their motivations, identity development, and impact of prior engineering-related experiences. Her work dwells into learning in informal settings such as summer camps, military experiences, and extra-curricular activities. Other research interests involve validation of CFD models for aerospace and industrial applications, as well as optimizing efficiency of thermal-fluid systems.Dr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering. Cheryl earned her first Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from National Uni- versity of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate
the transport and fate of contaminants in groundwater and surface water systems, as well as engineering education reform.Dr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is a Senior Lecturer of the Industrial, System & Multidisciplinary Engineering Department. Li earned her first Ph.D. in me- chanical engineering from National University of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate Professor in mechatronics engineering at University of Adelaide, Australia, and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, respectively. In 2006, she resigned from her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion
. She received her Bachelors of Engineering from MIT. Her research focuses on the nontraditional engineering student – understanding their motivations, identity development, and impact of prior engineering-related experiences. Her work dwells into learning in informal settings such as summer camps, military experiences, and extra-curricular activities. Other research interests involve validation of CFD models for aerospace applications as well as optimizing efficiency of thermal-fluid systems.Dr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is a Senior Lecturer of the Industrial, System & Multidisciplinary Engineering Department. Li earned her
. Erdil, University of New Haven Nadiye O. Erdil is an assistant professor of industrial engineering and engineering and operations man- agement at the University of New Haven. Her research interests include use of statistical methods and lean tools for quality and process improvement, and use of information technology in operations management. Her work is primarily in manufacturing and healthcare delivery operations.Dr. Cheryl Q Li, University of New HavenDr. Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven Jean Nocito-Gobel, Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of New Haven, received her Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. She has been actively involved in a number of
research focuses on the nontraditional engineering student – understanding their motivations, identity development, and impact of prior engineering-related experiences. Her work dwells into learning in informal settings such as summer camps, military experiences, and extra-curricular activities. Other research interests involve validation of CFD models for aerospace applications as well as optimizing efficiency of thermal-fluid systems.Dr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is a Senior Lecturer of the Industrial, System & Multidisciplinary Engineering Department. Li earned her first Ph.D. in me- chanical engineering from National
, PI of the ASPIRE grant, and is the coordinator for the first-year Intro to Engineering course. Her profes- sional interests include modeling the transport and fate of contaminants in groundwater and surface water systems, as well as engineering education reform.Dr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is Associate Professor of the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department. Li earned her first Ph.D. in mechanical engineer- ing from National University of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate Professor in mechatronics engineering at University of Adelaide, Australia, and Nanyang Tech
Paper ID #21777Investigating the Entrepreneurial Mindset of Engineering and Computer Sci-ence StudentsDr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is Associate Professor of the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department. Li earned her first Ph.D. in mechanical engineer- ing from National University of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate Professor in mechatronics engineering at University of Adelaide, Australia, and Nanyang Tech- nological University, Singapore, respectively. In 2006, she resigned from
Paper ID #25289Assessing the Growth in Entrepreneurial Mind-set Acquired through Curric-ular and Extra-curricular ComponentsDr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is a Senior Lecturer of the Industrial, System & Multidisciplinary Engineering Department. Li earned her first Ph.D. in me- chanical engineering from National University of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate Professor in mechatronics engineering at University of Adelaide, Australia, and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
prepare anelevator pitch based on the two-semester-long capstone design project as part of a companioncourse called Senior Innovation. The competition starts in class and then moves to extra-curricular rounds for cash prizes. The semi-finals and finals were traditionally held as 3-minutelive pitches made in front of a panel of judges with a follow-up of 2 minutes of question andanswer (Q&A) period. Due to COVID-19, Stevens went entirely online after seven weeks of in-person classes in the Spring semester. While coaching can be online, the elevator pitchcompetition required a new format for the pitch competition.Conducting live-video pitches has the risk that an internet connectivity disruption during thepresentation can scuttle a perfectly
included theselabs and design project. Each lab was then granted a score (0-3 or 0-4) in each evaluativecategory depending on the lab’s level of adoption of that category. The two researchers thendiscussed and reconciled their results into one final result set, which is what is presented in theresults that follows.Results and DiscussionAfter the final agreement was met on the scores, a summary of the overall scores wasgenerated, as seen in Table 1. Table 1: Summary Statistics from Final Data SetIt can be seen that every lab failed to attain a majority of total points with the exception ofthe Software Design Project (SDP), which ranked first in most categories. The Quality andProductivity (Q&P) lab was also much higher
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 Experimenting E.1 Experiment as a way to understand how things work .99 .83 E.2 Experiment to create new ways of doing things .73 .66 E.3 Be adventurous and seek out new experiences .53 E.4 Actively search for new ideas through experimenting .79 .69 E.5 Take things apart to see how they work .77 .65 Questioning Q.1 Ask a lot of questions
make headway for scaling and sustainability of educational innovations. The panel session will be designed to be interactive. The working schedule is given below but can be modified to adjust to the conference schedule. Short introduction of panelists (5 min) Panel Q & A with 5-‐7 key questions (55 min) Wrap-‐up with questions from the audience (10 min) Page 26.144.3 2
voltages and currents affect the patient during DBS? How effective and what is the success rate of DBS? How expensive is DBS and what are the risk factors? How does bioelectricity of the brain get affected during DBS? What are the side-effects of Deep Brain Stimulation? How does the cost-benefit analysis of these procedure compare to that of other treatements? How does the procedure affect people differently? (Ex. ethnicity, presence of other health conditions, and stage of the respective disease) How does deep brain stimulation work on the bioelectric level?Here is a passage from the moderated chat with the physical therapy professor: Q: First, what is the general thought
. 38.[6] Y. Xing, “Cultural identity: Synergy, motivation and self-organization,” Theoretical Exploration, no. 4, pp. 56-60, 2017.[7] Q. Xu, “Cultural foundation of entrepreneurship education in China’s universities: Theoretical interpretation and consolidated paths,” Journal of Higher Education Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 82-88,124, 2020.[8] Q. Xu, “Cultural foundation of entrepreneurship education in China’s universities: Theoretical interpretation and consolidated paths,” Journal of Higher Education Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 82-88,124, 2020.[9] S. Zhou, “The analysis on the types of enterprise education of higher institutions in America under the effect of pragmatic culture and its inspiration,” Studies In
: 57– 88.Erdil, N. O., Harichandran, R. S., Nocito-Gobel, J., Carnasciali, M., & Li, C. Q. (2016). Integrating e-learning modules into engineering courses to develop an entrepreneurial mindset in students. Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA.Erdil, N. O., Harichandran, R. S., Nocito-Gobel, J., Li, C. Q., & Carnasciali, M.I. (2017). Impact of integrated e-learning modules in developing an entrepreneurial mindset based on deployment at 25 institutions. Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH.Fila, N. & Purzer, S. (2017). Exploring connections between engineering projects, student characteristics, and the
Conference and Expositon, Columbus, Ohio, 2017/06/24, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/27454.[10] N. R. Sattele, K. M. Kecskemety, and K. A. A. Parris, "Analysis of the Entrepreneurial Mind-set Elements in Established First-year Engineering Labs: Analysis Process and Lessons Learned and Changes for the Future," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019/06/15, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32089.[11] C. Q. Li, R. Harichandran, S., N. O. Erdil, M.-I. Carnasciali, and J. Nocito-Gobel, "Assessing the Growth in Entrepreneurial Mind-set Acquired through Curricular and Extra-curricular Components," presented at the first year
Information and Communication Technology, vol 378. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergPatton, M. Q. (n.d.). Qualitative research & Evaluation Methods : Integrating Theory and Practice.Patton, M. Q., & Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications.Sheridan, K., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the Making: A Comparative Case Study of Three Makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531.Trochim, W., Donnelly, J., & Arora, K. (2015). Research methods: The essential knowledge base.Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker.Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002
. Applied. Psychology, Henan Univ., Zhengzhou, Henan, 2010.[11] M. C. Díaz-García, J. Jiménez-Moreno, “Entrepreneurial Intention: The Role of Gender,” J. Int. Entre. & Manag., vol. ED-6, pp. 261-283, 2010.[12] C. Camelo-Ordaz C, J. P. Diánez-González, J. Ruiz-Navarro, “The Influence of Gender on Entrepreneurial Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceptual Factors,” BRQ Biz. Res. Q., vol. ED-10, pp. 260-276, May. 2016.[13] C. Jiang, Z. Huang, “The Research on Effect Factors of College Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention--Based on a Survey of Peking University Students,” High. Educ. Explor., vol. ED-1, pp. 120-123, 2018.[14] Q. Wu, “Investigation on Effect Factors of College Students’ Entrepreneurial Tendency,” Pioneer. Sci
training sessions, the final presentations are made. In some cases it is necessary to havea semi-final presentation session where all teams record their presentations so that a group offinalists can be chosen. This can be a logistic necessity. If five teams present at the finals andeach team gives a 10-12 minute presentation with a 3-5 minute Q&A, then the program lasts forat least 75 minutes (5 teams X 15 minutes each). Now, add in a 15 minute introduction forleaders from the University and firm to talk and judges to be introduced. Then account for 5minutes between the presentations, at least 10 minutes for judges to select the winner(s), and 10minutes to thank the participants and award the prizes. In this format, even if nothing gets
the Summitagenda in Appendix A). Because group input was a key objective, almost half of each panelsession was devoted to Q&A with the audience. Detailed session notes capture theconversations for these and all sessions at the Summit.6Table 1. Research-Based Panel Sessions at the Epicenter Research SummitSession Title Central Questions for PanelistsResearch on Students’ How can we learn about students’ entrepreneurialEntrepreneurial Development development through an interactive lens, i.e., the interplayand Pathways between individual characteristics and contexts? How diverse are students’ entrepreneurial pathways? What are the implications for
] K. E. Gerdes, E. A. Segal, and C. A. Lietz, “Conceptualising and measuring empathy,” Br. J. Soc. Work, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 2326–2343, 2010.[16] J. Zaki, “Empathy: A motivated account,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 1608–1647, 2014.[17] J. L. Hess and N. D. Fila, “The manifestation of empathy within design: findings from a service-learning course,” CoDesign, vol. 12, no. 1–2, pp. 93–111, 2016.[18] J. B. Scott, “The Practice of Usability: Teaching User Engagement Through Service-Learning,” Tech. Commun. Q., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 381–412, 2008.[19] W. A. Sugar, “What Is So Good about User-Centered Design? Documenting the Effect of Usability Sessions on Novice Software Designers,” J. Res. Comput. Educ., vol
. Eng. Entrep., vol. 4, pp. 55–78, 2013.[8] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes,” Int. J. Eng. Educ, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 425–435, 2012.[9] Q. Jin et al., “Entrepreneurial Career Choice and Characteristics of Engineering and Business Students,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 598–613, 2016.[10] M. W. Ohland, S. A. Frillman, G. Zhang, C. E. Brawner, and T. K. Miller, “The effect of an entrepreneurship program on GPA and retention,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 293–301, 2004.[11] P. Shekhar, A. Huang-Saad, J. Libarkin, R. Cummings, and V. Tafurt, “Assessment of student learning in an
expert, the webinars are hosted on a videoconferencing platform that allows presenters and attendees to be seen simultaneously;there is no “sage on the stage.” Presenters begin with information about their experienceand expertise, but “Q&A” always makes up a large part of the discussion, allowingparticipants to develop a clearer understanding of how the strategies shared might applyon their campus. As such, these online webinars are not simply an opportunity to increaseknowledge; they are an opportunity to foster a sense of community among theparticipants.As part of the application process for Pathways teams, applicants are now required toinclude in their application the reasons why they want to be a part of the Pathwayscommunity of practice
Assessing Students' Entrepreneurial Skills and Mind‐Set." Journal of Engineering Education 94.2 (2005): 233-243. 2. Ochs, John B., Todd A. Watkins, and Berrisford W. Boothe. "Creating a truly multidisciplinary entrepreneurial educational environment." Journal of Engineering Education 90.4 (2001): 577-583. 3. Vickers, Ken, et al. "Creation of an entrepreneurial university culture, the University of Arkansas as a case study." Journal of Engineering Education 90.4 (2001): 617. 4. Erdil, N. O., & Harichandran, R. S., & Nocito-Gobel, J., & Carnasciali, M., & Li, C. Q. (2016, June), Integrating e-Learning Modules into Engineering Courses to Develop an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Students Paper presented
., Yang Q, Nilsson C.-H., Jun J, Larsson A., Warell A. (2014). “Fostering Automatic Control students to become innovators”, In procedings of 19th World Congress International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), South Africa, September 2014.9. Kansanen, P. (1999). Teaching as Teaching-Studying- Learning Interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(1), 81 - 89.10. Knight F. H. (2002). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Beard Books.11. Muljadi P. (2011). Entrepreneurship. A group of ideas around entrepreneurship. PDF generated by the open source mwlib toolkit See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated Dec 14, 2011.12. Prince M. and Felder R. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods
;'ÿ )%$*+,ÿ )%&&ÿ-./.ÿ )%&&ÿ-./4ÿ 5ÿ 041ÿ1ÿ23ÿ 041ÿ1ÿ23ÿ 6ÿ7ÿ0ÿ 8ÿ8419:ÿ ;7ÿ1ÿ7ÿ ;7ÿ1ÿ7ÿ1ÿ76ÿ 677ÿ ÿ P+K*@C'ÿ#''Q@CRÿ /IF-ÿHÿIFEÿ /GFOÿHÿIF/ÿ .F./NJÿÿ !08ÿ B?+*@+C%&ÿP'M5+CM'ÿ /EFEÿHÿIF-ÿ /IFSÿHÿEF4ÿ .F./4Jÿÿ #T+,*ÿU',?ÿUT@CQ@CRÿ //FSÿHÿEFSÿ /EF4ÿHÿEFEÿ .F..I%ÿÿ 89V94ÿ!V:ÿ W7ÿ1ÿW7Wÿ 7;ÿÿ#*K^'C*ÿ)''^J%$Qÿ[ÿ_4ÿ4ÿ_4ÿ4]ÿ_4ÿ133ÿÿÿ39ÿV9"ÿ1ÿV94ÿ1ÿ34Vÿ0_`Vÿ4421a`ÿ2"94:7ÿ0_4ÿ"94:ÿ"4ÿ1ÿb94ÿ9ÿc`4ÿa1347ÿV"4ÿWÿ_9ÿ_4ÿ4"3ÿ9bÿ_4ÿ"94:7ÿ84ÿ9bÿ_4ÿ1ÿV913ÿ9bÿ4Vÿ_`Vÿÿ9ÿb9a"ÿ9ÿ_4ÿ44ÿ9bÿ_4ÿ"47ÿ2"4ÿ43b4913"14ÿ_1ÿ_4ÿ4Vÿ_
thepublic or private sector. This guest is the focus of a one-hour round table discussion(Q&A) that is conducted by the student team to create a learning experience for the class.In the past, most guests were from engineering/technical companies, but on one occasion,the embedded student arranged to have a successful entrepreneur from a non-technicalenvironment participate in the session. Allowing the technology students to appreciatemore diverse perspectives also has added value to their undergraduate education.The final deliverable of the first course of the E4/Capstone Design Project is a FormalTechnical Proposal (FTP). These documents present the planning activities that havebeen undertaken by the teams and include project management tools
. Page 23.386.12Appendix 1. Course in actionDuring the class meeting time, students actively work within their product teams and regularlypitch ideas and lessons learned to their classmates. Page 23.386.13Interesting product concepts emerged in the inaugural course offering. Page 23.386.14Appendix 2. Final presentation team score sheetEvaluator: _______________________Student Team: _______________________ Date: _______________________Time: 20 minutes plus 3-5 for Q&A (1) The Evaluator should include a ‘0’ or ‘1’ in each shaded cell