Conference Session

Exploring the Entrepreneurial and Innovation Mindset

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Schar, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University; Angela Harris, Stanford University; Beth Rieken, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

avery brief measure, a 5-item innovation self-efficacy (ISE.5) scale was developed using the 19-item Dyer et al. Innovative Behavior Scale (IBS) as a starting point, adapted for undergraduateengineering students, and then condensed using confirmatory factor analysis.The ISE.5 measures innovation self-efficacy as a unitary construct drawn from Dyer et al.’s fiveinnovative behavior components (Questioning, Observing, Experimenting, Networking Ideas andAssociational Thinking) and has good internal and external validity as well as good test-retestreliability. The ISE.5 (as a measure of innovation self-efficacy) is shown to be an importantmediator between innovation interests and a desire to pursue innovative work as a career post-graduation. This

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Douglas E. Melton, Kern Family Foundation

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

curves.28This problem can be made more effectual by converting it to a PBL assignment. The followingPBL assignment has been used at Lawrence Technological University in Michigan: You purchased a primitive cabin “up north” situated in the forest near a lake. It has no plumbing and you’d like to upgrade the cabin and turn it into a quaint vacation retreat. Referring to Figure 3, design the water supply system for the cabin meeting the following expectations:  Two story cabin approximately 30 ft above the lake.  Meet basic water needs for comfortable living (i.e., at least shower, faucet(s), etc.)  Each water consumption unit can be controlled independently, and also

Conference Session

Improving Student Entrepreneurial Skills

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Santarelli, Cal State Fresno

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

8 6 4 2 0 t t m s t s

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Opening General Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Grimsley Michaeli P.E., Old Dominion University; Gene Hou, Old Dominion University; Xiaoxiao Hu, Old Dominion University; May Hou, Norfolk State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

was developed by a Russianscientist, G. S. Altshuller and his colleagues. TRIZ hypothesized that the solution of any givenproblem or one similar to it has already be done. Creativity is how to find that solution and adaptit to the specific problem. After reviewing 2.5 million patents from 1946 to 1985, Altshuller andhis colleagues found patterns that led to the breakthrough solutions to given problems. Thesepatterns were summarized into 40 inventive principles for problem solving, the separationprinciples, laws of technical evolution and technology forecasting and 76 standard solutions.Advanced Systematic Inventive Thinking (ASIT) is a creative thinking method derived fromTRIZ by R. Horowitz in 1999.17 ASIT simplified TRIZ’s principles into

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

(value) and variation were brought up again.The follow up report constituted addressing the following tasks: • Providing a description of the case including background, important factors, critical measures, etc. • Determining each design’s performance with regards to the quality measure(s) identified • Recommending which design that the company should continue with for further advancement based on both technical feasibility and economic value analysis • Providing statistical justification to all responsesAll the information necessary to conduct a technical feasibility analysis using statistical toolswas available in the materials covered during the lectures; but the students had to research togather more information to

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Heydi L. Dominguez, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Vibhavari Vempala, University of Michigan; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University; Jacob Frederick Fuher, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. 738–743.[4] L. J. Shuman, C. Delaney, H. Wolfe, A. Scalise, and M. Besterfield-Sacre, “Engineering attrition: Student characteristics and educational initiatives,” in Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education, 1999, pp. 1–12.[5] S. P. Nichols and N. E. Armstrong, “Engineering entrepreneurship: Does entrepreneurship have a role in engineering education?,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 134–138, 2003.[6] P. Shekhar, A. Huang-Saad, J. Libarkin, R. Cummings, and V. Tafurt, “Assessment of student learning in an entrepreneurship practicum course,” 2017.[7] T. P. James, E. Rose Morehouse, and T. P. James, “Employer Perceptions of Undergraduate Student Entrepreneurial

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Magdalini Z. Lagoudas, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University; Rodney Boehm, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

affiliates.References[1] J. M. Bekki, M. Huerta, J. S. London, D. Melton, M. Vigeant, and J. M. Williams, “Opinion: Why EM? The potential benefits of instilling an entrepreneurial mindset,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7(1), 2, 2018.[2] C. J. Creed, E. M. Suuberg, and G. P. Crawford, “Engineering entrepreneurship: An example of a paradigm shift in engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91(2), pp. 185-195, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00691.x[3] National Science Foundation, NSF Innovation Corps (I-Corps™), 2019. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/i-corps/index.jsp[4] A. Huang-Saad, J. Fay, and L. Sheridan, “Closing the divide: Accelerating technology

Conference Session

Assessing Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Craig G. Downing, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Diane Evans, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Press.2. Pryor, J. H. and Reedy, E. J., 2009, “Trends in Business Interest Among U.S. College Students: An Early Exploration of Data Available from the Cooperative Institutional Research Program,” Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.3. Yang, A., 2014, Smart People Should Build Things. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.4. Boyd, N. G. and Vozikis, G. S., 1994, “The Influence of Self-Efficacy on the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp. 63-77.5. McGrath, R. G., 2000, The Entrepreneurial Mindset: Strategies for Continuously Creating Opportunity in an Age of Uncertainty. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.6. Condoor, S. and McQuilling, M., 2009, “Incorporating an

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University; William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Cory Hixson, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

., the Business ModelCanvas (Osterwalder & Pigneur, 2010)) in university settings and, as a quick internet search willreveal, the increasing number of unique canvases that are being developed to address specificneeds/contexts. At their most fundamental level, a canvas is a one-page visual frameworkmodeling the critical elements of a real-world system. The elements chosen are those that thecanvas’ creator(s) have deemed essential in order to design, add value or make changes to asystem out in the world. Visually, a canvas is often divided into segments, with each segmentcorresponding to one of the elements that should be considered. Based on this structure and ourexperience using canvases in educational settings, a canvas can • Focus a

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan Reissman, University of Dayton; Allison L. Kinney, University of Dayton; Kevin Patrick Hallinan, University of Dayton

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

of all of the projects, students were remindedagain and again to think back to these goals, and encouraged to revise the goals as they learned more. Instep 3 (Decide what should be modeled and why), students imagined the model(s) they would create tomatch their physical system. This process didn’t simply ask students to rely upon knowledge they alreadytheoretically had. Rather, it forced them to research in order to learn how they might model the systemthey were analyzing. This research might take them back to foundational knowledge they had alreadybeen exposed to or to new knowledge; although at the beginning the modeling efforts tended to mainlyemphasize the former. The point is that there had to be early imagining of the ultimate model(s

Conference Session

Entrepreneurial Leadership and Non-traditional Ways to Engage Students in Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen High, Oklahoma State University; Paul Rossler, Oklahoma State University; Martin High, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

-Engineering curriculum. Dr. High is involved with the development of an undergraduate entrepreneurship program at Oklahoma State University.Paul Rossler, Oklahoma State University PAUL E. ROSSLER directs the Engineering and Technology Management Program and co-directs the Legal Studies in Engineering Program at Oklahoma State University and is an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering and Management. He is a licensed professional engineer and holds a M.S. and Ph.D. in industrial engineering from Virginia Tech.Martin High, Oklahoma State University MARTIN S. HIGH founded and co-directs the Legal Studies in Engineering Program at Oklahoma State University and is an Associate Professor of

Conference Session

Assessment

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lindsey Anne Nelson, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

sustainable community development. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2008;33(3):307-319.2. Reid K, Estell JK. Incorporation of Poverty Alleviation in Third World Countries in a First-Year Engineering Capstone Course. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2011;27(6):1273-1280.3. Smith A. The International Development Fair: The Human Factor at Work in the WorldMIT: Lecture; 2008:3 October 2008.4. Vanasupa L, Slivovsky L, Chen KC. Global challenges as inspirtation: A classrom strategy to foster social responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2006;12:373-380.5. Mehta K, Brannon ML, Zappe S, Colledge T, Zhao Y. eplum Model of Student Engagement: Expanding non-travel based global

Conference Session

Basic Concepts in Entrepreneurship

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara A. Karanian Ph.D., Stanford University; Mona Eskandari, Stanford University; Jackie Liao, Stanford University; Zubair Ahmed

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

WeLive, Love, Parent, and Lead. Gotham, 2012.[12] Wagner, A., Benjamin, S., Itamar, K., & Buckner, R., Parietal Lobe contribution to episodicmemory retrieval. TRENDS in Cognitive Science, Vol. 9, No. 9, Sept. 2005.[13] Goleman, D., What Makes A Leader? Harvard Business Review, 2004.[14] Eskandari, M., Pincheira, F. E., Krauthamer, R., Aggarwal, A., Forouhar, P., Dua, J., Peng,C., Kress, G., Karanian, B., Open Process for Entrepreneuring Team Collaboration: StoryParallels from an Academic Design Team to the Studied Start-Up, ASEE, Entrepreneurship andInnovation Division, San Antonio, TX. 2012.[15] Baum, J., Locke, E. & Kirkpatrick, S., A longitudinal study of the relation of vision andvision communication to venture growth in

Conference Session

Novel Entrepreneurship Programs

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James V. Green, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

best practices for planning, launching, and managing new ventures. This multidisciplinary course will draw on management, business, legal, financial, as well as technical, concepts.Further courses at the undergraduate and graduate level are currently under evaluation for onlinedelivery.Alignment of the University of Maryland’s approach to student s’ expectationsFor course design, priority for introducing online technology entrepreneurship course is placedon existing face-to-face on campus. This provides a tested syllabus with proven deliverables andexisting pedagogy that can be modified for the online environment. Technologies used are thosealready familiar to students and faculty, where possible. Details of the variables

Conference Session

Critical Success Factors for Technopolis Creation

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Zidek, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Cindy Orndoff; Susan Blanchard

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

enthusiasm of the engineering students involved in the project,in particular with respect to their commitment to improving mathematics education at the highschool level using their engineering skills to guide them to appropriate applications, and finallydue to the commitment of the faculty involved in both cases. The project provides anentrepreneurial learning experience for the engineering students as well as the opportunity toimpact the local community through service learning. The interaction between the university andthe high school may be the first steps in helping improve the math skills of high school studentsin Florida and across the country.Bibliography[1] G. Heinrich, K. Jordan, A. Smalley, and S. Boast. Prepare Students for Technical

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 11

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victor Taratukhin, Stanford University; Anastasiia Baryshnikova, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Yury V. Kupriyanov, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Jörg Becker

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

problems for companies, to obtainvaluable experience of creative problem-solving process and opportunity to learn and applynew business technologies for students and to develop Digital Business Framework for bothsides by innovative ideas, products and services. References 1. Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. T. M. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14, 1–11. 2. Brown, T. 2008. "Design Thinking," Harvard Business Review, 84-92. 3. Brown, Tim, and Barry Kātz. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York: Harper

Conference Session

Research and Assessment

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Geoff Wright, Brigham Young University; Tyler Lewis, Brigham Young University; Paul T Skaggs, Brigham Young University; Bryan Howell, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, ability to deferjudgment, intrinsic motivation, ability and willingness to prototype and iterate, willingness toflexibility to change roles and grow a diversity of ideas, and collaborative autonomy (ability towork both collectively and as an individual. Being able to bring individual ideas and connectthem with the ideas of others). Finally, the process can be viewed as both linear and non-linearbecause although there should be movement from divergent ideas to a convergent solution, theinnovation process steps can (and should) often be revisited to ensure the best solution(s) arebeing developed. Figure 1.3 diagrams the flow. Although the diagram is presented in linearformat, the process needs to be interpreted as being cyclical – in that idea

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Education Session 3

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony Joseph, Pace University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

experiencedentrepreneurs are less likely to fail.”12 In addition, size does not define the level ofentrepreneurialism within a company – an entrepreneurial company could be a large corporationor a reasonably small business. In fact, since the 1990’s, larger corporations in the U. S. seekingto gain a competitive edge have been downsizing while small businesses have been creating newjobs – a net of over 80%12. However, only “[a] small number of innovative start-ups account fora disproportionately large number of new jobs” 13. Contemporaneously, many companies are Page 24.1177.4laying off high-paid older workers with dated skills for those with current skills

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Peter Golding P.E., University of Texas at El Paso; Scott A. Starks P.E., University of Texas at El Paso; Roger V. Gonzalez P.E., University of Texas at El Paso; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso; David G. Novick, University of Texas at El Paso; Cole Hatfield Joslyn, University of Texas at El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Intro. by H. S. Pritchett, 2009.[8] "Engineering for the Conceptual Age," UTEP College of Engineering Lecture Series [Online] Available: engineering.utep.edu/engineeringlectureseries [Accessed: Nov. 11, 2020].[9] C.W. Clough, et al., "The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century," Washington D.CDCational Academies Press, 2004, pp 28-29.[10] L.R. Lattuca, P.T. Terenzini, J.F. Volkwein and G. D. Peterson, "The Changing Face of Engineering Education," Reforming Engineering Education, vol. 36, no. 2, 1996.[11] S.C. Florman, The Introspective Engineer, New York: Thomas Dunne, St. Martin's Press, 1996.[12] "Engineering for the Conceptual Age," UTEP

Conference Session

Exploring the Entrepreneurial and Innovation Mindset

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tuuli Maria Utriainen, Aalto University; Ville Taajamaa, University of Turku; Raghu Ram Movva, SAFM - College des Ingenieurs Italia; Joona Kurikka, Aalto University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

formation in a multicultural and interdisciplinarysetting coupled with hands-on doing based on repetitive do-test-learn cycles that areconstantly assessed and communicated by the teaching team.Design, whether as design science or design thinking has been with us for quite some time.Already in the 1950´s B. Fuller, a renowned scientists and inventor described design scienceas: “…the effective application of the principles of science to the conscious design of ourtotal environment in order to help make the Earth’s finite resources meet the needs of allhumanity without disrupting the ecological processes of the planet” Buckminister Fuller [17].There is relevant criticism to be considered as well. The three perspectives, based on Kimbell2011, are that

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Making and Maker Spaces

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

David G. Alexander, California State University, Chico; Colleen Robb, Florida Gulf Coast University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

$5.00 per yard Juki Industrial Sewing By Appointment User Provided Machine Wacom Cintiq 13HD Drop-in No Charge Creative Pen Display Button Maker Drop-in $2.00 per 10 buttons Cutting Board and Cutting Drop-in No Charge Tools Epson Perfection V800 Drop-in No Charge Photo Flatbed Scanner Einscan-S 3D Scanner Drop-in No Charge Ultimaker 3 3D printers Operated by Makerspace 3 hours per user per month, (Extended) Student Advisors Only No Charge 3D Printer Pen* By Appointment

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia; Douglas Muir, University of Virginia; Elizabeth P. Pyle, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

) observing, (4)experimenting, and (5) networking. All of these, they argue, can be deliberately cultivated (asopposed to being innate). The broader category they use to describe the confluence of these skillsis "creative intelligence, which enables discovery yet differs from other types of intelligence[because it] engage(s) both sides of the brain.” Associating, which they define as “the ability tosuccessfully connect seemingly unrelated questions, problems, or ideas from different fields,” isthe culminating skill. They liken associating to “a mental muscle that can grow stronger by usingthe other discovery skills. . . .The more diverse our experience and knowledge, the moreconnections the brain can make.” The article is only seven pages long and is

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David G. Alexander Ph.D., California State University - Chico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

competitive at the event in New Orleans at the end of May 2016.Reference 1. Archibald, M., Clauss, M., and Dupree, J., “Entrepreneurship in Capstone Design Using Interdisciplinary Teams and a Business Plan Competition,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2. Trevisan, M., Davis, D., Beyerlein, S., McCormack, J., Thompson, P., Leiffer, P., Davis, H., Howe, S., LeBeau, J., Gerlick, R., Brackin, P., and Khan, M. J., “Integrated Design Engineering Assessment and Learning System (IDEALS): Piloting Teamwork and Professional Skills Development Instructional Materials,” (2012) American Society for Engineering Education. 3. Oladiran, M., Uziak, J

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Magdalini Z. Lagoudas, Texas A&M University; Jeffrey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University; James L. Wilson, Texas A&M University; Peter Seth Hamilton; Rodney Boehm, Texas A&M University; Prasad N. Enjeti, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

(IRB2015-0672D).References 1. The Innovative and Entrepreneurial University, retrieved from https://www.eda.gov/pdf/the_innovative_and_entrepreneurial_university_report.pdf2. University Maker Spaces” Discover, Optimization and Measurement of Impacts, Morocz, R. J., Levy, B. D., Forest, C. R. , Nagel, R. L. Newstetter, W. C., Talley, K., G., Linsey, J. S. 2015 ASEE3. Barrett, T. W., Pizzico, C. M., Levy, B., Nagel, R. L. A Review of University Maker Spaces, 2015 ASEE, June 2015, Seattle, WA.4. Forest, C., et al. The Invention Studio: A University Maker Space and Culture. Advances in Engineering Education, Summer 2014.5. Tate, M., Norris, S. A Maker Space of Their Own, Prism, October 20146. Rees, P., Olsom, C

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Constanza Miranda, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile; Isabel Hilliger, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. F., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 34(1), 103–120.5. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology , ’ Translations ’ and Boundary Objects  : Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley ’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology , 1907-39. Social Studies of Sciences, 19(3), 387–420.6. Galison, P. (1999). Trading Zone: Coordinating Action and Belief. In M. Biagioli (Ed.), The Science Studies Reader (pp. 137–160). New York: Routledge.7. Grinter, L. E. (1956). Report on the evaluation of engineering education. Journal of Engineering education, 46, 25-63.8. Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., & Sorensen, C. D

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benedict M. Uzochukwu, Virginia State University; Coray Davis, Virginia State University ; Ben U. Nwoke, Virginia State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. 2, pp. 82 - 98; doi: 10.3390/admsci2010082Konda, I., Starc., J., and Rodica, B. (2015). Social Challenges are Opportunities for SustainableDevelopment: Tracing Impacts of Social Entrepreneurship through Innovations and ValueCreation. EKONOMSKE TEME 53 (2): 215-233Senge, P. et al. (2008). The Necessary Revolution. How individuals and Organisations AreWorking Together to Create a Sustainable World. New York: Doubleday.Wright, S, Katz, J (2016). Protecting Student Intellectual Property in the EntrepreneurialClassroom. Journal of Management Education. Vol. 40 Issue 2, p152-169.Katz, J. A.; Harshman, E. F.; Dean, K. L (2000). Nondisclosure Agreements in the Classroom: AStudent Entrepreneur's Refuge or Risk? Journal of Management Education, Vol

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan R. Peterfreund, SageFox Consulting Group; Emanuel Costache, SageFox Consulting Group; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University & SKG Analysis; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

can potentially engage their undergraduate students. Our study was aimed at gaining a perspective on the current status of offerings and the relative importance of I&E from both highly and less engaged members of the ASEE community. Drawing on the work of Byers et al. on the role of of I&E in engineering education4 and Shartrand et al.’s work on the nature of entrepreneurship programs,5 we established a baseline of current student engagement in I&E across curricular and extra-curricular offerings as well as a desired level of what the ideal levels of student engagement ought to be. 3. What are the practices and institutional factors that promote or inhibit implementation of I&E

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Rees Sattele, Ohio State University; Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University; Kadri Akinola Akanni Parris, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

). Students use knowledge of MATLAB taught in the lectureportion of the course to design a game. Students choose one or more games from a provided listto design or invent their own. Each game carried a point value and students could exceed thepoint requirements for extra credit. Students then conducted two user interviews to determinerequirements for the game and created a team working agreement. Before coding began, studentscreated a flowchart, algorithm, or pseudocode draft. Students then coded their chosen game(s).Additionally, students created a project notebook including a project schedule, business plan,advertisement, and project pitch video. Software documentation was also prepared including auser manual. Students were given multiple class

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Teaming and Collaboration

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University; Mona Eskandari, Stanford University; Akshit Aggarwal, Stanford University; Felipe Pincheira, Stanford University; Rebecca Rose Krauthamer; Gregory Kress, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. Page 25.1011.11[13] Goleman, D. What Makes A Leader? Harvard Business Review, 2004.???-1-4244-1970-8/08/$25.00 ©2012 ASEE/IEEE June, 2012, San-Antonio, TX 40th ASEE/IEEE Session ???[14] Baum, J., Locke, E. & Kirkpatrick, S. 1998.A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83. 43-54.[15] McClelland, D., Power: The Inner Experience. Van Nostrand: New York, 1964.[16] McClelland, D., Human Motivation. Van Nostrand: New York, 1987.[17} Stefik, M. & Stefik, B. 2004

Conference Session

Case Studies in Entrepreneurship

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Schar, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Stanford University; Mark Cuson; Michelle Marie Grau, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Education; 2012 Jun p. 77.4. Duval-Couetil N, Reed-Rhoads T, Haghighi S. Engineering Students and Entrepreneurship Education: Involvement, Attitudes and Outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2012;28(2):425.5. Neck HM, Greene PG. Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management. 2011;49(1):55–70.6. Rippin A, Booth C, Bowie S, Jordan J. A Complex Case: Using the case study method to explore uncertainty and ambiguity in undergraduate business education. Teaching in Higher Education. 2002;7(4):429–41.7. Banning KC. The effect of the case method on tolerance for ambiguity. Journal of Management Education. 2003;27(5):556–67.8. Practice C on D in the S