cadetreports are that the project experience thus far is realistic, relevant and exciting. Cadets arefrustrated by the communication challenges but optimistic that this will be the best capstoneexperience in the building.RICHARD W. FREEMAN has served as a lecturer in the U.S. Coast Guard Academy’sElectrical Engineering Section since 2008. Prior to joining the faculty, he taught fulltime foreight years. He also worked in the Telecommunications Industry for eight years. He earned BSand PhD degrees in Computer Engineering from Iowa State University and a MBA fromSouthern Methodist University. He is pursuing his Professional Engineering License.RONALD S. ADREZIN serves as an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Sectionat USCGA, where he has
, 2009, pp. 819-827. 2. Caldwell, J.E., “Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips,” Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 2007, pp. 9-20. 3. Fies, C. and J. Marshall, “Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 2006, pp. 101-109. 4. Patterson, B., J. Kilpatrick, and E. Woebkenberg, “Evidence for Teaching Practice: The Impact of Clickers in a Large Classroom Environment,” Nurse Education Today, 30(7), 2010, pp. 603-607. 5. Karaman, S., “Effects of Audience Response Systems on Student Achievement and Long-Term Retention,” Social Behavior and Personality, 39(10), 2011 pp. 1431-1440. 6. Black
Professors AAUP. Contingent Appointments and the Academic Profession, AAUP Policy 10th Edition, 2006, http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/issues/contingent/ (Accessed September 2011).4. Daryl G., Smith D G., Turner C.S., Osei-Kofi N., Richards S. “Interrupting the Usual: Successful Strategies for Hiring Diverse Faculty”. The Journal of Higher Education, 75:2, March/April 2004.5. Kezar A.J., Sam C. “Understanding the New Majority of Non Tenure Track Faculty in Higher Education: Demographics, Experiences, and Plans of Action”. ASHE Higher Education Report, 36, November 2010.6. Waltman J., Hollenshead C., August L., Miller J., Bergom I. “Contingent Faculty in a Tenure Track World”. Center for the Education of Women, University of
this ‘cycle’ in other ASEE publications. Page 25.221.9APPENDIX B : Sample Spreadsheet for Collecting Data STUDENT # X T Q M RUBRIC: FLUID MECHANICS RUBRIC BASED ON THE PRINCIPLES OF CRITICAL THINKING RUBRIC COURTESY OF W. S. U. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY PULLMAN, WA. 99164. LIKERT SCALE WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION : 5 4 3 2 1 1 Break down all barriers. √ 2 Create consistency of purpose with a plan. √ 3 Adopt the new philosophy of quality. √ 4 Establish high Standards. √ 5 Establish Targets / Goals
topics –thereby making the structure of the lecture more interesting in the process. This is exhibited inTable 3. Table 3: Causes of failures with Examples Important causes of failures Example(s) 1 Failure in communication Challenger space shuttle disaster, Airline accidents ( Tenerife airport disaster) 2 Quality related failures BP oil spill, Therac 25 (the computerized radiation therapy machine) 3 Failure in leadership Exxon Valdez Oil Spill - Joseph Hazelwood, the person selected to be the ships leader, consumed
Optimization: State of the Art: SIAM, 19973 Kodiyalam S, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization - some formal methods, framework requirements, and application to vehicle design. International Journal of Vehicle Design 2001; 25:3-224 Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J. Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) methods: Their synergy with computer technology in the design process. Aeronautical Journal 1999; 103:373-3825 Xiaoyu G, Renaud JE, Penninger CL. Implicit uncertainty propagation for robust collaborative optimization. Transactions of the ASME. Journal of Mechanical Design 2006; 128:1001-10136 Tovar A, Khandelwal K. Topology Optimization for Minimum Compliance using a Control Strategy
DAN.4-2 DAN.4-3 Figure 1 – The Synthesis Step for Systems and Software Architecting: DA = DesignApproach; DAx.y-z = Design Approach for sub-function x.y for architecture zAfter the synthesis matrix has been developed, the (three) alternative architectures are evaluatedusing a ”standard” weighting and rating scheme6. This is the “analysis” step which producesmeasures of the cost and the effectiveness of each of the alternatives.We note that in the CE-AM approach we are explicitly defining and evaluating alternativearchitectures, with the ultimate goal of finding a cost-effective architecture (solution) for thecustomer(s) (stakeholders). The steps of the procedure are the same as the critical “views” in thateach step is defined by
. Page 23.1127.8Bibliography1. Nathan, M., Tran, N., Atwood, A., Prevost, A., and Phelps, L.A. “Beliefs and Expectationsabout Engineering Preparation Exhibited by High School STEM Teachers.” Journal ofEngineering Education, October, 2010. P. 409-426.2. Katehi, L., Pearson, G., Feder, M., editors. “Engineering in K-12 Education: Understandingthe Status and Improving the Prospects.” Committee on K-12 Engineering Education, NationalAcademy of Engineering and National Research Council. 2009.3. Virani, S. Burnham, I., “Innovative Curriculum for Engineering In High School (ICE-HS):Status Update.” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings,2012.4. Jain, R., Sheppard, K., McGrath, E., and Gallois, B. “Promoting Systems
other competencies of systems engineers. Systems Engineering-Practice and Theory, B. Cogan, ed., INTECH Open Access Publisher, pages 217–230, 2012.[10] John Krupczak Jr. and A. Mehran Shahhosseini. Application of a computerized method for evaluating systems-level thinking. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, number 10.18260/1-2–32097, Tampa, Florida, June 2019. ASEE Conferences. https://peer.asee.org/32097.[11] Marsha Lovett, Oded Meyer, and Candace Thille. The open learning initiative: Measuring the effectiveness of the oli statistics course in accelerating student learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2008.[12] S. Eppinger and K. Ulrich. Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill Higher
Opposable Mind: Winning Through Integrative Thinking, 11. Martin, Roger. Boston, Mass. : Harvard Business Press, 2009. print 12. MIB 3: Men in Black 3 . Dir. Barry Sonnenfield. Perf. Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones. Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, 2012. DVD. University of Guelph: Changing Lives Improving Life 13. "Multiple Choice Exams." . Learning Common Library, n.d. Web. 14. Okuda, S. M., M. A. Runco, and D. E. Berger. "Creativity and the Finding and Solving of RealWorld Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
refers to how long a movement or sequence of movements continues.Kinesthetic response refers to a spontaneous reaction to motion. Repetition refers to the repeatingof something onstage. The viewpoint of space encompasses shape, gesture, architecture, spatialrelationship, and topography. Shape refers to the contour the body(ies) makes in space. Gesturerefers to a movement that engages part(s) of the body; gesture is a shape with a beginning, middle,and end. Architecture refers to the environment the actors are working in and how their awarenessof it impacts the way they move. The actors learn “to dance with the space, to be in dialogue witha room, to let movement evolve out of our surroundings” [10]. Topography refers to the floorpattern and the
the US and even around the world. This accreditation certainly ensures highquality of the engineering education that is provided to the students. However, with ABET’sapproach of accrediting individual programs, universities (and departments) tend to develop theirengineering programs largely in isolation. There is likely to be a strong overlap between thecollege-level math and basic sciences courses that are required by ABET, but the courses onengineering topics may or may not be common across multiple programs. There could certainlybe overlap based on the history of how these courses were initially designed, the programs theywere initially offered under, the faculty member(s) who designed and/or taught them, scheduling,etc. Universities and
Industrial and Systems Engineering (ISyE) in Healthcare Although ISyE was lauded in the 2014 PCAST report, engineers worked for many decades to improve the healthcare system and establish a long term partnership with healthcare providers. In the 1980’s Donald Berwick, former President and CEO of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), espoused that continuous improvement is a necessary solution to the ongoing problems in healthcare 2. During that decade, healthcare professionals observed an increasing amount of inefficiencies in the system which reinforced complexity and contributed to increasing costs. Two methods of improvement dominated the healthcare industry: 1) inspection and correction of problems and 2) continuous improvement
Evidence (FRE) include a number of principlesthat could be useful in the use of jury trial processes in engineering tradeoff studies. Some ofthese are described below; others are likely not useful or necessary in the specialized context of atradeoff study. For example, evidence may be excluded under FRE 403 if its “probative value is Page 26.1048.82 California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158, 90 S. Ct. 1930, 1935, 26 L. Ed.2d 489 (1970) (quoting 5 Wigmore,Evidence § 1367). substantially outweighed by a danger of unfair prejudice,” such as extremely graphic evidence ofviolence, which is
Systems Conference, IEEE Society, 2011, pp. 367-370.8. F. Squires, etal, “Investigating an Innovative Approach for Developing Systems Engineering Curriculum: The Systems Engineering Experience Accelerator”, ASEE Annual Conference, 2011.9. M.C. Brannon, T.A. Mazzuchi, “Introducing the Fundamentals of Systems Engineering to Freshman through Various Interactive Group Activities”, ASEE Annual Conference, 2014.10. S. G. Teng, “Embedding Systems Engineering Practices into Systems Engineering Classes”, ASEE Annual Conference, 2014.11. C.S. Wasson, “Systems Engineering Competency: The missing course in engineering education”, ASEE Annual Conference, 2012.12. M.D. Wilson, etal, “Entrepreneurship Education: Engineering a Pracademic
.” Proc. of ASEE Annual Conference, June 2015.8. Y. Bar-Yam. “When systems engineering fails-toward complex systems engineering," Proc. of Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2003, pp. 2021-2028.9. E. McGrath, S. Lowes, C. Jurado, and A. Squires, “SE Capstone: A Pilot Study of 14 Universities to Explore Systems Engineering Learning and Career Interest through Department of Defense.” Proc. of ASEE Annual Conference, June 2011.
, engineering firms and companies around theworld. In short, they began to see themselves as practicing professional engineers. This isprobably one of the most valuable outcomes of this course. Given the right opportunity, I wouldteach this course again, or another course using a similar format. What it lacked in structure, itmore than made up for in its breadth and depth of industrial-type experience.Bibliography1. Swartwout, M. A., & Jayaram, S. (2012, June), Spacecraft Integration and Test: AnUndergraduate Course in Systems Engineering Practice Paper presented at 2012 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/219272. Guerra, L., & Murphy, G. A., & May, L. D. (2013, June), Applying Systems
program, with clear lines of accountability and authority. Senior SE personnel should be experienced in the product(s) domain, with strong skills in architecture development, requirements management, analysis, modeling and simulation, affordability analysis, and specialty engineering disciplines (e.g., reliability, maintainability, survivability, system security, and technology maturity management” [AFSB, 2008].GRCSE: Graduate Reference Curriculum for Systems EngineeringGRCSE “is a set of recommendations for the development and implementation of asystems-centric (Fabrycky 2010) master’s level graduate program in systems engineering(SE). … GRCSE is designed for worldwide use. As such, it respects and accommodatesthe tremendous
statisticalsignificance. This work will inform modifications to enhance the course in future semesters.Modifications to the course will be monitored and impact on performance and perception will bequantified. 1. Twigg, C.A., “Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: Redesigning Large-Enrollment Courses”, The Pew Learning and Technology Program, Troy, New York (1999). Available from Center for Academic Transformation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute http://www.center.rpi.edu. 2. U. S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies, Washington, D.C., 2010. 3. WileyPLUS, http
general overview of productdevelopment process (see Table 3). Students form a start-up company and design a newproduct, develop a (rough) design of processes to manufacture this product, build acorresponding financial model and a business plan. This course is described in details in nextsection. Stage 2 is divided into two semesters: during the first semester lectures cover ProcessDesign and students are learning hands-on fundamentals of specialized software platform(s)for process modeling and simulation. Based on the knowledge and experience gained in the PPI class, in the following semesterstudent groups contact local companies, develop project proposals, and carry out projectsaccording to the joint agreement. Student teams offer services
Teaching and Learning, v11 n2 p76-90 Apr 201117. Khalid, A., Nuhfer-Halten, B., Vandenbussche, J., Colebeck, D., Atiqullah, M., Toson, S., Chin, C., ‘Effective multidisciplinary active learning techniques for freshmen polytechnic students,’ Intellectbase International Consortium Academic Conference, Atlanta, GA., October 13-15, 2011 Page 25.1229.13
. Assessment criteria can include: (a) Whether the problem was accurately defined (the Problem as State & Problem as Understood)? (b) Did the solution(s) solve the problem? (c) Did the student engage in critical thinking? (d) How is the solution going to be implemented? (identify concerns). (e) During student presentations: evaluate the use visuals, and presentation preparation & skills. (f) During group/team presentations: evaluate the quality of collaboration and initiatives undertaken by individual team members.(3) Student input should be part of the assessment process: Use class discussions to evaluate/critique PBL assignments/activities. Select
-world projects at their new positions. Page 22.613.11AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the Little Rock National Airport Executive CommissionersDeborah Swartz and Ronald Mathieu for their support during the project. The authors would alsolike to acknowledge two other students that worked on the project, Rodney L. Arnold and TaraN. Lancaster.References 1. Caldwell, B. S., Perspectives on Systems Engineering and Impacts on SE Education, Proceedings of the Annual Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Miami, FL, May 2009. 2. Sage, A. P., Systems Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and
/acquisitionworkforce, April 2010. 2. The Defense Acquisition University provides a full range of basic, intermediate, and advanced certification training, assignment-specific training, applied research, and continuous learning opportunities for DoD personnel. Information can be found at http://www.dau.mil/default.aspx . 3. Bloom B. S., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc., 1956. 4. Anderson, L.W., and D. Krathwohl (Eds.), A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York, 1956. 5. Information regarding graduate programs at the Air Force Institute of Technology can be found at
Technology (ABET) accreditation criteria forengineering programs that took effect in the 2019–2020 accreditation cycle [1] reflect an increasedemphasis in having engineering graduates that are prepared to participate in the development ofcomplex products and systems.The wide array of knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) desired in engineering professionals isevident in references such as the Engineering Competency Model jointly developed by theAmerican Association of Engineering Societies (AAES) and the US Department of Labor (DoL),the CDIO (Conceive Design Implement Operate) Syllabus 2.0 proposed by the CDIO organization,and the U. S. Department of Defense Systems Engineering Career Competency Model [2-5]. Someof the listed KSAs [2-5] highlight
effect group of ideas; and once all the cards have been placed under an appropriate affinity category, borders can be drawn around each affinity group to complete the diagram. Table 1. Define Tools 2. MeasureKASH Box A KASH box is a tool, similar to a SWOT where K is Successful:Analysis knowledge, A is attitude, S is Skill, and H is habits. visual, Management uses KASH Boxes to help identify areas qualitative where sustainable change can be done. This sustainable data, hands- change is necessary in most cases for a
Jing Guo, "A Systems Engineering Approach for Implementing An Electrical or Computer Engineering Master’s Capstone Course," in ASEE Rocky Mountain Section Conference, Cedar City, Utah, 2016.[2] S. B. Blachard and W. Frabrycky, Systems engineering and Analysis” (Fifth Edition), New York: Prentice Hall, 2011.[3] D. Buede, The Engineering Design of Systems – Models and Methods (Second Edition), Wiley, 2009.[4] A. P. Sage and J. James E. Armstrong, Introduction to Systems Engineering, Wiley, 2009.[5] yyy, Information retrieved from student deliverables for EE 692, Electrical Engineering Capstone,, 2015.[6] ASPCA, "Shelter Intake and Surrender," 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.aspca.org/animal- homelessness/shelter-intake-and
government experiencedoesn't necessarily mean one has hands-on design experience and vice versa. Also designprojects in academia can provide the requisite experience but only, in our opinion, if theproject(s) involve strict engineering discipline and in-depth reviews. If design experiencedinstructors are not available, course objectives can still be met but the class will probably lackdesign room realism.How to start - Figure 13 is a summary of our recommendations if you find yourself having todevelop your own SE Design course of instruction. 12 Figure 13: SE Design Capstone Course Design Approach1. If you don't have first-hand design experience, educate yourself on how it's done
over the last two decades is Networked Control Systems (NCSs).[6-9] NCSs are controlsystems where the feedback occurs in the presence of a data network (typically, a digital orwireless communications channel). Fig. 3 provides a typical architecture for an NCS. The blocksmarked "S" and "A" represent sensors and actuators, respectively. Notice an NCS may be alarge, spatially distributed system comprised of a collection of plants, controllers, actuators, andsensors, sharing information via the communications network. Page 26.1161.6 Fig. 3. Typical NCS architectureThe study of NCS has flourished due to the
., . . . Rabadi, G. (2008). System of systems Page 26.1271.19 engineering. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 36; 33(4), 62-62. doi:10.1109/EMR.2008.4778760.4. Jamshidi, M., & Jamshidi, M. (2008). System of systems engineering - new challenges for the 21st century. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 23(5), 4-19. doi:10.1109/MAES.2008.4523909.5. Dimario, M., Boardman, J., & Sauser, B. (2009). System of Systems Collaborative Formation. IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 3, 360-368.6. Eusgeld, I., Nan, C., & Dietz, S. (2011). “System-of-systems” approach for interdependent critical infrastructures