Paper ID #12240Revitalizing the Chemical Engineering Senior Design Experience: Empower-ment, Entrepreneurship, and a Flipped Classroom ExperienceDr. Andrew Tadd, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan Andrew Tadd earned a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Michigan in 2006. After graduation, he remained at the University as a Postdoctoral Fellow, continuing research work on cata- lysts for hydrocarbon reforming and hydrogen production. In November of 2007 he officially joined the Department of Chemical Engineering’s staff when he was appointed as an Assistant Research Scientist. He holds
DetroitMercy in response to the need for introducing the entrepreneurial mindset to engineeringstudents at a very early stage. The course is required of all undergraduate students in MechanicalEngineering, Electrical Engineering and Robotics/Mechatronic Systems Engineering. Thecourse is centered on a recently developed commercial technology where the students are taskedwith analyzing that technology and associated intellectual property. They are then tasked withproposing ventures in other markets using that technology and to do so in business terms.Assessment results indicate an increased level of self-confidence and self-efficacy in relation todeveloping and presenting product ideas. The balance between technical and business contentwas brought into
Paper ID #14745WORK IN PROGRESS: K8—The Future of Engineering EntrepreneurshipMr. Mike Thomas Pitcher, University of Texas - El Paso Mike Pitcher is the Director of Academic Technologies at the University of Texas at El Paso. He has had experience in learning in both a traditional university program as well as the new online learning model, which he utilizes in his current position consulting with faculty about the design of new learning experiences. His experience in technology and teaching started in 1993 as a student lab technician and has continued to expand and grow over the years, both technically as well as
business environment whereconsumers have changing needs, engineers need to be able to think creatively to meet thoseneeds. Thus, it is both the goal and the challenge for engineering students and educators alike tobuild creativity into the front end of teaching endeavors, research endeavors, and professionalendeavors. Few engineering endeavors are done without the idea of a cost-benefit analysis, whichbusinesses utilize to determine if they will make profits enough to start, innovate, and sustainproduction. Engineers of the 21st century thus need to realize that they need to think beyond justthe technology involved in a product or service. They need to be able to provide this product orservice at a price/value that would be acceptable to a
. Page 25.581.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Factors Related To Entrepreneurial Knowledge in the Engineering Curriculum Page 25.581.2Given changes in the global economy, innovative, entrepreneurial engineers are in high demand.As a result, entrepreneurship has become one of the fastest growing academic areas inengineering. Yet, we know little about what engineering students actually know regardingentrepreneurship in engineering. To address this issue, we devised a multi-institution pilot studyusing the Entrepreneurship Knowledge Inventory (EKI), a tool that measures students’familiarity with common technology entrepreneurship
sequence of two courses during the following academic year. The Silicon Valley programincludes living in the homes of entrepreneurs and interviews with financers, founders andCEO’s. During the academic year, students participate in a course taught jointly by the Collegesof Business and Engineering and work on interdisciplinary teams to prepare both prototypes andbusiness plans for their own entrepreneurial ideas. At end of the year each team competes in theWSU Business Plan Competition. The other parts of the program are an annual entrepreneurshipworkshop for graduate students and an elective course entitled, “Technology Ventures.”IntroductionIn December of 2003 with funding from Mr. Harold Frank, a 1948 Electrical Engineeringalumnus and founder
Paper ID #20062Ecosystems of Entrepreneurship in Canadian Engineering Faculties: A Sys-tematic MapMr. Majed Jarrar, University of Ottawa Majed Jarrar is a PhD candidate in e-Business at the University of Ottawa, and he teaches Technology Entrepreneurship for Engineers and Computer Scientists at the Faculty of Engineering, University of Ottawa. His research interests revolve around the impact of entrepreneurship on engineering education. He obtained his MASc in Electrical Engineering and B.Sc. in Electronics Engineering from the University of Ottawa, and the American University in Cairo, respectively.Dr. Hanan Anis
(Technological Advances in Science, Medicine, and Engineering, Toronto, Canada), Academic Member and the Unit Head, Electrical Engineering, ATINER (Athens Institute for Education and Research, Athens, Greece). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Experiential and Interactive Learning in Engineering Innovation and Entrepreneurship Program Bala Maheswaran College of Engineering Northeastern UniversityAbstractThe paper will highlight a successful faculty-led program that was run in San Jose, California forthe past three years to
regarding operations of engineering corporations andtheir paths to entrepreneurial success. Students were required to present in teams on a newbusiness idea related to the assigned engineering project of the course. Student learning was alsoassessed through surveys on the impact and effectiveness of integrating the entrepreneurshipcomponent into the first-year engineering class.IntroductionToday, numerous technology companies established by engineers are leading innovation andeconomic growth of the nation, which simultaneously strengthens the global economicleadership of the U.S. in science and engineering. However, many developing nations arerapidly developing their work forces in high tech fields and gaining comparative advantage inscience and
University of Tennessee was initiated in fall 2001with a focus to provide students in Engineering with skills and knowledge of businessfocused towards new product development. National Science Foundation (NSF) providedfunding for the program from 2005 to 2008 which helped enhance the program and led todevelopment of several prototype products and commercialization of one the productsSafelightTM. The program has graduated more than 25 joint MS/MBA students so far withthe number growing every year. The graduates have a double set of skills:enterpreneurship and business skills along with the advanced engineering skills needed tobecome leaders in innovative science and technology. The faculty associated with theprogram, who had limited previous
AssessmentAbstractCapstone engineering design courses play pivotal roles in development of engineering students’professional skills needed for innovation in a globally-competitive technological world. Thispaper describes a two-semester course sequence, jointly taught by faculty in engineering andentrepreneurial studies, that integrates engineering design and business development. Courseoutcomes are defined based on research that established four performance areas addressingstudent and solution development in capstone design courses: personal capacity, team processes,solution requirements, and solution assets. Performance criteria for each area establishdefinitions of desired student achievement in each area and form the basis for assessment ofoutcomes for the
publications include over 90 journal and conference papers. His edited book on metal foam, November 2012, is the most recent book about metal foams including their production, characterization and applications. His research has been supported by Ford Motor Company, NASA, National Science Foundation, United Technologies and DENSO North Amer- ica. Dr. Dukhan earned his Ph.D. in 1996 in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Toledo, and has worked for the industry for 4 years. He is the recipient of the University of Detroit Mercy’s Faculty Achievement Award for 2011.Prof. Nassif E Rayess, University of Detroit Mercy
Paper ID #32832Developing Intrapreneurship in the Next Generation of EngineeringInnovators and LeadersDr. Tim Dallas P.E., Texas Tech University Tim Dallas is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Texas Tech University. Dr. Dal- las’ research includes developing educational technologies for deployment to under-served regions of the world. His research group has developed MEMS-based educational technologies that have been com- mercialized, expanding dissemination. He has served as an Associate Editor of IEEE Transactions on Education. Dr. Dallas received the B.A. degree in Physics from the University of
board process engineering, printed electronics, applications of RFID technologies and manufacturing engineering pedagogy. Through his research, Dr. Wells has supervised the completion of twelve graduate degrees in the past six years. His publication history includes nearly seventy print publications and over forty invited presentations. He has addressed professional audiences in Ukraine, Japan, India, Brazil, Peru, Mexico and Canada, as well as in many United States venues. For many years, he has been active in the national leadership of Society of Manufacturing Engineers, American Society for Engineering Education, and ABET. Over the past twenty-six years, he has been a
gasification, and wind turbine reliability/optimization. Previous to Taylor, Don was at Dow Corning Corporation for 16 years as a technology leader, project leader, and Expertise Center Leader in the R&D of processes and products for silicon containing materials. Don is currently a consultant for university-industry partnerships, grantsmanship, research development, partnership development, engi- neering, project management, and science education. Don received his PhD and MS in Chemical Engi- neering at Northwestern University and his BS in Chemical Engineering at Purdue University.Dr. Hank D. Voss, Taylor University Dr. Hank D. Voss received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Illinois in 1977.He then
Paper ID #15994Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration and Innovation for Engineering and Busi-ness Student TeamsDavid G. Alexander Ph.D., California State University - Chico Dr. Alexander’s research interests and areas of expertise are in teaching pedagogy, capstone design, renewable energy systems, thermal sciences, vehicle system modeling and simulation, heat transfer, new product development, entrepreneurship, and technology transfer. He is PI and adviser of the Department of Energy Collegiate Wind Competition 2016. He is also working on an undergraduate research project modeling solar cells using a thermodynamics approach and
the professional level of SAE, serving as a Director on the SAE Board of Directors (term, 2007-2010), a past Director of the Publications Board, and Past-Chair of the Engineering Education Board. He is also active in numerous committees. Greg joined the faculty at Kettering after serving on the faculties of the U.S. Naval Academy and Lawrence Technological University. He received his doctorate in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan in 1991. Prior to this, he worked as an engineer for both the automotive and electric utility industries. Dr. Davis is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Michigan.Craig J. Hoff, Kettering University Dr. Craig J. Hoff is a Professor of Mechanical
universities and amajor professional society. Libraries are transdisciplinary spaces that promote interaction andcollaboration. We are exploring ways to tap into this interest – including a follow on panel composedentirely of student and recent graduate entrepreneurs alongside speakers from corporations, andcompetitions that exercise entrepreneurial thinking.PITCH CompetitionDuring a one month period in the academic quarter following the panel discussion, Drexel UniversityLibraries and the College of Engineering jointly-hosted a blended online competition for students to craftideas for new technology-driven startups. The goal was to engage students across disciplines in thesimulated entrepreneurial experience of pitching an idea in a mock “Series A
. IntroductionResearch in engineering education over the past 15 years has shown that US undergraduateengineering student enrollment in decline while the demand for qualified engineering graduatesis expected to increase1. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) predicts a 22% growth injobs for fields related to Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) between2004 and 2014 (U. S. Department of Labor, 2005)2. It revealed that fewer than 40 % of studentswho enter college intending to major in a STEM field complete college with a STEM degreetoday3. The engineering graduation rate is even lower for Texas Higher Education institutions4.Research by ACT indicates that fewer than one in five 12th graders have both high interest inSTEM and high
encouraged across an increasinglywide range of disciplines, the approach to teaching entrepreneurship has not been standardized.There are a number of competing perspectives regarding the most effective curriculum forteaching entrepreneurship. To make the matter even more complex, these perspectives differfrom school to school (e.g., from the business school to the engineering school) and also fromstudent level to student level (e.g., from undergraduate student to graduate student).1Business schools were the initial locus for entrepreneurship education, although a fewengineering programs such as the one at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology can laylegitimate claim to being pioneers of the genre. Still, it is not in dispute that
research consulting firm. Her expertise and interests focus on education and workforce development in engineering and science fields. Previous and current clients include the American Chemical Society, the Anita Borg Institute for Women and Technology, California Institute of Technology, the College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics at California State University Fullerton, the Office of the Vice Provost for Graduate Education at Stanford University, the School of Medicine at Stanford University, and the School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Analyzing Innovative Behavior Outcomes of Early
Paper ID #16542The Shark Tank Experience: How Engineering Students Learn to BecomeEntrepreneursDr. Tobias Haertel, TU Dortmund University Tobias Haertel studied social sciences and put his research focus on science and technology studies as well as creativity in higher engineering education. In his work, he always tries to combine the depth and sophisticated spirit of the analogue world with the interconnectedness and usability of digital techniques.Mr. Claudius Terkowsky, TU Dortmund University Since 2009, he is senior researcher, lecturer and trainer in higher engineering education. Since 2012, he is scientific lead of
perspectivesand actions evidenced by their teammates caused students to actively reflect and view thesituation in a new light. As an example, Ivan (an industrial engineer) described how electricalengineering students assisted him in achieving a new understanding of the project technology,which aided innovation. Everything in this project was something that none of us had done before, regardless of major or experience. Another thing that was innovative was all of us got to work with each other at some level. I worked with EE's and I learned from them how they design solar panel arrangements and how they use some of their power generation formulas and how they store energy in some of their battery systems. And I got to work
Page 14.76.10they enjoyed the class and applied many of the skills that they had learned in the courseto their term project. Pre- and post-course assessments indicated that the students’confidence in their ability to create new products and services had significantly improvedin the case of several students as a result of taking the class. Most of the students whotook this class are now continuing in the engineering entrepreneurship minor program.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Kern Family Foundation. Theauthors are also grateful to Mr. Gerry Mayer for hosting the tour to Lockheed MartinCorporation’s Advanced Technology Laboratory.References[1] P.Singh, E.J. Dougherty, W. Hurley, and J. Klingler, “A Novel
products continues to increase;providing additional motivations for including entrepreneurial training in highereducation. As a result, entrepreneurship education has spread laterally to non-businessdisciplines such as engineering, technology, science, and arts [10]. This expansion has ledto an evolution of entrepreneurship education from the business school model of venturecreation to focus on developing skills in graduates that foster innovation in their careerpursuits which may or may not involve self-employment [11]. Particularly inengineering, several curricular and co-curricular entrepreneurship programs have beeninitiated which typically use student-centered, experiential learning approaches to impartcontent knowledge and more importantly
Paper ID #13460Opportunity Thinktank: Laying a foundation for the entrepreneurially mindedengineerProf. Robert Gettens, Western New England University Rob Gettens is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering and the Director of the First Year Engineering Program at Western New England University.Prof. Jose Antonio Riofrio, Western New England University Jos´e A Riofr´ıo received his B.S. in Engineering Physics from Elizabethtown College in 2003, and his M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Vanderbilt University in 2005 and 2008, respectively. At Vanderbilt, Jos´e focused his research in controls
Paper ID #34692Using Rapid Prototyping to Realize Design: Mindset and EngineeringSelf-EfficacyDr. Andrea T. Kwaczala, Western New England University Andrea Kwaczala is an assistant professor at Western New England University in the biomedical engineer- ing department. She teaches Biomechanics, Biomedical Engineering Laboratory Courses, Senior Design and Prosthetic and Orthotic Design. She focuses on hands-on labs centered on student engagement and project based learning. She works in collaboration with Shriners Hospitals for Children where her re- search focuses in the design of assistive technologies to help people with
– innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nathalie Duval-Couetil is the Director of the Certificate in Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program, Associate Director of the Burton D. Morgan Center, and an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation at Purdue University. She is responsible for the launch and devel- opment of the university’s multidisciplinary undergraduate entrepreneurship program, which has involved over 5000 students from all majors since 2005. She has established entrepreneurship capstone, global en
roboticdesign projects. While in the second semester, entrepreneurial mindset materials wasincorporated in a smart design project emphasizing seeking opportunities using brainstorming,accessing market interest, accessing technical feasibility, designing for manufacturability, andproviding a cost analysis of an eventual finalized product.A semester-long freshman engineering design course [8] was developed from scratch to coverthe entrepreneurial topics including opportunity recognition and value proposition, understandingintellectual property, ideation and concept generation, customer discovery, pro-forma financials;manufacturing considerations in product design, technology roadmapping, understanding returnon investment and venture creation within and
University of Tennessee,Knoxville. Cornell Engineering offers a more in-depth program starting with an Introduction toEntrepreneurship for Engineers course at the sophomore level. The minor requires 18 credits andincludes courses on Ethics, History of Capitalism and Technology, Accounting and Finance,Ideation and Design Thinking and a capstone entrepreneurship project. An experiential learningexperience through a summer internship or coop program is encouraged but not required.The engineering entrepreneurship minor at the University of Virginia is comprised of threerequired courses and one elective. The three required courses are Business Fundamentals,Engineers as Entrepreneurs, and Entrepreneurial Finance. An elective course is also requiredwhich