AC 2010-1455: A MULTI-FACETED STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS FORINNOVATIONMonica Cardella, Purdue UniversityRobert Davis, Purdue UniversityShripad Revankar, Purdue UniversityLoring Nies, Purdue UniversityCarolyn Percifield, Purdue UniversityLeah Jamieson, Purdue University Page 15.58.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A Multi-Faceted Strategic Planning Process for InnovationStrategic planning has become an important component of how academic programs set goals andpriorities.We present an approach to strategic planning that is characterized by inclusion ofinternal and external stakeholders and is unique in the combination of process tools utilized.1
point scale, thereare two commonly used ways to measure interrater agreement.The first of these is the rWG index developed by James, Demaree and Wolf (1984). Although this method is themore common, it has several drawbacks including scale dependency, the assumption that a uniform distributionmodels perfect disagreement, the need for a distribution to model disagreement, and dependence on the numberof judges (Kozlowski and Hattrup 1992, Brown and Hauenstein 2005). The aWG index developed by Brown andHauenstein corrects for these problems and measures consensus among judges. It calibrates itself according tothe scale and the number of judges. The equation for aWG is: aWG = 1 - 2*Sx2/{[(H+L)*X-X2-(H*L)]*[K/(K-1
Paper ID #9510Developing Cognitive Innovation Skills through a Problem Solving Approachin Science and Technology to Develop Solution EntrepreneursDr. James L. Barnes, James Madison University Dr. Barnes oversees all proposal development and research design. He coordinates all needs assess- ment and benchmarking studies. He leads BTILLC’s Readiness and Emergency Management activities. He is certified in National Incident Management Systems (NIMS) and Incident Command System (ICS) courses, Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED), Crisis Management and is very fa- miliar with NIMS standards and protocol: (1
becoming increasingly complex across all its branches - from thetraditional civil engineering to the modern computer, space, and genetic engineering. Thecomplexity has increased even more due to a growing interdependence among disciplines andthe emergence of a wide range of new technologies.To manage this situation, engineers whocan keep pace with new technologies and think laterally when developing new applications,and engineers who are creative and capable of abstract thinking are required. It has beenobserved that recent engineering graduates are lacking in these competencies; and thetraditional and still dominant engineering curriculum at most universities, especially indeveloping countries, makes little provision for developing them 1-3
associated with product and service design,manufacturing, and support, engineers are being called upon to a much greater extent to performthe what-to-do functions that drive technology innovation and fill the front-end of the design-product-service pipeline.” 1Development of the new industrial and entrepreneurial engineering programIn 2006, the faculty initiated a complete review of the IE program. It was decided that no courseor topic was off limits. The objective was to completely revise the IE program and put in place acurriculum that would meet the needs of future graduates. After several meetings and retreats, thefaculty agreed that the new IE curriculum should have the following features: 1. Change the name of the program to reflect the
post-interaction writings and through focused quantification ofmotivation, valuation, and integration in our freshman and sophomore engineers.Kriewall, TJ and Mekemson, K (2010). Instilling the entrepreneurial mindset into engineering undergraduates. TheJournal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 1(1): 5-19.Green JV (2011), Designing And Launching The Entrepreneurship And Innovation Living-Learning Program ForFreshmen And Sophomores. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 2(1): 28-38.Weaver J and Rayess N (2011). Developing Entrepreneurially Minded Engineers By Incorporating TechnicalEntrepreneurship Case Studies. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 2(1):10-27
andengineers.Below is the final science complex design by the architects and engineers. Included in this finaldesign were about 85% of the deliverables from the Junior Engineering class projects on energysavings, architectural features, and detailed building design (including internal rooms and space). Page 24.517.17Final Gold LEED science complex design by architects and engineers, which incorporatedalmost all of the deliverables from student projects.High Altitude BallooningBackground: A High Altitude Balloon can send a student experiment 20 miles into Near Space where there is extreme temperature (-‐65 degrees C) and pressure (1
graduates have an interest and/or intention towardsentrepreneurship. Analyses related to the demographic characteristics, desired career outcomesand career satisfaction, and pre- and post-graduation undergraduate learning experiences, ofthese alumni were conducted. The research questions guiding this study are: 1) How might engineering alumni be characterized based on their levels of interest in and intention to pursue entrepreneurial activity? 2) What similarities and differences in desired career outcomes, career satisfaction, and undergraduate learning experiences exist among engineering alumni with varying levels of entrepreneurial interest and intention?IntroductionEntrepreneurially-minded alumni are in high demand
to create a thinking culture of exploration and discipline. This segregated thinkingmethod and toolset allows teams and individuals to work together by thinking in parallel. Thefocused sequencing of these thinking styles can prevent adversarial dialog and create anopportunity for the brain to “Maximize its sensitivity in different directions at different times”(de Bono, 1985, p. 1).Western Thinking is concerned with “what is” versus designing forward from parallelpossibilities to create “what can be”. Traditional thinking is also based on rock logic where youestablish dichotomies and contradictions to force a choice based on search and discovery. DeBono’s Six Thinking Hats uses the concept of water logic which flows to accept
all majors able to enroll. Recently, students at Penn State have begun enrolling in the new university wideEntrepreneurship and Innovation Minor. The minor, which previously existed only within theCollege of Engineering, has expanded to include concentration areas, called clusters, inTechnology-Based Entrepreneurship, Social Entrepreneurship, New Media, Food and Bio-innovation, and New Ventures. The five clusters are housed in four different colleges andadditional clusters will be added in the near future to focus on entrepreneurship and innovation inother disciplines, contexts and customer segments. The purpose of this paper is 1) to describe the changes to the minor and the new format,2) to discuss preliminary assessment of
, combined classeswith their business schools or adding entrepreneurial classes to their core curriculums 1. The lackof standardization when it comes to helping engineering students develop these skills is notnecessarily a bad thing, but it certainly highlights the need for a deeper understanding on how thecreative process works and how to foster an entrepreneurial mindset in engineering students.Understanding biassociationThe term biassociation was first coined by Arthur Koestler in 1964 as “a distinction between theroutine skills of thinking on a single ‘plane’ as it were, and the creative act,” or in other words“collision of two apparently unrelated frames of reference” 2. Hitt et al. divides innovativeactions as either “equilibrating” or
; Shuman, Besterfield-Sacre, &McGourty, 2005). The authors have conducted preliminary research, which was supported by asmall pilot grant awarded through the Stanford University Epicenter. This work consisted of: 1)developing a rationale for aligning entrepreneurship education with ABET Criterion 3a-k, and 2) Page 24.265.2conducting preliminary research which resulted in a preliminary list of 52 entrepreneurshipoutcomes in 4 major categories or content areas. Results and dissemination of this work atvarious conferences and meetings suggest that there is significant interest and support amongengineering faculty and administrators in pursuing
action-oriented entrepreneurial mindset inengineering, science, and technical undergraduates. Some skills often associated with theentrepreneurial mindset are effective communication (written, verbal, and graphical), teamwork,ethics and ethical decision-making, customer awareness, persistence, creativity, innovation, timemanagement, critical thinking, global awareness, self-directed research, life-long learning,learning through failure, tolerance for ambiguity, and estimation.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 In 2010, KEENspecifically outlined seven student outcomes pertaining to the entrepreneurial mindset.7 Astudent should be able to: 1. Effectively collaborate in a team setting (teamwork) 2. Apply critical and creative thinking to ambiguous problems
,multi-disciplinary project. The course is offered to engineering students majoring in electrical,computer, mechanical, civil, and engineering education. The expected outcomes are effectivecollaboration and communication, persisting and learning from failure, management, and solvingambiguous problems. In addition, the paper presents all involved details in this project includingthe phases mentioned above, rubrics used for project evaluation, assessment of students’ attitudetoward this activity, assessment of project outcomes, and the related ABET student outcomes.1. IntroductionEducators should always seek opportunities to enhance course material and equip students withskills to help students achieve a successful career after graduation
and CharacteristicsINTRODUCTIONTechnological innovation and entrepreneurship are widely regarded as key elements to economicgrowth and the creation of new employment. Engineers are often important members, if notleaders, of the teams that make this innovation and entrepreneurship possible. It has become evenmore important for engineering graduates to not only understand business basics, but to be“flexible, resilient, creative, empathetic, and have the ability to recognize and seizeopportunities” 1. To help engineering graduates succeed in this environment, engineering schoolsare creating courses and programs focused on innovation and entrepreneurship, sometimesdrawing from business approaches in doing so 2.In designing these courses and
to provide insight intohow different entrepreneurial skills, knowledge and aptitudes can be building blocks of thedefinition of entrepreneurship. Churchill defined entrepreneurship as the “process of uncovering or developing anopportunity to create value through innovation and seizing that opportunity…” (p . 586)1. Thereare four important elements in this definition. The first element highlights an entrepreneur’sability to uncover an opportunity. Few people would disagree that opportunity recognition is animportant skill of an entrepreneur, and this skill is frequently listed as an indicator ofentrepreneurial ability or intention2,3. However, there is some debate as to whether or not this
faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Page 24.337.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Creative Go-Getters: Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Activities in Engineering UndergraduatesAbstract:The purpose of this study is to examine characteristics of incoming engineering students aspossible predictors of later participation in entrepreneurial activities. Four characteristics wereexamined: 1) locomotion, 2) self-evaluation, 3) creative self-efficacy and 4
specifically we answered the followingquestions: a) Which of the five skills do innovators most frequently use first in their innovationprocess?; b) With which of the five skills do innovators most often conclude the innovationprocess?; c) Which sequence of skills do innovators most frequently use?; d) Which skills are Page 24.354.2central to innovation?Research FrameworkUsing the Innovator’s DNA as a framework, this study identifies the sequences of skills used bysuccessful innovators. The skills in question are observation, questioning, experimenting,association, and networking. These skills are defined in The Innovator’s DNA as follows: 1
to engage and encourage students to think creatively in design andengineering. Investigators are exploring how and why the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)method facilitates a creative process, overcomes obstacles to creativity and changes students’perceptions to explore creative design solutions. An AHP-based creativity process is developedand implemented in three different case studies. Lessons learned from these initial trials arediscussed herein and will contribute to a detailed investigation to assess the effectiveness of theproposed AHP-based design process to foster an environment for engineering students to thinkcreatively and to produce creative solutions.1. IntroductionEngineers and STEM professionals must possess the skills and
remaining threestudents from Computer Science disciplines.Two or three students are required to form a team to brainstorm, conduct research, design, build,and test a robot using LEGO Mindstorm NXT. The project simulates a real business case. Theteams were asked to investigate, design and implement a prototype of a small, inexpensivesystem that can fulfill the given engineering challenge with the limitation of the budget formaterials and labors. The challenge was to design and program a robot to maneuver through agiven test area in the shortest time, as shown in Fig. 1. It required the robot to go forward,backward, make turns, sense/avoid objects, sense/response the light, and sense/response thesound. The challenge requires a team to practice
although not free of frustrations. Faculty also observed the pedagogicalvalue of collaborative projects but there was no consensus as to if or how much extra work isrequired to administer them.1- IntroductionCapstone design projects, being the culminating experience of a typical four year engineeringcurriculum, present an opportunity to reinforce a number of critical soft skills that are deemedimportant in professional engineering practice. Such soft skills are outlined by the EngineeringCriteria of ABET1 relating to communications, teamwork, ethical responsibilities, contextualunderstanding, among others. A more extensive list of student outcomes, presented by the KernEntrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN), is aimed at fostering an
factors: 1) personal heterogeneities: disparate physical characteristics associated withdisability, illness, age, or gender, 2) environmental diversities: different climatic conditions andavailable natural resources, 3) variations in social climate: access to public goods and differingamounts of social capital, 4) differences in relational perspectives: effects of wealth distributionwithin communities, and 5) distribution within the family: how income gets allocated to meetneeds of income earners and non-income earners.18 Sen’s early work on wellbeing establisheddefinitions at the individual level, whereas the later work of scholars attached to the Voices of thePoor19 project and the Wellbeing in Developing Countries project15 created community
teaching paradigm to learningparadigm that is based on the discovery approach. One must remember that the ultimate goal ofthe discovery approach, however, is to deliver the needed information to learners in the bestpossible manner, that suits the receiver’s optimum learning style. The author also strongly recommends and encourages students to utilize the resourcesthat are readily available at the university, such as University Library, Divisional Documents,Departmental Research Reports, Computer Laboratory, Writing Center, etc. 1. Discovery approach utilizes five principles and this has been documented in Appendix A. 2. Discovery Based ISD is recorded in Appendix B. According to Reuben Tozman, Instructional Systems Design is the
, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and career intent. Results show that studentscan increase their knowledge of targeted entrepreneurship concepts without diminishment oflearning core engineering concepts. While the case study experience did not significantly changeentrepreneurial career intentions it did grow students’ perceived entrepreneurial self-efficacy (asmeasured by confidence in business skills), which can be a precursor to changing career intent.The case study experience also appealed to a broad spectrum of students with career interestsranging from working for a start-up to working for an established global business. Theimplications of entrepreneurial case study instruction are discussed.1. IntroductionThe career pathway for engineering students
universities though the“Helping Hands Dense Network” is described in a previous ASEE paper. 1The three-year project focused on intrapreneurship is described graphically in Figure 1. Phase I Phase II Phase III Figure 1 - Intrapreneurship Study PlanThe team recently completed Phase I, and this paper presents a summary of its findings. Thepurpose of Phase I is to expand the knowledge and understanding of i-ship and innovation asthey relate to engineering education outcomes. It is hoped that those findings will definelearning outcomes of engineering education programs (Phase II). This in turn will guide thedevelopment of curriculum and experiences at
the otherdrowned trying to save her. Professor Henry thought “How can this happen in such an affluentcollege community?” So, she met with Mr. Rotolo, who is the father of one of the children anduncle to the other, and his minister to talk about how she could help. The result was a studentproject initiated in her class on multiculturalism and education that has raised thousands ofdollars to sponsor pool passes for local families in need. The Poolpass Project has now passedthree years of operation and become a sustainable student-run philanthropic organization 1. Page 23.1404.2For the eclectic mix of students enrolled in “Impact: Exploring
the entrepreneurial ideas primarily come from the “Need-Approach-Benefits-Competition” or NABC approach espoused by Carlson and Wilmot.1 The successes and failuresof the approaches are discussed. Examples are provided to illustrate how these ideas have beenused to enhance the undergraduate learning experience. Since the university has a strongautomotive focus, many of the examples cited pertain to that industry, but the concepts can beeasily applied to other fields such as aerospace, power production, and alternative energy.In addition to enhancing undergraduate education, there are significant other benefits to thisapproach. For students, these ideas can be much more engaging than traditional classroommaterial and the exposure to the ideas
deliver quality presentations.The student teams have realized that the success of their App depends upon the quality of eachteam member in these areas. One student stated, “I enjoyed working with other individuals whohad backgrounds different than mine. This allowed us to the split the tasks based on eachperson’s strengths. As a group, we discussed each task to determine who would be best suited totake on that portion of our project. That person would then take the lead and the rest of the groupwould help out wherever and whenever necessary. I believe it aided in the success of ourproject.”1 If a team is lacking in any of the needed skills, they are allowed to seek out assistancefrom students outside of the course. For example, if a team is in
quests forentrepreneuring success are qualitatively analyzed using the following two questions: 1) How do we introduce and measure the predictive engagement aspect of vulnerability in successful entrepreneurial storytelling? And, 2) How do we develop a procedure for applying the storytelling results to the start-up phases of entrepreneurial work and illuminate its effectiveness for delivering innovation.Increasingly, academic and industrial collaborations begin as entrepreneurial expectations fordelivering something novel. Defining the first steps of start-ups results in discussions of a seriesof related concepts: innovation, empathy, and storytelling. While the media is rich
: The rubric that will be applied (see Table 1 for an example). Details about the activity or assignment that generated the student work. The illustrative activity (see Figure 1) is a reflection paper intended to afford evidence of students’ Page 25.317.3 effectiveness in a team setting. This activity was completed by students in a freshmen engineering course. Student work examples (artifacts) that illustrate high and low proficiency (each on a separate page; see Figure 2 and Figure 3 for examples), A score sheet for each artifact to be evaluated (see Table 2 for an example). Table 1: Rubric for the Effectively