, andconversations within the research team upon conclusion of the course.Concept MapsConcept maps are used in these courses to meet the first learning objective. Concept mappinghelps students meta-cognitively arrange their understanding of a complex web of ideas. Thishigher level form of thinking is a habit of mind essential to engineers, and as such, it is importantto help students develop this meta-cognitive capacity within the classroom. Concept maps wereused within both pilot courses at two universities during the Fall 2013 school semester. Eachcourse asked students to develop their own concept maps depicting their understanding ofsustainability. Students developed their concept maps once at the beginning of the semester and asecond time at the end
journal articles published under her name. She has also written in thegenre of science fiction, and published books in the body-mind-spirit genre about her empathic encounterswith horses. She has taught courses in Nanotechnology Ethics and Policy; Gender Issues and Ethics in theNew Reproductive Technologies; Religion and Technology; STS & Engineering Practice; The Engineer,Ethics, and Professional Responsibility; STS and the Frankenstein Myth. Rosalyn regularly incorporatesmindfulness practices into her engineering school courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Dimensions of Diversity in Engineering: What We Can Learn from STSIntroductionThe challenge of increasing diversity in engineering is
thelight bulbs went off.Radical Disciplinary Mixing – Brain, Mind and CultureEngineers typically take some number of courses outside of the sciences to fulfilluniversity and ABET breadth requirements. Unfortunately, while they typically performwell, many engineering students do not take these courses seriously. They put on theirhumanities and social science “hats” on in these courses, but then quickly take them offagain once they are back to their engineering life. Those who do gain some lastinginsights keep them compartmentalized.The Brain, Mind and Culture course was co-taught by the author and a professor ofcomparative humanities. It was cross-listed in the departments of biomedical engineering,neuroscience and comparative humanities, with
sequentially throughout astudent’s academic career and which researchers can use as a guide for exploring thedevelopment of empathy among engineering students. However, before we do this, we first mustconceptualize this multi-faceted and complex phenomenon.2. What is Empathy?Empathy is a nuanced phenomenon. It has been labeled as a construct, ability, skill, disposition,intellectual virtue, and much more. According to Batson,15 there are eight distinct concepts thatscholars have called empathy, each of which merits distinction. Batson described the first ofthese concepts as “knowing another person’s internal state, including his or her thoughts orfeelings.” The emphasis on knowing another’s mind is akin to what some scholars have called“empathic
Paper ID #25409An Educational Framework to Promote Self-Authorship in Engineering Un-dergraduatesDr. Laura Kasson Fiss, Michigan Technological University Laura Kasson Fiss is a Research Assistant Professor in the Pavlis Honors College at Michigan Techno- logical University. She holds a PhD from Indiana University in English (2013). Her work has appeared in Victorian Periodicals Review, The Lion and the Unicorn, and The Cambridge Companion to Gilbert and Sullivan. In addition to her research on Victorian humor, she conducts higher education research and scholarship on issues of inclusion, reflection, and innovation.Dr
areoversimplified, false dichotomies of social divides (i.e., “wealth and poverty, health andsickness, food and hunger”). Such complex conditions are not binary on-off states but rather acontinuum that exists both within nations and across the globe. Who goes hungry, for example,is as much a function of politics, culture, economics and ethics as it is of agricultural production.Though suggesting that “engineers must frame their work with the ultimate goal of universalaccessibility in mind,” no attention is given to how engineers might go about contributing to thesolution of such complex problems (other than, à la Moses, pushing forward with technologicalprogress).It is beyond the scope of this essay to examine every one of the fourteen specific
“sufferingand shared hardship” [1]. This negative culture of hazing has been described as particularlyunwelcoming to marginalized groups in engineering [3, 4]. The high stress from this culture ofsuffering and socially acceptable hazing in engineering may negatively impact student mentalhealth.Mental health of undergraduate students is a growing concern. Roughly 40% of college students(N = 62171) surveyed in the 2018-2019 Healthy Minds study report having been diagnosed witha mental health disorder in their lifetime [5]. Some studies have suggested that engineeringstudents face higher levels of anxiety, stress, and depressive symptoms than non-engineeringstudents [6, 7]. Concerningly, students who are underrepresented often face additional
Paper ID #22401Exploring the Human Dimension of Engineering Through the Built Environ-mentDr. Jeffrey C. Evans P.E., Bucknell University Jeffrey C. Evans, Ph.D., P.E., F. ASCE is Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Bucknell University in Lewisburg, PA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring the Human Dimension of Engineering through the Built EnvironmentAbstractHumanities and social sciences along with mathematics and natural sciences are at thecore of liberal learning. Further, the proposed ABET student outcome five requiresstudents to
broaden the appeal of engineering educationto a wider range of gender and ethnic categories. 8 These activities seek to engage students incritical thinking processes while simultaneously achieving a greater sense of civic and socialresponsibility. However, depending on the approach there are inherent technical, cultural andpolitical limitations which can privilege students and teachers at the expense of the communitiesbeing served. 9 With that in mind, we note that analysis of practices such as service learning showpositive effects on students’ attitudes, social behavior, and academic performance. 10 As such,finding the most effective means by which these topics and pedagogical approaches can beintegrated into the engineering curriculum has the
, control of how potential NGO partners develop andenact accountability towards constituents and values, ETH programs can have influence onhow NGO partners put effectiveness into practice. For example, ETH design projects can bethought through from the outset with embeddedness in mind by ensuring that data-gatheringin community only happens after enough trust building has taken place between thecommunity and NGO partners. In doing so, engineering teams can ensure that the quality ofthe data informing design projects is reliable and trustworthy.ETH teams can also influence what NGOs do with their organizational flexibility. Forexample, engineering teams can invite NGO staff to have more involved participation inproblem definition/solutions with
‘how’ typically results in a methodological solution, rather than a solution that conveys understanding. Asking ‘why’ instead of ‘how’ has resulted in a better understanding of the reasoning behind things, as well as an increased awareness of the methodology.” • “Contextual understanding is the greatest strength a senior engineering studies (EGRS) major possesses and while other Engineers are trained to problem solve with their design goals in mind, EGRS majors are taught to go beyond the straight-forward analysis and consider other, non-technical factors. EGRS look towards social, economic, and political factors (among others) to fully comprehend the problem at hand. In doing so, EGRS majors
Accreditation Commission of ABET, Inc. The Biomedical Engineering and Software Engineering programs are preparing for accreditation in the next review cycle. Also, a special interdisciplinary General Engineering program is offered that is not accredited. At SJSU, BS Engineering programs are treated as accredited, since all programs are designed with assessment and accreditation in mind. Rationalization for the Course Sequence: The 120 Unit Plan Discussions of reduction in units to earn a baccalaureate degree have occurred within the California State University (CSU) system since the 1990’s. Much progress was made to reduce programs in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s. By 2008 approximately 81% of degree programs met the 120-unit
AC 2012-3526: INTEGRATION OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND SO-CIETY (STS) COURSES INTO THE ENGINEERING CURRICULUMDr. Wesley Marshall P.E., University of Colorado, Denver Wesley Marshall is an Assistant Professor of civil engineering at the University of Colorado, Denver, and Co-director of the Active Communities Transportation (ACT) research group. He focuses on transporta- tion research dedicated to building a more sustainable infrastructure, particularly in terms of improving road safety, active transportation, and transit-oriented communities. Other recent research topics involve transportation planning, congestion pricing, human behaviors, parking, and street networks. A native of Watertown, Mass., Marshall is a
schedules arealready overloaded with ‘more important’ – usually more technical – assignments.Therefore, the intention was to trigger subtle, internally-induced change towards moreempathic, socially conscious, and ‘human-centred-designing-compatible’ mindsets in design,without having to go through the possible resistance and/or backlash from students.As studies show that Priming can facilitate such subtle, subconscious, internal change, andthat empathy can be induced by priming, we set out an intervention to check if we can ‘PrimeCivil Engineers into Human-Centred Designing’.About PrimingThe priming effect is an unconscious prompt that occurs as a result of a subtle, contextual cue(a prime) that activates an existing semantic association in the mind
AC 2011-1233: FOSTERING INNOVATION THROUGH THE INTEGRA-TION OF ENGINEERING AND LIBERAL EDUCATIONCherrice Traver, Union College Cherrice Traver received her BS in Physics from the State University of New York at Albany in 1982 and her PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia in 1988. She has been a faculty member at Union College in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department since 1986, and has been the Dean of Engineering since 2005. Recently Dr. Traver has been involved in initiatives at the interface of engineering and the liberal arts. She has led two national symposia on Engineering and Liberal Education at Union College and she was General Chair for the 2008 Frontiers in Education
that remainon the margins of society, and how this wealth of knowledge relates to engineering practices,habits of mind and dispositions [35]. 8 Laura did not have the resources to buy a new stove. Her family owned a restaurant in Mexico and they needed the stove as soon as possible. To solve this problem, Laura and her family designed a stove made out of inexpensive raw materials, including adobe, empty coffee and soup cans, barro (a mixture of clay materials), and a pipe. They also repurposed an antique washing machine, called chaca-chaca (as it is commonly known in Mexico for the sound it makes during the washing cycle), by disassembling it and using
addition, the framework will suggest membership requirements forparticipating institutions, keeping in mind the benefit of the program’s flexibility ofadapting to many different types of institutions. The funds will be used to define astructure in which the quality of the Engineering Ambassador program remains high, andoffer the essential support system for participating institutions and new schools who wantto start a similar program. Part of the success of the founding partner schools can beattributed the collaboration between the Engineering Ambassador advisors and thesupport system that ensued. The network will allow the same benefit to participatinginstitutions in sharing materials, offering invaluable networking opportunities, andproviding
professional society they represent foremost in their minds. Theinformation different entities within this organization have access to, and the pressures they feel,inevitably influences their actions and reactions in a time of reevaluation such as the one beforeus now.At the same time, ABET operates within a broader ecosystem of engineering educationorganizations in Washington, including the professional societies, the National Academies,government agencies like the National Science Foundation (NSF), and other coalition-basedengineering organizations such as the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE), theNational Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES), and the AmericanAssociation of Engineering Societies (AAES). The
Paper ID #18551Learning to Anticipate the User in Professional Engineering WorkDr. Alexandra Vinson, Northwestern University Alexandra H. Vinson is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the School of Education and Social Policy at Northwest- ern University. She received her Ph.D. in Sociology & Science Studies from the University of California, San Diego. Her research interests include professional education in medicine and STEM fields.Dr. Pryce Davis, University of Nottingham Pryce Davis is an Assistant Professor of Learning Sciences at the University of Nottingham. He received his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences from Northwestern
Paper ID #25301An Exploratory Study of Engineering Students’ Misconceptions about Tech-nical CommunicationDr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is a Senior Lecturer of the Industrial, System & Multidisciplinary Engineering Department. Li earned her first Ph.D. in me- chanical engineering from National University of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate Professor in mechatronics engineering at University of Adelaide, Australia, and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, respectively. In 2006
& Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri. His research/teaching focuses on engineering as an innovation in pK-12 education, policy of STEM education, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering, engineering ’habits of mind’ and empathy and care in engi- neering. He has published more than 140 journal articles and proceedings papers in engineering education and educational technology and is the inaugural editor for the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Educa- tion Research. Page 26.740.1 c American Society for Engineering
responsibility of individual community members, including engineers,to create positive outcomes for the community and make decisions with the community’s bestinterests in mind. Larry also felt that engineers had equal responsibilities to other communitymembers: I think engineers do just as much as anybody else in the community. Everyone has a part. I think specifically, they are suited more so that they could help come up with more ideas or something. But again, everyone has as part, so it’s not like these people have more of a part. Everyone has about an equal amount. – LarryEven though Larry recognized that engineers could use their skills to help generate solutions to acommunity issue, Larry’s response suggests that engineers
,” 11 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2016-June, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.25509.[16] J. Trevelyan, “Reconstructing engineering from practice,” Eng. Stud., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 175–195, 2010, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2010.520135.[17] S. Cristancho, L. Lingard, T. Forbes, M. Ott, and R. Novick, “Putting the puzzle together: the role of ‘problem definition’ in complex clinical judgement,” Med. Educ., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 207–214, 2017, doi: 10.1111/medu.13210.[18] J. Lave, Cognition in practice : mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press, 1988.[19] E. Wenger, Communities of practice : learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, 1998.[20] J. Gainsburg
methodology enable the multi-vocality,multi-subjectivity, and critical questioning of each other’s narratives (Chang et al., 2016), whichin turn help expand and more finely conceptualize various paradoxes and aspects of the cultureof engineering education. Multiple autoethnographers collaborating, questioning each other, andexamining their own and each other’s data allows for complementarity and criticality of findings(Hernandez, Chang, & Ngunjiri, 2017; Chang et al., 2016). Furthermore, throughintersubjectivity (subjectivity shared by different minds/individuals) and multivocality, thesingularity of an individual’s experiences is tamed (Hernandez et al., 2017). Multiple voicesdistilling out the essence of an idea and sharing multiple experiences
, are two-fold. First, the UTAs might serve as aspirational peers that are more relatable and approachableto the first-year engineering students. With this intention in mind, the UTAs typically circulatedthrough the classroom in the second half of the semester during “work days” when the first-yearstudents were working on the provisional patent application assignment. Further, UTAs offeredoffice hours and selected a location in the student work area. Secondarily, the UTAs took fieldnotes following semi-structured observational guidelines that described the interactions andactivities in the discussion section. The UTAs met with the research team to review the fieldnotes and deliberate on the activities every other week for the duration of the
often not well situated to address ethics of technology or the kindof technical writing and communication that is relevant to engineering students. The embeddedSTS department is a “third way” of sorts. By giving the task of introducing engineering studentsto STS professors whose research and teaching focuses precisely on the intersection oftechnology and society—and often more specifically on engineering education—engineeringfaculties and schools are able to confidently address the shortcomings of the two approachesdescribed above. It is with this “third way” in mind that we use the term “embeddeddepartment.” Embedded STS programs enjoy nominal membership in the engineering faculties inwhich they are embedded. This situates the STS
does the university prepare students for graduation? For what is the university heldaccountable? How do students participate in their preparation process? What does industrycontribute? These are questions that faculty and engineering programs must consider to besuccessful preparing minds for the next step in their students’ life’s journey. The universitysetting is expected to provide an environment to help students transition from high school tobeing an adult. Are graduates really prepared for what lies ahead? 1Each year Baylor University graduates another class of students who will begin theirprofessional life. For those faculty who have had the privilege of teaching both freshman andgraduating
reflection depends on the instructor’smotivation for introducing reflection in the first place. While assessment seems appropriate forreflections geared towards understanding of course content, integration of bodies of objectiveknowledge, and application of foreign bodies of objective knowledge to the field of engineering,it could be argued, as sources indicate above, that with other purposes – such as personaldevelopment or self-assessment – students would be more truthful if they did not anticipate beingassessed or even needing to turn in their reflections. However, one must keep in mind the pointalready cited: assessment, even of subjective reflections, may help students improve theirreflection skills.c) Factors in Successful ReflectionA number
Paper ID #31588Designing an Engineering Computer Instructional Laboratory: Working withthe PanopticonDr. Shehla Arif, University of Mount Union I am a thermal-fluids sciences educator. My doctoral and postdoctoral work is on experimental fluid dynamics of bubbles. My emphasis is interdisciplinary moving between mechanical engineering, geology, and biology. I acquired PhD from Northwestern University, IL and a post-doc at McGill University, Canada. I am passionate about integrating Engineering education with liberal arts studies. To that end, I am interested in embedding social justice and peace studies into engineering
Paper ID #16973A Principlist Approach for Thinking About the Social Impacts of Engineer-ingDr. Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida Jonathan Beever is Assistant Professor of Philosophy and faculty with the Texts & Technology Program at The University of Central Florida. He has held postdoctoral positions with Penn State’s Rock Ethics Institute and with Purdue University’s Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering before joining UCF. He has held fellowships with the Kaufmann Foundation, the Aldo Leopold Foundation, and the Global Sustainable Soundscape Network. Jonathan works and publishes at the intersection of