do you spend with organized extracurricular activities (sports, clubs, professional organizations)? • How many hours a week to do spend with work commitments (i.e., part-time job/work-study)? • If you have an assignment or project due in 2 weeks, how far in advance do you usually start? • If you have an exam in 2 weeks, how far in advance do you usually start studying?A group of questions also addressed questions of how students seek help, including in class,through classmates, or through other means. Students have numerous ways to get information,especially with videos and tutorials being posted online for free. These questions helpedinvestigators to better understand what students do more frequently. • How
infrastructure projects, sustainability education, and increasing diversity in STEM fields.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction and in the Civil & Environmental Engineering Department, and an affiliate faculty of the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She holds a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in civil engineering and a graduate certificate in engineering education – all from Clemson University. She is the 2016 recipient of Virginia Tech’s College of Engineering Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Assistant Professor and the Black Graduate Student
Scholars since my freshman year. Within the program I worked on my teamwork skills by participating in many volunteering and engineering events with fellow members. I also help plan events and projects for the program as a member of both the social and mentorship committees. As the Ohio State University Pistol Club Vice President I have gained valuable experience as a leader; teaching members how to properly and safely handle a pistol. Besides being involved with these activities I enjoy volunteering for my high school Science Olympiad team. I help coach and run events for the team when they attend invitationals in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. I enjoy going back to help the students learn more about science and
Award. Dr. Ofori-Boadu received both the 2017 NC A & T - CoST Rookie Research Excellence Award and the 2017 North Carolina A & T State University (NCAT) Rookie Re- search Excellence Award. Under her mentorship, Dr. Ofori-Boadu’s students have presented research posters at various NCAT Undergraduate Research Symposia resulting in her receiving a 2017 Certificate of Recognition for Undergraduate Research Mentoring. In 2016, her publication was recognized by the Built Environment Project and Asset Management Journal as the 2016 Highly Commended Paper. Andrea has served as a reviewer for the National Science Foundation (NSF), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and several journals and conferences. Dr
, he supports over 230 cadets in the ABET accredited systems engineering major. Systems Engineering is currently the largest engineering major at USAFA, administered by seven departments with cadets participating in over 30 engineering capstones projects. Trae received his undergraduate degree in Systems Engineering in 2012 from USAFA with a focus in Electrical Engineering. He is a distinguished graduate from the Air Force Institute of Technology receiving a Master of Science in Systems Engineering in 2018. Trae serves in the USAF as a developmental engineer and holds Department of Defense certifications in systems engineer- ing, science and technology management, test & evaluation, and program management. He
questions: Likert scale, 6 2. Exam contribution to organizing research items ranging from strongly 3. Exam aiding to acquire information for research project disagree (1) to strongly 4. Exam broadening student knowledge agree (6) 5. Exam components well integrated with one another 6. Exam helping with PhD research plan 7. Exam instructions easy to follow 8. Exam being a worthwhile process Open-ended Your thoughts on the purpose of exam? Questions: Your suggestions for areas of improvement with the exam?Results and DiscussionA total of 56 doctoral candidates participated in
the ScLRprocess.The ScLR was broken into five stages: (1) identify the research questions, (2) identify relevantstudies, (3) study selection, (4) charting the data, and (5) collating, summarizing and reportingresults, closely following the methods outlined by Arksey and O'Malley [6]. These are iterativestages and expanded on in Table 1 below. Table 1 The Five Stages of a Scoping Literature Review Stage Objective Outcomes 1: Identify Research Determine scope of project and Inclusion and Exclusion Questions focus for search. Criteria 2: Identify Relevant Determine relevant sources of
potentially interested in the makerspacemovement and for those in the beginning stages of planning or implementation of a space. Ourprimary aim is to help students navigate through the process of creating a space similar to ours,emphasizing resources (people, financial, and otherwise) needed. Our secondary aim is toprovide faculty with student perspective on the creation of a makerspace, including the type ofguidance needed (and not needed) from a collaboration between students and faculty.Team-Building (Empathize)It cannot be emphasized enough the importance of a diverse team of both faculty and studentswhen working on a student-centered project like this one. Our student group consisted of twobiomedical engineering majors (one with an interest in
freshmen for several years. She is actively involved in community services of offering robotics workshops to middle- and high-school girls. Her research interests are dynamics and system modeling, geometry modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing.Dr. Diane L. Peters, Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University.Prof. Stephanie G Wettstein, Montana State University, Montana Engineering Education Research Center Stephanie Wettstein is an Assistant Professor in the Chemical and Biological Engineering department at Montana State University in Bozeman, MT. She has been the faculty advisor of the MSU SWE chapter since 2013.Dr
Figure 1: Cycle 1 Sample codeFigure 2: Cycle 1 Sample Documentworking on or to have some project in mind they’d like to work on. If students didn’t bringanything to work on, we provided the Figure 2 document to practice with.As the content of the workshop started coming together, a clash in how to present the informationcame about due to the difference in our learning and teaching styles. H´ector insisted we keep inmind that the course be driven by the needs of the students attending. Nadra agreed in part, butwas focused on creating a solid foundation of LaTeX for students. This was needed to balance thebreadth of students that would attend from different disciplines. After the first workshop, H´ectorrealized that Nadra’s and his dynamic would
expertise in mechanical engineeringwas required. Thus, during a departmental faculty meeting two senior professors were selected forhelping the students with technical issues; one professor in the area of thermo-fluidics and the other inmaterials, machine tools and manufacturing. Each one was given one and half (1.5) credit hours of releasetime per semester for mentoring the undergraduate students with their specific technical problems, suchas technical projects and their oral presentations, preparing them for job interviews, writing technicalpapers for publication in journals and conference proceedings, etc. Both the professors maintained awritten document like a log-book or field notes for each mentoring session. These are powerful tools, forthe
Carolina A & T State University (NCAT) Rookie Re- search Excellence Award. Under her mentorship, Dr. Ofori-Boadu’s students have presented research posters at various NCAT Undergraduate Research Symposia resulting in her receiving a 2017 Certificate of Recognition for Undergraduate Research Mentoring. In 2016, her publication was recognized by the Built Environment Project and Asset Management Journal as the 2016 Highly Commended Paper. Andrea has served as a reviewer for the National Science Foundation (NSF), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and several journals and conferences. Dr. Ofori-Boadu engages in professional communities to include the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the
students and to leadership, policy, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of engineering doctoral students for careers in academia and industry and the development of engineering education assessment tools. She is a National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career (CA- REER) award winner and is a recipient of a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE).Thomas John Wallin, Cornell University Thomas Wallin is a doctoral student in Materials Science and Engineering at Cornell University.Mr. Marc James MurphyMrs. Amanda Michelle Lorts Harding, Norfolk State UniversityRabia Hussain, Norfolk State UniversityMr. Sonny
expense ofinvolving himself in other extracurricular activities.Kimmy was initially a first year materials science engineering major, but decided to switch intocivil engineering due to her interest in project management, or more importantly due to herdisinterest in the micro-scale and research heavy world of materials science. Kimmy is part of aliving and learning program designed to provide support for incoming freshmen girls inengineering. Kimmy seems to work hard, but suggests that her grades are not as high as shewould hope them to be. In addition to focusing on her classes, Kimmy also seems to be interested in participating in non-engineering related social extracurricular activities. Professor X is a relatively young professor that
psychology, and the learning sciences. Through in-situ studies of classroom and institutional practice, Chandra focuses on the role of culture in science learning and educational change. Chandra pursues projects that have high potential for leveraging sustainable change in undergraduate STEM programs and makes these struggles for change a direct focus of her research efforts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Role of Empathy in Supporting Teaching Moves of Engineering Design Peer EducatorsAbstractEmpathy is a diverse and complex phenomena by which humans relate their experiences to oneanother. This work explores empathy as a resource for engineering
EngineeringFaculties’ Responses to Nature of Engineering Instrument (Work-In-Progress) AbstractEngineering faculty have advanced experiences with engineering that non-engineers do nothave, but what Nature of Engineering (NOE) concepts do engineering researchers hold? For K-12 engineering education, having an informed NOE understanding is an essential part ofengineering literacy. Yet for the higher education engineering community, NOE is hardly everdiscussed. Understanding engineering faculties’ NOE views can be a valuable contribution tocurrent NOE research. Our project is part of a collaboration between a southwestern US highereducation institute and a Vietnamese University. The cohort of Vietnamese engineering
of results details the interests of student members in Chapter-providedprogramming. Some respondents are interested in greater outreach or social programming, butfor the most part, participants want their ASEE Student Chapters to be focused on teaching andresearch. Participants are most interested in faculty panels for teaching programming,presumably learning from the experts, and are interested in research projects as research-focusedprogramming.Student Chapters are valuable for a variety of reasons. First and foremost, they provideindividuals with an opportunity to interact with students that have an interest in engineeringeducation. The common interest in engineering education is interdisciplinary, meaningindividuals may interact with
Paper ID #5730Assembling the Ideal Doctoral Dissertation Committee in Engineering Edu-cationDr. James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach James J. Pembridge is an Assistant Professor in the Freshman Engineering Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He earned a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering, M.A. Education in Curriculum and Instruction, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. His research has focused on mentoring as pedagogy for project-based courses and understanding the adult learning characteristics of undergraduate students.Dr. Stephanie Cutler, Virginia Tech Dr
. As a result, student advice presented in this paper reflects on theuntimely shift to online learning and provides insights to future online learners, from a group ofunwilling online students, on how to succeed in online courses.MethodsAt the conclusion of the 2020 spring semester, 233 students (across 67 project teams) in the FirstYear Engineering (FYE) program at a public Midwestern STEM-oriented university were givena group assignment. This assignment asked student teams to provide advice for future onlinestudents on how to succeed in the online learning environment through a survey administeredusing the university learning management system. The assignment administered builds onprevious research conducted in 2019 to obtain student advice
information, the General Causality Orientations Scale (GCOS) [6] score, andaspect of student learning, as it is how instructors communicate Exams, Quizzes, In-lab Activities, Lab Assignments, Projects, In-class Activities, Class Assignments, or self-identified feedback preferences. Students were recruited for themisconceptions or gaps in knowledge to learners [2] and therefore, a Other, allowing them to enter an additional activity used. Instructors could also select that they do not quantitative data collection in Fall 2020. This quantitative data was used toworthwhile and deserving focus
and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: College Students with ADHD: A Framework for Studying the Role of the College Experience on Academic SuccessAbstract Students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) represent a growingfraction of the college population. We plan to study the experiences of college students withADHD majoring in science, engineering, and mathematics
follow the K-12 engineering education principles byutilizing the project-based learning (PBL) approach. The PBL is introduced by Kilpartick andthis method is used in education by Dewey. This method is based on designing or creatingproduct, solving problem, investigating, and developing an answer (J Dewey, 1980; J Dewey,2008; Kilpatrick, 1918). The PBL approach improves group work skills and collaboration whilekeeping students more engaged in learning by keeping them motivated as the key element of thisstrategy (Harun, Yusof, Jamaludin, & Hassan, 2012; Huang, 2010). The fundamental norms of agroup of students working together are communication and collaboration skills as well as anintrinsic motivation to become an effective group (Blumenfeld
that she received. Furtherfunding will come from asking the students, faculty, and staff alliances at the University.Funding can also come from other internal organizations, however these provide minimal funds.Additional funding comes from percentage nights from local food establishments.Best PracticesDespite the difficulties with membership at meetings, the DAC has been successful in helping tobring in speakers and holding events. Further, the DAC has been included in diversity measuresand organizations within the university. Finally, the DAC has spearheaded both physical anddigital accessibility change projects within Virginia Tech and the surrounding community.Purdue University: ASEE Student ChapterBackground and DevelopmentPurdue
that students often feel as they try tomake a final decision about which graduate program is the best option.In the end, the best choice is often the graduate program that “feels right” to the student: theplace where they found multiple connections and diverse opportunities, with strong support foryour academic, personal and financial goals. When faced with a choice between the “perfect”research project and the “perfect” faculty advisor, it is wise to remember that the mentoringrelationship is critical to success in graduate school – while projects come and go, the support ofa good mentor can have a much longer impact on your academic and professional success.References[1] “How to Make the Final Grad School Enrollment Decision | Applying to
Development Assistant at the Center for Teach- ing and Learning at TAMUQ, where he assists in organizing faculty oriented workshops, investigating effective teaching techniques in STEM, and conducting faculty evaluations.Ms. Jude Aloudeh, Texas A&M University at Qatar I am an undergraduate electrical engineer studying electrical engineering at Texas A&M University at Qatar. My interest lies in the field of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and different aspects of power and communication. I have completed various research projects that relate to both scientific and social issues. I have received a first-place award from the Weil Cornell Medical Conference regarding the 2030 Qatar Vision, where my group and
for this course, all workshop leaders and instructorswere given a tutorial on using DyKnowTM in the classroom to interact with students virtually.Using DyKnowTM, I was able to receive instant feedback from students on their level ofunderstanding, poll students for answers to multiple choice questions, collect student work, anddisplay student work as a teaching aid during class. Although common notes were prepared forthe course, instructors were given the freedom to alter the course notes or integrate relevantexamples from their own work, as long as they maintain the integrity of the notes for thestudents. I decided to take advantage of this opportunity to integrate several of my own personalexamples from past projects and research.In spring
. is an Associate Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context and storytelling in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering De- sign Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?,” and is a Co-PI on the NSF
uncertain how to adjust their instruction tomotivate their students. Many instructors who design new laboratory-based and project-basedinstruction to boost motivation find that these efforts are often greeted by apathy or resistancefrom the students. This situation is further exacerbated by curriculum (re)design efforts whichemphasize the presentation and transmission of course material rather than everyday teachingdecisions that motivate, or demotivate, the students to learn the material3. Based on the premise that educational psychology must inform the practice of teaching4,this primer first presents and synthesizes a selection of recent theories of motivation. With thesetheories as a backdrop, we discuss how these theories can be used in
research agenda includes epistemological beliefs in science and evolution education. He is recently engaged in professional development activities supported by several grants targeting to increase elementary teachers’ knowledge and skills to integrate science, language arts, and engineering education within the context of Next Generation Science Standards.Miss Ezgi Yesilyurt, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Ezgi Yesilyurt is a PhD student in curriculum and instruction/science education at University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She is working as a graduate assistant and teaching science methods courses. She received her MS degree and BS degree in elementary science education. She participated European Union Projects in which
, and your supervisor has given you the following project: A horizontal cantilevered beam is used to support traffic lights as shown. For the horizontal part of the beam, several designs are possible: 1. Circular cross-section with radius 5cm at the fixed end (where it’s attached to the vertical pole) tapering to a circular cross section with radius 10cm at the free end 2. Circular cross-section with radius 10cm at the fixed end tapering to a circular cross section with radius 5cm at the free end 3. Circular cross section with radius 7.5cm throughout the beam 4. A different design You will need to find the best design and justify it with reasoning. Figure 1: Problem used for this