-Couetil, N., Dyrenfurth, M., Teaching students to be technology innovators:Examininng approaches and identifying competencies. ASEE 2012, San Antonio, TX.[3] Steuer-Dankert, L., Gilmartin, S., Muller, C., Dungs, C., Sheppard, S., Leicht-Scholten, Ca.,“Expanding Engineering Limits—A Concept for Socially Responsible Education of Engineers,”International Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 1–16, 2019.[4] Brunhaver, SR, RF Korte, SR Barley, and SD Sheppard. April 13, 2018. Bridging the Gapsbetween Engineering Education and Practice. In R. Freeman, and H. Salzman (eds.), U.S.Engineering in the Global Economy, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.[5] Gilmartin, SK, AA Antonio, HL Chen, SR Brunhaver, and SD Sheppard. April 13
persona of-fers a metaphor for understanding impact. How is a persona different from a stereotype? Willa stereotype inform a persona? Applying the similarities and differences of a persona and astereotype has concrete classroom use with potential for amplifying understanding of inter-personal perceptions. The gendered findings in the study indicate there is a relational qualityto interpersonal perceptions of gender. Therefore, who and how we pay attention to others isimportant. The attention that is given to women and men in the classroom, women and menon internships, and women and men in male-dominated work environments is worthwhile.References[1] Lee, H., Choi, J., and Kim, S. “Does gender diversity help teams manage status conflict?An
(91)90020-TAjzen, I. (2002), Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-83.Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749- 5978(91)90022-LBoyd, N. G., & Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The Influence of Self-Efficacy on the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 18(4), 63- 77.Call, B. J., Goodridge, W. H., & Scheaffer, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial curriculum in an Engineering Technical Communication course: Looking for impact
practicing engineers – to become the creative, innovative, and entre-/intrapreneurialthinkers and doers of the 21st century (Sheppard et al. 2015).2. ACTIVITIES, INITIATIVES, AND PROGRAMSEngineering education at the University of Ottawa goes back to the 1870’s (Hallett 2011). It tookmore than a century before the introduction of a formal option in engineering management intothe undergraduate programs of studies in engineering. This was followed in 1980 by theestablishment of a certificate in engineering management offered as a 5th year of business andmanagement courses following the undergraduate degree in engineering. A graduate diplomaprogram in engineering management was created in 1981 and this program later (1989) evolvedinto the current
). “Deutsche Universitäten im Epochenwandel 1500–1900,“ UNIVERSITÄTS-REDEN, vol. 147, 21-28.[5] Picht, G. (1965): “Die deutsche Bildungskatastrophe,“ München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.[6] Koppel, O. (2014): “2014: Ingenieure auf einen Blick. Erwerbstätigkeit, Migration, Regionale Zentren,“ Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V. Düsseldorf.[7] Gassmann, O. & Friesike, S. (2012): “33 Erfolgsprinzipien der Innovation,“ München: Hanser.[8] Helper, S. (2000): “Economists and Field Research: ‘You Can Observe a Lot Just by Watching’,” In: The American Economic Review 90 (2), S. 228-232. DOI: 10.1257/aer.90.2.228[9] Leonard, D. & Rayport, J.F. (1997): “Spark innovation through empathic design,” In: Harvard Business
team re-designed each of these three major coursedeliverables, with the goal of fostering an Entrepreneurial Mindset in students and leveragingsynergies between the Entrepreneurial Mindset and the existing goals of the course (engineeringdesign and technical communication). In particular, the faculty team created a new linkagebetween the research sequence and the humanities assignment. The new research sequence isbuilt around the U.N.’s Sustainable Development Goals; each student chooses one of the goals toexplore through their individual rhetorical analysis, annotated bibliography, and literaturereview. The humanities assignment is a team project in which students explore solutions tosustainability problems on the campus of Rowan University
-Couetil, N., Reed-Rhoads, T., & Haghighi, S. (2012). Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes, and outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 425-435. 11. Duval-Couetil, N., Reed-Rhoads, T. & Haghighi, S. (2011). Investigating the impact of entrepreneurship education on engineering students. Paper presented at the NCIAA Conference, Washington D.C. 12. Zimmerman, J. (2008). Refining the Definition of Entrepreneurship. (Doctoral Dissertation). UMI Dissertation Publishing 13. Martin, R.L. & Osbrg, S. (2007). Social Entrepreneurship: The Case Definition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Social
already started the process to implement Page 14.653.11the Graduate Certificate in Technology Entrepreneurship at Texas Tech University. We hope tohave this certificate fully implemented by the fall semester of 2010.References1. Texas Tech University, Office of Official Publications. (2007). Undergraduate and Graduate TTU Catalog 2007- 08.2. Drucker, P.R. (1985). “Innovation and entrepreneurship” New York: Harper & Row.3. Solomon, G.T., S. Duffy and A. Tarabishy (2002). “The state of entrepreneurship education in the United States: A nationwide survey and analysis”. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, (1
abachelor’s degree program titled “Technology and Business Development,” which the framerspurposely designed as entrepreneurial type program that matched the role and scope of theuniversity as well as a program that did not directly compete with the business administrationprograms offered at the neighboring state funded campuses. The business department wasn’tparticularly fond of the name of the new business program and in the late 1990’s the opportunitypresented itself to change the business offerings at the school and Montana Tech started the newcentury by offering a bachelors program in Business and Information Technology with threeoptions including Business Information Systems, Management, and Entrepreneurship.Historically, the entrepreneurship
neglected in the first offeringof this two course sequence was the development of a good assessment approach. This aspectwill be addressed in subsequent offerings of the course.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge Venture Well (formerly the National Collegiate Inventorsand Innovators Alliance) for funding of this project. The authors also thank the Deans of theCollege of Engineering and the Villanova School of Business for supporting travel to Nicaraguato deliver the January 2014 entrepreneurship workshop to UNI students.References[1] P. Singh, S. Kulkarni, E. Keech, R. McDermott-Levy, and J. Klingler, “Progress on Making Healthcare more accessible to Rural Communities in Waslala, Nicaragua, using Low-Cost Telecommunications, IEEE
26.261.13 undergraduate engineering students?Q54 Other Please list any themes you would like us to consider for future program eventsBibliographical Information[1] NACIE University Presidents Commitment Letter, April 19, 2011, http://www.innovationamerica.us/images/stories/2011/NACIE_Letter- University_Commercialization-20110617084146-20110617215655.pdf[2] The Innovative & Entrepreneurial University: Higher Education, Innovation, & Entrepreneurship in Focus, U.S. Department of Commerse, October 2013.[3] Duval-Couetil, N., Reed-Rhodes, T., Haghighi, S., The Engineering Entrepreneurship Survey: An Assessment Instrument to Examine Engineering Student Involvement
in the breakthrough EDI/EFT payment system implemented by General Motors. Dr. Ferguson is a graduate of Notre Dame, Stanford and Purdue Universities and a member of Tau Beta Pi.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette S¸enay Purzer an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. In 2011, she received a NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. She is also a NAE/CASEE New Faculty Fellow. Purzer conducts research on aspects of design education such as innovativeness and information literacy.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University and Central Queensland University Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue
them if theyare the right fit for them. Copyrights are limited to creative works (e.g., writings, music, lyrics,programming code). Protection time is the life of the creator + 70 years for new creations, whichtraditionally has generated and protected the family revenue of successful authors and recordingartists for generations[16]. To create a ‘notice’ for a copyright, the work must be accompaniedby any one of the flexible notice option examples shown below: • Copyright © 2021, , All Rights Reserved; OR • © 2021 ; OR • Copyright Note, the needs to reference the individual(s) or the entity (e.g., ABC LLC, etc.) thatowns the copyrighted work.Copyright flexibility has increased with the advent of ‘Creative Commons
also slow the process ofdiscovering groundbreaking research due to prioritizing and giving a huge amount of time intraining and tutoring, instead of students already have developed and gained experience on thosepractical skills. The vision is to incorporate a set of guidelines that can be taken into considerationin order to ease the transition from an inexperienced student into a high-end proficient student thatwould not need huge time investment on teaching. In addition, an infrastructure model will beshown with capabilities to scale up/expand and adapt to each college needs without restructuringeverything all over again.INTRODUCTION:The earliest 3D printing technology was developed in the late 1980’s and was referred to as rapidprototyping
Consciousness Competency. In the United States entrepreneurial training was starting toget introduced across colleges and universities in the 1970’s. Since then entrepreneurshipeducation and training programs have expanded and been adopted in several more college anduniversity curricula in recent years. It is estimated that 80% of all U.S. colleges and universitiesat present implement such programs [3]. Entrepreneurship for most of the students is a newexperience. The benefits it offers includes the opportunity to acquire new skills and experience,access to knowledge and tools related to establishing and operating companies, decision makingand negotiations, project management and team working and bearing consequences of undesiredoutcomes. Self
addition, by using an advanced course management infrastructure two other major barriers toscaling PBL learning, namely investment in course development and managing the more complexlogistics associated with PBL are largely overcome.2. AN INTRODUCTION TO PROBLEM BASED LEARNINGFirst implemented in the 1950’s by Case Western Reserve University and in medical schools in the Page 11.115.41970’s, problem-based learning (PBL) has now permeated throughout all levels of the education 3system, including K-12 (San Diego State University 2004). Additionally, PBL
Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA,USA, June 26-29, 2016.[2] C. Bodnar, J. Tranquillo, V. Matthew, and A. Turrentine, “Iteration by design: developmentof a game-based workshop for teaching innovation and entrepreneurship concepts,” ExperientialEntrepreneurship Exercises Journal, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 28–33, 2015.[3] M. Davies, “Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are thedifferences and do they matter?” Higher Education, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 279-301, 2010.[4] S. Ferguson and R. W. Foley, “Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes and ABETAccreditation: A Pilot Study of Fourth-Year Engineering Students using Longitudinal ConceptMaps,” in Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition
- 2016-2017/#outcomes on January 24, 2016. 5. Gilmartin, S., Shartrand, A., Chen, H., Estrada, C., & Sheppard, S. (2014). U.S.-Based Entrepreneurship Programs for Undergraduate Engineers: Scope, Development, Goals, and Pedagogies. Epicenter Technical Brief 1. Stanford, CA and Hadley, MA: National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation. 6. Duval-Couetil, N., Reed-Rhoads, T. & Haghighi, S. (2012). Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education 28(2), 425-435. 7. Forbes, M., Bielefeldt, A., and Sullivan, J. (2015) The choice opportunity disparity: Exploring curricular choice opportunities
ended. Ideally, the community will create new ways towork together, and will continue to share and develop their expertise.AcknowledgmentsThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation: DUE 1125457.References1. Beach, A. L., Henderson, C. & Finkelstein, N. Facilitating Change in Undergraduate STEM Education. Change Mag. High. Learn. 44, 52–59 (2012).2. Dempster, J. A., Benfield, G. & Francis, R. An academic development model for fostering innovation and sharing in curriculum design. Innov. Educ. Teach. Improv. 49, 135–147 (2012).3. Duderstadt, J. J. Engineering for a Changing World. (University of Michigan, 2008).4. Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S. & Weilerstein, P. Entrepreneurship: Its Role in
lastingstories that provide a preliminary direction necessary to guide an expansive and meaningfuldesign effort –those that gets at the heart of a mesmerizing story.AcknowledgmentsThanks to the imagination, innovation and disciplined work of all the students in ME 236 atStanford University. We would also like to remember the wisdom of Professor Cliff Nass, whoinspired the course, and to the generous campus affiliate – REVS, which made the class possible. Page 26.326.13References1. Doody, S. Why we need storytellers at the heart of product development. UX Magazine. 655, April, 2011.2. Karanian, B. Patterson, C. and Sansbury, T. Students Redefine
project staff including the AUHSDteachers & administrators, CSUF college student mentors, and the project evaluator: ArroyoResearch Services for their contributions to this research.References 1. Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, May 2013, 3-9. 2. Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self‐efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485-499. 3. Huang, J., A. Bernal, J. Jackson, Y. Lu, & A. Cox-Petersen (2016): Integrating STEM Education with Entrepreneurship Practices at Middle Schools: Feasibility Study and Preliminary Results, Proceedings of Hawaii University International Conference on
they are not in a traditional engineering program nor in the EDDP.Appendix A contains a comprehensive listing of the month and year each survey participantgraduated and Appendix B shows the distribution of responses by engineering discipline.Research QuestionsResearch questions were developed to gather a large amount of data that can be evaluated toanswer the research problems. The questions were compiled using an if/then system in thesurvey tool. The employment questions (3-10) were given based upon the previous question’sresponse. Each participant was asked questions 10-14. The questions are: 1. Month and year of graduation 2. Major(s) 3. When did you receive your first job offer (related to your major)? Month and year 4. Did
, environmental and health problems in the developing worldthrough the formation of innovative business structures that disseminate these products on thewidest appropriate scale. The GIC has played a central role in facilitating the spinoff of a varietyof CSU-related business ventures such as Envirofit [9] and Solix Biofuels [10]. Figure 1 showsan example of the GIC approach wherein research on clean cookstoves at the EECL (Fig. 1a)was transformed into a viable product (Fig. 1b) by the non-profit corporation Envirofit, whichrecently partnered with the Shell Foundation to produce and sell 10 million clean-burning stovesover the next 5 years. Figure 1 (a) Cookstove research at CSU and (b) the Envirofit S-2100 cookstove in use in India.Putting it All
toanalyze the origins, influences and implications s of entrepreneurial culture in higherengineering education in Chinese mainland through cultural speculation and historicalanalysis.3. Research methods3.1 Literature research methodThe research uses the literature research method to focus on the research materials andliterature results on the implementation of entrepreneurship education in colleges anduniversities, and to collect, sort, screen and analyze relevant data, fully interpreting thefactors affecting entrepreneurship education of Chinese colleges and universities from acultural perspective.3.2 Historical analysis methodThe research uses the historical analysis method to conduct in-depth examination of theChinese traditional culture
)K. Arrow, "Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention," 1962.L. Lee and P.-K. Wong, "Attitude towards entrepreneurship education and new venture creation," J. Enterprising Culture, vol. 11, no. 04, pp. 339–357, Dec. 2003.M. Feldman, J. Francis, and J. Bercovitz, "Creating a Cluster While Building a Firm: Entrepreneurs and the Formation of Industrial Clusters," Regional Studies, vol. 39, no. 1. pp. 129–141, 2005, doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320888.P. Brown, "The opportunity trap: Education and employment in a global economy," European Educational Research Journal, 2003.N.Pasha-Zaidi, E., Afari, J.Mohammed, S. Cubero, A. Shoukry, and W., El-Sokkary. “Gender - Based teams: Perceptions of
Proceeding, AC 2009 - 570.11. A.Funai, A. Interrante, R. Reisberg, S. Wadia-Fascetti, B. Maheswaran, Connections Physics Review (CPR) Program, ASEE Conference Proceeding 2006 -1764.12. Henry Chesbrough, Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape, Harvard Business Review Press; 1 edition (December 6, 2006).13. Steve Blank and Bob Dorf. K & S Ranch, The Startup Owner's Manual: The Step-by-Step Guide for Building a Great Company, 1 edition (March 1, 2012)Appendix 1: GE2010 Sample Syllabus (five weeks) :Week Topics Assignments/Activities Week Engineering and Entrepreneurship Intro A1: SV Companies and Products 1 Why we are here