Displaying results 1 - 30 of 38 in total
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Evelyn C. Brown, East Carolina University; Mary A. Farwell, East Carolina University; Anthony M. Kennedy, East Carolina University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
Paper ID #11823Writing and Implementing Successful NSF S-STEM ProposalsDr. Evelyn C. Brown, East Carolina University Dr. Brown is a professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. Most of her research is in the are of applying industrial engineering techniques to health care process improvements. However, she also does reserach in the area of STEM education. Dr. Brown has published education- related research in INFORMS Transactions on Education, Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE National Meet- ing, and Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Southeast Section Meeting. She is PI on an active NSF S-STEM grant in
- Conference Session
- Perspectives on Engineering Education During COVID-19
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Amr Hassan, University of Pittsburgh; Ahmed Dallal, University of Pittsburgh; Mohamed A. S. Zaghloul, University of Pittsburgh
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
focus is on education development and innovation. His Research interests include, but not limited to: Machine Learning, es- pecially Deep Learning, for Image Processing and Video Prediction, Neuromorphic Computing Systems and its applications.Dr. Ahmed Dallal, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Dallal is an assistant professor at the department of electrical and computer engineering, Unversity of Pittsburgh, since August 2017. Dr. Dallal primary focus is on education development and innovation. His research interests include biomedical signal processing, biomedical image analysis, and computer vision, as well as machine learning, networked control systems, and human-machine learning.Prof. Mohamed A. S. Zaghloul, University
- Conference Session
- That's a Great Idea! Learning-focused Methods to Revitalize Your Courses
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Vishwas Narayan Bedekar, Middle Tennessee State University; Ahad S. Nasab, Middle Tennessee State University; Walter W. Boles, Middle Tennessee State University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
- ally circulated journals related to materials science and mechanical engineering. He has also served on several NSF panels as a reviewer. He is currently teaching fundamental courses in materials science and mechatronics engineering at MTSU.Dr. Ahad S. Nasab, Middle Tennessee State University Dr. Ahad Nasab received his PhD from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1987. He then worked as a research scientist at the Center for Laser Applications of Physics Research Group of University of Tennessee Space Institute. In 1991 he joined the faculty of Middle Tennessee State University where he is currently the coordinator of the Mechatronics Engineering degree program.Dr. Walter W. Boles, Middle Tennessee State University
- Conference Session
- Faculty Unite! Effective Ways for Educators to Collaborate Successfully
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Christine S. Grant, North Carolina State University; Barbara E Smith, North Carolina State University; Louis A Martin-Vega, North Carolina State University; Olgha Bassam Qaqish, North Carolina State University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
Paper ID #15274Case Study: Establishing a Sustainable Faculty Development Unit within aCollege of EngineeringDr. Christine S Grant, North Carolina State University Dr. Christine S. Grant joined the NC State faculty in 1989 after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. (Geor- gia Institute of Technology) and Sc.B. (Brown University) all in Chemical Engineering (ChE). One of less than 10 African-American women full ChE professors in the country, her research interests are in interfacial phenomena and recently biomedical systems. She is the first Associate Dean of Faculty Ad- vancement in NC State’s College of Engineering. Awards
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 1: Learning Aids
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Zhilin Zhang, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Chirantan Mahipal, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; David Mussulman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Christopher D. Schmitz, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Robert Thomas Baird, University of Illinois Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning; Hongye Liu, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Ruihua Sui, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Maryalice S. Wu; Rob Kooper, NCSA / University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
assistant and frontend developer of ClassTranscribe. He was nominated for Illinois Innovation Prize 2020 because of his contribution to educational software.Dr. Maryalice S. Wu Maryalice is the Director of Data Analytics at the Center for Innovation in Teaching & Learning at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. She holds a position as an adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Illinois and has a Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of Illinois. Her recent research focuses on the economic and health empowerment of women in developing nations. Her other projects relate to program evaluations and learning analytics in academia. . She has taught several courses at
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Madeleine Arvold, Seattle Pacific University; Steven David Mow, Seattle Pacific University; Zachary W. Cook, Seattle Pacific University; Natalie Goode, Seattle Pacific University; Caitlin H. Wasilewski, Seattle Pacific University; Rida Y. Al-Hawaj, Seattle Pacific University ; Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
reporton the role of oral communication in the workplace. Communication Education, 52, 1-16.2. Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L. D., & Beddoes, K. (2013, October). Team effectiveness theory from industrialand organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review. Journal ofEngineering Education, 102(4), 472-512.3. Prescott, D., El-Sakran, T., Albasha, L., Aloul, F., & Al-Assaf, Y. (2012, Spring). Teambuilding, innovation andthe engineering communication interface. American Journal of Engineering Education, 3(1), 29-40.4. Dannels, D. P., Anson, C. M., Bullard, L., & Peretti, S. (2003, January). Challenges in learning communicationskills in chemical engineering. Communication Education, 52, 50-56.5
- Conference Session
- Classroom Strategies – New Engineering Educators Division
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
for the actors to develop their own contextthrough improvisation.In TPC, Open Scene is used differently. Students are paired up (with an occasional trio, ifnecessary) and given a generic set of instructions explaining that they will perform a ‘scene’ withtheir partner(s) for their peers in approximately ten minutes. These instructions also include somereminders of things to consider that may help them communicate their scene, including tone,volume, body language, and use of relational space (all discussed previously in course content).Students are additionally encouraged to use readily available props as they deem appropriate.Each group is instructed to keep their scene a secret from other groups as they prepare. Then,each group is given
- Conference Session
- Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Peggy C. Boylan-Ashraf, San Jose State University; John R. Haughery, Iowa State University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 4
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Faisal Shaikh, Milwaukee School of Engineering
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
. Methods Student(s) Clicker ABCD Internet / Proposed raise voting App based method: LaserPerformance Criteria hand(s) cards pointersEasy and quick hardware/ x x xsoftware set-upLow cost of setup and use x x xLow usage burden for x x xstudentsLow/no learning curve for x x xadoption by facultyZero potential for technical x
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 2: Success In and Out of the Classroom
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Elizabeth Payne Tofte, South Dakota State University; Albena Yuliyanova Yordanova, South Dakota State University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
,questionnaires and surveys, content analysis of text, secondary analysis of existing data, quasi-experiments (e.g., comparison of two sections of the same course), observational research, andcase studies” [13]. In addition, Lee S. Shulman, president emeritus of the Carnegie Foundationfor the Advancement of Teaching, has long encouraged teaching faculty to engage in scholarlysystematic research in the practice of teaching and learning. He argues that it is “only when westep back and reflect systematically on the teaching we have done, in a form that can be publiclyreviewed and built upon by our peers, that we have moved from scholarly teaching to thescholarship of teaching” [15, p. 1].Active learning exercises emphasizing the design process as a
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 5
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Ralph Ocon, Purdue University, Calumet
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
humor by an instructor is 1.60 1.58 1.68 typically a waste of classroom time. 5. I feel more comfortable asking an 3.83 4.25 4.43 instructor a question if s/he uses humor in the classroom. 6. An instructor’s job is to teach, not 2.83 2.33 2.75 entertain. 7. I would rather have an instructor try to be 4.14 4.17 4.00 humorous and fail rather than not try to be humorous at all. 8. I am sometimes offended by the uses of 1.43 1.79 1.72 humor by an instructor. 9. I am likely to go to class where the 4.13 4.30 4.50 instructor uses some humor. 10. An instructor doesn’t have to use humor 3.96 3.42 3.50 to be an
- Conference Session
- Tips of the Trade: Best Practices, Expanded Advice, and Strategies for Implementable Course Improvement
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Gillian M. Nicholls, Southeast Missouri State University; William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University; Neal A Lewis, University of Bridgeport
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
the same subject.Second, build a spreadsheet model to solve the calculated problem to test out your formulasbefore you put them into the LMS question. Have a data block in the spreadsheet that shows thelabels for all problem variables, identifies the randomized parameters by name, and includesyour settings for those parameters’ minimum value(s), maximum value(s), and number ofdecimal places. If your LMS has other potential settings for algorithmic parameters, includethose as well. While the formulas and functions are obviously different for a spreadsheet than anLMS formula answer, this step is still valuable for building the question.Having the parameter value settings worked out in advance makes constructing the calculatedquestion in the LMS
- Conference Session
- Enhancing Teaching and Research
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University; Kelsey Watts, Clemson University; Evan Ko, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Balsam Albayati
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
-peer-review-putting-skills-into- practice/[3] A. E. Carroll, “Peer Review: The Worst Way to Judge Research, Except for All the Others.” NY Times, November 6, 2018. Retrieved from https://nyti.ms/2yRcClr.[4] C. Tyson, “E.O. Wilson on the Next Big Thing.” Chronicle of Higher Education, May 7, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/EO-Wilson-on-the-Next- Big/246257?utm_source=at&utm_medium=en&cid=at[5] L. Benson, “Reflecting, Rebooting, Reviewing,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 3, p. 311 - 312. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20288[6] K. Edström, J. Bernhard, M. van den Bogaard, L. Benson, C. Finelli, S. Chance, S. and R. Lyng, “Reviewers, reviewers, reviewers
- Conference Session
- Size, Civility, and the Classroom Culture: Setting Class Tone with a Student-centered Perspective
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University; Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Tamara Floyd Smith P.E., Tuskegee University; Nanette M Veilleux, Simmons College
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
affective outcomes wereinvestigated with the goal of predicting and improving engagement and connection tocommunity across a diverse range of institutions, students, teaching styles, and faculty. In theportion of the study discussed here, qualitative analysis of focus group data was used to identifydifferences in student perceptions of formal (in class) and informal (out of class) faculty supportby class size and institution type at five different institutions in engineering and computerscience majors.Research SettingThe five participating institutions in this study, described according to their Carnegieclassifications34, and their key characteristics as drawn from institutional data and missionstatements are as follows: HBCU (Masters S): A
- Conference Session
- Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Kenya Z Mejia, University of Washington; Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
. This work encourages the engineering educationcommunity to find new ways to define how an inclusive practice is working for a specificcontext, as a supplement to a quantitative approach.References[1] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, “‘I Wish that I Belonged More in this Whole Engineering Group:’ Achieving Individual Diversity,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 103–115, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00921.x.[2] B. Berhane, S. Secules, and F. Onuma, “Learning While Black: Identity Formation and Experience for Five Black Men Who Transferred Into Engineering Undergraduate Programs,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 26, 2020, doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2020024994.[3] M. Kali, S. Secules, and C
- Conference Session
- NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Dustyn Roberts P.E., Temple University; Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware; Allen A. Jayne P.E., University of Delaware; Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Andrew Novocin, University of Delaware; James Atlas, University of Delaware
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
Potential sources of material include your own personal notes where you Present students with made a mistake, or a homework/exam inaccurate work (on a solution that introduces mistakes worth slide or handout) and pointing out have them take a few Make clear something is wrong on your notes on what is wrong, handout, to avoid confusing students Intentional 2-10 then follow up by calling who arrive late or aren't fully paying Mistake(s) minutes on students
- Conference Session
- Research on Diversification & Inclusion
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Erin A. Cech, Rice University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering
Satisfaction Measures:question was missing). (m) Personal satisfaction from work (n) Satisfaction with quality of work unitSurvey respondents were asked “do you consider (o) Satisfaction with working conditionsyourself to be one or more of the following,” with (p) Employee empowermentthe following response categories offered: (q) Co-workers cooperation“Heterosexual or Straight,” “Gay, Lesbian, (r) Satisfaction with procedures (s) Overall job satisfactionBisexual, or Transgender,” or “Prefer not to say.”Respondents who answered “prefer not to say” were excluded from
- Conference Session
- Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Jennifer R. Amos, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Zhilin Zhang, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Hongye Liu, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Yiyin Shen
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
the“How well have you improved...” self-assessment questions in the survey, the students withdisability responded significantly (p=0.004 for response of “very well improved” and p=0.048for “extremely well improved”) more positively than the majority. Moreover, the group ofstudents who transferred or the group of students who were international, we found these twogroups of non-majority students also gave more positive responses than the majority. We foundthese three student groups shared a commonality: their common areas are the ability tocommunicate and explore from viewpoints of more than one academic field. Lastly, greaterpercentages of students with disability found “Course(s) outside my major” had the most impacton their improvement than
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 3 - Grading: Grate or Great
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Ashish D. Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Christina Marie Zambrano-Varghese, Rutgers University-Newark; Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Swapnil Moon
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
, and B. Moore, “Why College Students Cheat: A conceptual model of five factors,” in The Review of Higher Education, vol. 41, no. 4, p.549+, Summer 2018.[8] M. G. Simkin and A. McLeod, “Why do college students cheat?,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 94, no. 3, pp.441-453, July 2010.[9] M. Peters, T. Boies, and S. Morin, “Teaching academic integrity in quebec universities: roles professors adopt,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 4, no. 99, pp. 1-13, Sept. 2019.[10] T. VanDeGrift, H. Dillon, and L. Camp, “Changing the engineering student culture with respect to academic integrity and ethics,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 23, pp.1159-1182, Nov. 2016.[11] S. E. Küçüktepe, “College students’ cheating
- Conference Session
- Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Tawfik Elshehabi, University of Wyoming
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
90% of my students (N=87) strongly agreedthat sharing my teaching philosophy is critical. Additionally, underrepresented students wereempowered and archived more than half the “A”s in my courses. In conclusion, since equal is notalways fair, instructors must make their expectations exceptionally clear to ensure that anystudent can succeed and earn an “A.” I believe it is time for educators to polish their teachingphilosophy, create appealing visual models, and share them with their students.IntroductionDeveloping a Teaching Philosophy Statement (TPS) is central in any academic career [1]. TPSdeclares the educator’s approach to teaching and learning. Creating a teaching philosophyengages educators in metacognitive reflection on what they
- Conference Session
- Size, Civility, and the Classroom Culture: Setting Class Tone with a Student-centered Perspective
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jenny L Lo, Virginia Tech; Kacie J. Hodges PE, Virginia Tech Dept of Engineering Education; Wm. Michael Butler, Virginia Tech; Tamara Knott, Virginia Tech
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
teamwriting team, review a test led to team used contributed test preferably not the coordinator. long and questions, but were ultimately This team should create the unproductive responsible for creating and solutions and rubrics for grading discussions. printing the final version(s) of its the tests as part of the test design. assigned test. Instructors who Any instructor could express Provide a deadline for comments weren’t directly concerns about any questions that prior to review by the test creation involved in had been submitted to the Google team and then
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Donald P. Visco Jr., University of Akron; Dirk Schaefer, University of Bath
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
. Perry, W. G., Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years – A Scheme, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968, 1970. 2. Guttenplan, D. D., “Measuring the Wealth Effect in Education”, in The New York Times, 12/1/2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/02/world/europe/measuring-the-wealth-effect-in-education.html? , (accessed 1/26/2015). 3. Strauss, S., “The Connection Between Education, Income Inequality, and Unemployment”, in The Huffington Post, 1/2/2012, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between- ed_b_1066401.html , (accessed 1/26/2015). 4. Morse, R. and M. Foster, “How U.S. News Calculated the Best Global Universities Rankings”, in US News
- Conference Session
- Perspectives on Engineering Education During COVID-19
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Ziyan Bai, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Shruti Misra, University of Washington; Morgan Anderson, University of Washington, Seattle; Neha Kardam, University of Washington
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
- Conference Session
- Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; Matthew Walker, Ohio Northern University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
-based grading and reporting will improve education,” Kappan, pp. 64-68, Apr 2015.11. P. J. Parker, B. Bocher, & A. Polebitski, “Assessing Student Writing Competencies in Environmental Engineering Courses,” In Proc. 121st Am. Soc. Eng. Edu. Annu. Conf. & Expo., pp. 24.205.1–12, 2014.12. S. L. Post, “Standards-Based Grading in a Fluid Mechanics Course,” In Proc. Am. Soc. Eng. Edu. Annu. Conf. & Expo, pp. 24.1099.110, June 2014.13. S. L. Post, “Standards-Based Grading in a Thermodynamics Course,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 173–182, 201714. J. B. Hylton & H. Diefes-Dux, “A Standards-based Assessment Strategy for Written Exams,” 2016 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2016.15. Marbouti, Farshid, "A standards-based
- Conference Session
- Size, Civility, and the Classroom Culture: Setting Class Tone with a Student-centered Perspective
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Dimitra Michalaka P.E., The Citadel; Michael Golub, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
Sensing (S) or Intuition (N). The third categoryis about the way one takes decisions. Does he/she base decision on logic and consistency(Thinking (T)) or on people and circumstances (Feeling (F))? The last category is about howpeople deal with the outside world. Do they prefer to get things decided (Judging (J)) or stayopen to new information and options (Perceiving (P))? When the preference in each category isrecorded, the personality type is expressed as a code with four letters, one from each of the fourcategories. That leads to sixteen different personality types. This test is widely used in Americancompanies to form teams and it is used more than twenty years to form engineering designteams.12 However, some studies have shown that the Myers
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 2: Success In and Out of the Classroom
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- David Gau, University of Pittsburgh; Deanna Christine Easley Sinex, University of Pittsburgh; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Steven Abramowitch, University of Pittsburgh; Sylvanus N. Wosu, University of Pittsburgh
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
Department tours and participant research presentations 3:30 - 4:30 pm Return to hotel 5:00 - 6:30 pm Networking dinner and distinguished speaker 6:30 - 7:30 pm Panel discussion with newly recruited faculty members Day 2 8:00 - 8:30 am Breakfast 8:30 - 9:30 am Interactive session with program host(s) 9:30 - 11:30 am Campus tour 11:30 am DepartureAssessment MethodsAt the completion of the program, attendees completed a post
- Conference Session
- Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Pedro E. Arce, Tennessee Technological University; Andrea Arce-Trigatti, Tallahassee Community College; Stephanie Jorgensen; Robby Sanders, Tennessee Technological University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
interfacing with the office of research of the institution Member/s facilitating the different aspects related to the Scientific Core Expert research being proposed and the connections with gaps in literature Educational Core Member/s facilitating the different program of study for Expert students involved in the proposal effort Recruitment Many programs require a plan for the recruitment of Coordinator students and the support from the institution to achieve it Member/s reviewing and editing the draft in consultation Review and
- Conference Session
- Size, Civility, and the Classroom Culture: Setting Class Tone with a Student-centered Perspective
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Ralph Ocon, Purdue University Calumet
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
instructor can encouragestudents to respect the ideas and opinions offered by fellow classmates. S/he can stress theimportance of active listening (using both the mental and physical components of listening).After different viewpoints are exchanged, students can be encourage to decide on a course ofaction for dealing with the issues identified. Table 15 provides an example of the potentialComponents of Civility that can be satisfied using the preceding example.Table 15: Potential Components of Civility satisfied by the preceding example.Civility Assignment Features/Author’s (Civility) BehaviorComponentGive Praise The instructors can express appreciation to students for ideas contributed.Be considerate The instructor
- Conference Session
- Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Valeriya Yudina, Higher School of Economics; Yulia Skrupskaya, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Victor Taratukhin, SAP Silicon Valley and University of Muenster; Elvira Kozlova; Natalia Pulyavina, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
diversity among those ideas. During prototyping, the ideas andexplorations are taken out of heads and into the physical world – the more artistic theprototypes are, the more feedback (both negative and positive is collected) on these, thebetter. The sixth stage is testing but is not usually the last one since testing is an iterativeprocess that initiates the creation of the next version of the prototype, representing anopportunity to refine solutions and learn more about users (Branson S., 2020).Next-Gen Design thinking (or Future Design thinking (Taratukhin, 2020)) as a furtherdevelopment of Design thinking (aka Stanford Design Method), based on a significantnew understanding of Ideation and Prototyping stages, novel approach of usestoryboards
- Conference Session
- NEE 1 - Innovative Teaching & Learning Strategies
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida; Heather Maness, University of Florida
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
).Future workThe course development support offered by the UFIT Center of Instructional Technology andTraining has the following phases: Design and Development, Implementation, and Evaluate andRevise. We are currently in the design and development phase and will do the implementationsoon. In the future, the ID and I will conduct surveys with students and review the coursefeedback to find other short-term and long-term opportunities to improve the online students’learning experience. References[1] J. A. Barker, Paradigms : the business of discovering the future. HarperBusiness, 1993.[2] S. Coyner and P. McCann, “Advantages and challenges of teaching in an electronic environment: The accommodate