pedagogically. Currently he works in one of the most technically outstanding buildings in the region where he provides support to students, faculty, and staff in implementing technology inside and outside the classroom, researching new engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that
Paper ID #25326Cui Bono. Engineering and Technological Literacy and Higher EducationDr. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. research and development in Curriculum and Instruction; The Assessment of learning in Engineering Education; The human Side of Engineering, and Empowering
Paper ID #22330What’s in a Name? Technology and the Image of EngineeringDr. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. he is author of Engineering Education. research and development in Curriculum and Instruction. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 What’s in a name? Technology and the Image of EngineeringAbstractIn some of the Western
Paper ID #28922”Should we consider transforming the definition of technological andengineering literacy. . . ”Prof. Carl O. Hilgarth, Carl O. Hilgarth, M.S., is immediate past division chair of the ASEE Technological and Engineering Literacy / Philosophy of Engineering Division of ASEE. He is Professor Emeritus and former chair of engineering technologies at Shawnee State University, Portsmouth, Ohio. He is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Management and Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Mr. Hilgarth has a 30-year career in academia instructing courses in
Paper ID #10840Development of a Simplified Method for Representing Technological Systemsfor Non-EngineersDr. John Krupczak, Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Former Chair of the ASEE Technologi- cal Literacy Division. Former Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division. Senior Fellow CASEE, National Academy of Engineering, 2008-2010.Lauren Aprill, Hope College Engineering Student, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49423Daniel J Langholz Engineering student at Hope College, Holland, Michigan
Paper ID #9187An Intuitive Approach to Teaching concepts in Engineering to a General Au-dienceDr. Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic UniversityMr. George Roskovich Page 24.172.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 An Intuitive Approach to Teaching Concepts in Engineering to a General Audience Daniel Raviv and George Roskovich Department of Computer & Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Florida Atlantic University
AC 2011-1197: DEVELOPMENT OF ENGINEERING LABORATORY PROJECTSFOR GENERAL EDUCATION ENGINEERING COURSESJohn Krupczak, Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, MI 49423Lauren Aprill Page 22.493.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Development of Engineering Laboratory Projects for General Education Engineering CoursesAbstractA group of laboratory projects is being developed for use in either general education engineeringcourses to improve technological literacy or in introduction to engineering courses. The projectseach focus on the construction of a working
dialog. The consensus views are affected by participants on the panels and committees,which introduces several possible biases such as small industries being under-represented.Definitions over TimeEtymological Basis of “Engineering”Etymologically, engineering seems to derive from similar roots to technology, a term which wasgiven a philosophical basis in ancient Greece 1, 4 through the root techne—productive skill orart—which was one of Aristotle’s intellectual virtues 5. Techne includes the skills of making andcreating that are in modern definitions of engineering. While engineering as defined today didnot exist in ancient Greece, nor is the evolution of modern definitions obvious, the influence ofancient writings on Western thought seems to
Education, 2013ReviewsA reviewer commented on the draftIs it possible to consider the standard deviation of the class performances in the analysis?Author’s ResponseYes. It is possible to consider the standard deviation of the class performances in the analysis. Anew paragraph was added in the results and discussion section.A reviewer commented on the draftThe author(s) have described a methodology for improving the technological literacy of studentswith their analysis and interpretation of peer reviewed journals. The method implemented is veryspecific, and does not allow for the "serendipititous" approach-making discoveries by accident.-often found in general database searching. Utilising a general search engines such as Web ofKnowledge or Scopus
Paper ID #8690Designing a stage of ”romance” for programs in technological literacyDr. John Heywood, Trinity College-Dublin John Heywood MA MSc LittD (Dublin) M.Litt (Lanacaster). Professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College – The University of Dublin and formerly Professor and Director of Teacher Education in the University (1977 – 1996). In addition to a higher doctorate he is the holder of a Masters degree in engineering education (MSc). He is a Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society, a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Educa- tion, a Senior Member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic
, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields, linking other researchers andpractitioners (industry) to innovative research, and informing the public of research results andtheir impact on society. The George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake EngineeringSimulation (NEES), an NSF-funded network of 14 large-scale experimental laboratoriesconnected by a robust cyberinfrastructure, completes its tenth year of operation in September2014. Its mission is to reduce the impact of earthquakes and tsunamis on society throughresearch, innovation, engineering, and education. Since the launch of NEES in 2003 the EOTprogram has grown from a federation of outreach activities run independently at the experimentallaboratories to an integrated network of
experts and leaders that can ensure successful continuation of their mission.6As a result, the Unites States Standards Strategy established standards education as a highpriority in the U.S.Efforts in that direction started in 2000, when ABET, recognizing the benefits of includingtechnical standards into engineering education, included a reference to standards and codesin General Criteria, Criterion 5, requiring that all major design experience shouldincorporate appropriate engineering standards. Moreover, to provide additionalopportunities for education on standards, many SDOs have established educationcommittees with the goal to assist engineering and technology programs. Standardseducation is accepted as highly beneficial to engineering
AC 2012-4411: TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY AS AN ELEMENT IN THESTRUCTURE, ASSESSMENT, AND EVALUATION OF ENGINEERINGAND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEGREE PROGRAMSDr. John W. Blake P.E., Austin Peay State University John Blake is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, Tenn. He served as Department Chair from 1994-2005. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Northwestern University, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Tennessee. Page 25.1266.1 c American Society for
Paper ID #29876Understanding better young people’s views on technology in FinlandDr. Johanna Kristiina Naukkarinen, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT Johanna Naukkarinen received her M.Sc. degree in chemical engineering from Helsinki University of Technology in 2001, her D.Sc. (Tech) degree in knowledge management from Tampere University of Technology in 2015, and her professional teacher qualification from Tampere University of Applied sci- ences in 2013. She is currently working as a post-doctoral researcher and project manager with the School of Energy Systems at Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology
Paper ID #6174Gadget Avalanche: A Technology Literacy Course for Novice AdultsDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Recruiting at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she received her Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published nearly two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing undergraduate education through hands
AC 2011-1212: IMPROVING TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY THROUGHTHE USE OF NEWS ARTICLESRandy Libros, Community College of Philadelphia Associate Professor, Physics Program Director, Applied Science and Engineering Technology Co-Chair, Center for Science and Engineering Education Page 22.839.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Improving Technological Literacy Through the Use of News ArticlesIntroductionA new course, Science, Technology and Public Policy, was first offered at Community Collegeof Philadelphia in the Fall of 2009. The course
AC 2012-2992: CREATIVITY FOR ENHANCING THE TECHNOLOGI-CAL LITERACY FOR NON-SCIENCE MAJORSDr. Robert M. Brooks, Temple University Robert Brooks is an Associate Professor of civil engineering at Temple University. He is a fellow of ASCE. His research interests are engineering education, civil engineering materials, and transportation engineering.Jyothsna K. S., Jyothsna K. S., Department of English, St.Joseph’s College, Bangalore, eecured a gold medal for the high- est aggregate marks in the Post Graduate English Literature course at St.Joseph’s College (autonomous). K. S. has been working for the Department of English, St.Joseph’s College for almost two years now, teaching both undergraduate and postgraduate
Paper ID #5928Using Heavy Metal Music to Promote Technological and Socio-cultural Un-derstandingDr. Brian P Kirkmeyer, Miami University Brian P. Kirkmeyer is the Karen Buchwald Wright Assistant Dean for Student Success and Instructor in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio. He specializes in recruitment, advising, retention and placement of undergraduate students. He currently serves as Director At Large of ASEE’s Women in Engineering Division (WIED), and previously served WIED as Secre- tary. He earned his Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Materials Science and Engineering from the
Paper ID #7147Gains in Engineering-Related Skills Achieved by Students in Technologicaland Engineering Literacy MinorsDr. John Krupczak, Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Former Chair of the ASEE Technological Literacy Division, Former Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division, CASEE Senior Fellow 2008- 2010.Dr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Page 23.631.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Gains in Engineering-Related Skills Achieved by Students
AC 2012-4696: MINORS AS A MEANS OF DEVELOPING TECHNOLOG-ICAL AND ENGINEERING LITERACY FOR NON-ENGINEERSDr. John Krupczak, Hope College John Krupczak is professor of engineering, Hope College, Holland, Mich.; CASEE Senior Fellow (2008- 2010); Past Chair, ASEE Technological Literacy Division, and Past Chair, ASEE Liberal Education Divi- sion.Dr. Mani Mina, Iowa State UniversityDr. Robert J. Gustafson, Ohio State University Robert J. Gustafson, P.E., Ph.D., is Honda Professor for engineering education and Director of the Engi- neering Education Innovation Center in the College of Engineering and a professor of food, agricultural, and biological engineering at the Ohio State University. He has previously served at Ohio
AC 2012-3366: IMPROVING LEARNING TECHNOLOGY DESIGN THROUGHTHE IDENTIFICATION OF ANTHROPOLOGICALLY INVARIANT LEARN-ING BEHAVIORS IN THE ADOPTION OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOL-OGYMr. Steven R. Walk, Old Dominion University Steven Robert Walk, P.E., is an Assistant Professor of electrical engineering technology in the Frank Batten College of Engineering and Technology at Old Dominion University. He is Founder and Director of the Laboratory for Technology Forecasting. His research interests include energy conversion systems, technology and innovation management, and technological forecasting and social change. He is owner and founder of Technology Intelligence, a management consulting company in Norfolk, Va. Walk earned
Paper ID #12637Reaching Out to the Masses: Building Literacy About Engineering AmongstNon-Engineering StudentsJonathan Grunert, Virginia Tech Jonathan Grunert is a graduate student in Virginia Tech’s department of Science and Technology in Soci- ety, with backgrounds in history and library science. His broader interests are in the history of scientific representation. He has taught courses in American history, Science and Society, and Engineering Cultures.Dr. Peter Doolittle, Virginia Tech Peter Doolittle is currently the Assistant Provost for Teaching and Learning, Executive Director of the Center for
engineering students are not prepared by current pedagogies to actethically? To frame this question this paper questions how well rules-based, or deontological,ethics provides useful guidelines in the case that the domain in which decisions are made becomecomplex or when technology is changing rapidly. Given that some companies report the half-lifeof information is as short as six months [private communication], can engineering ethics alwaysprovide useful guidance to action, or are there situations where other ethical frameworks aremore appropriate?Engineering ethics is an often-discussed subject, and substantial work in engineering educationaddresses how to effectively teach ethics [1]–[3], evaluate learning outcomes [4], and identifyissues and
clearly distinguish between images of "engineers" and"scientists"). The paper also assesses specific character and professional attributes, stereotypes(profession-, ethnicity or gender-based) and attributes known to facilitate viewer's identificationwith on-screen characters, of engineering professionals portrayed in selected films. In particular,the key research question of “How are engineer(s) and their work portrayed in the feature films?”was broken down to more detailed sub-questions: • What types of engineering work are represented? How is creative component of that work shown? How successful (or unsuccessful) are the outcomes? • Is the distinction between science and technology, and scientist and engineers depicted? • Are
science.[17] While Gasset’sseminal work has defined the line in the sand between a scientist and the more technicalprofessions, the debate on developing a philosophy of engineering continues. Gravander gives anumber of examples in his recent work to divide a philosophy of engineering from a philosophyof science. Foremost, although mentioned as an aside within his work, a philosophy ofengineering is not a philosophy of technology. To these ends, it is important to understand theintentions of Heidegger’s works when applied to an engineering sphere. Heidegger had a numberof applications for his ideas on thought at the time they were written, and one would be remiss toeliminate the engineering bent from them simply because he used the world
that seeks support to improve the quality of math, science, and technological educationin K-12 schools. One of the reasons for all these efforts is the alarming decline in AmericanSTEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education observed for over the lasttwenty years.The 2009 report from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) [2] on theperformance of 15-year-olds in mathematics and science literacy in 65 countries and othereducation systems found that in comparison with students in all 64 other countries and educationsystems, students in the United States on average scored lower than students in 23 countries in
Engineer or Engineering Manager at General Motors, Cadnetix, and Motorola. His interests include engineering management, technological literacy, improving the competitiveness of American companies, and real-time embedded systems.Prof. Terence Geyer, Eastern Washington University Terence Geyer, Eastern Washington University Terence L. D. Geyer is currently a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering & Design at Eastern Washington University. He obtained his B.S. in Manufacturing Technology and M.Ed. in Adult Education in a specially combined program of Technology and Education at Eastern Washington University. He has 20 years of business experience in the IT field and 15 years of experience in education. He
, and cultural objects and ideas.Dominic Francis GelfusoDr. Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Dean Nieusma is Associate Professor in Science and Technology Studies and Director of the Programs in Design and Innovation at Rensselaer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Contextualizing 3D Printing’s and Photosculpture’s Contributions to Techno-Creative LiteraciesIntroductionAutodesk CEO Carl Bass, upon the 2011 release of Autodesk’s free “123D” CAD-to-3D printingsoftware, claimed that the future of design innovation would be found not within the engineeringindustry, but from the ranks of creative, tinkering consumers. “There are tens of thousands
Paper ID #17200An Exercise to Promote and Assess Critical Thinking in Sociotechnical Con-textJohn Krupczak Jr, NSF Division of Undergraduate Education Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Former Chair of the ASEE Technologi- cal Literacy Division. Former Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division. Senior Fellow CASEE, National Academy of Engineering, 2008-2010.Dr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been working on better understanding of students’ learning and issues of technological and engineer
Foundation of Society and Technology” as part of a broad program of study inthe Arts and Humanities, Social Science and Sciences.11 The course gives historical highlightsof materials and the impact these materials have had on society and technology. Items such asplastics, golf clubs, and hip implants are explored. Students who elect to take this course comefrom a wide range of majors such as education, marketing, architecture, and history. Somestudents are also engineering majors, seeking unique perspectives on materials not oftendiscussed in a traditional materials courses. The course assessment indicated that some of thestudent in non-engineering majors did not see the connection of this course with their major.The conclusion was that the teaching