. 6. Council of Chief State School Officers, Attn: Publications, One Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Ste, 1997.[11] K. K. Hess, B. S. Jones, D. Carlock, and J. R. Walkup, “Cognitive Rigor: Blending the Strengths of Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge to Enhance Classroom- level Processes,” p. 8.[12] N. L. Webb, “Depth-of-Knowledge Levels for Four Content Areas.” Unpublished Paper, Mar. 28, 2002, Accessed: Apr. 07, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://dpi.wi.gov/sites/default/files/imce/assessment/pdf/All%20content%20areas%20%20 DOK%20levels.pdf.[13] L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing : a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, 2001.[14] E
Curriculum for Innovative Design,” sponsored by the Ministry of Science and Technology (formerly National Science Council), Taiwan, under Grant no. NSC 102-‐2511-‐S-‐002-‐011-‐MY3. Teachers engaging in interdisciplinary curriculum are often freed from isolation, allowed toactively take on multiple roles in teaching,10 and supported in reconstructing their roles andviews on their profession.6 On the other hand, some kind of mechanism—either institutionalor social—also needs to be in place in order to foster interdisciplinary cooperation amongteachers in the long run.8 In December 2013, three university teachers from civil engineering (CE), building andplanning (B&P), and futures studies (FS) embarked on a 3-year
terms go away but do not develop adeeper understanding on why. Considering this was a point of emphasis in the review packet andrelated to this experiment, it seemed a fair question on the final exam to gauge if the students hadmore comprehension of why certain terms in the balance were removed.The question was: “Recall the experiment you all did on the last day of class. The height of water in the column is 25” and you measure a flow rate of 0.000213 kg/s. I used the mechanical energy balance and simplified it to . This means Ftotal = 6.23 J/kg. • The cross sectional area at the top of the column of water (Point 1) is 0.00456 m2 and the cross
Design,” IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology, vol. 13, no. 4, Jul. 2005.5. D. P. Crismond, and R. S. Adams, “The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 4, Oct. 2012.6. B. Layng, D. Cain, K. McNulty, R. O’Connor, and T. Estrada (faculty mentor), “Design of an Autonomous, Line Following Pace Car for Athletic Training,” Zone 1 ASEE Confereence, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, Connecticut, April 2014.7. J.E. Speich, S. Yingfeng, and K.K. Leang (2008, December). “Low-Cost IR Reflective Sensors for Submicrolevel Position Measurement and Control,” in IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 13, pp. 700-709.8. M. P. Hans, AAAI
interesting/meaningful data during the flight, e.g. a camera that producespictures of the flight, a thermometer that records ambient temperature as a function of altitude, etc. 3) All payload components should be easily detachable such that they can be independentlyweighed before the final competition launch. 4) The solid-propellant propulsion system’s total impulse can not exceed 30 N-s. It is each team’sresponsibility to demonstrate that the constraint is met at the day of the final competition launch. 5) The total budget for the complete design, fabrication and operation should not exceed $250. 6) Demonstration of design analysis competence. Each team should develop theoretical models thatcan predict maximum altitude and total time of
Advanced Electrical PowerEngineering. The Mechanical Engineering department has been in the top 10 for BSMEgraduates nationwide for each of the last 27 years, with one of the department’s leadingeducational and research areas being vehicle and propulsion systems. In the mid-1990’s,Michigan Technological University was one of the first universities in the world to establishdistance learning with programs designed specifically to support the automotive OEM's and the Page 25.173.14electric power industries. It has the experience, courses, and faculty necessary to deliver theeducation program simultaneously to students on, and off campus
its firstyear of operation, we summarize the current state of the program and make some suggestionsabout the future of the program.Background and LiteratureThe term, data science, likely coined in 2001 by W. S. Clevland [2], has had a number ofdefinitions. For the purposes of this paper, we focus on considering data science as a disciplinethat combines the fields of computer science, mathematics, statistics, and information technologybut with a focus on the generation, organization, modeling, and use of data to make scientific andbusiness decisions. Needless to say, a distinguishing feature of data science is the centrality of‘data’ to the mission of the discipline and its professionals. Data science programs shouldproduce data scientists
. Felder and R. Brent, Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria, Journal of Engineering Education, January 2003.5. G. H. Gaynor, “The Engineer As A Professional: What Does It Mean, What Does It Take?” Innovation Management Institute, 1997 Professional Activities Conference Proceedings, Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 1997.6. N. E. Gronlund, How to write and Use Instructional Objectives, 6th ed, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice- Hall, 1999.7. From Analysis to Action: Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, Challenge Paper for the NRC/NSF Convocation, April 9-11, 1995 (Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1995).8. S. G
to the Mechanical Properties of Ceramics, Cambridge, 1998.7. K. J. Bowman, An Introduction to Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Wiley, 2004.8. M. F. Ashby, Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, 3rd Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005.9. P. S. Steif and J. A. Dantzler, “A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis”, J. Eng. Education, V. 94, [4] 364-371 (2005).10. H. A. Bruck, D. K. Anand, W. L. Fourney, P.C. Chang, and J. W. Dally, “Development of an Integrated Statics and Strength of Materials Curriculum with an Emphasis on Design”, ASEE Proceedings 1999, Paper 2566,11. P. A. Tipler and G. Mosca, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, Vol. 1 and 2, 5th Ed., W. H. Freeman and Co., 2004
Programs, 2018-2019.” [Online].Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-technology-programs-2018-2019/#GC1. [Accessed Jan. 26, 2019][2] Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Architecture and engineering occupations,” April 13, 2018.[Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/home.htm. [AccessedApr. 21, 2019].[3] J.M. Beggs, J.H. Bantham, and S. Taylor, “Distinguishing the factors influencing collegestudents’ choice of major,” College Student Journal, vol. 42, pp. 381-394, June 2008. [4] M. Kikendall Orr, C. Brawner, M.W. Ohland, R.A. Layton, “The effect of requiredintroduction to engineering courses on retention and major selection,” Proceeding of the 120thASEE
to college: What evidence is there that it works?” Change, 30(4), pp. 26-35, 1998.[5] T. Kriewall, K. Mekemson, ”Instilling the Entrepreneurial Mindset Into Engineering Undergraduates,” The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol 1, Number 1, pp. 5-19, January 2009.[6] J. Wheadon, N. Duval-Couetil, ”Business Plan Development Activities as a Pedagogical Tool in Entrepreneurship Education” The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol 5, Number 1, pp. 31-48, June 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.7814/jeen5v5p3wd. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2017].[7] M. Schar, S. Sheppard, S. Brunhaver, M. Cuson, M. Grau, ”Bending Moments to Business Models: Integrating an Entrepreneurship Case Study as Part of Core Mechanical
the College of Arts &Sciences by combining the new Institute of Engineering Science and the established B. S. inComputer Science program, which was previously offered through the Department ofMathematics. When the initial faculty had completed planning for a full degree program with anappropriate set of all new engineering courses, the 1985-86 catalog announced the full degreerequirements and curriculum plan for the new B.S. in Engineering Science program, initiallywith computer, electrical, and mechanical “options.”In 1988, the Department of Engineering and Computer Science, still a unit within the College ofArts and Sciences, moved into its own new building, called the Rogers ECS Building, after thedonors whose contribution enabled the
surveys, available to the participants online using the GTNeuro.net website(powered by Drupal 6.0’s webform feature, secured with AES encryption), were utilized tomonitor and understand the perspectives of LINCR Fellows (biweekly), PIs (monthly), andmentors (biweekly) before, during and after the LINCR program. The survey instruments weredeveloped by the LINCR planning committee and were sent out to the relevant user groups asreminders via the Boomerang application attached to Google mail. These short feedback formswere used to assess how the collaborations were proceeding and/or ask the graduate studentshow valuable the collaborations are to their particular research. We took survey data in abiweekly capacity to see how impressions change
, specifically models, to describe how somethingworks.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.0648316. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.BibliographyAngelo, T. A. & Cross, K.P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Page 25.513.7Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy
would be packaged in mission-specific HA/DR kits for partner nation use; 3. Develop modular, scalable, expeditionary housing systems that possess "green" electric power and water generation, waste and wastewater disposal, hygiene, and food service capabilities. Systems should be designed to blend in to natural/native surroundings and with minimal footprint; 4. Continued investigation and exploration into the realm of the possible with respect to “Immersive” training technologies. Objective is to flood the training audience environment with the same STIMULI that one would experience during actual mission execution. Where possible full sensory overload is desired much the same as experienced in combat. Specific S&T areas for
Director, Dis- covery Learning Program Affiliate Professor, Bioengineering Olivia Coiado has a Postdoctoral training from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2013-2015) where she developed a new technology for cardiac therapy. She received her B.S degree in medical physics in 2005 from the University of S˜ao Paulo, Brazil, M.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Campinas, Brazil (2008) and Doctorate degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Campinas, Brazil (2012). She has published journal articles describing a new technology to pace the heart using ultrasonic pulses and med- ical/engineering education research. Prof. Coiado is passionate about everything that involves
Applied Science Using Challenge Based Learning," International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33-41, 2015.[4] National Research Council, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition, National Academies Press, 2006.[5] T. Martin, S. D. Rivale and K. R. Diller, "Comparison of student learning in challenge-based and traditional instruction in biomedical engineering," Annals of biomedical engineering, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1312-1323, 2007.[6] D. L. Schwartz, S. Brophy, X. Lin and J. D. Bransford, "Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course," Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 39-59, 1999.[7] M. Smith, D. Craig
. 1836504. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] S. M. Lord and J. C. Chen, “Curriculum design in the middle years,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER), B. Olds and A. Johri, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 181–200.[2] J. C. Lucena and J. A. Leydens, “From Sacred Cow to Dairy Cow: Challenges and Opportunities in Integrating of Social Justice in Engineering Science Courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2015.[3] R. L. Lehrman, “Energy Is Not The Ability To Do Work,” Phys. Teach., 1973.[4] R. A. Lancor, “Using Student
required to make three presentationsthroughout the process. The first is a simple poster board presentation on the problem andpossible solutions. The second presentation is a professional poster at Methodist University’sannual Center for Research and Creativity (CRC) Symposium where they talk about the problem,their top solution(s), and implementation, if possible, to individuals from all across campus,including the President, Provost, several of their professors, and fellow students. The lastpresentation accompanies the technical paper and adds the evaluation step of the engineeringdesign process. As this is the third paper written in their engineering classes, students are nowexpected to follow format guidelines, use references and cite
," IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 89-99, 1997.[4] D. Bradley, "What is mechatronics and why teach it?," International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 275-291, 2004.[5] S. Boverie, D. D. Cho, H. Hashimoto, M. Tomizuka, W. Wei and D. Zühlke, "Mechatronics, robotics and components for automation and control: IFAC milestone report," in 17th IFAC World Congress (IFAC'08), 2008.[6] C. F. Auerbach and L. B. Silverstein, Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis, New York: New York University Press, 2003.[7] N. L. Ramo, A. Huang-Saad and B. Belmont, "What is Biomedical Engineering? Insights from Qualitative Analysis of Definitions Written by Undergraduate Students," in ASEE
lasted between 30 and 45 mins, between8-10 faculty members.References[1] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020 – 2021,” ABET, 2020. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-progra ms-2020-2021/ (accessed Feb. 05, 2021).[2] J. Selzer, “The composing processes of an engineer,” in Central works in technical communication, J. Johnson-Eilola and S. A. Selber, Eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 317–324.[3] J. Lievens, “Debunking the ‘nerd’ myth: Doing action research with first-year engineering students in the academic writing class,” Journal of Academic Writing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 74–84, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v2i1.66.[4] D. L
, and the sequence of topics follows that of most introductory statistics textbooks. Most chapters of the course textbook [3] are covered, but some sections are not covered at all and others are covered superficially. Table 1 provides a summarized listing of the course topics, their sequence, and the instructional emphasisTable 1 – Current Topic Coverage & Instruction EmphasisTopic Area Weeks Topic Coverage H S C Sampling methods: Random, systematic, stratified.Obtaining Data 0% 0% 100% Types of
Community, https://www.mechatronicseducation.org/.[6] Mechatronics Education Community Workshops & Webinars, https://www.mechatronicseducation.org/events/.[7] R. Comerford, “Mecha … What?” IEEE Spectrum, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 46-49, 1994.[8] S. Ashley, “Getting a Hold on Mechatronics.” Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Vol. 119, No. 5, pp. 60-63, 1997.[9] D. Talbot, “10 Emerging Technologies that will Change the World: Mechatronics.” Technology Review: MIT’s Magazine of Innovation, Vol. 106, No. 1, pp. 40-41, 2003.[10] A. S. Brown, “Who Owns Mechatronics?” Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Vol. 129, No. 6, pp. 60-63, 2008.[11] M.A. Gennert, G. Tryggvason, “Robotics Engineering: A Discipline Whose Time Has
elective none of which is humanities & social restricted to technical sciences)* Includes 23 hours of upper division and EGR 225, EGR 226 and EGR 235.References 1. One University in Many Places: Transitional Design to Twenty-First Century Excellence www.asu.edu/president/univdesign/OneUniversity80305.ppt 2. C. Roberts, D. Morrell, R. Grondin, C.-Y. Kuo, R. Hinks, S. Danielson, and M. Henderson, “Developing a Multidisciplinary Engineering Program at Arizona State University’s East Campus,” 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, June 2005 3. Annette
of discussions with the relevantdepartment chairs. Ultimately, the course creation proposal was signed by the chair of eachdepartment before moving forward through normal undergraduate curriculum approval channels.Course creation took approximately 1.5 years to marshal through university processes and takeeffect. During the life of the S-STEM project, three cohorts of undergraduates engaged inmultidisciplinary senior design projects: 2015-2016; 2016-2017; 2017-2018. Only the finalcohort (2017-2018) was able to enroll in GEEN 4301/4302. In 2016-2017, students enrolled inselected topics courses as a stop-gap while the course creation process was underway, and theselected topics courses were substituted for the relevant senior design courses
to create a repository with the results of thisand all subsequent projects and the ongoing test data to enable future teams of students to confidentlydevelop solutions and to enable faculty to organize and manage such projects.13References1. S. Murugesan, and I. Bojanova, "Encyclopedia of Cloud Computing", ISBN:9781118821978, Wiley,2016.2. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Trends, 2017-2022 White Paper,https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/white-paper-c11-741490.html3. S. T. Faraj Al-Janabi, A. Shehab, "Edge Computing: Review and Future Trends", ResearchGate (2019)https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335858067_Edge_Computing_Review_and_Future_Directions4. B. Varghese, R
session prove that the program is on the righttrack. With this experience under the belt, more and better research projects can be planned andundertaken by the college in the future and will hopefully attract more student participants. It isfurther hoped that Principia’s success will inspire other small colleges to pursue similarundergraduate research endeavors.References[1] S. Khandani, "Engineering Design Process," Saylor, Pleasant Hill, 2005.[2] "Shakhatreh, H., Sawalmeh, A., Al - Fuqaha, A., Dou, Z., Almaita, E., Khalil, I., Othman, N. S., Khreishah, A., and Guizani, M.," Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, 2018.[3] A. Mackenzie, "Optar AI," Optar AI, 1 January 2018. [Online
and industry mentors.Bibliography1. Miller, R. L. & Olds, B. M. A model curriculum for a capstone course in multidisciplinary engineering design. J. Eng. Educ. 83, 311–316 (1994).2. Hotaling, N., Fasse, B. B., Bost, L. F., Hermann, C. D. & Forest, C. R. A quantitative analysis of the effects of a multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course. J. Eng. Educ. 101, 630–656 (2012).3. Howe, S. & Wilbarger, J. National survey of engineering capstone design courses. in Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 18–21 (2005).4. Lamancusa, J. S., Zayas, J. L., Soyster, A. L., Morell, L. & Jorgensen, J. 2006 Bernard M. Gordon Prize Lecture*: The Learning Factory: Industry-Partnered Active Learning. J
made was to use existing coursenumbers for the credits students would earn for the program; thus, it was not necessary toshepherd approval for new course(s) through the Curriculum Committee or develop a descriptionfor the Course Catalog. We (the faculty teaching the course) and the involved administratorssaw our program as an innovative program, and this led to several helpful effects: our sense ofaccountability was increased as this was the primary professional development focus and westrived to make the pilot a success in order to provide a pathway for future variations anditerations of the Summer Grand Challenge format.However, as Bernal notes in her response to the reflection question about drawbacks of pilotingthe program, there was extra
this goal.AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledge the Idaho Regional Optical Network for support in providing the videocollaboration system and support for both the class and the Resilience Week Grid Game Event.We also acknowledge the University of Denver for providing computers at Resilience Week andthe Idaho National Laboratory’s on Instrumentation Control and Intelligent Systems distinctivesignature for support in organizing Resilience Week and the resilient controls class.References [1] Cecati, C., Mokryani, G., Piccolo, A. & Siano, P., “An overview on the smart grid concept IECON 2010 - 36th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society,” 2010, 3322-3327 [2] Shladover, S., “PATH at 20 -- History and Major