avariety of software applications and engineering topics. Maryland began offering the PLTWcurriculum in 2002. By 2009, the state had 80 high schools and 34 middle schools teachingPLTW, reaching 100 to 250 students per school, and in 2014 the pre-engineering curriculum wasbeing taught in 106 high schools and 81 middle schools.2 K-12 teachers express a need andappreciation for the technology integrated into the PLTW curriculum that keeps their studentsinvested and interested in engineering using real-world applications.As reported by the American Association of Community Colleges, teachers look to communitycolleges for access to advanced technology and effective strategies.3 For the past seven and ahalf years, The Community College of Baltimore
development of learningprogressions. First, we understand that instruction and curriculum are an integral part ofconsidering learning progressions. However, since we know very little about elementarystudents’ knowledge and reasoning about design, the first step is for us to find out the status quoof understanding in order to make suggestions on targeted instruction and progressions. Second,we are employing a cross-sectional study to document students’ development of knowledge andreasoning on design across multiple grades. Third, learning progressions focus on fundamentaland generative ideas in a discipline, and design has been identified as an important concept inengineering learning [15]. Some might argue that designing involves procedural skills
College StudentsAbstract Low enrollment and high attrition rates in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math(STEM) based degree programs have created a workforce problem in industries like shipbuildingand repair which are important for national security. Part of this problem can be attributed topedagogical issues like lack of engaging hands-on activities utilized for science and matheducation in middle and high schools. Lack of student interest in technical careers can also beattributed to lack of an integrated approach in teaching math, science and technical education. Toengage student’s interest in the technical career path, it is important that students establish a linkbetween the theoretical knowledge and its application to solve real
on hold. However, we are re-evaluating ourwork to date to incorporate the above recommendations. Many youth did indicate a desire formore “hands-on” training. By running a separate course on “game design for kids” led by collegestudents, the students could assign specific tasks that relate to a current game project. Thereby, wemight be able to provide both an opportunity for learning and integration in a student project.Bibliography1. Grose, T. K., “The Science of FUN,” ASEE Prism, Volume 14, Number 5, 2005, http://www.prism- magazine.org/jan05/tt_science.cfm.2. Entertainment Engineering and Design, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Howard R. Hughes College of Engineering, http://www.eed.egr.unlv.edu/index.cfm.3. The
publication appear on the journalwebsite in pdf format, and are accessible for the public to view and download at no charge. To provide oversight of the technical content and relevance of published work, articlessubmitted for publication in the journal undergo a unique review process consisting of two highschool student/teacher combinations (including math, science, and English teachers), and by anindividual from academia or industry who demonstrates expertise in the associated field. Thestudent/teacher combinations serve as sources for judging the impact the submitted content mayhave on stimulating self-motivated learning and its usefulness for integrating within theeducational curriculum. Thus, an opportunity exists for students to understand
. Page 13.1075.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Service Learning: Community and Cultural Values that Engage Under Represented Groups into the STEM PipelineAbstractEnvironmental and Spatial Technology (EAST) is a high school elective class that usessophisticated technology in service projects designed to improve students’ critical thinking andproblem solving skills. EAST is a national initiative that now includes more than 220 schools inArkansas, California, Hawaii, Iowa, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania. It is aproject-based, service-learning class that integrates technology into the traditional high schoolcurriculum. EAST students work in teams to solve real world problems in their schools
competitions as an educational tool, competitions have been shown to be usefulin promoting student interest in engineering and science.31,32 A NSF report examiningcompetitions indicated that the participation rate of girls in competitions was comparable to thatof boys.32 In addition, other studies have noted that both genders felt that competitions wereenjoyable and integral to the class atmosphere and that competition competency between malesand females was similar.23 Our observations of the summer camps have indicated that couplingcollaborative teamwork with the competitions effectively engages all participants in the activitiesregardless of gender or race.Challenges and Lessons Learned to Date
needs of thediversity of students and represent a more real-world view of science as opposed to traditionalcourses that emphasize each area of science standing alone. As integrated science unifiesconcepts and looks at the reality of the natural world, the science is more relevant and betterconnected to students’ lives, which can increase student interest and motivation to learn.5 Project2061 discussed the use of integration in the curriculum, highlighting three key reasons whyintegration is essential: integrated planning, interconnected knowledge, and coherence.6Integrated planning merges teachers of many disciplines including science, mathematics, andtechnology. This collaborative effort eliminates dividing subjects per person, and may
Paper ID #7052High School Students Modeling Behaviors During Engineering DesignMr. Tanner J Huffman, Purdue University Tanner Huffman is a research assistant and Ph.D. candidate in the Technology, Leadership and Innovation department at Purdue University. Additionally, he is an engineering and technology instructor at Richland Senior High School (7-12) in Johnstown, Pa. Tanner has experience writing integrated STEM curriculum and delivering professional development workshops on ITEEA’s Engineering by Design program. His research interests include modeling and design in STEM education, as well as STEM teacher professional
followed by theparticipants as emulation of real-world design activities. This is a novel approach thatwas developed by the authors. The course curriculum encompassed the followingsubjects in the following sequence: • Introduction to Animatronics and Robotics • Introduction to Engineering and Product Design • Project Management • Team Work Basics • Concept Development • Artistic and Industrial Design • Materials and Manufacturing Process Selection Page 11.1178.2 • Mechanism Design and Assembly • Actuators, Sensors, Controls • Controllers and Programming • CostumingAfter welcoming events, students were given an
an increasing number of states and school districts have been adding technology education to the mix, and a smaller but significant number have added engineering. In contrast to science, mathematics, and even technology education, all of which have established learning standards and a long history in the K-12 curriculum, the teaching of engineering in elementary and secondary schools is still very much a work in progress. Not only have no learning standards been developed, little is available in the way of guidance for teacher professional development, and no national or state-level assessments of student accomplishment have been developed. In addition, no single organization or central
% No long-term effect 23% Real-world connection 15% Cross-curriculum connection 15% Careers in engineering 8% Awareness of resources 8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%Figure 5: Long-term Changes in Teaching Due to Program Participation as Reported by TeacherPartnersFour other themes emerged with 15% or more teachers responding similarly. Teacher Partnersreported a new awareness of real-world connections with statements such as, “I try to integrate engineering into my lessons more than before and I tell my students that "an engineer would
the early 1990s1 , Malcolm argued that students perception towards engineering was considered more of atechnically oriented, they did not understand the socio-economic context and benefits ofengineering. Accordingly, preferences of introducing of engineering design to K-12 educationprograms were emerged to provide a venue and experience demonstrating engineeringconnections to human needs 2. STEM is actually an integration of four disciplines in which technology and engineering arelayered onto standard science and Mathematics curricula resulting in cohesive curricula in whichbarriers are removed between the four disciplines. Although wide spectrum of scientific knowledge and socio-economic advances are based ontechnological developments
would improve thecurriculum by connecting these various disciplines. In this module we aim to teach high schoolstudents the concepts of pressure, while focusing on how blood flows through the cardio-vascular system. LEGO (model design) and Vernier Probes (simulations) help the teacherfacilitate the learning process by using engineering components to present an alternative methodof teaching science. Our module includes components of the physics curriculum (pressure), thebiology curriculum (cardio-vascular system), and engineering curriculum (design process). Thecurrent version of this module would fit into the anatomy and physiology curriculum during astudy of the cardio-vascular system. Our initial case study was piloted as an after
expertise of an urban school of engineering, school ofmedicine and school of education. The BMERET program has provided middle schooland high school science teachers in urban settings with opportunities to engage withpremiere researchers in BME laboratory settings at a top tier research university. Withthe combined expertise of the BME scientists and education faculty, BMERET teacherparticipants are creating powerful curriculum to use in their middle school and highschool science classrooms. The teacher participants have experienced greater scienceteaching efficacy then their non-participant teacher peers, which may be as a result of thecollaborative RET experience. Sixth through twelve grade teachers have benefited greatlyfrom bringing the BME lab
/engineering earned in the United Statesduring the last twenty years shows that less than 20 percent of graduates account forunderrepresented minorities which place this population in great disadvantage with other ethnicgroups. Given that New Mexico is a state with high percentage of underrepresented minorities,the Department of Engineering at Northern New Mexico College through the support of GoogleInc. and the National Science Foundation has organized and developed Computational Thinking(CT) workshops and activities for K-12 teachers and pre-service teachers during the last twoyears as an approach to increase the awareness of Computer Science among K-12 students inNew Mexico. The curriculum developed in the workshops have provided teachers andpre
forms.2O’Neill and Harris identify four categories of e-mentoring:3 Ask-an-expert: professionals answer questions on an ad hoc basis. Tutoring: usually a one-to-one exchange based on a rigorous master-to-apprentice scenario. Curriculum-Based Tele-mentoring: students pursue in-depth examinations of topics covered in the classroom, guided by their external mentor-expert. A Tele-mentoring Relationship: exchanges move beyond question-and-answer to achieve goals of broad-based affective and cognitive development.We have adopted the best practices from these successful approaches in order to use socialnetworking to build powerful mentoring relationships among 9th-grade girls and female
Georgia Institute of Technology and is currently pursuing a Ph.D. She has researched the effects of product debundling in the airline industry and is interested in airline competitiveness indicators.Dr. Laurie Anne Garrow, Georgia Institute of Technology Laurie Garrow is an Associate Professor in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Prior to joining the faculty, she worked for four years as a Research Analyst with United Air Lines and one year with a management consulting firm.Mr. Christopher Cappelli, Georgia Institute of Technology Christopher Cappelli is a Research Associate at the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathemat- ics, and Computing (CEISMC) at
improvement consultant for a number of manufactur- ing and service companies, and educational institutions. Roberts has worked with K-12 teachers for 30+ years facilitating curriculum development, STEM activities, and providing information on engineering ca- reers. His work at K-State includes outreach and support of STEM programs like Future City, USFIRST, Odyssey of the Mind, Boy Scouts and Engineering & Science Summer Institute (ESSI).Dr. Gary A. Clark, Kansas State University Senior Associate Dean and ProfessorDr. Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University Dr. Amy Betz is an assistant professor at Kansas State University in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. She received her Ph.D. from Columbia University in
encourage students to independently continue their studies beyond the course.Curriculum. The curriculum consists of a series of self-contained laboratory exercises thatincrementally build upon one another. The exercises were adapted from laboratory exercisesoriginally developed for use in a sophomore level, undergraduate electrical and computerengineering curriculum [7, 8, 9]. In developing the program an emphasis was placed onminimizing theoretical lectures while maximizing student investigation and discovery throughhands-on laboratory exercises.A typical schedule is provided in Table 1 while a summary of laboratory exercises is provided inTable 2. The schedule is divided into 12 separate 2 hour and 15 minute lessons. A 15 minutebreak is provided
their classrooms and mentor the next generation of technology/engineering teachers to effectively teach students of diverse backgrounds. • develop engineering analysis and design skills in technology teachers, and to strengthen their mathematics and science knowledge and skills. • develop curriculum integration and collaboration skills in practicing technology teachers so that they can effectively collaborate with mathematics and science teachers.This paper will document the first two years of professional development activities conducted byBYU faculty.Professional Development Literature ReviewBecause of the potential impact on the quality of teaching and learning that occurs in theclassroom, there has been a
(Boston Museum of Science)General Description: The Center’s goal is to integrate engineering as a new discipline in schoolsnationwide and to inspire the next generation of engineers and innovators. It offers curriculum,professional development, and partnership with industry, and school systems. The Center isresponsible for the following programs:Engineering is Elementary: Engineering and Technology Lessons for Children (EiE) is aimed toelementary level students. The program integrates engineering content with elementary scienceconcepts. “Each unit focuses on a field of engineering—for example, materials engineering,mechanical engineering, and environmental engineering—and includes a child's illustratedstorybook, lesson plans, and student
students in exploring and understanding engineering content in K- 12 education through professional development activities, and • Serve as a national model for other undergraduate institutions in integrating engineering content in K-12 education.This initiative to integrate engineering content in the middle school curriculum and train teachersregarding engineering concepts has been extremely successful as evidenced by participantfeedback [4-5].Clinic Modules: Four engineering clinics are included in the workshop. These clinicsrepresented the four engineering disciplines at Rowan University namely Chemical, Civil andEnvironmental, Mechanical and Electrical and Computer Engineering. The Bridge moduleallows participants construct
are knowledgeable about or comfortableteaching—into an already-packed elementary curriculum can present challenges. This paper willdraw upon the experiences of educators at the Museum of Science, Boston who have beensupporting the implementation of elementary engineering for over seven years. Specifically itwill address how the Museum of Science has engaged in three kinds of partnerships fostered byEiE that have enabled the development and dissemination of the program—partnershipsassociated with (1) development and testing of resources, (2) building teacher capacity, and (3)fostering national dissemination and advocacy. It briefly describes the goals of thesepartnerships, the roles that partners can play, sets forth some characteristics of
paper reports the responses from participants in this unique workshopsession.BackgroundThe emergence of engineering as a school subject is in its infancy. The most importantengineering concepts and skills that students of differing interests and aptitudes shouldmaster are not well defined. State adopted curriculum materials, often the cornerstone of aprofessional development program, are still unavailable. To begin to understand theimportant features of an effective professional development program, NCETE focused itsefforts on engineering design as a content area in high schools. The rationale for thisdecision is that aspects of engineering design are shared by technology design as describedin standard 8 of the Standards for Technological
offormal educational settings4. Contemporary values underpinning the nature of STEM basedsubjects’ places greater focus on preparing students to be active participants in society. It istherefore the role of STEM educators to motivate students to explore and establish what is ofvalue to them and in turn to increase the capability of students to critically engage in andhave an impact on society5, 6.In Ireland, proposed change at lower post-primary level (Junior High, 12-15 year olds) aimsto move towards a more design focused curriculum, where the focus of education is on theneeds of the student to develop competencies and not driven by the need to perform in
AC 2010-1482: TEACHING ENGINEERING TO ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONMAJORSLaura Bottomley, North Carolina State UniversityJustin Osterstrom, Combs Elementary Scho Page 15.1174.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Teaching Engineering to Elementary Education MajorsThe elementary education teacher preparation program at North Carolina State University is aSTEM-focused program that requires a course in engineering and technology called ChildrenDesign, Invent, Create. For the fall 2009 semester, the course was taught by a faculty member ofthe College of Engineering from an engineering perspective. Although only one set ofassessment data is available, presentation of
thinkingrequired for engineering majors. The net result has been the development of programs atnumerous campuses, many of which survive only for the duration of the initial funding sourceand then disappear. Like many schools, Clarkson University has traditionally had a few smalland isolated K-12 outreach programs. However, in 2004 with the establishment of its Office ofEducational Partnerships, it initiated a concerted effort to institutionalize its outreach efforts in amanner to increase the extent of these efforts, assess their impacts, and maintain the University’scommitment to area school districts for an extended period of time. As with our integrated
engineering/technology content and context. Thecontent was aligned with the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks for Science andTechnology/Engineering and with the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks forMathematics and provided solid integration of key scientific and mathematical conceptswith the engineering design process. In this institute, participants explored the generationof electricity by the alternative energy sources of wind, water, and solar. Participantsengaged in lab activities, completed worksheets and visited a “Green Home” powered bya wind turbine and by both passive and active solar energy. During the fall of 2006, theparticipants met with the community college faculty to share their personally designedlessons and results.During the
, but also, presents STEM in an accessible,engaging way, leveraging students’ passion and interest in music as a catalyst for learning. SMTis a unique STEM experience for high-school students who would not otherwise considersupplementing their education with STEM or even pursuing STEM careers.1 IntroductionThe Summer Music Technology (SMT) program offers a unique educational experience for risinghigh school sophomores and juniors. The week-long program, initiated in 2006 as part of an NSFCAREER award, aims to introduce its participants to the concepts underlying modern musictechnology through inquiry-based projects and activities, drawing upon common music listeningand performance experiences. Music continues to prove an integral part of