Paper ID #37619The Development of Career Resilience for Early Career Engineers inChina: A Grounded Theory StudyMr. Lichao Ma, Tsinghua University Lichao MA, male, PhD. student, Division of Engineering Education Research Tsinghua University. His scholarship focuses on higher education policy and management, engineering education. He is devoted to understanding and facilitating Chinese higher engineering education reform, through which he expects to cultivate engineers who can demonstrate innovation, resilience, social competency, responsibility and ethics. His research is published with journals like The Asia-Pacific
(e.g., theoretical, empirical, case study, etc.), student outcomes from therespective story-driven learning approaches tended to align across articles. Most commonly,outcomes tended to involve at least one of the following areas: 1) leadership and career skills, 2)well-being, 3) empowerment among marginalized groups, 4) self-concept clarity, 5) empathy andsense of belonging, and 6) learning skills and engagement. While the results from our analysisrevealed a relative paucity of story-driven learning in higher education, the conclusions show arange of positive impacts for students—highlighting the potential utility of story-driven learning. 2
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Learning the impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion modules in an undergraduate electrical engineering classroomAbstract:In this paper, we present the design and implementation of a set of diversity, equity, andinclusion (DEI) based modules, created to be deployed in an introductory computing courseoffered to first year students in our program. Our objective is to ensure that engineeringundergraduate students, who are not historically exposed to DEI content within the engineeringcurriculum, are introduced to these important topics in the context of their technical courseworkand that they understand the relevance of DEI to their careers. We created 6 modules that cover awide range of topics
, speaking, listening; managing process; adapting approach to circumstances; persuading and influencing others) 3. Teams and Groups a. Coordination, cooperation, collaboration b. Multidisciplinary teams, knowledge integration c. Negotiation and conflict management d. Relationship between individual capabilities and group functioning 4. Identity and Culture a. Duality/sociotechnical differentiation (technical/nontechnical; either/both; simplistic/complex; deterministic/contingency) b. Stage of career/role in organization c. “Typical/average engineer” as leader/entrepreneur (norm vs. exceptional)4.3 Topic Models Tables 2-4 display the
into the expert-like practicesengineers might engage in to address challenges, but how and where engineers develop the abilityto engage in sociotechnical thinking throughout their careers is currently unclear. Sociotechnicalthinking is inherently complex, and while many engineering educators regard it as a critical skill,relatively little is understood about the learning experiences and processes needed to promotesociotechnical thinking. The purpose of this paper is to synthesize the literature on cognitivedevelopment and sociotechnical design theories and to envision a research area related to studentsand professional development of sociotechnical thinking in engineering design. In cognitivedevelopment, I highlight literature related to
engineers who worked on the SE3 committee, I heard similar reports about how theirfirms viewed this committee work relative to work on technical committees (like the SeismologyCommittee or the Existing Building Committee), which work to develop codes, standards, ormitigation strategies using the latest developments in research. While those involved in SE3noted the benefits that their involvement had to the career, they were not necessarily recognizedin terms of advancement in their firms for this work.Various interlocutors let me know that their work heading SE3 was valuable in terms of makingconnections with others and the work was well-regarded among others in the professionalorganization that shared the values of diversity, equity, and inclusion
complex sociotechnical and global contexts, as well as designing one’s ownengineering pathway and designing for real-world clients as required in our Capstone Designsequence. For assessing and growing this programmatic spine, we have carefully integrated theassessable performance indicators into our course delivery to expand what it means to be adesign engineer in a socially, and technologically, complex world.Problem Solving Five Years OutAs we develop our students for their post-graduate careers, we consider not only the mission andvalues of our department, but projections for student development and growth five years aftertheir learning experience in our courses. Program educational objectives (PEOs) help us to framestudent success as related
profession. As engineering educationfaculty, students, and support practitioners, we are engaging in a collaborative inquirymethodology to examine engineering education programs, recruitment, and curricula, andengineering career pathways to identify key practices that hinder learning about and workingtowards Solidarity Engineering. This work-in-progress presents a broad outline of work we areundertaking to explore what we call the “re-engineering” of both engineering education and ofpotential career pathways. Through our work, we hope to identify a broad set ofsolidarity-focused examples and methods. Further, we hope this paper inspires a largerconversation about how the engineering profession can reframe its ways of engaging within theworld to
Communication is widely misunderstood, and while this is perhaps especially truein STEM disciplines, STEM is not alone in their misconceptions. Outside of CommunicationStudies, Interpersonal Communication (IPC) tends to be treated as a personality trait (Okoro,Washington, & Thomas, 2017; Pert, 2019), and on popular career websites and in professionalcontexts alike, is most often defined in terms of “people skills,” “personal skills” (Doyle, 2021),or even “friendliness” (Indeed, 2021). IPC is also frequently discussed as a set of traits that areinherent to a person.However, the role of IPC in everyday professional communication is much deeper and morecomplex than cordiality; it is essential to functionality and effectiveness across disciplines
academic success and optimal emotional development of their students. Unfortunately,engineering students often do not have access to such relationships. Were engineering educatorsto better recognize the importance of these relationships and contribute to creating such acommunity, they could help to ensure engineering students were able to thrive academically andemotionally.C. Absence of Harassment and Expression without FearIn the United States, harassment is a growing problem in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) fields [14]. Harassment can be verbal, physical, or sexual and include anyunwelcome or unfavorable behavior due to one’s identity (e.g., gender, race, age, religion).Harassment has adverse impacts on career outcomes
computerengineering portion. Typical course topics in the materials and mechanical engineering portionof the course included: metals and atoms, hardness testing, microstructures and properties,Hooke’s Law, and the design of trusses. Typical course topics in the electrical and computerengineering portion included Ohm’s Law, the resistor color code, equivalent resistance, power,digital logic, ASCII, and concepts regarding computer programming like basic variables andconditional statements. In addition to these technical topics, professional orientation toengineering was addressed with lectures on career opportunities, resume development, etc.Centered on preliminary topics in computer, electrical, materials, and mechanical engineering,past versions of EG 101
Paper ID #39634Mediation and Maintenance in Engineering Professional Work Practices:Findings from a Utility CompanyRussell Korte, The George Washington University Russell Korte, PhD. studies the social, cultural, and professional systems in organizations and higher education, along with their effects on learning and performance. This work focuses on the professional education and socialization of engineering students, the work of practicing engineers, as well as the prepa- ration of professionals for their future careers. Dr. Korte is an Associate Professor of Human and Organizational Learning at The George Washington
system) categorizes Mann as “highly influential,” yet itappears that the most extensive account of his life is a brief biographical sketch in the 1922-1923edition of Who’s Who in America [Marquis, 1922]. That sketch forms the outline of thechronology presented here. Mann was born in Orange, New Jersey on July 12, 1869, shortlyafter the passage of the Morrill Act of 1862 and the creation of “the land-grant institutions thatgave basic shape to the U.S. approach to engineering education” [Akera, 2017, p. 1].His career followed a typical path for the first 25 years. He earned an A.B. from Columbia in1890 and an A.M. in 1891. In 1896, he received a Ph.D. in physics from the University of Berlin.He married in June of that same year and took a position
in their home countries. For StudentH, astudent from NYCU, for example, the situation improved when he discovered that the topicscovered in the course were closely related to their major and future career as an engineer.During the interview with Shawn when the semester ended, he said: “I would say this courseis quite useful in retrospect. I can easily connect the topics explored back to the real worldand current geopolitics.”12Cultivating “global competency” in a divided worldClearly, NYCU students became more active after the instructors made it clear that classroomperformance would also affect their final grade during the one-on-one sessions with eachstudent. However, the disparity in classroom participation between students from NYCU
society. She is particularly interested in developing and implementing interventions to improve mental health related help seeking in undergraduate engineering students. Sarah graduated with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Rowan University and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Massachusetts. She began her academic career as teaching faculty in Chemical Engineering at the University of Kentucky. As an educator, Sarah works to integrate non-cognitive skills such as creativity, social and emotional intelligence, and communication into her courses. Her experience as a teaching faculty member led her to the development of her research in student mental health, resulting in her transition from
. L., Slack, T., & Junqueira, W. (2022a). Factors Impacting Engineering Advanced Degree Pursuit and Attainment Among Black Males. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 28(4), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2021036005Henderson, J. A., Hines, E. M., Davis, J. L., Benjamin, L. S. S., Alarcón, J. D., & Slack, T. (2022b). It’s a Vibe: understanding the graduate school experiences of Black male engineering faculty. Journal for Multicultural Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-01-2022-0013Henderson, T. S., Shoemaker, K. A., & Lattuca, L. R. (2022c). Career calculus: Assessing the psychological cost of pursuing an engineering career. Journal of
). I havelimited experience with qualitative research, and kept this in mind while interperting the resultsof our study. I tend not to think about how my identity is affecting my interpretation of datawithout prompting. As a non-engineer, educator, and social scientist, my biases are that empathyand critical thinking are integral to the development of deep-thinking. Career-focused beginningstudents are unlikely to take a critical look at the field of they have just entered, and need to seeexamples of this. I attempted to assist with data analysis and interpretation as the project hasbeen implemented.Michael Laver: I am a forty-nine year old white, cis-gender male from Indiana, currently livingin Rochester, New York. I received my bachelor’s
. Waidzunas, “Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM,” Sci. Adv., vol. 7, no. 3, p. eabe0933, 2021, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0933.[11] J. B. Yoder and A. Mattheis, “Queer in STEM: Workplace Experiences Reported in a National Survey of LGBTQA Individuals in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers,” J. Homosex., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–27, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1078632.[12] E. A. Cech, “The (Mis)Framing of Social Justice: Why Ideologies of Depoliticization and Meritocracy Hinder Engineers’ Ability to Think About Social Injustices,” in Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities, J. Lucena, Ed., in Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Dordrecht
silenced and highlighted inthe process of shaping hybrid pedagogies and engineering by reflecting on and assessing thenature of “hybridity,” “innovation,” and “design” in engineering education. Introduction During the late 2000s, the South Korean government identified the need to prioritizescience and technology policy in the university sector, specifically in the area of informationand communication technologies, with the aim of developing global leaders. A concerningissue of a "crisis in science and engineering fields" was identified, whereby many youngstudents were disinclined to pursue science and technology careers. In response, thegovernment initiated an effort to attract talented young
embraced.The faculty of RMC have a strong commitment to the liberal arts tradition. The College also hasa strong faculty governance model and “faculty control the curriculum.” A vote of the fullfaculty is required in order to begin a new major. A vocal minority of faculty members believestrongly that the purpose of a liberal arts education is “to promote the common good” [16],regardless of whether or not that education leads to career. They also believe that any newcurricular ideas must percolate up naturally from within the faculty rather than being driven byoutside donors.Given the faculty perspective described above, it became clear that in presenting the new majorfor faculty approval, it would be best to emphasize the scientific foundation of
skills and collaborative and inclusive teams into the curriculum. Dr. Rivera-Jim´enez graduated from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez with a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering. She earned an NSF RIEF award recognizing her effort in transitioning from a meaningful ten-year teaching faculty career into engineering education research. Before her current role, she taught STEM courses at diverse institutions such as HSI, community college, and R1 public university. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Social Responsibility Views in Science and Engineering: An Exploratory Study Among Engineering Undergraduate
Engineering, English,Communication, Rhetoric, Theatre, Visual Art and Design, Science and Technology Studies, andEngineering Education. Our teaching responsibilities run the gamut of transdisciplinaryinstruction, including communication, science and society, professionalism, team skills,leadership and ethics, and responsibilities as an artist-in-residence, with instruction andsupervision at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Our research interests reflect theseactivities and our career stages span from graduate school to near retirement. We are united by acommon interest in how engineering students develop mindsets that enable effective humanisticpractice, and we share common values in supporting our students’ development of
ofdevelopment, with communication assignments (e.g. memos, reports) accompanying manystages using genres appropriate for the given project phase. In almost all modules students arerole playing in the lab’s make-believe company, which is managed by Harold, doing work formake-believe clients.Prior to this faculty position, Harold had accumulated over 13 years of experience working inindustry. There, he learned through trial and error how important communication andprofessional skills are to the success of a technical professional’s career. So, when he begandesigning and teaching laboratory and project-based courses, he understood how they are anideal environment to simulate the settings and activities found in engineering workplaces,including
National Science Foundation projects in the engineering education realm, researching engineering career trajectories, student motivation, and learning. Sreyoshi has been recognized as a Fellow at the Academy for Teaching Excellence at Virginia Tech (VTGrATE) and a Fellow at the Global Perspectives Program (GPP) and was inducted to the Yale Bouchet Honor Society during her time at Virginia Tech. She has also been honored as an Engaged Ad- vocate in 2022 and an Emerging Leader in Technology (New ELiTE) in 2021 by the Society of Women Engineers. Views expressed in this paper are the author’s own, and do not necessarily reflect those of organizations she is associated with. Learn more about Sreyoshi’s impact
programs positioned the engineer’s role as a leader orcollaborator. Programs with an “engineering for” orientation framed leadership and collaborationskills in transactional or extractive terms - that the purpose of learning how to lead or collaboratewas to reap the greatest success for your career or your employer. This approach was commonlyfound in the international or global engineering minors, which emphasized “competency” and“effectiveness” as the goals, which would facilitate successful cross-cultural negotiation ormanagement. On the other hand, leadership or collaboration for “engineering with” relied moreon language that understood the goal to be co-development and mutuality. For example, whereother minors described the goal as solving
for error. However, this fear was tempered to some degree for Joris knowing thatresponsibility would be shared since engineers work in teams. Joris explained, It also kind of scares me, not really scares me because I know that for the career path I want to pursue I know that I want to design in groups, so it's not going to be my own personal responsibility. I'll still share that responsibility with some people, I assume.Joris perceived that teamwork and distributed responsibility lessened the fear he felt. However,him using the language “I assume” implies that he is not entirely sure of the reality of working asan engineer.StressTwo of the participants described feeling stressed about their future responsibility as
perceived by students as immediately relevant to their roles andidentities as engineers, resulting in decisions based on functional outputs but also entailinginterpretive flexibility and inherent contingency. We believe such approaches can produceeducational interventions that capture advanced conceptualizations of sociotechnical integration,while still being accessible to engineering students and interested faculty alike.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank our interviewees for sharing their time and expertise with us for this project,and we acknowledge their career-long commitments to engineering educational transformation.We thank our colleagues in the Engineering, Design, and Society Department for supporting andproviding focused feedback on our
Paper ID #39294Someone Like You: Theorizing LGBTQ Participation in Engineering throughNetwork Homophily and State AuthenticityDr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University, Bozeman Bryce E. Hughes is an Associate Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University. His research interests encompass diversity and equity in engineering education, with a focus on LGBTQ students. He was recently awarded an NSF CAREER grant to study the experiences of LGBTQ under- graduates in STEM fields. He holds a Ph.D. in education from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.A. in student development administration
intended for first year students, it is optional for certain majors, who areable to take it in later years if they desire.Researcher PositionalityWe identify as middle-class women who are interested in supporting and studying justice-oriented engineering education from elementary through undergraduate levels. Both of us haveengineering degrees followed by engineering education degrees and have taught undergraduateengineering courses. The first author, Chelsea Andrews, is a white American early-career facultymember, has been a part of this research project from its inception, and leads the researchcomponent, including overseeing data collection. She designed many of the sociotechnicalactivities for the course, including the lesson analyzed in this
Past President and Wise Woman of the Organization for the Study of Communication, Language, and Gender. She has received career achievement awards from ICA, NCA, the Central States Communication Association, and Purdue University where she was a Distinguished University Professor in communication and engineer- ing education (by courtesy) and Endowed Chair and Director of the Susan Bulkeley Butler Center for Leadership Excellence. Her primary research areas are organizational communication, career, work-life, resilience, feminist/gender, and design. Her grants have focused on ethics, institutional transformation, and diversity-equity-inclusion-belongingness in the professional formation of engineers.Dr. Sean M