I. (2003). Imbedding Assessment and Achievement of Course Learning Objectives withPeriodic Reflection, Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Session 3613.8 Page 15.1280.13 Rogers, G. (2008). Faculty Workshop on Assessing Program Outcomes, Louisville, KY.9
; may interfere occasionally Language or her sentences are with awkward reflects attempt to solid but meaning. (problematic practiced or articulate may lack Problems sentence refined main points, development with writing