Conference Session

Technological Literacy and the Non-science College Student

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert M. Brooks, Temple University; Jyothsna Kavuturu; Mehmet Cetin, Temple University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

AC 2012-2977: SCIENCE FOR NON-SCIENCE MAJORSDr. Robert M. Brooks, Temple University Robert Brooks is an Associate Professor of civil engineering at Temple University. He is a fellow of ASCE. His research interests are engineering education, civil engineering materials, and transportation engineering.Jyothsna K. S., Jyothsna K. S., Department of English, St.Joseph’s College, Bangalore, eecured a gold medal for the high- est aggregate marks in the Post Graduate English Literature course at St.Joseph’s College (autonomous). K. S. has been working for the Department of English, St.Joseph’s College for almost two years now, teaching both undergraduate and postgraduate courses in English. K. S. has published papers in

Conference Session

TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Corey T. Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York (CoE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

qualitative approach for examining language mediated frames that highlight someaspects of social reality while obscuring other aspects [52]. These frames or discourses may bespoken or communicated through “texts”, including the multimodal texts like videogames [11],[53]. To identify any discourses in Iconoclasts, the author analyzed the recorded dialogue fromthe game and associated notes on the story or storytelling from the research journal. Particularattention was given to engineering and technology topics and what was being included or excludedabout the topic, what assumptions the discourse(s) carried and which characters were invoking thediscourse(s). Previous engineering education research was reviewed to help connect the discoursesin

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Technological Literacy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

R. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

viewof ethics, where the engineer is strongly coupled to the system they affect through their work,provides the opportunity for more meaningful feedback through narrative construction [39]; atopic that will be addressed in future work.Bibliography[1] W. R. Bowen, Engineering Ethics: Outline of an Aspirational Approach. London: Springer-Verlag, 2009.[2] K. Rayne, T. Martin, S. Brophy, N. Kemp, J. D. Hart, and K. R. Diller, “The Development of adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, pp. 165–174, 2006.[3] W. Carpenter, “Teaching Ethics To Engineers,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2004, p. 13862.[4] M. A. Selby, “Assessing Engineering Ethics Training

Conference Session

Promoting Technological Literacy

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Thalia Anagnos, San Jose State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

students and faculty contribute meaningfully to a region’seconomy and individuals get adequate return on their investment in education. Finally auniversity’s moral function gives individuals the guidance and experience to act in ways thatcontribute to a common good. Taken together these functions contribute to holisticdevelopment of the individual. It is proposed that this Learning-Societal-Economic-Moral(L-S-E-M) framework can be used to describe potential impacts of IT on university functions.In other words it provides a framework to discuss the aims which a university educationshould seek to achieve as pressures rise to shift its functions from humans to computers.As digital technologies are increasingly adopted in education and cost pressures

Conference Session

TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Sara Kaye Jones; Mani Mina, Iowa State University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

ideationsKeywords: Inquiry-base, student role, real-time feedback, dynamic classrooms, autonomyAbstractIn this work, we address the role(s) students play during their education. While the students’ mainrole is to learn, it is observed that in most classrooms, students approach learning through the lensof the instructor’s vision. The authors have experienced it in engineering as well as technologicalliteracy classes, with some differences. For this paper we focus on the engineering students. Inrecent years, newer pedagogical approaches and improvements in instruction techniques haveexpanded the student’s view from this lens [1,2]. Nonetheless, students who are taking more thana few classes with heavy syllabi tend to focus on finishing the classes with

Conference Session

Promoting Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dan G. Dimitriu, University of Texas at San Antonio; Mehdi Shadaram P.E., University of Texas, San Antonio

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

examine solutions of their own. Students must understand the basicterminologies associated with different technologies. Being a college freshman student issufficient to understand the content of this course.Instruction consists of:a. Topics introduced through lectures, discussions, and reading assignments;b. Students working individually and collaboratively to complete assigned tasks and projects;c. Field activities, Internet, and library research on assigned subjects;d. Oral and multimedia presentations and written assignments;e. Quizzes, midterm test, and final exam.After an extensive search the selected book for the course was “Technology and Society:Issues for the 21st Century and Beyond / 3rd Edition” by Linda S. Hjorth, Barbara

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, University of California, Merced

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

-based practice in stem education,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, (Indianapolis, Indiana), ASEE Conferences, June 2014. https://peer.asee.org/23306. [6] D. M. Riley, “Aiding and abeting: The bankruptcy of outcomes-based education as a change strategy,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, (San Antonio, Texas), ASEE Conferences, June 2012. https://peer.asee.org/20901. [7] A. D. de Figueiredo and A. P. Afonso, Context and Learning: A Philosophical Framework. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2006. [8] I. Scheffler, Reason and Teaching. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973. [9] G. Domenico and M. B. Burkins, Holistic engineering education: beyond technology. New York: Springer, 2010.[10] H. Morgan and S

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

 old  model  was  to  start  with  the  technician  training  and  infuse  more  science,  and  mathematical  version  of  the  50’s-­‐60’s  technician  trainings.  However,  the  pragmatic  essence  of  engineering  to  build,  design,  and  make  things  was  fading  and  began  to  disappear  in  most  curricula.    Consequently,  ABET  tweaked  its  emphasis  to  ensure  that  engineers  are  developing  the  right  balance  of  hard  and  soft  skills.     Page 24.679.5  One  perspective  on  the  ABET  requirement  was  to  liberate  engineering  education  by  bringing  together  the  most  important

Conference Session

Technological Literacy and the Non-science College Student

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mariana Tafur, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Demetra Evangelou, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

can help overcome fixation effects. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing. 2010;25:77-92.22. Jansson DG, Steven S. Design Fixation. Design Studies. 1991;12(1):3-11.23. Doherty W. A Partnership ot Provide Teachers With Basic Computer Troubleshooting Skills. Technology and Teacher Education Annual. 2005;4:2573-2576.24. Doherty W, Gibson K. The Efficacy of Providing Basic Computer Troubleshooting Skills to Pre-Service Teachers. Technology and Teacher Education Annual. 2006;4(2828-2832). Page 25.1379.925. Hale CR, Barsalou LW. Explanation Content and Construction During System

Conference Session

Objectives, Assessment, and Methods for Teaching Technological Literacy

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott Bartholomew; Geoff Wright, Brigham Young University; Ron Terry, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

place to facilitate teachers as they plan, prepare, and organize theircurricula.References1. ITEA, Standards for Technological Literacy; Content for the Study of Technology, Reston, VA: ITEA, 2002.2. McTighe, J. and Thomas, R. S., Educational Leadership; Backward Design for Forward Action, VOL 60; PART 5, 2003, pages 52-55.3. Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J., "What is Backward Design?," in Understanding by Design, 1st edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall, 2001, pp. 7-19.4. Wiggins,G., McTighe, J., Understanding by Design, Prentice Hall, ISBN 013093058X, 2001.5. Wiggins,G. & Jay McTighe, Understanding by Design Professional Development Workbook, Association for

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Krupczak Jr., Hope College; A. Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

: Morgan James Publishing, 2017. 8. K. Stave and M. Hopper, “What Constitutes Systems Thinking: A Proposed Taxonomy.” 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Jul. 1, 2007. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/sea_fac_articles/201. 9. J. Froyd, L. Pchenitchnaia, D. Fowler, and N. Simpson, Systems Thinking and Integrative Learning Outcomes paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. 10. D.V. Behl, and S. Ferreira, “Systems Thinking: An Analysis of Key Factors and Relationships.” Procedia Computer Science, Complex Adaptive Systems, Philadelphia, PA Nov. 3-5, 2014, vol. 36, pp. 104–9, Jan 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.09.045. 11. F

Conference Session

TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

definitions, general criterion 3 student outcomes, and general criterion 5 curriculum,” 2015.[3] B. Seely, “‘Patterns in the History of Engineering Education Reform: A Brief Essay,’” in Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century, Washington D.C.: National Academcy Press, 2005, pp. 114–130.[4] M. S. Schiro, Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2012.[5] E. T. Pascarella and P. T. Terenzini, How college affects students. 2005.[6] A. Akera, D. M. Riley, R. A. Cheville, J. Karlin, and T. A. DePree, “The Distributed System of Governance in Engineering Education: A Report on Initial Findings,” in Proc. of the Amer. Soc

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

, Engineering for Human Rights: Opportunities, Risks and Responsibilities. Webinar, Engineering for Change, AAAS, ASME. June 13, 2012. https://www.engineeringforchange.org/webinar/video-engineering- for-human-rights/ [Accessed Jan 29, 2019][12] United Nations (UN). Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights. http://www.un.org/en/sections/what- we-do/protect-human-rights/ [Accessed Jan. 29, 2019][13] S. McFarland, “International differences in support for human rights,” Societies Without Borders, vol. 12 (1), pp. 21. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/swb/vol12/iss1/12 [Accessed Jan. 28, 2019].[14] H. Rindermann and N. Carl, “Human rights: Why countries differ,” Comparative Sociology, vol. 17, pp. 29-69, 2018

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Clippinger, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Kathleen Jernquist, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Steven Nozaki, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Fredrick A. Nitterright, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

and her Ph.D. from Brown University.Dr. Steven Nozaki, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College Ph.D. Engineering Education - The Ohio State UniversityMr. Fredrick A. Nitterright, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College Mr. Fred Nitterright is a lecturer in Mechanical Engineering Technology at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. He received the A. A. S. in Mechanical Drafting and Design in 1989 from Westmoreland County Community College, the B. S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology in 1991 from Penn State Erie, The Behrend College, and the M. S. in Manufacturing Systems Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 1998. Mr. Nitterright is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education ASEE . Fred

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University; Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Traditional teaching methods to improve learning and retention.”Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 17, no. 1 (2016).[2]. B. M. Alemu, “Enhancing the quality and relevance of higher education through effectiveteaching practices and instructors’ characteristics.” Universal Journal of Educational Research2, no. 9 (2014): 632-647.[3]. K. Robinson, Out of our minds: Learning to be creative, John Wiley & Sons, 2011.[4]. P. T. Terenzini, A. F. Cabrera, C. L. Colbeck, J. M. Parente, and S. A. Bjorklund.“Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: Students' reported learning gains.” Journal ofEngineering Education 90, no. 1 (2001): 123-130.[5]. D. Boud, R. Keogh, and D. Walker, Reflection: Turning experience into learning, Routledge

Conference Session

Exploration of Broad Issues and Promotion of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Carl O. Hilgarth

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

experiences, thus raising the questionof how do the literacy definitions and standards apply in these contexts, and leading to theobservation that literacy, in the end, even with definition, can mean a “million things.” From thisarose the concept of terminology and communication, i.e. the effect on conveying information indialects, slang, and insider jargon, as well as the discontinuities involved in how wecommunicate technological and engineering literacy in and through any given language, notingthat translations from one language to another, from one culture to another can be affected bychanges in word meanings and idea constructs and contexts (Remember the 1990’s VWcommercial that featured “Fahrvergnügen.” How did we translate this into English

Conference Session

Defining and Refining Technological and Engineering Literacy

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert M. Brooks, Temple University; Mehmet Cetin, Temple University; Jyothsna Kavuturu

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Engineering.Jyothsna Kavuturu, Jyothsna K. S., Department of English, St.Joseph’s College, Bangalore, secured a gold medal for the high- est aggregate marks in the Post Graduate English Literature Course at St.Joseph’s College (autonomous). K. S. has been working for the Department of English, St.Joseph’s College for almost two years now, teaching both undergraduate and Postgraduate courses in English. K. S. has published papers in intramu- ral and extramural publications, and presented papers at several conventions, conferences, and seminars. Page 23.199.1 c American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

New Approaches and Applications to Enhance Technological Literacy - Part II

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thalia Anagnos, San Jose State University; Becky Carroll, Inverness Research, Inc.; Shannon Weiss, David Heil & Associates, Inc.; David R. Heil, David Heil & Associates, Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

. a) b)Figure 3. a) A model of the bridge constructed of chain and metal segments exaggerates the motion of thebridge. b) When a visitor twists and pulls down on the center span area, the resulting torsional vibrationmode mimics that caused by the wind. (credit: S. Lani (a) R. Reitherman (b))Tracking the Daily Movement of the Bridge – This exhibit is not currently installed. In 2013 itwill be installed at base of the bridge and at the nearby Exploratorium discovery museum. AGPS device at the center span of the Bridge tracks its movements. This GPS signal is capturedand plotted for visitors. Figure 4a shows the cyclical up and down movement of the bridge eachday as it expands and contracts

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado Boulder; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Chris Swan, Tufts University; Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College-Dublin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

subscribe to this ideology value a programmed curriculum, and the psychology underpinning it to be found in behavioural psychology, as for example that of B. F. Skinner. In engineering education it can be seen in the systems of mastery learning and personalised instruction that were experimented with in the 1960’s and 1970’s [18; [19]; [20]. While behavioural psychology was replaced by cognitive psychology it is relevant to note that there are many politicians and administrators who believe that computer assisted learning might come to be used to replace lectures which are considered to be conveyors of the same knowledge that is to be sound in textbooks. Evaluation is very important to those who hold this ideology. There are

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Karlin, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Dan Ewert, North Dakota State University; Ronald R Ulseth P.E., Itasca Community College

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

National Academies, Washington, DC. 2. Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207. 3. Prince, M., Borrego, M., Henderson, C., Cutler, S., & Froyd, J. (2013). Use of research- based instructional strategies in core chemical engineering courses. Chemical Engineering Education, 47(1), 27-37. 4. Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(Special Centennial Issue), 1344- 1360. 5. Jesiek, B. K., Borrego, M., and Beddoes, K. (2010

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

focused on ambitious goals:“To take full advantage of the benefits and to recognize, address, and even avoid some of thepitfalls of technology. . . [to help citizens] become better stewards of technological change” (p.2). Then, as now, “technological literacy” is the most widely recognized way of describing theproject(s) in which this division is engaged. In my 2006 paper, I argued that we needed torename the enterprise, mainly because “literacy” implied remediation rather than the aspirationto create something that had never existed before: a well-informed citizenry with the knowledge,motivation, and confidence to engage in purposeful deliberation about technology. Looking back from a distance of over 10 years, I am pleased to say that

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Technological Literacy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Marjan Eggermont, University of Calgary

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

revised Bloom’s taxonomy. The working document in Figure 3 shows a mid-semestersnapshot of some of the questions asked. The document in the meantime has been updated threetimes to date and will be an ongoing reminder to vary questions, to think about creative ways tohave students think about the material from different angles, to find parallels in their own lives,and to apply historical examples to current situations. Students are free to consult their neighborsand their phones but at the end of class have to hand in a small chit with their answer(s) to theTAs for the course. The revised taxonomy combines the pyramid most of us are familiar with

Conference Session

TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Y. Curtis Wang, California State University, Los Angeles; Jim Kuo, California State University, Los Angeles; He Shen, California State University, Los Angeles; David E. Raymond, California State University, Los Angeles; Mathias J. Brieu, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Multicultural Education: A Renewed Paradigm of Transformation, p. 20.[7] G. May, M. Taisch, A. Bettoni, O. Maghazei, A. Matarazzo, and B. Stahl, “A New Human- centric Factory Model,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 26, pp. 103–108, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.112.[8] S. Hadjerrouit, “Learner-Centered Web-Based Instruction in Software Engineering,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 99–104, Feb. 2005, doi: 10.1109/TE.2004.832871.[9] B. Altay, “User-centered design through learner-centered instruction,” vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 138–155, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.827646.[10] P. Debiec, “Effective Learner-Centered Approach for Teaching an Introductory Digital Systems Course,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 38–45, Feb

Conference Session

Developing Technological Literacy in Students

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Johanna Kristiina Naukkarinen, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT; Hanna Niemelä, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

, opportunitiesand lessons for EU policy design (2018/2090(INI)),” 2018. [Online]. Available:http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0400_EN.pdf.[3] O. Mayseless and E. Keren, “Finding a Meaningful Life as a Developmental Task inEmerging Adulthood: The Domains of Love and Work Across Cultures,” EmergingAdulthood, Vol. 2(1) pp. 63–73, Jan 2014, doi:10.1177/2167696813515446.[4] E. Pekkarinen & S. Myllyniemi (eds.), Opin polut ja pientareet. Nuorisobarometri 2017[Educational pathways and roadsides. Youth Barometer 2017.], Publications of the StateYouth Council 58, Publications of the Finnish Youth Research Society/Finnish YouthResearch Network 200, 2018.[5] D. Yazilitas, S. Saharso, G. C. de Vries and J. S. Svensson, “The

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Above the st Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press (2005).3. Duderstadt, J. J., Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education. Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan Press, (2007).4. Bloom, Benjamin S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (1956). Published by Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA. Copyright (c) 1984 by Pearson Education. Page 26.226.195. Bloom, B. S

Conference Session

Innovations in Promoting Technological Literacy II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William R. Loendorf, Eastern Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

every student and that is automobiles.The particular technology of interest here is the engine type that powers the vehicle. This storywas adopted, adapted, and expanded from a concept by Teich19 (2008) and titled by the author ofthis paper as “The Better Technology.” The Better Technology In the early 1900’s, gas-powered cars shared the roads with those powered steam engines, such as the well known Stanley Steamer’s. Another small player was the electric cars. Eventually, internal combustion engines captured the market and the old steamers disappeared. But why? The usual assumption is that the two contenders went head to head and the best technology won. But there is a lot

Conference Session

TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

John Krupczak Jr, Hope College; A. Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University; Darin R. Stephenson, Hope College

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

/sea_fac_articles/201. 7. J. Froyd, L. Pchenitchnaia, D. Fowler, and N. Simpson, Systems Thinking and Integrative Learning Outcomes paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. 8. D.V. Behl, and S. Ferreira, “Systems Thinking: An Analysis of Key Factors and Relationships.” Procedia Computer Science, Complex Adaptive Systems, Philadelphia, PA Nov. 3-5, 2014, vol. 36, pp. 104–9, Jan 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.09.045. 9. F. Camelia and T. Ferris, “Systems Thinking in Systems Engineering,” INCOSE International Symposium, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1657–74, Jul. 1, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334- 5837.2016.00252.x. 10. R.D. Arnold and J.P. Wade, “A Complete Set

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ulan Dakeev, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Reg Recayi Pecen, Sam Houston State University; Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University; Shah Alam P.E., Texas A&M University, Kingsville

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Dissertation Award (2005), LSU PUBLICATIONS (Dr. Alam has published over 20 refereed journal papers/conference proceedings.) List of Selected Peer-Reviewed Publications: 1. M.S. Alam, M.A. Wahab and C.H. Jenkins, ”Mechanics in Naturally Compliant Structures,” Journal of Mechanics of Material, 39, pp.145-160, 2007. 2. M.A. Wahab, M.S. Alam, Su-Seng Pang and Jerry Pack, ”Stress analysis of non-conventional composite pipes” Journal of Composite Structures, 79(1), 2006, pp. 125-132. 3. M.A. Wahab, M. S. Alam, M.J Painter and P.E. Stafford, ”Experimental and Numerical Simulation of Restraining Forces in Gas Metal Arc Welded Joint,” American Welding Journal (Research Supplement) 85(2), February, 2006. 4. M.S. Alam and M.A