poster session where teamsshowcase their projects and the actual hardware and/or demonstrations. We have also integratedthe annual open house with our continuous assessment process to identify any strengths andweaknesses of the curriculum for modifications and improvements. This tightly interwovenrelationship between the capstone course, curriculum evaluation, and MEAC participation hasserved the department well in many fronts: continuous improvement of the capstone course andcurriculum, harvesting of relevant projects for the capstone course through strong industrialinvolvement, and expanded career opportunities for our graduates.2ConclusionIn this paper, an evaluation of the senior capstone design course at our university has beenaddressed as
work environment, ultimately leading tocost and time savings.Over the last decade, the construction industry has seen an increased use of alternative PDMsthat integrate the roles of both designer and contractors into a single entity, and offer morecollaboration opportunities among the various disciplines. One of these growing alternative PDMis Design Build (DB). DB has experienced increasing popularity in the construction industryultimately for its recognized benefits, including overall reduction of project cost and completiontime, compared to traditional Design Bid Build (DBB) PDM. A quick comparison of the majordifferences between the two PDMs shows that in a traditional DBB, the owner hires an engineerto design the project and develops the
on the control system may make itnecessary to take over manual control.The automatic control system consists of a frequency sensor that feeds back through aproportional, integral, differential (PID) set of gains. Students can experiment with how differentgain values change the response of the grid to changes in load and generation. An objective is tooptimize the scoring metric by changes to the PID gains. The system of generation, loads, batterysystem and closed loop control is summarized in .With the automatic control engaged, the player takes on the strategic role, while maintaining asupervision of the operations of the microgrid, of deciding how to grow their operations byinvesting their points. Decisions include how much storage to buy
participants should be capable of developing a set of rubrics that can be effectively utilized in administering their assessment procedures. 3. The participants should finally be able to generate a set of graphs that provide them with appropriate, productive feedback pertaining to student learning capabilities. A problem-based curriculum is significantly different from the traditional disciplinecentered curriculum (Woods, 1994). This is because problem-based learning has been definedas minds-on, hands-on, focused, experiential learning (Wilkerson & Gijselaers, 1996). Modernteaching techniques should be combined with knowledge acquisition along with an activity
Page 14.1136.4level courses, and presents a case study that demonstrates how facility management isimplemented in one healthcare facility building.BackgroundMany definitions exist for the term “facility management” (FM.) The International FacilityManagement Association defines FM as: “a profession that encompasses multiple disciplines toensure functionality of the built environment by integrating people, place, process andtechnology”3. The British Institute of Facilities Management adds that: “facilities management isthe integration of processes within an organisation to maintain and develop the agreed serviceswhich support and improve the effectiveness of its primary activities”4. Other definitionsinclude: “The primary function of facility
, this classical course model is deficient, and mustchange if the future educational needs of our students are to be best satisfied, and our globalcommunity best served. Of particular interest in this context is the exposure of non-engineeringmajors (e.g., management students) to micro/nanotechnology, something they would generallynever encounter in a “normal” college undergraduate curriculum. We offer here an example of asolution to this dilemma by describing a new course introduced at Georgia Tech which dealssquarely with micro/nanotechnology at the undergraduate level, and importantly is intended toserve undergraduate students of all majors (e.g., management, engineering, sciences, etc.) and alleducational levels (freshman through senior).At
faculty needing to provide all of the mentoring of team members.Figure 1: MD Minor template. A multi-year experience.While in some ways the MD Minor can be thought of as the heart of the Multidisciplinary DesignProgram, we do not expect every undergraduate will or even should earn this minor. However, agoal of working with departments of the College of Engineering to integrate multidisciplinary andDBT experiences broadly in the undergraduate curriculum drives our overall efforts. For example, Page 22.1031.5the College of Engineering, working with departments, has actively promoted the creation ofsections of our required introductory freshman
with projectsadministered by the Collaboratory for Strategic Partnerships and Applied Research. TheCollaboratory, or Collab for short, is an interdisciplinary organization established by theengineering department at Messiah College in 2000. The Collab seeks to involve students andfaculty in service-oriented projects that encourage them to bring their talents and abilities tobear on real-world problems involving clients from around the globe.9 Not surprisingly, theunderlying purpose of the Integrated Projects Curriculum (IPC) and the mission of the Collabare very similar, as they both originated from people in the same department. While the two areclosely intertwined, some significant differences exist. Student participation in the Collab
AC 2007-803: MEASURING STUDENT ABILITY TO WORK ONMULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS: BUILDING AND TESTING A RUBRICCarolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engineering at Montana State University. She works on various curriculum and instruction projects including instructional development for faculty and graduate students, assessment of student learning, and program evaluation. Prior to coming to MSU, Plumb was at the University of Washington, where she directed the Engineering Communication Program. While at the UW, Plumb also worked as an Instructional Development and Assessment Specialist for the School of
serving a large and diverse constituency with limitedresources.IntroductionProject-based “capstone” design has become an integral component of the undergraduateengineering experience. Howe and Wilbarger1 surveyed over 400 programs in the 2005 NationalSurvey of Engineering Capstone Design Courses, a follow-up to a comprehensive surveyconducted by Todd in 19942. Last year’s ASEE conference contained a number of papers oncapstone design programs3-9, with many of them focusing on assessment practices and lessonslearned. Important benefits associated with collaborative design projects include: innovativeproblem solving, improved handling of complexity and ambiguity, enhanced communicationsskills and self-confidence, and improvements in team building
are degreeprograms commonly offered at other institutions. Mathematics, physics, and chemistry were alsoincluded in the study to gain an understanding of curricular choice opportunity in non-engineering Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) disciplines.The “Choice Value” term was developed as a quantified representation of the aggregatecurricular choice opportunity within a given degree program, and is a function of total coursechoice opportunities, the proportion of degree credit hours that provide curricular choice, and thenumber of courses from which students may choose. Choice Values were determined using thepublished curriculum in the 2013-2014 university catalogs, as well as counts for the number ofindividual course options
threads are cross-departmental pathways of classes and projects inareas that address the “new machines and systems” of the future and that are likely to play a major partin impacting the world when the students graduate. By participating in the pilot, students will earn an SBdegree from the department they are majoring in and a NEET Certificate naming the thread, within theusual four-year duration. NEET has launched two additional pilot threads in Fall 2018: AdvancedMaterials Machines (covering materials science and engineering and mechanical engineering) and CleanEnergy Systems (covering nuclear science and engineering, civil and environmental engineering andmechanical engineering).The NEET approach and curriculum developed over more than nine
Director of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) at ASU. Through the GCSP, Amy aims to prepare students to become globally and socially aware engineers who will lead future efforts to solve the world’s biggest challenges. Amy also helps new schools to develop GCSPs as part of the GCSP Network New Programs committee. She is also actively involved in the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), focused on students’ development of entrepreneurial mindset through GCSP and curriculum. Amy received the 2019 KEEN Rising Star award for her efforts in encouraging students to develop an entrepreneurial mindset. Amy has contributed to the development of a new hands-on
Ph.D. degree in Engineering from TTU in 1999. From 1999 until 2004 he was employed by Square D Company / Schneider Electric in Nashville, Tennessee, where he served as a senior electrical engineer, then as an engineering manager. He is currently an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Western Kentucky University in Bowling Green. His research in- terests involve computational electromagnetics, application of electromagnetics to the analysis and design of electromechanical devices, and photonics. Page 22.1090.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011
following ten years in Georgia Tech’s College of Computing where she was a member of the NSF-funded Learning By DesignTM Problem-Based Learning curriculum de- velopment and research project. She also conducted an NSF-funded ethnographic study of learning in a problem-driven, project-based bio-robotics research lab at Georgia Tech. In addition to her duties in BME, she is an advisor to the interdisciplinaryScience Learning: Integrating Design, Engineering, and Robotics (SLIDER) project.Mr. James William Schwoebel, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMr. Ethan James Craig, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMr. Anish Joseph, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAjit Vakharia, Georgia Institute of TechnologyProf. Steve M. Potter PhD, Georgia
teams. In order to assist withresolving these issues, an online portal was developed to support the implementation of multidisciplinary CapstoneDesign projects. Faculty and student feedback was solicited in order to conceptualize and develop the website tosupport the entire process of student team formation, sharing of multidisciplinary project ideas across schools andmaking student-team assignments. This paper presents the design of this web portal along with a discussion on thescope for further improvement.KeywordsMultidisciplinary, capstone design, senior design, online portalIntroductionCapstone Design Course is offered as a project based culminating course in many undergraduateengineering programs. It is an integrative course where senior
students decided to take part in the challenge of building a human poweredsubmarine. Together, both groups of students needed to obtain SCUBA training, create andinstall the safety systems, integrate all of the components, test, and repair the submarine. Theteam completed a functioning wet submarine in 9 months and competed in the InternationalSubmarine Races (ISR). This paper outlines the teaming successes and pitfalls of the project.The International Submarine Races (ISR) involves human powered submarines that are designed andbuilt by various students, including large universities, community colleges, private companies, andindividuals. It provides an opportunity for students to take what they have learned in the classroomand apply it to a real
respective departmental capstone course. Communication andscheduling between the teams were the biggest challenges in this model. In an effort to improvemultidisciplinary design, faculty from 3 engineering departments at UCSB met over the courseof an academic quarter to discuss a more integrated multidisciplinary capstone design programfor seniors. One complicating factor was departmental pressure to maintain the discipline-specific integrity of the engineering experience throughout the student body. Anothercomplicating factor included the disparity between course units and timelines created by eachdiscipline. In response to these challenges, we have created a supplementary multidisciplinarycapstone course (SMCC) to be coupled to the existing
inherent in teaching a multidisciplinary course, coursecoordinators should represent the disciplines in the class and should have equal input to thevision, goals, and expectations of the course, and having co-coordinators is preferable to aprimary coordinator. Teaching a design course with multidisciplinary students requires amultidisciplinary educational approach.Bibliography1 Ronald L. Miller and Barbara M. Olds, "A model curriculum for a capstone course in multidisciplinary engineering design," Journal of Engineering Education 83, 1-6 (1994).2 N Yu and P.K. Liaw, "Ceramic Matrix Composites: an integrated interdisciplinary design curriculum," Journal of Engineering Education 87, 539-544 (1998).3 Jeffrey L. Dalsin
on business and intellectual property law, and a course on internationalbusiness and policy issues. Each of the more traditional courses is integrated back into thelongitudinal team experience. As an example of the difference, and integration, the proposalpreparation course will work on real proposals, e.g. Small Business Innovation Researchproposals with local companies or teaming with international partners, which will then help fundthe team efforts.Each Cross-discipline core is a coherent collection of 21 credits from one “cross over” area theindividual will include in the degree program. The initial cross-discipline cores are: The Technology Core (for non-technology degrees) will provide a broad coverage of engineering and
assessments, teams met to develop a consensus evaluation of the workshop. Thisprovided an opportunity for the team to discuss their individual perspectives and develop aclearer understanding of the assessment dimensions. The average of all team’s consensusassessments determined the grade receive by the workshop presenters.The two exams in the course covered only material presented in the workshops (20% of semestergrade). Students took learning the workshop material seriously and performed well on the exams. Plan for Self-MasteryStudents developed their personal plan for developed from the compilation and integration ofwritings throughout the course. Each of these writings had been commented on and some sharedwith teammates. There were numerous
AC 2009-237: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY UNDERGRADUATE PROJECTIMPLEMENTING A ROBOTIC ARM FOR THE ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATIONOF ENDANGERED AMPHIBIAN SPECIESClaudio Talarico, Eastern Washington University Claudio Talarico is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at Eastern Washington University. Before joining Eastern Washington University, he worked at University of Arizona, University of Hawaii and in industry, where he held both engineering and management positions at Infineon Technologies, IKOS Systems (now Mentor Graphics), and Marconi Communications. His research interests include design methodologies for integrated circuits and systems with emphasis on system-level design, embedded
AC 2010-31: WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY'S HYBRID BUS - AMULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO PROJECT BASED EDUCATIONSteven Fleishman, Western Washington University STEVEN FLEISHMAN is currently an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Technology Department at Western Washington University. He joined the Vehicle Research Institute at WWU in 2006 after spending twenty years in automotive drivetrain R&D. Steven.fleishman@wwu.edu Page 15.1362.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010Western Washington University’s Hybrid Bus – A Multidisciplinary Approach to Project-BasedEducationAbstract Western
preliminary data, three research questions were formulated toassess the impact of incorporating an Experiential Learning Project as a part of a second-yearcourse on class effectiveness, retention (persistence) and graduation rates, and students’engagement/perception of instruction:Research Questions 1) To what extent does the introduction of IDEAS Active Learning Project improve student’s success in Engineering Analysis Statics? 2) To what extent Active Learning Projects introduced early in the curriculum improve student retention and graduation rates? 3) Do Active Learning Projects improve Engagement, Class Participation, and Students’ Perception of Instruction?Research Design and ControlTo answer these questions, an
compares similar entities, i.e.,decision making units (DMUs), against the “best virtual decision making unit”. Due to variousadvantages and ease in its use, DEA has been employed extensively in various areas, such as healthcare, education, banking, manufacturing, and management.One of the relevant studies is published by Johnson and Zhu1. In their work, the authors employedDEA to select the most promising candidates to fill an open faculty position. DEA has also beenutilized extensively in the environmental arena. To this extent, Sarkis2 proposed a two-stagemethodology to integrate managerial preferences and environmentally conscious manufacturing(ECM) programs. Subsequently, Sarkis and Cordeiro3 investigated the relationship betweenenvironmental
. M. Brown and C. J. Seidner, eds., pp. 297-319: Springer, 1998.[4] R. L. Miller, and B. M. Olds, “A Model Curriculum for a Capstone Course in Multidisciplinary Engineering Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 311-316, 1994.[5] S. Howe, and J. Wilbarger, “2005 National Survey of Engineering Capstone Design Courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL, 2006.[6] A. Chandak. "Tech student body integrates for capstone," 2013; http://nique.net/life/2013/09/12/tech-student-body-integrates-for-capstone/, 12/31/2013.[7] B. Tabbache, A. Kheloui, and M. E. H. Benbouzid, “An Adaptive Electric Differential for Electric Vehicles
Paper ID #33801Innovative Pedagogy for Teaching and Learning Data VisualizationDr. Vetria L. Byrd PhD, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Vetria Byrd is an assistant professor in the Department of Computer Graphics Technology in the Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. Dr. Byrd is the founder and or- ganizer of BPViz: Broadening Participation in Visualization (BPViz) Workshops. Dr. Byrd has given numerous invited talks on visualization, and given numerous workshops nationally and internationally on visualizaiton. Dr. Byrd received her graduate and undergraduate degrees at the
Paper ID #17831Initial Survey of Engineering Technology Capstone Courses and TeamworkBuilding Using CATMEDr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Lucietto has focused her research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engineering technology students. She teaches in an active learning style which engages and develops practical skills in the students. Currently she is exploring the performance and attributes of engineering technology students and using that knowledge to engage them in their studies.Dr. Andrew Simon Scott, Western Carolina University I am an
emphasis in STEM-H related curriculum experiences at various colleges and universities across the U.S. Gwen’s work with NSF, USDOE, DOE, DOD, HRSA, and DOJ helps in providing the evaluative needs and expectations of federally funded grants with regard to accountability and compliance. In addition, she has served as a panel reviewer for NSF proposals for S-STEM and other EHR programs, GAANN, SIP, and EOC with the USDOE, and is currently an AQIP Reviewer and Peer Reviewer for the NCA Higher Learning Commission. As an administrator, Gwen has served Director of Assessment for 6 years and Executive Assistant to the President for one year at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She has also served as Assistant to the
produce ordinary knowl-edge in the baccalaureate program through improved methods of teaching and learning.1 Further,students & faculty must also learn the processes to produce higher knowledge that will becomean important part of their future professional practice.Insight is important for knowledging, especially for conceiving higher knowledge. The domainof psychology divides insight into five commonly utilized progressive processes.6 These are: ‚" Completing a schema when an integrated component fits into a larger system. ‚" Restructuring the given material by first making a mental or spatial visualization of the problem before one attempts a reorganization of the visual picture. ‚" Reformulating or restructuring goals or givens of a