engi-neering (eventually including commentary from professional engineers), as well as the class’srelevance with respect to other areas within the mechanical engineering curriculum.To aid students in planning their schedules, it will also list prerequisites, the estimated workload, helpful books and/or internet sites, places to get help, and other similar classes the Page 11.145.10student might like if he or she enjoyed the class.Interests PageThis page is designed to guide students through mechanical engineering based on theirparticular interests. It will describe the various fields within mechanical engineering, notingthe types of jobs available
tenets of the engineering profession and its actions [2].” Reference [3] includes the students’ knowing of the engineering practice within aglobal, environmental and societal context as one of the ‘awareness skills’. It alsoindicates that mastering such skills will be a major determinant of the futurecompetitiveness of engineering graduates. Agenda 21, a global action plan for delivering sustainable development accepted atthe Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, stated that “education is critical forpromoting sustainable development and improving the capacity of the people to addresssustainable development issues [4]”. The international survey of Ref. [4] found out thatengineering students had weak knowledge of many of the environmental
here, with tiered content – each topic buildingdirectly on the previous – setting up an assessment plan separating proficiency and mastery skillssets fosters improved student mastery of core principles across the entire sequence of topics.The increased success rate on the proficiency level work by the students is likely due to severalinterrelated causes, including shifted expectations and having the foundation necessary for thenext topic. Students appreciate the clearly defined expectations required for the proficiency levelcompetency (also access to a C-level grade). The instructor now also know precisely wherethese students have demonstrated competency at the end of a course. When competency inprocedural analysis is conflated with the
Thermodynamics, thisfaculty member also assigned the same Thermodynamics student activities to students enrolled inIntroduction to Thermal Systems and Applied Thermodynamics. Data was collected for both ofthese courses in addition to the planned Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics sections. Figure 1 Courses with modified content highlighted in the BSME curriculumThrough 2016 Fall to 2017 Fall, the developed modules were implemented to introduce studentsinto the area of fluid power. Eight different instructors were involved and a total of 239 studentswere exposed, as shown in Table 1. Results in different courses are presented in sections below. Table 1 Course sections covered and number of students introduced to fluid power Semester
Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education. 2005;94(1):103-120.10. S&T M. ME Curriculum Worksheet. 2017; https://mae.mst.edu/media/academic/mae/documents/advising/MEwPrereq4DigFS14.pdf.11. University TAM. MEEN Curriculum Flowchart. 2017; https://engineering.tamu.edu/media/3717002/Prereq%20Flowchart%20for%20ME%20M ay%202016-139.pdf.12. Nebraska-Lincoln UO. Mechanical Engineering. 2015; https://bulletin.unl.edu/undergraduate/2014/major/Mechanical+Engineering/plans.13. Kansas Uo. Curriculum Flowchart (Fall 2015 and After). 2017; http://me.engr.ku.edu/sites/me.drupal.ku.edu/files/docs/ME_Curriculum_Flowchart_Fall_ 2015.pdf.14. University KS. Mechanical Engineering Flow
California, San Diego as postdoctoral fellow in the area of bioacoustics. He teaches dynamics, machine design, numerical methods and finite element methods. He has worked for the automotive industry in drafting, manufacturing, testing (internal combus- tion engines—power, torque and exhaust emissions, vibration fatigue, thermo-shock, tensile tests, etc.), simulations (finite element method), and as a project manager (planning and installation of new testing facilities). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Design and validation of a bracket using laser scanner, topology optimization and a 3D printerIntroductionLaser scanners, topology optimization
his Ph.D. he worked at the University of California, San Diego as postdoctoral fellow in the area of bioacoustics. He teaches dynamics, machine design, numerical methods and finite element method. His research inter- ests are in vibration, numerical methods, finite element methods, continuum mechanics and acoustics. He has work for the automotive industry in drafting, manufacturing, testing (internal combustion engines –power, torque and exhaust emissions, vibration fatigue, thermo-shock, tensile tests, etc.), simulations (finite element method) and as a project manager (planning and installation of new testing facilities).Dr. Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University Arif Sirinterlikci is a University Professor
-stakes meeting may have reducedsocial loafing and contributed overall to students’ verbal participation.I. IntroductionIn the workplace and the academy, professional engineers, researchers, and students typicallyfunction in teams. Even if individual team members have diverse technical backgrounds andexpertise, the effectiveness of their work together depends on more than engineering ‘chops’. Inorder to negotiate, plan, motivate, and integrate tasks at the team and even department level,engineers must practice and become skilled at interpersonal tasks like “communication,collaboration, networking, feedback provision and reception, teamwork, lifelong learning, andcultural understanding”1. As a collective rather than individual endeavor, the
. Assessment establishes thatraise in student engagement and learning is significant. Student engagement calculated for thetotal class registration against the actual number of students present for that day. Actualengagement will be little higher, if the student engagement is computed against the actualnumber of student present in the class. However, it is evident that student engagement andlearning improved, using above method to solve problems through active learning. As a futurework, authors plan to establish a method to measure and present the increased effectiveness ofactive learning in such courses.References[1] Jenny A. Van Amburgh, et al, A Tool for Measuring Active Learning in the Classroom,American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2007
23.372.2energy. The Sustainable Urban Transport (SUT) is such a vehicle.There are multiple SUTs in existence today that match our project design criteria. The MyCarwas originally a manufacturing collaboration between EU Auto Technology and Hong KongPolytechnic University. It was available in Hong Kong, Britain, Austria, and France. In 2010,EU Auto Technology was acquired by GreenTech Automotive. As of today, GTA plans to beginmanufacturing the MyCar in its Mississippi plant soon. Current specifications are unknown.However before the acquisition, The Mycar had a maximum speed of 35 to 40 mph, a chargetime of 5 to 8 hours, and a driving range of 40 to 68 miles. Length, width, and height were 2.6m, 1.4 m, and 1.4 m, respectively. The price was $10,000.001
Engineering Technology Department with a major inmechanical or electrical engineering technology.The objectives of the Engineering Technology Project class are: i. To introduce the students to CNC programming including programing G-code for milling and turning operations; ii. To introduce the students to industrial robotics and robot programming; iii. To understand the fundamentals of fuel cells, fuel cell components, materials and manufacturing processes used in the fuel cell industry; iv. To be knowledgeable with the computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) process; v. To acquire experience in project planning, team work, design and creative thinking; vi. To learn how
carried out by the Associate Chair for theUndergraduate Program.Final ThoughtsThough not as thorough as more exhaustive outcome review, a sampling approach does allow for Page 25.384.5the identification of program improvements similar to those from a more exhaustive review.More importantly, it requires considerably less faculty time and effort and, hence, it much moresustainable.References1. ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2012 – 2013, http://www.abet.org/engineering-criteria-2012-2013/, visited January 11. 2012.2. Younis, Nashwan, “Supplementary Assessment Tools for the Enhancement of the Program Assessment Plan
knowledge of particle measurement techniques to plan and conduct an ambient aerosol measurement campaign near the University. The students analyzed their data and compared it to measurements from nearby monitors and related the data to national standards.As the next step, the course material is being prepared for online posting and adapted for integration with the theoretical modules described earlier.COURSE WEB EFFECTIVENESS:The effectiveness of the course website was assessed in two ways:1. Usability tests were conducted on an early version of the site and conducted again onthe revised version of the site. In both tests, participants were given tasks to find coursematerial and use the calculation model available on the site. The purpose
the voltage produced. The maximum temperature difference tested was 68.1°C and thisproduced an efficiency of 2.22% and an output power of 1.17 watts. While this efficiency mightseem low, thermoelectric generators are noted for their relatively low conversion efficiency.Also, the maximum temperature difference tested (68.1°C) is fairly modest, higher temperaturedifferences would result in higher efficiency. Typical thermoelectric devices require atemperature difference of approximately 500°C to achieve an efficiency of 10% 9,10. Testing isplanned for the future with higher temperature differences, but the current testing has beensuccessful for the conditions tested.It is planned to use this experimental setup both as an in-class demonstration
constructtheir own versions of reality rather than simply absorbing versions presented by theirteachers.”7 Patterson’s Using Everyday Engineering Examples (E3) in the Classroom9, has alsoshown to improve the deep learning experiences of students. As the E3 name implies, everydayengineering examples that are familiar to students are used to provide the specific applications onwhich to build the inductive learning experience. The examples are chosen so thatstraightforward implementation of engineering principles is possible. Full lesson plans havebeen developed in Mechanics of Solids, Dynamics, Thermodynamics, and Fluid Mechanics10.The lesson plans for the instructors are based on the Principles of the 5E’s: Engage, Explore,Explain, Elaborate, and
, establish goals, plan tasks,and meet objectives.A question pertinent to any engineering educator is, “Where, when and how do we satisfy thisoutcome?” As an example of this, Sangelkar et al [2] surveyed faculty in their mechanicalengineering program to identify teaming experiences throughout their curriculum. They found anumber of courses with collaborative learning experiences, projects staffed by multiple students,and some degree of instruction in teaming, but conclude that the teaming experience in acurriculum can contain significant gaps.One of the challenges of teamworking is finding the time to provide instructor guidance withinthe scheduled classroom time. Some of the key issues to be addressed in teaming instruction arenoted in [3] and [4
during homework applications. This 7-minute time constraintwas decided upon originally to align with the desires of GenZ students for short bursts ofviewing, but also fit well into the 12-minute restriction which is required under softwarelicensing terms. It was discovered early in our pilot that a strict adherence to the 7-minutelimitation was too restrictive for many of the planned videos and would require the instructor toeither reduce the included material or to artificially separate the footage into two videos. Neitherof these points were considered sufficient to maintain the original, relatively arbitrary 7-minuteframework and we modified the concept to allow for single-topic review videos which weresimply as short as possible to cover the
Entrepreneurial Mindset (ICE) - KEEN ICE Award and joined a KEEN Innovative Teaching (KIT) faculty member and become part of a unique cohort of faculty who are commit- ted to improving engineering education. The overall goal of her Ph.D. research is to improve healthcare operations through systems engineering and optimization while focusing on operations and health out- come metrics. Going forward, she plans to continue and broaden this research in support of two overall goals: maximizing the long-run average daily net profit of a medical system from business perspective as well as quality of life from human being aspect. She believes teaching is a very challenging and promising effort. At the end of each class, instructors
accomplished with the rapidprototyping capability, and is a planned future activity. Future additions planned include thetesting of more complex wing morphing, perhaps more focused on wing morphing as a means ofboundary layer control, and refinement of the image illumination system to extend the field ofview and clarity of image captures. A more flexible (i.e., two or more degree of freedom)sectioned wing model is envisioned as the next logical step, which would require moresophisticated internal joint control.AcknowledgementsThe MNE research engineer and instrument shop machinist Jason Selland is gratefullyacknowledged for his work in conjunction with the rapid prototyping system, which was used toconstruct the smoke rake and flapped wing designs
Full-Time Staff Daytime 15 Fall 2016 Full-Time Faculty Daytime 15 Adjunct Faculty Evening 15The course content covers four topics: modeling of dynamic systems, analysis of dynamic systems,integrating mechatronic systems, and feedback control systems. A list of detailed learningobjectives for the overall course and individual modules are provided to students. The prerequisiteCircuits and Electronics course did not include a laboratory prior to Fall 2016. Therefore, inaddition to the planned learning objectives, Mechatronics serves as a first hands-on experiencewith electronics for many students. As an example, the overall course-wide
computed. This is accomplished bytrajectory planning. This profile needs to be defined in a way to avoid or reduce the mechanicalvibration and stress on components and actuators, as well as to reduce overshoot response andexcessive position error during motion. This is accomplished by electronic cams. The inversekinetic analysis, which includes masses, center-of-mass locations, and mass moments of inertia,is used to generate the required actuator torque / force for the motion profile, and results in aspeed / torque-force diagram on which to base actuator selection. The chosen actuator nowbecomes part of the system, and, with the updated system, a control system, with feedback andfeedforward control, is designed, which then results in a new speed
engineering design [2]. Stanford University also requires that first-year students takeIntroduction to Solid Mechanics, a course dedicated to teaching first year students themathematics behind design [3-4]. Stanford does not teach their students Engineering Drawinguntil their second year, but they still made this class a requirement before advanced engineeringdesign classes [3]. These colleges are similar to NAU’s Mechanical Engineering 4-yearprogression plan because they require introductory mathematical and engineering design coursesin the students’ first years. However, these colleges differ from NAU’s 4 year progression planbecause students are taught geometric dimensioning for engineering drawings and designthroughout multiple classes and
projects and students in a study group practicing solutions to challenging problems. The success of a team usually depends on the leadership, goal setting, task planning and other teamwork skills of its members.Note that these are not steps for engineering problem solving. Rather, they are the maincomponents or ingredients that are required to solve problems. In most problems, many of theSeven C’s will play a role, though perhaps not all of them at once.In addition to providing a framework for organizing new knowledge and skills, the structure andvocabulary of the Seven C’s can be used to identify specific areas of learning strength andweakness. A general statement such as, “I am not good at solving this type of problem” might bereplaced
observation is the succeed/fail nature of these projects created a strong desire toaccomplish the tasks at hand resulting in the necessary adoption of project managementtechniques such as detailed scheduling and organization and utilizing multiple resources toaccomplish several tasks at once by the student researcher.Along with the mentioned project management experiences, the project also provided valuabletechnical experiences. The student researcher had completed in the semester prior to project startour Instrumentation and Experimentation course. Expectations were high on performance onexperimental planning, instrumentation uncertainty prediction and selection and the studentresearcher performed in an exemplary manner. Present throughout the
activities from the pilot program to be leveraged across multiple K-12 age ranges as part of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) outreach activities. To date, this program has been in place for three academic sessions of each course. Thework presented here will cover results and observations to-date, preliminary evaluations ofeffectiveness relative to standard (non-pilot) program instances, and plans for future work. Gradedistribution, pass/fail percentage, and anonymous student feedback surveys are utilized asmetrics to evaluate the impact of the pilot program’s changes for each of these courses.Description of Program The pilot program utilizes experiential learning tools in the form of hands-on projects,classroom
FEA method through lecturing, examples, and homework assignments.The modified MECH625 was mainly focused on using SolidWorks Simulation andimplementing it for design projects. The main contents or skills in SolidWorks Simulation aregeneration / pre-processing of 3D models, assignment of materials, setting boundary conditions,creating appropriate meshing, defining contact conditions, post-processing, including applyingthe appropriate failure criterion, convergence iterations and interpretation of results [4]. Theweekly plan of the modified MECH625 is provided in Table 1.Most homework assignments in the modified MECH625 were focused on developing somespecific skills of FEA simulation. Successful completion of homework usually developednecessary
found least enjoyable.Assessment Quantitative assessment of the benefits of the design and build project to the students has notbeen attempted in this work. This issue requires a careful design of questions in the form of aquiz or as part of the final exam of the course to gauge whether the understanding of the materialhas improved as a result of implementing this project. The author plans to take that intoconsideration in the future. It is, however, the opinion of the author that this kind of project hassome significant contribution to the students’ understanding of some key issues in heat transferapplications. First, the students are forced to do research or even come up with a model ofevaluating the thermophysical properties of materials
be aligned with these national objectives.The planning team consisted of the authors as this small team possessed the expertise, resourcesand authority to perform the needs assessment and to implement the recommendations thatresulted. Dr. Stanton worked for Delphi Automotive after earning his B.S degree in ElectricalEngineering at Clarkson University. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at VirginiaTech, and was employed at Colorado State University as a Research Scientist under the HEVEprogram. Dr. Thomas Bradley was Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at CSU withindustrial and academic experience in HEV engineering and analysis. Bradley was PI for CSU’sportion of the HEVE program and had authority to implement necessary
the solutions andconsider any additional feedback, they engage metacognitively: they self-assess what they havelearned, and what they still need to know. They are self-directing their learning. According toAmbrose et al., 27 the key metacognitive skills to becoming self-directed learners are "studentsmust learn to assess the demands of the task, evaluate their own knowledge and skills, plan theirapproach, monitor their progress, and adjust their strategies as needed" (p. 191). When thesemetacognitive skills are nurtured, students' complex cognitive reasoning skills are enhancedwhich affect goal setting and improved performance.DiscussionDiscipline-based educational research seeks to understand impediments to student learningwithin a given
inthe engineering curriculum, the projects were completed in single classes.In this study, a PBL approach is implemented by developing projects in a series of requiredcourses in a Mechanical Engineering curriculum. The projects assigned in each course are relatedand planned to build up the knowledge and skills needed to develop a successful senior designproject or capstone project. In implementing the approach, the instructor identifies the topic orproblem to be proposed as a senior design project. In the first of the sequential courses, anexperimental measurements laboratory course, a project is assigned regarding a sensor that couldbe used in the senior design project. In the second of the sequential courses, a thermal-fluidslaboratory course