Conference Session

Research! Research! Research! in Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ariana C. Vasquez, Colorado School of Mines; Amy Hermundstad Nave, Colorado School of Mines; Sam Spiegel, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

Paper ID #29070”It’s been a while”: Faculty reflect on their experiences implementingwhat they learned during an intensive summer programDr. Ariana C Vasquez, Colorado School of Mines Ariana Vasquez is the DeVries Post-Doctoral Fellow at Colorado School of Mines. She earned her doc- torate in Educational Psychology from The University of Texas at Austin. Ariana’s research focuses on motivation, learning, and achievement. Her research is driven by a desire to find solutions to educational problems in the classrooms. Her work experience while at UT Austin, included time at the Charles A. Dana Center, the Center for Teaching

Conference Session

Learnin' Lessons about Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Daniel Galvan, California State University, Los Angeles; Jianyu Jane Dong, California State University, Los Angeles; Lizabeth L Thompson P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Emily L. Allen, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

, 2020Lessons Learned: Teaching and Learning Academy Workshop to Promote an Asset-based Mindset among STEM facultyAbstractThis lessons learned paper describes the strategies in planning, organizing, and delivering aTeaching and Learning Academy Workshop that focused on bridging the cultural and perceptiongap between faculty and students in math and engineering classrooms. Grounded in Yosso’sCommunity Cultural Wealth model, the workshop was designed to engage participants in asequence of reflective and conversational activities that allowed the faculty to connect their owneducational experiences with their expectation towards the students, and recognize the strengthof the students in terms of their cultural wealth in Aspirational

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kenya Z. Mejia, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Yuliana Flores; Hadas Ritz, Cornell University; Jiehong Liao, Florida Gulf Coast University; John Chen, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo ; Boni Frances Yraguen, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

students in reflecting on experience, how to help engineering educators make effective teach- ing decisions, and the application of ideas from complexity science to the challenges of engineering education.Miss Yuliana FloresDr. Hadas Ritz, Cornell University Hadas Ritz is a senior lecturer in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, and a Faculty Teaching Fellow at the James McCormick Family Teaching Excellence Institute (MTEI) at Cornell University, where she received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering in 2008. Since then she has taught required and elective courses covering a wide range of topics in the undergraduate Mechanical Engineering curriculum. In her work with MTEI she co-leads teaching workshops for new faculty

Conference Session

WIP It! Faculty Development Style!

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lisa Bosman, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Erin J. McCave, University of Houston; Molly H Goldstein, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Kelli L. Chelberg, College of Menominee Nation

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

virtualsupport systems and learning communities [5-8]. These virtual environments can help addressissues of targeted support, particularly through VWGs. Writing and support groups are nostranger to engineering education [9-11], and VWGs offer many benefits [12] includingnetworking, accountability, feedback, increased motivation, a sense of belonging, emotionalsupport, and many others.MethodsDue to the nature of the research goals, a collaborative autoethnographic approach [13] wasappropriate. Autoethnography uses self-reflection and writing to understand and exploreanecdotal and personal experiences which we hoped would allow for a deeper connection acrossour individual stories as well as contribute to a wider understanding of individual

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jazmin Jurkiewicz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Byron Hempel, The University of Arizona; Malori Redman, San Francisco State University; Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Christopher Dominguez; Amber Ford

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

’ experiences in K-12 and higher educationas they adapted to new technology while education shifted to an online format as a result ofCOVID-19. This autoethnographic study sought to understand commonalities in five instructors’attitudes toward online education tools, external variables that affected their adaptation, and theiroverall perceptions of the technology and its usefulness. The research design was guided by theTechnology Acceptance Model (TAM). Deductive analysis of reflections, interviews, and focusgroup transcripts demonstrated the presence of TAM constructs in participants’ experiences.Participants recognized the usefulness of various technologies and tools but did not inherentlyview them or the experience of teaching online in a positive

Conference Session

WIP-ing Up Faculty Development!

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Richard J. Aleong, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 WIP: Supporting Faculty Developers’ Engagement with Disciplinary PerspectivesIntroduction This work in progress presents three ways of approaching the analysis of an empiricalresearch study that explores how faculty developers engage with disciplinary perspectives. As acore element of interdisciplinary work, disciplinary perspectives represent the ways individualsmay see and approach a problem based on their unique disciplinary background and training.This paper aims to evoke reflection on faculty development as an interdisciplinary practice withimplications for the professional development and identity of faculty

Conference Session

Faculty Development Medley!

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Elizabeth Pluskwik, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Mani Mina, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin; Arnold Neville Pears, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

Paper ID #31581Determinants of initial training for engineering educatorsDr. Elizabeth Pluskwik, Minnesota State University, Mankato Elizabeth leads the Engineering Management and Statistics competencies at Iron Range Engineering, an ABET-accredited project-based engineering education program of Minnesota State University, Mankato. She enjoys helping student engineers develop entrepreneurial mindsets through project-based and expe- riential learning. Her research interests include improving engineering education through faculty devel- opment, game-based learning, and reflection. Elizabeth was a Certified Public

Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Patrick Cunningham, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Cheryl Carrico P.E., E4S, LLC; Rachel McCord Ellestad, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Stacy Tantum, Duke University; Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University; Rebecca Simmons, Duke University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

Paper ID #32676Supporting Students’ Skillful Learning: Lessons Learned from a FacultyDevelopment WorkshopDr. Patrick Cunningham, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Patrick Cunningham is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technol- ogy. His professional development is focused on researching and promoting metacognition, self-regulated learning, and reflection among students and faculty in Engineering Education. Dr. Cunningham has been a PI/Co-PI on two NSF-funded grants and led Rose-Hulman’s participation in the Consortium to Pro- mote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE). He is also a

Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer L. Herman, Ohio State University; Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University; Lynn Hall, Ohio State University; David A. Delaine, Ohio State University; William Cohen, Ohio State University; James Edward Toney, Ohio State University; Lisa Abrams, Ohio State University; Alan Kalish, Ohio State University; Melinda Rhodes-DiSalvo, Ohio State University; Toni M. Calbert, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

conversation withtheir supervisor or mentors to ensure that choices are made based on reflection about teachingpractice as well as timelines for submitting dossiers for promotion and tenure.We determined that incorporating meaningful, but intermittently administered summativeoptions as part of faculty annual reviews would ensure that the focus remained on teachingdevelopment, rather than strictly measured performance. To meet the needs of faculty whowould require summative evaluations for their promotion and tenure dossiers, our review optionson classroom teaching, syllabus and course materials include instructions and forms to helpobservers produce written reports documenting their observations that could be incorporated intoformal summative letters

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University; Brian David Gockley, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

projects to the missions and tactics. It is important to recognize that no one person will contribute in a meaningful way to all aspects of the canvas. 8. Discuss any of the above with a peer, thinking partner, or with a small group to hear their thoughts on your own canvas as well as to see the diversity of ways in which to fill out the canvas.The Henderson model of university change (Henderson et al., 2011) identifies four approaches touniversity change that ideally would be used in synergy. Three are primarily top-down (e.g., policies,programs). The single bottom up approach is to create a culture of ‘reflective practitioners.’ (Schon,1984). It is difficult, if not impossible, for an administrator to map out how every

Conference Session

Faculty Development Evidence-based Practices!

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Chris Migotsky, University of Illinois

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

and one trained volunteer. By having two observers, multiple perspectives are capturedand the post-observation discussion is more robust. During the pre-observation meeting, the newinstructor goes over the course syllabus, lesson plan for the day they are to be observed, andpresents an overview of student feedback collected so far. They also inform the observers whataspects of their teaching they most want feedback on to help guide the actual observation. Onceobserved, the two observers share notes and write up a one-page summary of their observation.The instructor completes a self-reflection sheet before the post-observation meeting is conducted.At the debriefing, the conversation always begins with the instructor’s self-reflection

Conference Session

Faculty Development 2: COVID-19 Impact on Faculty

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Susannah C. Davis, University of New Mexico; Yan Chen, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Pil Kang, University of New Mexico; Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico; Eva Chi, University of New Mexico; Sang M. Han, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

sustained faculty changes, including their awareness and carerelated to students’ success, their readiness and implementation of online teaching pedagogy, andtheir initiatives in creating inclusive learning environments for diverse student needs. Resultssuggest the importance of fostering and sustaining change by creating collaborative spaces forfaculty to reflect on and support each other’s teaching practice. A departmental Community ofPractice (COP) related to teaching provided faculty with existing space, norms, and practicesupporting each other in reflecting on, adapting, and improving their teaching to support theneeds of diverse learners. We share our findings and implications in a traditional lecture.IntroductionThe emergence of COVID-19

Conference Session

Faculty Development Evidence-based Practices!

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michelle M Blum, Syracuse University; Katie D. Cadwell, Syracuse University; Julie M. Hasenwinkel, Syracuse University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

Rubrics for Anything 8 No speaker: Make-up Session & Open Forum 9 Final summer deliverables due uploaded to Blackboard beginning of Presentation of Projects (2 sessions) fall semester beginning of Assessments/Reflections for faculty projects implemented in Fall 2019 due spring semester beginning of Assessments/Reflections for faculty projects implemented in Spring 2020 due summer termThe aforementioned required written deliverables included:  Intermediate Deliverables o Draft of New/Revised Student Learning Outcomes o Brief Summary of Project Plans and Progress to Date o Preliminary Assessment Plan to evaluate

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Richard J. Aleong, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

learning pedagogy, and assessment through collaborativelearning sessions and 3) scaffolding learning moments to build up to a culminating courseexperience. In the following sections, each of these strategies corresponding to the course designconsiderations are described, as well as my instructor reflection on student feedback.Table 1Translation and Reframing of Course Design Considerations for Implementation in an Open-ended Course Design Context Course Design Core Idea and Reframed Approach Strategy for Considerations Approach to Expand Thinking Implementation Focus on learning Focus on being and Journey mapping for objectives to address

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amy B. Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

, service, and career advancement) and provideholistic faculty support in areas such as time management, work-life topics, and well-being [1].From the context of the CTL, the intentional alignment of programs, in which the relationshipsbetween goals and activities of different faculty development programs are considered, helps toidentify strategic approaches to advancing the CTL’s goals. At the same time, from the contextof faculty members, participating in exercises that encourage the consideration of an issue fromboth big picture and granular perspectives and the connections between the factors that impactthe issue can help foster reflection and make visible the role of faculty members in the issue.The objectives of this paper are to 1) present a

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Stephanie Laughton, The Citadel; Daniel Gingerich, Ohio State University; Sneha Prabha Narra, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Casey I. Canfield, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

may have a difficult time adapting to highlysocial university, local community, or governmental service organizations. The authors reflect onhow their time as graduate student leaders, in student government, student organizations, andcampus committees, influenced their ability to maximize impact while efficiently balancing timespent. The authors’ service portfolios span a range of fields – as student organization advisors,committee members, or advisory board members – in diverse types of institutions (from researchuniversities to undergraduate teaching colleges) and have each balanced their personal andprofessional goals with their commitments. While not all junior faculty may have comparablegraduate student leadership backgrounds, the

Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, Rice University; Samuel Garcia Jr., NASA EPDC

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

parenthesesThe survey also included an open-ended question for both cohorts: Share your thoughts and reflections about your experiences collaborating with the faculty advisor (e.g., mentorship experience), and your overall experience conducting researchIV. RESULTSCohort 1 ResultsThe questions administered on the survey (Table 2) were intended to inquire about developingrelationships, commitment to mentorship, genuine desire for mentee to succeed, and willingnessof the faculty member to disseminate personal and academic wisdom.Table 2. Student Response Percentages: Cohort 1 Question N Yes No Prior to joining the group, did you engage in research

Conference Session

Faculty Development Medley!

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

faculty in engineering educationresearch, regardless of institution type. While only a small fraction of CAREER proposals arerecommended for funding, former EEC deputy director Sue Kemnitzer frequently remindedapplicants that the process of applying for a CAREER award has value in itself. By this claim,she included the self-reflection on a faculty member’s research agenda, a plan to integrate theresearch and education activities throughout the individual’s career, and the discussions heldbetween the early career faculty member and their department chair, senior mentors, and, insome cases, deans and other constituencies. These key activities provide many opportunities forfaculty development and encouraging growth in all aspects of faculty life

Conference Session

Faculty Development Research

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Fethiye Ozis P.E., Northern Arizona University; Kyle Nathan Winfree, Northern Arizona University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

sizes. To normalize, the mean response fromeach of the seven programs were then averaged together, giving equal one-seventh weight toeach program of study.Response categories of “Strongly Disagree,” “Disagree,” “Neutral,” “Agree,” and “StronglyAgree” were assigned corresponding ordinal ranks of one through five respectively. The likertvalue responses were averaged for these groups in order to represent a “general consensus”response. Mean likert responses near one for any given question reflect a strong disagreementthat the given behavior is an important factor for student-instructor rapport, while meanresponses near five indicate a strong agreement that the behavior is an important factor forstudent-instructor rapport. Median was not calculated

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Angelica Burbano, Universidad Icesi; Ana Judith Ledesma, Universidad Icesi; Dayana Alexandra Ordoñez

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

Advance Trainingfor Research and Teaching Activities”. In it, Chuchalin establishes the following classificationof competencies for engineering professors : technical, pedagogical, social, psychological,ethical, didactic, evaluative, organizational, communicative and reflective competenciesAdditionally, we have utilized the investigative work of Ramón Bragós Bardía, which proposessix actions to promote the development of generic competencies in engineering with referenceto framework standards 9 and 10 of CDIO, including: relevant experience in the industry, designof courses that develop these competencies, experience exchange activities with the industry,and mentoring by professors with extensive professional experience. Methods The method used

Conference Session

Research! Research! Research! in Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amber Gallup, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Yan Chen, University of New Mexico; Pil Kang, University of New Mexico; Kristen Ferris, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

change their beliefs and instructional practices?This paper explores this question and offers practical suggestions for promoting peer learningamong faculty.Theoretical frameworkMuch research has supported the theory that people learn through active participation incommunities of practice [6]. Communities of practice are “groups of people informally boundtogether by shared expertise and passion for a joint enterprise” [7]. In these communities,participants learn new skills socially in a process guided by peers and mentors and situatedwithin the context where the skills are used. The community discusses and reflects together, asbeginners grow into full participants. Faculty, within the same department or across departmentsand institutions

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach; Timothy A. Wilson, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach; Olivia Elizabeth Roa, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

work has chosen to adopt Scrum at an operational level. Theintent is that Scrum Teams will be formed within the department that will be focused ondeveloping products that can enhance the quality of the student experience, quality of education,and the success of the faculty. Some of these products can include changes to the curriculum,modifications to instruction, and recruitment, and professional development.A prevalent change strategy in STEM education [19], identifies the use of dissemination,reflection, policy, and shared vision tactics to support a balanced approach to institutional change[19]. Each of the key features of Scrum promote align with these tactics [20]. Scrum can promotedissemination through the transparent approach which can

Conference Session

Research in Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kristen Ferris, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Pil Kang, University of New Mexico

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

so by a chair following poor teaching evaluations; this typicallydoes not make them more ready to change, however. Our setting, because of the five-year effortto engage all faculty in better meeting diverse student needs, provided an opportunity toinvestigate both groups of faculty. Our study reports on the first four years of the project.The departmental change effort included several strategies, guided by an engineering educationresearcher, to bring about change: threading design challenges through core chemicalengineering courses; switching from bleed-all-over-it, long technical reports to cycles of drafts,peer and instructor feedback, and revision and reflection; and developing ways to assess andsupport professional skills like teamwork

Conference Session

Faculty Development 1: Social Justice Research

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Katie Johanson, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Richard Carroll Sinclair, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Comas Lamar Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute; Rosario A. Gerhardt, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kinnis Gosha, Morehouse College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

transcribed by a third-party service and permanently deletedonce reviewed and cleaned.Reflexivity and Positionality. Prior to data analysis, the researchers engaged in the process ofreflexivity, in which experiences, beliefs, values, and assumptions on the ways in whichmentoring is used in academe to support the career development of faculty were reflected uponindividually and discussed collectively (Watt, 2007). Reflexivity is integral in qualitativeresearch because it forces the consideration and exposure of researcher bias through analyticalreflection and dialogue. The theoretical underpinnings of the pragmatic lens were revisitedduring the reflexivity process to ensure practical implications were foundational to the way inwhich the transcripts

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University; Jessica Rosenberg; Kathryn Fernández, George Mason University; Julie Shank, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

collaboration inshared physical spaces. Faculty and GTA reflections on the changes to teaching and learning dueto the online pivot provide insight into support that can be provided to help instructional stafffacilitate implementation of ACL across various modes of instruction. The guiding question forthe current study was: How did the rapid shift to online instruction due to COVID-19 affectadoption of ACL in calculus courses?MethodsThis paper describes insights from interviews with faculty and GTAs who were teaching andsupporting Calculus I and Calculus II courses in the Spring 2020 semester. All faculty and GTAsinvolved in these courses and additional faculty involved in the course-based community ofpractice were invited by email to participate in

Conference Session

Lessons Learned about Faculty Development!

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Emily Peterek Bonner; Vittorio Marone, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Timothy Yuen, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Robin Nelson, University of Texas at San Antonio; Joann Browning P.E., The University of Texas at San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

and working with the embedded experts, and allowed for the transformed courses to continue on without the initial instructor. However, this did not happen as frequently as expected, specifically for our EE courses, which had the largest variance in instructors. In talking to some of the newer instructors, they were not aware of any of the changes, but were interested in hearing more about these approaches. Upon reflection, the participating instructor, the department chair, and the embedded experts could work together prior to each semester to review the new course designs with the upcoming instructors. • The embedded experts team continued observations and interviews each semester to investigate the fidelity

Conference Session

Faculty Development 4: COVID-19's Impact on Students

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sreyoshi Bhaduri, McGraw Hill ; Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida; Debarati Basu, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Michelle Soledad, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

, ME) from the Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU) in Davao City, Philippines, and in Engineering Education (PhD) from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include learning experiences in fundamental engineering courses and data-informed reflective practice. Michelle’s professional experience includes roles in industry and academia, having worked as a software engineer, project lead and manager before becoming Assistant Professor and Department Chair for Elec- trical Engineering at the Ateneo de Davao University in the Philippines. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Grounded Theory Analysis of COVID-19 Information and Resources Relayed

Conference Session

Faculty Development Research

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sarah Hoyt, Arizona State University; Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Kara L. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Claire Fletcher Honeycutt, Arizona State University; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; James A Middleton, Arizona State University; Robert J Culbertson, Arizona State University; Ke Liu, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

than the facilitators.Grant Year 5 TCPAs word spread of the CCoPs, and as other grant-funded faculty development programs ended, facultynot initially involved in the original professional development series asked to become a part of thecommunity. To reflect this change and to create an inviting tone, we altered the name of the CCoPs toTeaching Communities of Practice (TCP). We sent introductory emails to the directors of all 9engineering disciplines (including the two that were not originally involved in the program) to describethe sessions and share the titles of the semester’s sessions. We invited them to share this informationwith their staff and to emphasize the importance of sharing this space to have discussions onevidence-based

Conference Session

Evidence-based Practices in Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware; Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware; Julia A. Maresca, University of Delaware; S. Ismat Shah, University of Delaware; Sheldon Allister Hewlett, University of Delaware; Jenni M. Buckley, University of Delaware

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

administered electronically (Qualtrics XM) to all faculty in the CoE after the firstmodule (pre) and final module (post). The surveys were confidential, voluntary, and IRB-exemptwith identifiers collected only for pre/post survey matching. The complete survey is presented inTable 2, and items were integrated from three sources. First, we developed eight Likert Scalesurvey items associated with the stated learning objectives (Table 1) in each of our five coreworkshop modules. These included reflective questions about classroom practices related tostudent mindset, unconscious bias, and fair assessment of student work. Second, instructor self-confidence with inclusive teaching practices was measured using a modified version of theCulturally Responsive

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Laura Ann Gelles, University of Texas at Dallas; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Gordon D. Hoople, University of San Diego; Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego; Mark A. Chapman, University of San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

open toquestions. Our department chair is deeply integrated in our program’s teaching and led the chargeas we pivoted to emergency remote teaching (ERT) halfway through the Spring 2020 semester.In this paper, we reflect on how our department’s faculty successfully navigated the transition toERT and share lessons learned on how we continue to maintain high quality education whileonline. We have also reported elsewhere on our students' responses to the adjustments madeduring the COVID-19 pandemic using a compassionate flexibility model [1].Establishment of a Virtual Community of PracticeBefore the pandemic, our department of five faculty already had strong relationships and anetwork of support. When classes were cancelled for a week to prepare