technological entrepreneurship programs. The innovationprocess is significantly improved and made more robust by adopting a SE mindset early in thetimeline. If SE concepts that work so well in engineering are applied to the innovation process,the quality of the innovation and likelihood of success are improved by significant orders ofmagnitude. For example potential investors will look more favorably on a product concept thathas a lifecycle design effort put into the initial model. This leads to a more mature productdevelopment process that is less likely to run into development troubles. Therefore the investorswill see a more desirable opportunity and the entrepreneur significantly improves the probabilityof entrepreneurial success.Goals of the
, experiential entrepreneurship program, wasconducted at Western New England University. Twenty-six participants were surveyedbefore and after the program in order to determine the impact of the program in terms ofseveral entrepreneurial skills and mindsets including idea generation, pitching an idea,idea selection, primary and secondary consumer research, engaging customers,prototype fabrication and engaging potential business partners. Students from theUniversity’s Colleges of Arts and Sciences, Business, Pharmacy and Engineeringparticipated in the event with approximately one-half of the participating students beingengineers. Students ranged from first year engineering students up to Pharm. D.candidates. The 3DS program was run in coordination with
(KernEntrepreneurial Engineering Network) philosophy there is momentum to push engineeringeducation further by fostering an entrepreneurial mindset in young engineers. At Western NewEngland University the first year engineering program has been revamped using a combinationof elements including entrepreneurially minded learning (EML), Problem Based Learning (PBL),Active Collaborative Learning (ACL) and a design framework based on the "living with the lab"program developed at Louisiana Tech University.The First Year Engineering program at Western New England University spans four commoncourses for all engineering majors. This work focuses on two courses, the Introduction toEngineering course, a four credit course offered in the first semester and the Data
Engineering institute for technology entrepreneurshipand innovation, we believe that a firm grasp of the entrepreneurial process and mindset benefitsevery person engaged in developing new ideas. Our core goal of the Entrepreneurship andInnovation Program is to infuse freshmen and sophomore students with that knowledge and itsaccompanying skills. Armed with an entrepreneurial mindset, Entrepreneurship and InnovationProgram students and alumni can drive economic growth by launching successful venturesand/or joining innovative companies to bring life-changing products and services to market. Page 15.365.2BackgroundThe University of Maryland is a
. Prior to joining Rose-Hulman, he was a company co-founder and Chief Operating Officer of Montronix, a company in the global machine monitoring industry. Bill is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Illinois College and a Bronze Tablet graduate of University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign where he received a Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering.Dr. Doug E. Melton, Kern Family Foundation Dr. Douglas Melton is a program director for the Kern Family Foundation and works with the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) which has partner institutions who are developing educa- tional experiences to foster an entrepreneurial mindset in their undergraduate engineering students. Doug Melton served as a faculty member for
undergraduate curriculum. We propose that a more clearand concrete demonstration of the alignment of entrepreneurship education outcomes and ABETCriterion 3a-k, which involve both technical and non-technical skills, would catalyze theintegration of the entrepreneurial skills and knowledge into engineering courses. Furthermore,direct assessment of entrepreneurial outcomes could aid in improving the mechanisms ofachieving both ABET accreditation and the development of an entrepreneurial mindset amongengineering students.IntroductionIn recent years, the value of entrepreneurial skills and an entrepreneurial mindset tocontemporary college graduates has been well documented. Global economic and workforcetrends have driven the need for engineering students
ambiguity in the definition of entrepreneurship isappropriate, as different markets, contexts, businesses, and ventures spawn unique problems thatrequire creative thinking and the innovative use of skills. One entrepreneur’s specific skills andinsights may be highly valuable and relevant in one scenario and inappropriate in another. Teaching students to develop the entrepreneurial mindset can also be challenging sincethe associated skills are not completely agreed upon in the academic literature. The goal of thisstudy is not to provide a definitive definition of entrepreneurship or a complete list of theentrepreneurial skills that are needed to be successful, but to examine instructors and students’definitions of entrepreneurship in order to
on-going grantsawarded to Baylor’s School of ECS to encourage the inclusion of the entrepreneurial mindset intotraditional ECS courses.The spring 2015 seminars focused on the Five Elements of Effective Thinking (based on the bookby the same name by Ed Burger and Mike Starbird) [10]. Included topics: • Understanding simple things deeply • Failing to Succeed, or how to welcome accidental missteps • Creating your own questions (how to create questions and actively listen) • Looking Back, Looking Forward (understanding current ideas through the flow of ideas, creating new ideas from old) • Engaging ChangeFor these seminars, we again opened attendance to other academic units and purchased books forthe participants.2015
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Developing a Direct Assessment for Measuring Students’ Ability to Make ConnectionsAbstractThe integration of entrepreneurial minded learning (EML) into engineering courses to developstudents’ entrepreneurial mindset (EM) is growing in popularity through efforts such as the KernEntrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN). As the integration of EML occurs, it is importantto assess students’ development of an EM to inform the efficacy of course changes. FollowingKEEN’s definition, we operationalize EM as the ability to create value, make connections, andbe curious. While we acknowledge the importance of all aspects of EML, in this full paper, wefocus on assessing students
was expanded into a more elaborate semester-long project that addedmakerspace visits and an essay where students reflected upon the opportunities these spacesmight offer to cultivate an entrepreneurial mindset. Student surveys captured attitudes about theproject and the university making facilities, and indicated that a large majority of the studentswere more likely to use the making facilities in the future because of the semester project.Student reflective essays also indicated that the students believed that making spaces addedenormous value to the university and supported cultivation of the entrepreneurial mindset,specifically promoting curiosity, making connections, and creating value.The “Teams Teaching Engineering” project may provide
allow for significant traction in the realization of a cohesiveset of resources - what we refer to as an integrated Innovation and Entrepreneurship (I&E)Ecosystem. The goals of our integrated ecosystem include the creation of cohesive learningenvironments, programs, and services that better engage students, faculty and staff in a)developing an innovation and entrepreneurial mindset, b) creating a bridge across academic unitsand the community at-large to foster collaboration, and c) connecting student innovators andentrepreneurs with resource networks that enable outcomes related to startup business executionand market entry for new innovative products.Through this paper we share our grass roots journey to creating an I&E Ecosystem on
regarding operations of engineering corporations andtheir paths to entrepreneurial success. Students were required to present in teams on a newbusiness idea related to the assigned engineering project of the course. Student learning was alsoassessed through surveys on the impact and effectiveness of integrating the entrepreneurshipcomponent into the first-year engineering class.IntroductionToday, numerous technology companies established by engineers are leading innovation andeconomic growth of the nation, which simultaneously strengthens the global economicleadership of the U.S. in science and engineering. However, many developing nations arerapidly developing their work forces in high tech fields and gaining comparative advantage inscience and
phase into the semi-final and the final rounds of our elevator pitch competition forengineering students.BackgroundThe Capstone Design experience is the culmination of the engineering educational experience.Several authors have identified that the senior design project is the perfect opportunity to applyentrepreneurship skills and further develop the entrepreneurial mindset ([1], [2], [3]). Whilemany definitions of entrepreneurial mindset persist, many authors include communication skillsas one of the specific skills relevant in acquiring an entrepreneurial mindset ([4], [5], [6]) [7]).ABET student outcome #3 also focuses on "an ability to communicate effectively with a range ofaudiences" [8]. These specific outcomes are typically met with
’ entrepreneurial mindset. Purzer, Fila and Nataraja provide a review of assessment methods in engineeringentrepreneurship education [2]. Most studies on the general assessment of an entrepreneurialmindset (EM) have been based on personality instruments that were not specifically designed toassess EM. An extensive literature review and a new measure of EM—the EntrepreneurialMindset Profile—is presented by Davis, Hall and Mayer [3]. A survey instrument to assess EMspecifically tailored around the KEEN Framework was developed by Li, et al. [4] andBrunhaver, et al. [5]. These types assessments of EM are indirect measures based on surveyinstruments. If these are to be used to assess EM growth resulting from curricular or co-curricular intervention, then
integrated as guest speakers, mentors, or providers of projects andinternship experiences.9Gilmartin et al. explain that skills fostered as part of entrepreneurship programs include, “…business understanding, an entrepreneurial mindset, understanding of technologycommercialization, and/or leadership ability; some also emphasize venture creation” (p. 1).10Both Ohland et al. and Gilmartin et al. capture the importance of learning by doing, or anexperiential approach. This type of active learning maximizes student self-efficacy and alsoboosts critical thinking, retention of information and persistence with the major. 4,7,11 The level ofself-efficacy and engagement with the material is further enhanced when students are able to becreative and build a
Paper ID #8741The Framework on Innovative EngineeringDr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is the recipient of three NSF awards supporting research in engineering education and a Research Associate at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University and Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology. His research interests include engineering innovativeness, entrepreneurial engineering, teamwork, mindset changes and learning strategies of
infusion of innovation and entrepreneurship (I&E) into undergraduateengineering education.1 Epicenter’s mission is to develop programs and initiatives thatempower U.S. undergraduate engineering students to bring their ideas to life for the benefit ofour economy and society. To do this, Epicenter helps undergraduate engineers connect theirtechnical skills with the ability to develop innovative technologies that solve importantproblems, while fostering an entrepreneurial mindset and skillset. Epicenter’s three coreinitiatives focus on students, faculty, and research.Students: The University Innovation Fellows ProgramThe University Innovation Fellows (UIF) program for undergraduate engineering students andtheir peers gives students the training
skills.Regarding practice of customer discovery skills through interviews, students identified four areasin which they desired additional improvement: (a) formulating the right question, (b) contactidentification within the market, (c) guiding discussion for useful customer feedback, and (d)interview presence. This paper provides valuable information for institutions interested inpursuing an I-Corps Site grant and to those who already have a grant but are looking foradditional ways to further enhance program impact on their campus.I. IntroductionIn today’s global market economy, equipping engineering students with a broader set of skillsassociated with an entrepreneurial mindset will empower them to create value for the companiesthey join or their own
), entrepreneurial mindset, and evidence-based entrepreneurshippractices.To address sustainability, a teaching module was created that demonstrates the use of severalsustainability tools (ex. whole system design and life cycle thinking) and reasons to considerthem. These were introduced in the context of the engineering design process. Part of the ABETdefinition [2] of engineering design includes “... examples of possible constraints include …sustainability…”. The goal of this approach is to include sustainability as a constraint right nextto manufacturability, usability, cost, etc. so students see it as just another thing they need toconsider and not an extra requirement of sorts. This module was initially delivered inEngineering Seminar in fall 2018 as a
entrepreneurial mindsetin graduating engineers.2The learning outcomes reinforced by the capstone design projects cannot be divorced from thecontext of the course itself. For example, a course in which engineering students from a singlediscipline working on a discipline-specific project would prove difficult to satisfy and properlyassess the learning outcome an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (ABET outcomed1). The work outlined in this article was borne out of a search for a better context for thecapstone design experience. The search for a better context in which to naturally foster anentrepreneurial mindset in engineering students led the authors to propose the intercollegiate (theterm intercollegiate is intended to mean multi-university
Engineering Network (KEEN) and provided by the University of New Haven(UNH), a KEEN partner institution. KEEN promotes engineering education by fostering anentrepreneurial mindset in students: “… beginning with curiosity about our changing world,integrating information from various resources to gain insight, and identifying unexpectedopportunities to create value. An engineer equipped with an entrepreneurial mindset is able tocreate extraordinary value within any type of organization. KEEN schools identify, nurture, anddevelop entrepreneurially minded engineers who will contribute to our national economicprosperity and secure individual fulfillment through a lifetime of meaningful work.”(engineeringunleashed.com)The UNH KEEN modules are intended to
developed and delivered by the Colleges of Engineering, Business and AgriculturalSciences at Colorado State University. The overarching goals of the STESE course were two-fold: (1) to instill an entrepreneurial mindset and global/sustainable perspective amongengineering and science students and (2) to provide technical expertise and rapid productrealization resources to student teams within the Global Social Sustainable Enterprise (GSSE)program housed in the College of Business. The motivation behind the first goal was to addressa deficiency of adequate entrepreneurship training opportunities for graduate students withinengineering and agricultural sciences at CSU. The motivation behind the second goal was toaddress a critical shortage of
HHDN will transform and sustain a culture of entrepreneurial-mindedness that originateswithin its member institutions and propagates to industry and corporate America through activeand collaborative cooperation between its member universities and local, national, and globalindustries.To that end, the HHDN will create, validate, and widely share a new, sustainable, educationalmodel that impacts every student producing entrepreneurially-minded engineers with a servantleader mindset by: Creating mutual value for students and clients through innovative multi-disciplinary intrapreneurial engagements, positively impacting the American economy in the process Demonstrating voluntary social responsibility through a focus on
ways. First, cards were sought foreach full participant, and their presence or absence was noted. Second, the presence of outcomesrelated to the physical creation of a prototype were tallied. Finally, the text description of theclass activity was read for activities related to making and then grouped according to emergentthemes. For comparison,10 randomly selected “Exemplar” Cards by faculty who have notattended these workshops were subject to the same analysis. Exemplar cards are a subset ofthose published on the website judged by website curators to be of exceptionally high quality interms of writing, pedagogy, and expression of entrepreneurial-mindset and representing a widevariety of disciplines, projects, and approaches. These were
that while entrepreneurship may involveventure creation, it is also the demonstration of a particular set of skills, knowledge and behaviorsused to identify and develop new opportunities. As Kuratko (2005) explains, “the characteristicsof seeking opportunities, taking risks beyond security, and having the tenacity to push an ideathrough to reality combine into a special perspective that permeates entrepreneurs” (p. 578).This paradigm shift in the conceptualization of entrepreneurship from an innate characteristic to adevelopable skillset, has led to the creation of several entrepreneurship education programs inmultiple institutions to impart entrepreneurial knowledge, instill entrepreneurial skills, anddevelop entrepreneurial mindset in
of thetotal course grade, are highlighted in figure 3. Page 24.864.7Figure 3. Assignments Weekly Assignments LinkedIn Profile 5% Innovation Fundamentals 5% Entrepreneurial Mindset 5% Entrepreneurial Motivations & Behaviors 5% Risk Profile 5% Industry Analysis 5% Competitive Analysis 5% Customer Analysis
transformational and progressive entrepreneurial ecosystem within theuniversity environment is essential to foster, support, develop, and commercialize newtechnologies2. Such an ecosystem across the UT System could help to change academic mindsetsand cultures an also result in higher competiveness in global markets, increased external fundingvia follow-up research dollars, enhanced educational environment for students and faculty,increased marketability of UT graduates, and greater financial returns to the university viatechnology commercialization.The UT System campuses individually face these challenges of commercializing thetechnologies they develop but, with the possible exception of the System’s flagship university atAustin, they lack the critical
, as well as students’ non-technical skills, skillsthat may or may not be a part of their technical coursework [3], [4], [5], [6]. While Simmons et al do not list the development of an entrepreneurial mindset (EM), anengineering competition is potentially a rich environment in which students can acquire EM. Forexample, the ASME Human-Powered Vehicle Challenge describes the nature of the challenge inthis way: Human-powered transport is often the only type available in underdeveloped or inaccessible parts of the world, and if well designed, can be an increasingly viable form of sustainable transportation. ASME's international Human Powered Vehicle Challenge (HPVC) provides an opportunity for students to demonstrate the
. To teach the concept of pivot, we had all students stand up and thenrotate themselves 180 degrees and list what they saw. For design thinking, we had them draw andhad each of them draw prototypes in real time while we gave prompts.Every session had an interactive component. We attempted not to lecture for too long. For thenegotiation session, we had them in groups of 2 and they had to negotiate as per the case. Table 1. Topics covered in the MOOC course Week Course description 1 Entrepreneurial Mindset 2 Pitch an idea – Identify the problem to be solved 3 Circular Design thinking 4 Understanding how to get effective customer feedback (using Lean Launchpad
assessment plan are potentially valuable for those who are considering running similarcommunication, teamwork and problem solving workshops, as this paper overviews both theactivities within the academy and the potential value that they have to communication, teamworkand problem solving related outcomes.BackgroundThis section will overview the objectives of the KEEN Entrepreneurial Mindset grant, how theLeadership Academy activities fit within those objectives, and how the objectives of theacademy align with other work in engineering education and entrepreneurship. Page 26.264.3Entrepreneurial mindsetAccording to Kriewall and Mekemson7 , the