Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Asghar Rezasoltani, Western Kentucky University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

andsurface properties of new materials. A model consisting of several standard test methods waspresented in this paper. The equipment is used to perform the presented tests are the same as thatused for conventional materials and usually available in material science labs of universities.References[1] Y. Huang, M. C. Leu, J. Mazumder, and A. Donmez, "Additive manufacturing: current state, future potential, gaps and needs, and recommendations," Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 137, no. 1, p. 014001, 2015.[2] S. Bland and N. T. Aboulkhair, "Reducing porosity in additive manufacturing," Metal Powder Report, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 79-81, 2015.[3] J. R. C. Dizon, A. H. Espera Jr, Q. Chen, and R. C. Advincula

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jahangir Ansari, Virginia State University; Zhenhua Wu, Virginia State University; Lipika Ghosh, Virginia State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Machine and compare the results with unwelded specimens.ProcedureTwo 6061 aluminum alloy plates (6x4x ¼ in) were welded together using the FSW process. Theweld was performed using tool rotational speed of 1200 rpm, the transverse speed of 4.5 mm/s,and plunging force of 5000 N. The welded plate was cut perpendicular to the welded line toproduce four rectangular strips. The strips were machined using CNC mill to make identicalspecimens for the tensile tests. The five steps of the welded specimens’ preparation and thegeometric characteristics of the test specimen are shown in Figure 3. Figure 3- Procedure Steps for Tensile TestThe recorded operation parameters of the FSW machine during the Al-Al welding processes

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; George McLeod, Old Dominion University ; Thomas E. Alberts, Old Dominion University; Cynthia Tomovic, Old Dominion University; Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Tysha Batts; Mary Louise Sandy, Virginia Space Grant Consortium

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

focused on building robots that can workin hazardous environments, but they also learned about different majors that explore roboticsconcepts in manufacturing, as well as the application of hydraulics for flood gates.AcknowledgmentThe project team wants to acknowledge Virginia Space Grant Consortium for its partnership inand continuous funding for the ODU BLAST program. 7References:[1] R. S. Andersen, S. Bøgh, T. B. Moeslund, and O. Madsen, "Intuitive task programming of stud welding robots for ship construction," in Industrial Technology (ICIT), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, 2015, pp. 3302-3307: IEEE.[2] S. Pfeiffer, "Robots, Industry 4.0 and humans, or why assembly work

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Faisal Aqlan, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Heather C. Lum, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Lisa Jo Elliott, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Richard Zhao, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

, & ones skills, resources and abilities allocating resources prior to learning Information Management – processing information efficiently Procedural – knowledge about how Monitoring – assessment of one s to implement a learning procedure learning or strategy use Debugging – correcting performance errors Conditional – knowledge about

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zhenhua Wu, Virginia State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

PLM Space (Fabricate, Inspect, Exchange through Exchange through Sensing/Control) Public Cloud Service Private Cloud Service CAD Modules CNC Machines PLM System Mfg Systems CAM Modules Design Inspection Maker s Product Maker s Ideas CAI Modules Input Sensing/Control CAE Modules MES

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Divya Pahuja, Florida State University; Marcia A. Mardis, Florida State University; Faye R. Jones, Florida State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

personological issues suggests thatgovernmental, industry, and educational stakeholders need to address the issue of a clearlystated, commonly used definition of AM to attract investors, recruit workforce participants, andguide effective educational opportunities.AcknowledgementThis work was supported, in part, by National Science Foundation award 1700581.References[1] B. Esmaeilian, S. Behdad, and B. Wang, "The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 39, pp. 79–100, 2016.[2] P. Panchak, "The manufacturer's agenda: Why we need a better definition of 'advanced manufacturing'," Industry Week, November 14. [Online]. Available: https://www.industryweek.com/leadership/manufacturers

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver; Jong-Hoon Kim, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

] university. University of This section (conclusion/summary) is a summary of In an online lab Minnesota the results and discussion from the report. It is still report writing Department of discussion, where you insert your opinion of the resource of a R1 Mechanical results. Report the key findings of the report here. It is university’s Engineering much like the results and discussion sections of the mechanical Student Writing abstract. Directly answer the report question here. Do engineering Guide [14] not be vague. program. Ringleb, S. I., Conclusions are logically tied to inquiry findings and In an engineering

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University; John M. Mativo, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

UnabridgedMerriam-Webster Inc. Springfield Massachusetts, USA. 2002.[5] Shekoyan, V., Dehipawala, S., Tremberger Jr., G., Cheung, T., Improving Fluid IntelligenceCritical Thinking Via Special Reasoning Ability in Community College Pre-Engineering PhysicsClasses. 2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic Spring Conference.[6] Rotante, T., Brem, S., Hubele, N., Runger, G., Kennedy, K., Case Based Reasoning forEngineering Statistics, 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, NSF Grantees Poster Session.[7] Papadopoulos, C., Rahman, A, Bostwick, J., 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.[8] Golanbari, M., Garlikov, R., Employing Socratic Pedagogy To Improve Students’ CriticalReasoning Skills, Teaching by Asking Instead of Telling, 2008 ASEE Annual Conference andExposition.[9] Liu, A

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Atif Saeed, Vaughn College of Aeronautics & Technology; Niki T. Taheri, Vaughn College of Aeronautics & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

(0)#define b (1)#define c (2)#define d (3)#define e (4)#define f (5)#define g (6)#define h (7)#define i (8)#define j (9)#define k (10)#define l (11)#define m (12)#define n (13)#define o (14)#define p (15)#define q (16)#define r (17)#define s (18)#define t (19)#define u (20)#define v (21)#define w (22) #define x (23) #define y (24) #define z (25) void printVR(uint8_t *buf) { Serial.println("VR Index\tGroup\tRecordNum\tSignature"); Serial.print(buf[2], DEC); Serial.print("\t\t");if(buf[0] == 0xFF){ Serial.print("NONE"); }else if(buf[0]&0x80){ Serial.print("UG "); Serial.print(buf[0]&(~0x80), DEC); }else{ Serial.print("SG "); Serial.print(buf[0], DEC); } Serial.print("\t"); Serial.print(buf[1], DEC); Serial.print("\t\t

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zareena Gani, Higher Colleges of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

knowledge ofindustrial practice are required to facilitate learning through PBL approach. Such real-worldexperience could be attained by collaborating with industries to get an insight of the currentpractices and requirements. Experts from industrial partners could also train the faculties duringthe program’s professional development sessions in order to combat the issue.7. References[1] S. S. S. K. H. B. Zareena Gani, "Teaching Manufacturing Technology through ’Learning by Doing’ Approach," American Society for Engineering Education, 2018.[2] H. A. H. a. S. K. Esche, "ENHANCING THE ENGINEERING CURRICULUM THROUGH PROJECT-BASED LEARNING," in 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, 2002.[3] D. F. T. Julie E. Mills

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University; Melissa Geist, Tennessee Technological University; Yunbo Zhang, Rochester Institute of Technology; George Chitiyo, Tennessee Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

the enrolledstudents were reported. Based on this initial development and implementation, the courseprofessors plan to make improvements and advance the deliveries of the course in the nearfuture.References[1] S. Brand, “Six Industries Benefiting from Additive Manufacturing,” California’sManufacturing Network Blog, August 21, 2018, https://www.cmtc.com/blog/six-industries-benefiting-from-additive-manufacturing, accessed on April 5, 2019.[2] S. Sedghi, and E. Hall, “3D printing will have a bigger economic impact than the internet,technology specialist says.” ABC News the World Today, April 1, 2015,https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-01/3d-printing-impact-bigger-than-internet-expert-says/6365296, accessed on April 5, 2019.[3] C. L.Ventola

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hamid Eisazadeh, Old Dominion University; Milan Rakita, Purdue University; Mona Torabizadeh, Old Dominion University; Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

University B (Blind-review)’s learningmanagement system. Papers in each section are milestone works in that discipline and span a fewdecades of development of theory and practice. Each week students are assigned to read on averagetwo to three papers that will be referred the most during the next lecture.Even though theoretical in nature, practice, and observation is a very important component of thiscourse. The equivalent of laboratory exercises in undergraduate classes, the purpose of practiceand observation is to perform simple experiments in order to verify theoretical calculations andpoint out their limitations and some trends. The course is offered as 3 lecture hours per week andno laboratory hours, which is traditional for graduate courses

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Hsieh, S. “Design of Remotely Accessible Automated Systems to Enhance Industrial Automation Education,” ASEE 2017 Annual Conference, June 25 - 28, Columbus, Ohio.[2] Grodotzki, J., Ortelt, T.R. and Tekkaya, A.E., 2018. Remote and Virtual Labs for Engineering Education 4.0: Achievements of the ELLI project at the TU Dortmund University. Procedia Manufacturing, 26, pp.1349-1360, 2018.[3] Bikas, H., Stavropoulos, P. and Chryssolouris, C., “Additive manufacturing methods and modeling approaches: A critical review,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University; Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu Husanu, Drexel University; Andrew Chi, Drexel University; Thomas Hays

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

design considerations were US D798,634 Sand US 9,775,443 B2. US D798,634 S is a design patent for an interconnected air pocket seatcushion. The only claim made by this patent is “the ornamental design for an air cushion, asshown and described”. This claim does not conflict with the project because it only affects seatcushions that match the design shown: Figure 1. Seat cushion design patentUS 9,775,443 B2 is a patent for a “discontinuous air delivery system for inflatable static medicaldevice” that maintains a preset pressure throughout the entirety of an air mattress using acomputer controlled air pump. This patent has 18 claims that are very specific and detailed, butthe easiest one that proves that the design

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Reality, Santa Barbard, CA, 2006, pp. 125-128.10. Zieliński, C. (1997). Object-oriented robot programming. Robotica, 15(1), 41-48.11. E. Freund, D. Rokossa and J. Rossmann, "Process-oriented approach to an efficient off-line programming of industrial robots," IECON '98. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (Cat. No.98CH36200), Aachen, Germany, 1998, pp. 208-213 vol.1.12. Emma C Morley, Chanan S Syan, (1995) "Teach pendants: how are they for you?", Industrial Robot: An International Journal, Vol. 22 Issue: 4, pp.18-22.13. Kaluarachchi, Malaka Miyuranga, and Fawaz Yahya Annaz. "GUI teaching pendant development for a 6 axis articulated robot." International Conference on Intelligent

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louise Rosanna Manfredi, Syracuse University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

/furniture/.[5] F. Granström, Socio-economic evaluation: An exploratory case study of a community waste, Cranfield: Cranfield University, 2006.[6] M. Braungart and W. McDonough, Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, North Point Press, 2002.[7] M. Braungart, W. McDonugh and A. Bollinger, "Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions – a strategy for eco-effective product and system design," Journal of Cleaner Production, pp. 1337-1348, 2007.[8] J. Conciatore, "From tea bags to Miatas, bioplastics are on the," 3 March 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=134326.[9] S. Brockhaus, M. Petersen and W. Kersten, "A cross roads for bioplastics: exploring product

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bahaa Ansaf, Colorado State University, Pueblo; Nebojsa I. Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

that they learned much or learned very much from the ML. The students wereasked to write a piece of information learned from the micro-lecture topic (selective assembly andtolerances analysis). Here are some samples of student’s answers (“ISO has 3 standards, selectiveassembly is 100% interchangeability, and reduce machine time but increase cost.”, “The limitationof selective assembly slide was become new information to me. Normal distribution was expected,however, I think it would been hypergeometric. It was interesting that selective assembly was usedsince in 1930's.”, “allows for 100% interchange with the cost effectiveness of statistical”. Thestudent’s feedback shows increased knowledge and advanced thinking about the subject

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeleine Jennings, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Audrey R. Boklage, University of Texas, Austin; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

the differences in experiences that differing identitieshave, as well as the need to homogenize these experiences.References[1] G. Cavalcanti, “Is it a Hackerspace, Makerspace, TechLab, or FabLab?,” Make: DIY Projects and Ideas for Makers.[2] W. C. Barrett, T. W., & Pizzico, M. C., & Levy, B., & Nagel, R. L., & Linsey, J. S., & Talley, K. G., & Forest, C. R., & Newstetter, “A Review of University Makerspaces,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[3] C. B. Leggon, “Diversifying Science and Engineering Faculties: Intersections of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender,” Am. Behav. Sci., vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 1013–1028, 2010.[4] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, “‘I Wish that I

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tomas Oppenheim, California State University Maritime

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

, Washington.10.18260/p.23523[7] P. Foster, “AC 2012-3107: Evolution of the Stirling Cycle: Empasis on Reliability, Durability,and Long-Term Unattended Operation,” Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/21350[8] J. Weller and V. Kumar and S. Grove and R. Bordia, “The Development of a Project-BasedIntroduction to Manufacturing Laboratory Involving a Stirling Engine,” Paper presented at 1998Annual Conference, Seattle, Washington. https://peer.asee.org/7033[9] N. Allen and JM. Cunnington and L. Westra and M. Klein and E. Odom and RE. Smelser,“Adapting the MIT Stirling Engine Project at the University of Idaho, A Land Grant Instiution,”Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu Husanu, Drexel University; M. Eric Carr, Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

stopping distance of 301 m within13.8 s. The best of 10 trials for the brake have shown a stopping distance of 212 m within 10.3 s. Thisshows approximately a 30% reduction in the stopping distance. The standard does not require the brake tohappen within any specified timeframe, but the time was collected to help understand how the brake isperforming along with the ability to calculate the acceleration of the brake for Figure 15. When braking,the deceleration is on average 19% greater than without braking [5]. 120 Velocity vs Distance 0.00

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul C. Lynch, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Joseph Wilck, College of William & Mary; Elizabeth Gaughan, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Industry, Retrieved from: https://www.bea.gov7. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Industry Economic Accounts and International Monetary Fund, Retrieved from: https://www.bea.gov8. Roadmap for Manufacturing Education, The Manufacturing Institute, December 2012.9. Morrison, T., Maciejewski, B., Giffi, C., DeRocco, E.S., McNelly, J., Carrick, G., Boiling point? The skills gap in U.S. manufacturing, Sponsored by Deloitte and The Manufacturing Institute, Retrieved from: http://www.themanufacturinginstitute.org/~/media/A07730B2A798437D98501E798C2E13 AA.ashx10. Todd, R. H., Red, W. E., Magleby, S.P., and Coe, S. “Manufacturing: A Strategic Opportunity for Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Will Tyson, University of South Florida; Marilyn Barger, National Science Foundation ATE Centers; Lakshmi Jayaram, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

] Moved up [1]: Sample¶ Deleted: The program composition of Deleted: s Deleted: broke down this way

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Chiou, Drexel University; Carlos Michael Ruiz, Drexel University; Michael G. Mauk, Drexel University; M. Eric Carr, Drexel University; Tzu-Liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

impact on the surface it is driving on. The prototyping for the crawlerinvolves some very advanced technologies, using a camera to allow the robot to see, and giving itthe ability to decipher objects and defects from the functional interior of the plane is one of thechallenges they are still trying to overcome. This project has been substantially helped out bythings such as CAD programs and rapid prototyping aids that let the project move ahead muchfaster. This is more important when using new materials such as polymers and carbon fiber.Presentation #5Title: The Evolution of Urban Manufacturing – 1970 to PresentAbstract: This presentation reviewed the state of Urban Manufacturing during the 1970’s incontrast to its condition today, using